Hello and welcome to the Nokia Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Results Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instruction] Please note this event is being recorded. I will now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Matt Shimao, Head of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Nokia's second quarter 2018 conference call. I'm Matt Shimao, Head of Nokia Investor Relations. Rajeev Suri, President and CEO of Nokia and Kristian Pullola, CFO of Nokia are here in Espoo with me today. During this call, we'll be making forward-looking statements regarding the future business and financial performance of Nokia and its industry. These statements are predictions that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may therefore differ materially from the results we currently expect. Factors that could cause such differences can be both external, such as general economic and industry conditions, as well as internal operating factors. We have identified such risks in more detail on pages 71 through 89 of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 20-F, our financial report for Q2 and half-year 2018 issued today, as well as our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Please note that our results release, the complete interim report with tables, and the presentation on our website include non-IFRS report results informations in addition to the reported results information. Our complete financial report with tables available on our website includes a detailed explanation of the content of the non-IFRS information and a reconciliation between the non-IFRS and the reported information. With that, Rajeev, over to you.

Thanks, Matt. And thanks to all of you for joining today. Nokia's second quarter results were consistent with the view that we shared last quarter. At that time, I said that the first half of the year would be challenging followed by a more robust second half. That view remains true today. Given what we are seeing in the market and how we are delivering on our strategy, I have confidence that we will be able to deliver on our full-year 2018 guidance. Our top-line results in the second quarter certainly point to improving conditions. Net sales were approximately flat at both a Group and Networks level, on a constant currency basis, a pleasing result, given the declines we have seen in the last couple of years. Equally pleasing is the fact that the top-line improvement was widespread. Three of our six regions, Latin America, Middle East, and Africa, and North America showed year-on-year growth in constant currency with our largest market, North America, up a healthy 6%. Three of our five Networks business groups, Mobile Networks, IP/Optical Networks, and Nokia Software also grew in constant currency in the quarter compared to last year. Nokia Technologies had an excellent performance with recurring licensing revenues up 23% compared to last year. Our strategic efforts to expand into vertical markets outside of our traditional telco operator customers continued to deliver with sales growth in the double-digits and expansion of our footprint to 37 new customers. And the strength of our end-to-end portfolio remains a differentiator, and when you look at our sales pipeline, 40% of it is now comprised of end-to-end deals. That is the highest level we have seen to-date. In short, we are making good progress in getting our top-line back on track. In terms of margins, our Group level…

Thank you, Rajeev. I will start today by spending a few minutes on the financial performance of Nokia Technologies and Group Common and Other, then a few words on taxes and financial income and expense. Next, I'll take you through our cash performance in Q2, and finally, I'll walk you through some key topics related to our guidance. First, Nokia Technologies, which delivered another quarter of solid results in Q2. While overall net sales declined 2% year-on-year, that was due to non-recurring items in the year-ago quarter. Adjusting for this, our recurring licensing revenues grew 23% year-on-year, reflecting the various licensing deals we signed throughout 2017. Based on our Q2 performance, we continue to be at an annual recurring net sales level of approximately €1.4 billion. Operating margin in Technologies reached 81% in the second quarter, driven by higher gross margins and lower operating expenses. The year-on-year improvement in OpEx primarily reflected lower expenses related to our digital media and digital health businesses, as well as the absence of Apple litigation costs, which negatively impacted the year-ago quarter. As a reminder, in May 2018 we completed the sale of our Digital Health business back to the co-founder of Withings. We believe that the Q2 operating expenses are at a healthy level and that investing at approximately these levels will enable us to achieve our guidance to grow at a three-year CAGR of 10% and deliver 85% operating margin in 2020. Continuing next with Group Common and Other performance in Q2. Overall net sales decreased by approximately 9% year-on-year on a reported basis and decreased approximately 4% on a constant currency. The decline was primarily driven by Alcatel Submarine Networks where the comparison to the year-ago quarter was challenging due to the completion of two large projects then. This was partly…

Thank you, Kristian. For the Q&A session, please limit yourself to one question only. Nicole, please go ahead.

Thank you. Our first question comes from David Mulholland of UBS. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Just wanted to come back on the point that you made around just kind of pricing pressure but not seeing any change in competitive intensity. Can you just explain to us why, if you're not seeing a change in competitive intensity, I can understand suppliers asking for price reductions, given what they're doing, but why you are accepting it? Given the change in the industry structure we've seen over the last couple of years kind of intrigued us to why you're accepting that. And then maybe if you could just add on to that what actions you're planning to do in the second half and what confidence you have that you can start to recover gross margins into H2.

