Steve Taylor
Analyst · Lake Street Capital. Please state your question
Thank you, Alicia and Erica and good morning and welcome to NGSG’s second quarter 2017 earnings review. Our earnings this quarter featured a few moving parts, but fortunately, a large part of the movement is positive. Our sales business continues to prosper. And this quarter, we received some very large orders that have pushed our backlog to the highest levels, at least a decade. In fact, the sum total of the orders represents a record level of revenue awarded in our sales business in one quarter. In our rental business, we are seeing slight improvements that seem to point to a better second half. Although this business remains under pressure, we continue to execute well and deliver industry leading margins. Our balance sheet continues to be unassailable and our ability to generate cash enviable. Among our publicly traded peers, NGS stands alone as the company providing consistent positive net income. While past performance does not necessarily provide a guaranty of future results, to-date, our net income has remained positive in each quarter of the downturn. I will comment on all of these in more detail to review the financials. Starting with total revenue and looking at the year-over-year comparative quarters, our total revenues decreased 6% from $17.2 million in the second quarter of ‘16 to $16.2 million in the second quarter of this year. Sales increased by $2.1 million. Our rental revenue saw a drop of $3.2 million. For the sequential quarters of the first quarter of ‘17 compared to the second quarter of ‘17, total revenues decreased $2.7 million from $18.9 million to $16.2 million. The decrease was primarily in our sales component with solid drop of $2.2 million. Our rental revenue decreased only $500,000. Looking at the comparative 6-month year-to-date periods, total revenues were down 9% to $35.2 million. Overall, we are pleased with the general resilience of NGS from a total revenue perspective, which saw a year-over-year decreases of only 6% in the comparative quarters and 9% in the 6-month year-to-date periods. Looking at gross margin and comparing the second quarter ‘16 to this current quarter, total gross margin declined from $9.5 million to $8.1 million and was 50% of total revenue compared to 55% of total revenue in the second quarter of 2016. Gross margin in each of our three business lines actually increased or stayed the same in this comparative period, but the overall decline in margin was due to a mix shift from rentals towards lower margin sales revenue. Sequentially, total gross margin decreased slightly from $8.7 million to $8.1 million. However, total gross margin as a percent of total revenues actually improved to 50% from 46% in the first quarter this year. In the 6-month year-to-date comparisons, gross margin dollars declined from $21.3 million to $16.8 million. As a percentage of revenue, year-to-date 2017 gross margin averaged 48% compared to 55% for the year prior year-to-date. As noted, all comparative periods saw lower gross margin due to the result in mix shift towards sales revenue. Although there is some variability in our total gross margins, we remain and have consistently remained a market leader in margins. This is evidenced by our ability to deliver very attractive rental gross margins of 63% in this quarter. Our sales general and administrative expenses, increased about $240,000 in the year-over-year quarters was down over $650,000 in the sequential quarters and is up a little over $700,000 in year-to-date comparisons over prior year. A primary factor in our recent SG&A variability is because of the accelerated non-cash stock expense taken last quarter. SG&A as a percentage of revenue has stayed within the range between 13% and 16% in all comparative quarters and we believe quarterly costs of $2.5 million or less should be sustainable through the rest of the year. In the comparative year-over-year periods, operating income decreased from $1.9 million to a little over $400,000. Sequentially, operating income increased from approximately $340,000 to a little over $400,000. When comparing year-to-date 2017 to 2016, operating income fell to nearly $760,000. This is driven by a mix shift resulting from a weak rental market that mitigated a strong sales performance. Looking at net income, the comparative year-over-year second quarter’s net income dropped from $1.3 million to about $400,000 this year. Sequentially, the second quarter 2017 saw net income increase from a little over $250,000 to approximately $400,000. On a fully diluted basis earnings per share this quarter was $0.03 per common share, up from $0.02 last quarter. On a year-over-year quarterly basis, EBITDA decreased from $7.3 million in the second quarter of ‘16 to $5.7 million in the second quarter of this year. Sequentially, EBITDA increased $50,000. EBITDA margins of 35% for the current quarter were up from 30% during the first quarter of this year. Our 6-month year-to-date comparison, EBITDA declined from $16.6 million for the first half of 2016 to $11.4 million for the same period this year. From a long-term operating perspective, we have maintained EBITDA at an average of 40% of revenue over the last 18 months. Total sales revenues, which includes compressors, flares and aftermarket activities, almost doubled in the year-over-year quarter from $2.3 million in the second quarter of ‘16 to $4.4 million in the second quarter of this year. For the sequential quarters, total sales revenues decreased $2.2 million from $6.6 million to $4.4 million. However, as we noted last quarter, the first quarter was a strong sale quarter and was the highest sales revenue we had in 18 months, which further reflects the volatility of that business. Although sequential quarters were down on a 6-month year-to-date basis, sales revenues increased $3.8 million from $7.2 million in 2016 to $11 million in the first half of 2017. Compressor sales for the current quarter were $3 million, up from $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2016, but down from $5.6 million last quarter. Comparing the 6-month comparative periods shows the year-to-date sales were up $2.9 million or 51% over year-to-date 2016. That is the first 6 months. As you can see, compressor sales are historically volatile quarter-to-quarter. Gross margins for compressor sales in the second quarter of 2016 were negative 10%. As a reminder, compressor revenues were not high enough to absorb all fixed fabrication costs for that period. However, this quarter’s gross margin is 5% compared to 15% in Q1 and 12% year-to-date comparing to 8% year-to-date in 2016. Although revenues and gross margin are volatile, this business is improving, providing additional support for our thesis that the sales margin is improving, in the present quarter, we