Gregg Piontek
Analyst · Neal Dingmann with SunTrust. Please go ahead with your question
Thank you, Bruce and good morning, everyone. I'll begin by discussing our Mats business before finishing with our consolidated results. The Mats business reported third-quarter revenue of $15 million, down 19% from the second quarter, but flat year-over-year. Sequentially, the revenue decrease is primarily attributable to a $3 million decrease in Mats sales. Rental and services revenues came in at $14 million for the third quarter, down modestly from the second quarter. The decline is primarily driven by the lower revenues from the power transmission markets where we experienced delays in certain projects during the quarter. The delays were driven in part by the heavy demand in the power transmission grid in periods of extreme heat such as those experienced in the South during July and August, which prevent the utilities from taking the infrastructure off-line for maintenance. The lower revenues from power transmission were partially offset by a modest improvement in oilfield markets, which as Paul mentioned, reflects our first quarterly improvement in revenues from the oil field in nearly two years. Overall non-exploration markets contributed approximately two thirds of total segment revenues in the third quarter, including $9 million of rental and service revenues and substantially all of our Mat sales. Comparing to the third quarter of last year, rental and service revenues have increased by $1 million, reflecting a $3 million increase from non-oilfield markets, offset by a decrease from exploration customers. As highlighted in yesterday's press release, the third quarter included a $700,000 charge resulting from our decision to recondition customer Mats that were produced in 2015 as part of our initial startup of the new manufacturing line. The reconditioning was isolated to a single batch of Mats produced from one customer last year addressing quality issue detected in the finished product. Including the impact of the Mat reconditioning charge, segment operating margin came in at 6% for the third quarter, compared to 21% last quarter. Adjusting for this charge, third quarter operating income was relatively in line with our expectations. Turning to our near-term outlook while the timing of Mat sales is always a challenge to predict, we are encouraged by the increasing pipeline for Mat sales opportunities, benefitting from customers looking to use their remaining budgets to purchase Mats prior to year-end, as well as the recent quarters for our recently launched EPZ matting system. Driven by stronger Mat sales, we expect revenues and margins to rebound somewhat returning more toward the level of the second quarter. Now moving on to our consolidated results, for the third quarter of 2016, we reported total revenues of $105 million down 9% sequentially and 32% year-over-year. SG&A cost were $21.7 million relatively flat sequentially, but down 16% year-over-year. The year-over-year decrease is primarily attributable to cost reduction programs executed over the past year. Corporate office expenses were $6.9 million in the third quarter, compared to $7.2 million in the second quarter and $7.9 million to the prior year. Consolidated operating loss was $15.1 million in the third quarter, compared to $51 million loss in the second quarter and a $9.3 million loss in the third quarter of last year. Foreign currency exchange resulted in a $1.5 million sequential decline with the third quarter currency exchange netting to $800,000 loss compared to a $700,000 gain in the second quarter. Foreign currency netting to a loss of $3.2 million in the third quarter of last year. Third quarter interest expense netted to $2.1 million, which compares to $3 million in the second quarter and $2.1 million in the third quarter of last year. As highlighted last quarter, the second quarter included a $1.1 million charge for the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the termination and replacement of our revolving credit facility. The provision for income taxes for the third quarter of 2016 with a $4.5 million benefit, reflecting an effective tax rate of roughly 25%. The third quarter provision was unfavorably impacted by pretax losses in Uruguay with the business activities were exempt from income taxes. Net loss for the third quarter was $13.5 million or $0.16 per share, compared to a loss of $0.17 per share in the previous quarter and $0.05 per share in the third quarter of last year. As noted in yesterday's press release, the third quarter 2016 results included $0.03 of charges associated with the demobilization in Uruguay and reconditioning of customer Mats. Now let me discuss our balance sheet and liquidity. During the third quarter, operating activities provided cash of $10 million, including $14 million from working capital reductions. We used $7 million to fund capital investments, the majority of which was spent on the Gulf of Mexico Deepwater infrastructure project in the Port of Fourchon. We also used $4 million to fund the acquisition that Bruce mentioned. As of the end of the quarter, total borrowings were $170 million including a $161 million of convertible bonds that mature in October of next year. No borrowings are currently outstanding under our facility. We ended the third quarter with cash of $92 million, resulting in a total debt to capitalization ratio of 25.7% and a net debt to capitalization ratio of 13.7%. For the full year 2016, we expect capital expenditures to be approximately $40 million with the majority of the fourth quarter spending related to the completion of the deepwater shore based project. As we highlighted previously, we expect our ongoing maintenance capital requirements to be fairly limited for the foreseeable future, which we expect to benefit our cash flow during the recovery of the industry. And now I would like to turn the call back over to Paul for his concluding remarks.