Thanks, David. We've seen this in a small number of large customers that have significant purchasing power, and it's not due to any widespread competitive intensity. This is more than saying, look, I mean, we're now going to have to bring forward 5G earlier than expected and we need to fund it within the current budget, so it's better to do it with that now. Now why are we accepting it? We don't accept it lightly because we have end-to-end portfolio. We ask for other business so that we can be made whole, we have offsetting mechanisms, we have pricing discipline, we have cost levers. But at the end of the day, in some cases we do have to accept it because there's also 5G footprint to be had. So, you've got to watch long-term footprint and balance it with short-term needs of the customers. I think then your second question was with regard to what are the action – what are the second half. So, in second half we expect the cycle of 5G, the super cycle of 5G to start in Q3, and so, we expect improvement in gross margin overall in second half, incrementally in Q3, but more significantly in Q4. And that is because we will see the regional mix play in our favor with North America and these big rollouts begin to really happen. We will also see a reversal of some of the adverse business mix portfolios, so, for instance, IP routing versus optical and so on. So, I'd say second half more robust from a gross margin standpoint. We also have other recovery actions both on – basically on fixed costs that we have levers that we can pull in the short-term and we're already working through those actions.

Thank you.

Maybe just to add, so clearly, as Rajeev said, so scale will give us gross margin benefit in the second half. And then it's restless kind of execution on projects and getting them done without any cost overruns and so on, which we also expect to yield improvement going into the second half here.

Thank you, David. Nicole, next question, please.

Our next question comes from Sandeep Deshpande of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Thank you for letting me on. You talked about the scale helping in terms of the margins in the second half, can you comment on the mix? Because you've announced over the past year and a half couple of major new products associated with the ReefShark based base stations as well as the FP4-based IP routers, I mean, can you talk about the mix of those new products in terms of your revenue and whether that will help improve the gross margin, not only in the second half but into 2019?

Thanks, Sandeep. Yes, I'm glad you asked the question. So, yeah, we do expect with AirScale ramping up in our mobile portfolio, including with ReefShark and the family of chips coming with ReefShark, FP4 in IP routing, PSE-3 in optical, these are all enhancements to product cost, and so we see product cost erosion, and therefore, we will see also a benefit from that. But, of course, also the mix regionally, North America being more as a percentage of total revenue, optical being a little bit more balanced, as we've seen in the first half it's been more aggressive growth in optical, but IP routing will pick up because FP4 is starting to ship across the family of our platforms in a meaningful way from the second half onwards, as well, and benefiting 2019, as you said. .

Thank you, Sandeep. Nicole, we'll take our next question, please.

Our next question comes from Aleksander Peterc of Société Générale. Please go ahead. Aleksander Peterc - Société Générale SA (UK): Yes. Hi and thanks for taking my question. I'd just like to understand a little bit of your message on the H2 recovery thanks to the 5G acceleration. That became more of a Q4 affair in today's release, is that how we should read it? And does this mean that there's been a bit of a pushout of recovery into year-end, so everything happening slightly later than anticipated, or is it just my perception of this? And then secondly, just very briefly regarding the gross margin evolution, you seem to be indicating that there will be already some improvement in the third quarter and generally for H2 should be better, but already in Q3 we should see some improvement from the depressed levels in Q2? Thanks.

Yeah, so, it will – thanks, Aleksander. So, the rollouts that we've won, the deals from North America, 5G including 4G, they will start in Q3, but they'll be stronger in Q4, given the rollout plans of the customers. There will be incremental improvement in gross margin in Q3 but there will be significant improvement in Q4, as we said, so particularly in Q4, given both the seasonality plus also the rollout schedule.

Thank you, Aleks. Nicole, we'll take our next question.

Our next question comes from Sébastien Sztabowicz of Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Sébastien Sztabowicz - Kepler Cheuvreux SA: Yeah, one question on the competitive landscape in Optical Networks going forward following the announcement of the deal between Infinera and Coriant. Do you see any market share gain opportunity there in the near term that they will be doing the integration process even though it seemed very rather interdeveloped between the two companies? Thank you.

Thank you, Sébastien. First of all, we see that as a good thing, that that industry consolidation is beginning to happen because there are many players. We've been on a tear in optical, we have been taking share, we're now according to Dell'Oro, number one in Europe, Middle East, and Africa for a couple of quarters in a row. We've been very successful with web-scale, we are being successful with enterprise vertical customers, and also with the service provider customers. And given the innovation that we see coming on top of this with the PSE-3 chipset and so on, we expect to be able to continue this. So, we're doing well, and we think if the industry consolidates it is better for the long-term industry structure for optical.