were awarded some large compressor orders. This resulted in a significant jump in our compressor sales backlog. Our backlog as of June 30, 2017 was $25.3 million, almost 10x higher than the backlog at the end of the first quarter of this year and 5x greater than the average backlog we have seen over the past year. As important as a growth in backlog is, the length of the backlog tail is significant too. We estimate this should last through the second quarter of 2018, a full year’s worth of work. Besides a meaningful revenue impact to the backlog increase, there are a couple of other important highlights. This is the highest backlog we have had in at least 10 years and these orders not only include our standard size wellhead compression units, but also a good number of 1,000 horsepower plus packages. We hope that this larger horsepower award will further establish our reputation for being able to fabricate this size of compression. Rental revenue had a year-over-year quarterly decrease from approximately $14.7 million in the second quarter of ‘16 to just under $11.5 million this current quarter. Sequentially, rental revenues were down about $500,000 from $11.9 million in the first quarter of ‘ 17, while year-to-date rental revenues were down $7.7 million from $31.1 million for the six months ending in June. From a gross margin standpoint, we continued to post superior results. Gross margin this quarter was 63%, the same as last year’s quarter and up from 61% in the sequential quarters. Year-to-date, our rental gross margins are averaging 62% compared to 64% last year. This is quite an accomplishment by our field personnel considering the appreciably lower revenue base. Average rental rates across the active fleet decreased approximately 6% over the second quarter of ‘16 and were down about 2% from the first quarter. Average rental rates for newly set units, which more closely reflect the current market are down about 4% this quarter compared to last year’s comparative quarter, but about 4% higher than last quarter. This is marginally better overall than last quarter. I will also point out that our average rental rates and gross margin per unit are comparable with mid-2014 before the downturn began. So while we have encountered pricing pressure and experienced declines, we are still at rates and margins when oil is trading at or near $100 a barrel. Fleet size at the end of June was 2,531 compressors, same as last quarter. Our active fleet utilization this quarter was 49.5%, down 0.5% from last quarter. It certainly appears that we are in a bottoming [ph] process when we are down to quoting utilization in 0.5 percentage point increments. On these same lines, we monitor another metric called churn rate. That’s the number of compressors rented divided by the number returned in a given period. This number has also continued to improve. I hasten to add however, that with the uneven nature of what may be a slow recovery, we will see continued variability in the rental business. We indicated the capital expenditures for the year will be $5 million to $10 million, predicated on market demands. In the first quarter ‘17, we spent a little over $450,000 and in the second quarter, we capitalized a little under $200,000. So we ended the first half of the year spending approximately $650,000 in capital funds. We do have total capital commitments for about $5 million in the first half of the year, but we haven’t completed the compressor packages yet, so they haven’t been capitalized, but they will through the balance of the year. The majority of this capital is dedicated to our larger 400 horsepower and 600 horsepower units and a smaller VRU line, with three quarters of it going to larger horsepower units. I will also quickly note that these two new product lines continued to be successful with all of our available inventory rented and with the newly built larger horsepower units being rented before they are completed. Going to the balance sheet, our total bank debt is $417,000 as of June 30, 2017 and cash in the bank is a little over $73 million. We have a small reduction in our cash balance this quarter. Recounting the last quarter’s call, we increased cash by over $10 million, but I mentioned that was unusually high due to the timing issues and that we wouldn’t expect that level of cash generation to continue on a quarterly basis. Timing works both ways and in this quarter, we had approximately $3 million less from compressor sales and $6 million less due to timing of one-time payments. We anticipate our cash additions to average about the same in the second half of the year as in the first half, $5 million to $6 million per quarter. As I have mentioned, we appear to be in the trough of our activity that can be a couple quarters long and price utilization pressure continue. In spite of this, NGS has been able to execute well and deliver industry leading results. Our sales performance is exemplary, as demonstrated by our large backlog increase. EBITDA and gross margin in our rental real business continue at a high level and our balance sheet remains strong. Among our publicly traded peers, NGS stands alone as one company providing consistent positive net income. From a macro perspective, there is some trepidation about the oil price, but later there seems to be more good news than not. Inventories are finally following consistently, OpEx seems serious about limiting supply and further reducing inventory and the rig count plan has slowed. These all point to tightening supply, albeit timing is anyone’s guess. But what’s really needed is a steady price and we all know the recent volatility has had a dampening effect. We have been in the lower for longer environment, as noted by the BP CEO a couple years ago, but I don’t think we are in the long – the lower longer forever scenario as Shell Oil mentioned the other day. However, in spite of the headlines about oil being lower priced forever, there was not much talk about another important comment made by the Shell’s CEO and that is Shell’s outlook for positive future for natural gas. Shell has bet big on this and their acquisition of BG Gas and new markets for U.S. operators are becoming evident. We have had growth in power gen, petrochem. And last year, natural gas’ market share exceeded coal for the first time. There has been acceleration in LNG exports and exports to Mexico. This is not a call for a sudden resurgence in gas pricing activity, but I think we are finally seeing some light at the end of the long tunnel for U.S. sourced natural gas. To conclude my remarks and summarizing NGS’ position no debt, cash in the bank, positive net income and a huge backlog, you can’t do much better than that in this market. That’s the end of my comments. Now, I am turning the call back to Erica for any questions anyone might have.