Robert Piconi
Analyst · Goldman Sachs.
So let me address the last two, the latter two, and David will go back to the first item. So relative to any potential delays and what we're expecting or what we're building in. Right now, with our current contracts on the batteries, and the delivery mechanisms. All the indications are very strong of our suppliers meeting, what we've agreed to and we're seeing that, in fact, here in this very first quarter, with the type of project size, Grace, that we have, we will get priority potentially over others, because of the nature of the volume that we have. So if something moves with another customer, we might get some priority, if there is any excess capacity and very candidly, that's what we're seeing with the relationships and the interactions we're having with our partners. So we build in contingency. So into our plans, we take very seriously our schedule commitments, because they do come with liquidated damages just like our customers, the independent power providers, they have their own liquidated damages that they have to sign up to with public utilities. So we build in the appropriate amount of, I would say both contingency as well as incentives. And we have examples with our customers where they work with us on actually financially structuring in incentives, meaning financial incentives for us to meet or exceed those schedule milestones. So we've used a few different mechanisms in that space. I'll reference that we do that with a very seasoned and experienced team that's done this before. If you look across our leadership team, and not only with the addition of E.B. Jensen who has 35 years plus 100%, in energy management, project, management himself, but all of us across the leadership team have had significant experience in the EPC world and executing on large projects. So we get the risks that are inherent with what we've taken on, we build inappropriate contingencies, we have to manage that execution risk. The third item you mentioned was around solar and what are we seeing around the complement of solar to storage and do we have any concerns in that space? We have a very interesting portfolio of projects, we have with some of the first ones announced one of them is actually a hybrid project combined cycle natural gas peaker plant with a battery storage program that's out in California with Wellhead, we have other pure play solar and storage that we see again, we are not responsible for that solar development portion. But in the early cases, those solar plants actually are already operating and we're looking to capture that excess solar in general. So we don't -- and everything we're seeing it right now, and even some of the projects have been awarded, we're actually looking to store capacity that already exists, and is not tied to any future solar development projects. David, you want to hit the first question of those sort of the ran through the year?