Thank you, Sébastien. Nicole, we'll take our next question, please.

Our next question comes from Andrew Gardiner of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, thank you. Just a follow-up on that optical question, Rajeev. I mean, you mentioned the success that you're having in optical with web-scale customers. Can you – and you've talked sort of loosely earlier about the end-to-end success, I'm just interested in a bit more detail as to whether the sort of toehold that you had with optical into web-scale, are you – is there evidence now that you can sort of – that can follow with routing with Nokia software? Are you seeing that – sort of that pipeline build within the extra-large enterprise or web-scale space? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks, Andrew. So, with regard to optical, we've been doing well with web-scales in China as well as web-scales in the U.S. Now, is that a good Trojan horse for us to get more with FP4? We've seen success with Apple and Xiaomi where we will be shipping FP4. We're working with the other web-scales, as well, so our opportunities are FP4, but also in Nuage and in Deepfield, which is basically the analytics platform that we have, both separately can be sold as well as embedded with FP4. So, yes, progress, but I think it's a journey, so it will take us a little bit longer to get to where we want to be with the target web-scale customers.

Thank you, Andrew. Nicole, we'll take our next question, please.

Our next question comes from Robert Sanders of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hi, good afternoon. I was just interested in asking a bit more about these North American contracts. What is the typical deal length on these RFQs that you're seeing with the big-four operators? Or to put it another way, what percent of the total 5G ramp would these deals represent that you're signing currently? Thanks.

Thanks, Robert. It kind of varies from customer to customer. There's not a universal answer. In some cases where the rollout is very clear where the operator knows exactly which cities they want to cover, which towns they want to cover, how much of nationwide coverage they'll have in 5G, then you get a three-year contract. In other places you might get a one-year contract. So, it really depends on the spectrum, what band it is, and what sort of rollout plans they have. Having said that, of course, it's a sticky business because a lot of these initial 5G rollouts would be done on what we call non-standalone 5G, so it sits on the 4G install base, so your install base does matter. In the second way there will be the standalone 5G networks and that's more for industrial applications with a separate core network. So, I'd say one year to three year, depends case by case, but it's a sticky business, so you keep making these deals every year.

And I guess it's fair to say that the recurring nature of 5G rollouts in North America still holds. We do see a first phase now. Then when optimal spectrum will be made available to our customers we'll see a next phase, and most likely, there will be a third phase, then with even more kind of focus on the industrial use cases. So, I think that's also what you need to keep in mind when you think about what the contractual nature of the business that we are doing with our customers there is.

That's a great point because you have 600 happening right now rollout, you have 2.5, you have some millimeter wave, but remember that the sweet-spot spectrum will still be around the U.S, which is about 3.7 to 4.2, this mid-band, so there will be a second wave of North America 5G rollout. And a third wave because of industrial, as Kristian said.

So, thank you, Rob. And, Nicole, we'll now take our next question.

Our next question comes from Richard Kramer of Arete Research. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Rajeev, if I can look past the sort of second half questions and look at the areas you laid out as having momentum into 2019 and beyond, notably IP routing, software, and maybe infrastructure as a service for enterprise verticals, most of these should carry materially higher gross margins than your current levels. And when you bridge this sort of long-term margin guidance, do you see this as a function of mix, i.e, these higher margin areas are going to outgrow a flat-ish network business? Or is the margin upside going to come more across the board from – given that Networks has been where you've seen the focus of a lot of the restructuring? And then quickly for Kristian, do you have any major IPR renewals that could materially affect 2019 and beyond? It seems one of your largest licensees is likely to come up for renewal either now or sort of shortly. Thanks.

Thanks, Richard. Your mix point is spot on because our strategy is to grow software. So, if we grow Nokia software, that's naturally structurally higher margin. Then our strategy is to grow enterprise, and what we're seeing right now is it's hitting the target margins we want, so it's structurally better, both margin as well as growth. Third, webscale and what we call technological extra-large enterprises. Again, same story holding there as well, particularly because they tend to buy more IP routing, these segments, both webscale and enterprise, a big part of our broader enterprise business is actually IP routing. And then you have areas like WING, areas like cognitive services, areas like enterprise services. So, in our Global Services business they're also targeting higher margin over time because by the very nature of it they're not RFQ-driven, they're driven out of cycles, they have proactive sales. So, yes, mix will improve. And then again, whenever you have 5G deals, the end-to-end scope of that will allow us to get more into routing and so on. And I think now IP routing is starting to – we've been gaining share for a while. As FP4 ships, we'll start to continue that trend and momentum.

