Thanks, Julie. Let's dive right into our discussion of price and input costs for the third quarter. Our actions have resulted in price increases each month of the quarter as our initiatives take hold. The overall impact of that pricing acceleration for the third quarter was $8 million over 2020. We expect these pricing actions will gain momentum in the fourth quarter and into next year. In terms of input cost increases, during the third quarter, we saw input costs rise even higher than our expectations to about $17 million over the prior year, of which we were able to offset about half directly with our pricing initiatives. For the fourth quarter, we're expecting an input cost increase of over $20 million versus 2020. We expect to recover about two-thirds in the fourth quarter through our accelerated pricing initiatives. We're now expecting an over $40 million increase of input costs for the full year of 2021 versus last year. As we've said, we expect to fully offset the raw material cost increases through 2022 with our pricing actions. Julie mentioned the unfavorable mix. Overall, the mix effect for the quarter was an unfavorable $4.5 million. Contributing to the unfavorable mix were the supply constraints. Let me share some thoughts about what we're seeing in today's input markets. Fiber prices have peaked globally, and in some regions, have started to give back some of the gains, though Europe has yet to fall from the peak. And while the rate of decline in North America has slowed, it remains well above highs from previous cycles. Chemical input prices rose in the third quarter on strong demand. Supply is beginning to recover from natural disasters and unplanned outages, while pricing of some basic chemicals is starting to show signs of leveling off as we start the fourth quarter. A number of materials remain in tight supply, causing availability issues, and historically high prices have yet to curb demand. We expect this market turbulence will continue into 2022. Energy has risen dramatically through the third quarter and remains very volatile globally with the most significant impacts to our business being seen in Europe. And lastly, the challenging global shipping market continues as congestion at many ports adds cost pressures. U.S. transportation market remains tight with national spot rates recently reaching the highest level of the year. Diesel prices have been climbing, hitting their highest levels at the end of the third quarter. It looks like those transportation cost pressures and availability issues will also left into 2022. In regards to Appleton, the facility was closed at the end of the quarter. Recall, we expect this action to save us approximately $78 million a year beginning in the fourth quarter of 2021. Here's a quick review of the third quarter financial statements. Consolidated sales reached $268 million, up $77 million from last year's comparable quarter. Itasa accounted for $36 million of sales in the quarter. We saw very strong growth in a number of areas, including filtration, packaging and industrials. Adjusted earnings were $12.7 million compared to $15.9 million in last year's third quarter. The primary driver of the variance was the favorable pricing of $8 million, offset by input cost increases of $17 million, netting an unfavorable $9 million, whereas Julie mentioned, a 300 basis point impact on margins or about $0.35 a share. We were able to offset most of that gap through favorable volume and fixed cost absorption as well as the impact of the Itasa acquisition. Consistent with our discussion last quarter, we expect to see margins begin to improve from here as those pricing actions, robust volume and other efficiency initiatives begin to offset the input cost increases and availability issues. Technical product sales were $173 million, up 46% from 2020 and up 15% excluding Itasa. Adjusted earnings were $10.8 million, down from $13.3 million last year, reflecting the impact of raw material cost increases along with labor and raw material availability. Technical Products is bearing the brunt of the input cost increases and is most impacted by timing with filtration annual pricing taking effect January 1. Fine Paper and Packaging sales were $95 million, up 32% from last year's level and above our original expectations of recovery, reflecting the strength of the packaging and consumer business. Adjusted earnings were $6.6 million from the quarter, up from last year's $6 million with pricing offsetting about 75% of the input cost increases. We expect to fully offset the input increase with pricing initiatives during the fourth quarter in this segment. Turning to the balance sheet and cash flows. Liquidity remained strong. While year-to-date cash flow from operations of $40 million was down from the $80 million recorded for the first nine months of last year, the difference was primarily due to working capital, reflecting the strong top-line. Trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA reached $122 million as of September 30 compared to the $101 million we recorded last calendar year as we see the benefits of our continued growth and the impact of the Itasa acquisition. As a result of the strong EBITDA growth and free cash flow, adjusted net leverage was 3.4 times at quarter end and is expected to drop a bit by year end, absent any other actions. Working capital from higher input costs will continue to moderate through the end of the year and availability issues will pressure mix and efficiencies. Year-to-date, CapEx was $19 million versus $12 million last year. We're expecting CapEx to end up in the low-to-mid $30 million range as safety, growth and cost reduction initiatives are implemented in Q4. In addition to returning cash to shareholders through our strong dividend, during the quarter, we bought back 71,000 for $3.4 million at an average price of $47.85 per share. Additionally, the board has authorized a $0.02 annual increase to the dividend beginning in the fourth quarter. Our dividend remains critically important and we're pleased to have raised the dividend every year for the last 11 years. SG&A was $26.1 million versus $19.1 million last year. Itasa accounted for about $4 million of the increase. The remainder was the result of cost reduction initiatives executed in 2020. While we typically expect our full year normalized tax rate to come in around the low-to-mid 20s as a percentage of pre-tax income, the 2021 full year rate is expected to be near 20% when considering the magnified benefit of research credits in the current year. Our effective income tax rate was 48% of pre-tax book income in the third quarter 2021 as compared to 23% in the third quarter of last year. This increase resulted primarily from the effects of non-recurring items relating to the closure of the Appleton facility. Looking forward, we had expected cost to stabilize in Q4. However, recent increases in energy, particularly in Europe, and stubbornly high chemical costs globally are now expected to continue through the fourth quarter with volatility and availability issues lingering into next year. As Julie mentioned, our teams are working to offset these input costs with additional pricing initiatives, surcharges and cost reduction actions. So for the fourth quarter, our seasonally weakest quarter, we now expect the impact of input cost to be over $20 million above last year, of which we expect to offset about two-thirds directly with our pricing initiatives. In spite of these pressures, because of the increased pricing recovery, we expect the third quarter margin to be the most challenged to the year and expect to see improvement in the fourth quarter. That being said, this is a very volatile year and things are changing quickly and unpredictably. No matter what, we'll continue with our actions to offset the cost and availability issues as we have done historically. To sum it all up, as the year stands now, we expect input costs for the full year to be up over $40 million, of which we'll have offset about half directly with pricing. We expect to offset the other half in 2022 as our pricing initiatives, particularly in filtration, take effect. And on that note, I'll turn it back to Julie.