And I think on the IPR, it is clear that for us to achieve the 10% CAGR over the three-year period ending 2020, we need to both get new licensing agreements in place with the smartphone vendors that are yet not licensed. As well as they'll break into automotive as well as consumer electronics and also renegotiate and renew some of the expiring patent licensing agreements, as we have said. So, it is a combination of those things and we are making progress on all those areas.

So, thank you, Richard. And Nicole, we'll take our next question.

Our next question comes from Stefan Slowinski of Exane BNP Paribas. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, thanks for taking my question. Just wanted to maybe drill in on China a little bit. Obviously, one of your competitors has been in a pause for the last couple of months, and just wondering if that's had any impact on your business, either positively or negatively? Has that been delaying any decision-making processes in China or has it been an opportunity to win share? And, I guess, along the same lines, in the recently announced $200 billion of U.S. tariffs, have you had a look at that and how to think about how that may or may not affect Nokia going forward? Thank you.

Thanks, Stefan. So, yes, there have been some delays in China on account of that situation, as tendering decisions have been slightly delayed. We have benefited. Again, I've always said this is a long-term possible improvement in the industry structure. But, yes, when it comes to fixed and optical and even mobile, we have won some deals in the quarter in that area from that competitor.

Outside of China.

Outside of China. And I'm talking also overseas, China.

Great, so thank you.

And I think on your – the kind of the trade war-related question, I think we are not seeing direct impact as we speak, but, of course, the overall uncertainty that increases as a result of this situation is, of course, impacting economic activity. And as a result of that, the indirect implications is something that one needs to keep in mind at this point of time, but no direct impact.

Thank you, Stefan. Nicole, next question, please.

Our next question comes from Alexander Duval of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi, many thanks for the question. Just noting that you grew 2% organically in your wireless business, which is quite similar to the growth rate of one of your key peers. I'm just wondering how confident you are that you can continue to see growth going forward in wireless and whether we might be troughing at this point in the market cycle. Obviously, you've talked a lot about the U.S., 5G seems to be gaining a lot of traction, but I wondered if you could talk a bit about some of the other regions in wireless, particularly one of your competitors has been talking about growth in those other regions and it looks like you've seen some bright spots, too, so maybe to get some thoughts on that. Many thanks.

Thanks, Alexander. So, with regard to 5G, it starts with North America, and as we discussed, there will be a couple of waves depending upon the spectrum awarded. There's South Korea going to happen later this year. There are trials ongoing right now, but that's going to start to move into rollouts. And then you have Japan, we'll start at some point in the first quarter next year with real momentum in rollouts because remember the Summer Olympics that is driving that deadline. And then you have China, which at current course we expect will start around at the end of Q2, Q3 next year. And then you have Middle Eastern countries that will also start in the first half, Nordic countries that will move into 5G at some point in the first half. So these are the lead countries. Nothing new. Also, the case in 4G, these were lead countries. And so I think given that the super cycle is starting from Q3, potential growth in the wireless end of the market is here to sustain for a while.

I think maybe the only comment I would make is that I would, with caution, look at kind of wireless quarterly numbers and because, again, we all know that the timing of completion of project and acceptances are driving the revenue recognition in that business. But as Rajeev said, when one looks at kind of over the quarterly cycle, the trend is strong.

Half yearly is a better thing.

Yep.

Thank you, Alex. And so, Nicole, we'll go to the next question.

Our next question comes from Simon Leopold of Raymond James. Please go ahead. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc.: Great, thank you for taking my question. Yesterday on its conference call, AT&T commented on vendor financing. Could you help us understand how, or if, this affects your financials and if you're engaged in this or how it may play into competitive environment? Thank you.

I think in general, we have a fairly limited direct vendor financing exposure as we speak. We are, of course, working together with our operator customers to provide them with alternative finance sources, working together with the export credit agencies in the countries where we have major operations, mainly for us Finland, Belgium, Canada, and so on. And when it comes to some of the large North American customers, we have successfully been able to provide them with substantial facilities that have been backed by the export credit agencies. So, I think that's what we'll do now also, and try to see how we can help. But it is not resulting in a direct exposure on the Nokia balance sheet.

Thank you, Simon. Nicole, next question, please.

Our next question comes from Tim Long of BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Just wanted to ask a little more detail on these end-to-end deals that you're getting, I think you mentioned 40% now. If you could just give us a sense as to how much that's grown as a percentage, if any point a year ago, or anything like that. And just also when you think about just kind of the overall profitability that you would see from these type of deals relative to more deals that are more single product in nature. I'm assuming they might be a little lower because it sounds like some of them there's a give-back on maybe wireless to get in with the other pieces. Thank you.

Yeah, thanks, Tim. In Q1 we said that was around 30%, 35%-ish. Now, we have 40%, about a year ago it was around 30%, as I recall it. So, it is growing. And this is the pipeline, remember this is the overall pipeline and what is the percentage of end-to-end deals within that pipeline. And then, of course, we fight for the conversion factor. It's already good news and that means that the end-to-end portfolio is being recognized, more and more operators want to buy more end-to-end from us. There's no – I can't give you a clear answer on our margin is better or not, it really is case-by-case. But you lock in the customer on various fronts, you get more strategic, you're talking about long-term network architecture if you have more of the end-to-end portfolio, you have more offsetting mechanisms if discount is asked in one place or the others. Overall, it's a healthy thing to do for us to go more end-to-end.

Thank you, Tim. Nicole, next question, please.

Our next question comes from Pierre Ferragu of New Street Research. Please go ahead.

Hey, thank you for letting me on. So, Rajeev, I just wanted to come back on the gross margin movements, specifically in ultra-broadband. So, if I look at it compared to your fleet margins in the first quarter of 2017, it's down 7 points. And that half (55:04) that decline actually came in the last like sequentially between Q1 and Q2 this year. And so, I'm thinking, well, if it's related to pricing, to pricing pressure, it seems like a lot because I imagine that in your revenues in any given quarter only a small portion of these revenues are coming from new deals and a lot of revenues are coming from older deals. So, if pricing on new deal has been hurt to the point that it's moving the needle by that much, like 3 points, 4 points sequentially and 7 points year-on-year, it feels like prices have been slashed. So, my question would be am I missing other moving parts that are very significant, in this 7 points margin decline over five quarters, or am I thinking that it's pricing pressure the wrong way? And then as a quick follow-up on the same topic, when I think of the pricing pressure in the markets, I usually expect to see similar trends happening like visible at all players, and if we do get Ericsson, we don't see a similar trend in gross margins and there is nothing really suggesting that Huawei is under like that kind of margin trajectory, so any thoughts you could have on why it could be different, would be very helpful as well. Thanks a lot.

Thanks, Pierre, I'll give you a few points. So, one is mix. So, Q1 we saw an adverse mix in North America was much lower because Q1 of 2017 was a very strong North America quarter relative to that. There was a compare issue. But, of course, the mix was adverse from a regional point of view plus some other lower-margin regions in comparison grew quite a bit. So, that's one. In Q2 we saw – and by the way, we also saw portfolio mix adversely move in Q1, lot more optical, less IP routing. In Q2 we saw, again, the same thing, more network implementation, less higher-margin care, and most notably, much stronger optical, less IP routing. Unfortunately, we missed a meaningful amount of revenue we could have captured in IP routing in Q2 because of some of the supply shortages. So, one is both the portfolio and the regional mix and the second is only part of it is the pricing thing, and it's not pricing to do with necessarily a new deal of future, it's to do with some of the install base we have, hence it's affected the first half. Now, we are saying that that is going to reverse to some degree in Q3 and more particularly in Q4.

So, thank you, Pierre. And based on the timing, it looks like we didn't quite get to the end of our queue, really apologize for that. But thank you all for your good questions today. And now, I'd like to turn the call back over to Rajeev.

Thanks, Matt and Kristian, and thanks to all of you for your good and thoughtful questions. Just a short closing comment. Yes, margins remained a challenge in the second quarter, but as I shared earlier, we expect improvement as we proceed through this year and beyond. We also see considerable progress in many areas across our business, a stabilizing top line, 5G wins in the key market of North America and elsewhere, improving roadmaps in mobile networks, share gains in IP routing, a return to growth in our software business, meaningful progress in our strategy to expand into the enterprise, and continued strength in our licensing business. With that, thanks again to all of you for joining and have a great day. Matt, back over to you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our conference call. I would like to remind you that during the conference call today we have made a number of forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may therefore differ materially from the results currently expected. Factors that could cause such differences can be both external, such as general, economic and industry conditions, as well as internal operating factors. We have identified these in more detail on pages 71 through 89 of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 20-F, our financial report for Q2 and half-year 2018 issued today, as well as our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Thank you.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.