Good day, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the NOVAGOLD first quarter 2018 conference call and webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mélanie Hennessey, Vice President of Corporate Communications. You may begin. Mélanie Hennessey: Thank you Sonia. Good morning everyone. We are pleased that you have joined us for NOVAGOLD's first quarter results and also for an update on the Donlin Gold and Galore Creek projects. On today's call, we have Greg Lang, NOVAGOLD's President and CEO and David Ottewell, NOVAGOLD's Vice President and CFO. At the end of the webcast, we will take questions, both by phone and by e-mail. But before we get started, I would like to remind our listeners that any statements made today may contain forward-looking information such as projections and goals which are likely to involve risks that are detailed in our various EDGAR and SEDAR filings and in various forward-looking disclaimers included in this presentation. With that, I now have the pleasure of introducing Greg Lang, NOVOGOLD's President and CEO. Greg?

Thank you Mélanie. NOVAGOLD is a development stage company with two great assets in North America as shown on slide four. Our 50% owned flagship asset in Alaska, Donlin Gold, is located about 280 miles west of Anchorage and it's nearly through the permitting process. The project is poised to become one of the largest producers in the gold industry. Galore Creek, which is held in 50% partnership with Teck, is about 100 miles northeast of Stewart in British Columbia and has the potential to be one of Canada's largest and lowest-cost copper mines. During the first quarter, efforts were focused on supporting the Army Corps of Engineers' activities to complete the Donlin Gold final EIS. As shown on slide five, the Corps anticipates issuing the document and publishing a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register shortly. The Corps' Record of Decision is expected to follow about four months later in the second half of the year. The final EIS presents a comprehensive environmental impact analysis that the Corps will use in making its decision on whether the Clean Water Act Section 404 and Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 permits. These are the key Federal authorizations for the project. The Record of Decision will describe both the legal and technical basis for the Corps' permitting decision. The permits that authorize project construction should be issued shortly after the Record of Decision. A lot of hard work has gone in to reach this major milestone and it's encouraging to see that permitting is almost done. Between publishing the final EIS and the issuance of a Record of Decision, several activities will unfold, including both the preparation of the Record of Decision and the Section 404 permit will then be sent to the State to ensure that the decision complies…

Thank you Greg. Slide nine highlights our first quarter operating performance. For the first quarter, we reported an $8.2 million net loss, $1.9 million lower than the prior year. The operating loss decreased by $2.2 million, primarily due to lower share-based compensation costs for stock options and PSUs compared to the prior year. After engagement with shareholders, the company extended the vesting period for new stock option and PSU grants to three years and eliminated the individual performance multiplier in the formula for long-term equity compensation, resulting in lower expense in the first quarter of 2018. At Donlin Gold, permitting costs were lower as the final EIS nears completion and were partially offset by project optimization cost. Other expense increased due to higher interest expense on the Barrick promissory note. NOVAGOLD's cash flow highlights are outlined on slide 10. In the first quarter, we spent $7 million, 25% of our full year budget. $2.4 million was used to fund our share of the Donlin Gold and Galore Creek projects and $4.6 million was used for operating activities, including administrative costs. Spending to settle year-end accounts payable and employee annual incentive payment is higher in the first quarter. We ended the quarter with $77 million in cash and term deposits. Greg?

Thank you Dave. Donlin Gold represents tremendous value to our broad stakeholder base. Our largest shareholders view NOVAGOLD as one of the best ways to gain exposure to one of the richest gold deposits in the industry, with 39 million ounces. This is nearly four times the size of its peer group average. Donlin is in the league of its own compared to the other 18 development projects in the Americas with greater than 2.5 million ounces. Another key attribute shown on slide 12 is the quality of the deposit. With a resource grade of 2.2 grams per ton, it's double the industry average. Donlin Gold is one of the highest grade known open pit gold deposits. Its grade makes the asset attractive in the precious metals industry where reserve grades are steadily declining and sources of emerging production are becoming increasingly scarce. Beyond the size and quality, Donlin Gold has longevity with an anticipated production profile of greater than a million ounces a year for almost three decades. Clearly, it's at the top of the list as shown on slide 13, when compared to other gold focused development projects. Once in production, the project will contribute great economic benefits to all of our stakeholders. I think it's also important to point out that the fundamental drivers for gold remain unchanged. As shown by the size of the next generation of gold mines, new meaningful development projects are very scarce. Large gold deposits are critical for the sustainability of the industry. Yet with the lack of new discoveries, a supply demand disequilibrium is on the horizon. Gold is getting harder and harder to find and the time from discovery to production is in the neighborhood of 20 years. And the often remote location of these new deposit present complex and…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Lucas Pipes of ‎B. Riley FBR. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good morning everybody and thank you for taking my question. Greg and team, first I want to say congratulations for the completion of the EIS. I know this has been a tremendous amount of work and it's great to see that completed and hopefully the rest of the permitting completing on the back of that very soon as well. I wanted to ask about the optimization work. Greg, what sort of timeline are you looking at to maybe have a little bit more of an update on that front? And then what are the priorities, specifically what are you looking at in terms of optimizing the project at this time? Thank you.

Sure. Lucas, thank you for joining our call this morning. On the optimization work, once the EIS is published, it will take about four months to write the Record of Decision and we are striving to complete our optimization work and be in a position to talk in detail about it after the Record of Decision has been released. [indiscernible]. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Stephen Walker of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Thank you very much. Greg, I have got two questions. The first is a follow-up, I guess, on the previous question. Can you talk a little bit about what do you think 2019 will look like once you have the Record of Decision published and the 404 water permit issued? And I guess, my question is sort of, to what extent will you be getting into detail engineering as part of the optimization and where do you think you could be as far as updating the detail engineering by year-end 2019? What specific activities can you see occurring in 2019 that will bring more clarity in the project? And then what specifically would be the timing of the updated feasibility or updated technical study that you made reference to? When could we expect details on that?

Sure. Stephen, thank you for joining us this morning. I think as we mentioned earlier, we are very sensitive about getting our permitting wrapped up and the Record of Decision in hand. It's a complicated process and we are too close to the end to want to disrupt it, if you will. So looking forward, we will be wrapping up our ongoing optimization work with Barrick in the second half of the year about the time the Record of Decision is done. At that stage, the owners will need to make a decision, do we proceed with engineering or do we wait until we are satisfied that the markets are ready for a large scale development project like Donlin. Anyhow, we have always taken the view that we are very patient with our assets. We have seen far too many examples of companies rushing into production and frankly doing some pretty ruinous financings just to get started. And we will not do that. We will wait until the time is right and we will go forward then. So I think, Stephen, not to mean to avoid your question, but I think we really just got to finish what we have got underway, which is a quite a bit of activities and then take stock of where the industry is, where gold prices are and where our partners are at and that will be toward the end of this year.

Great. Just hang in there. Greg, it's helpful.

My pleasure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from John Tumazos of John Tumazos Research. Your line is now open.

Thank you. Greg, what is the carrying value of 50% of Galore Creek?

Well, I have got our -- Go ahead, John.

And is that indicative of sales value? I know you might have had a sales process six, seven years ago. But is your goal to recover the book value or to get multiples of it?

Well, John, our CFO, Dave, is here and I will ask him to respond to your inquiry.

Sure. John, if you would refer to our 10-Q, in note five, it's on page seven, you will see that our investment in Galore Creek is $253 million and we also have a piece related to mineral properties that's approximately $50 million. So those are what we have on the books. What the amount that the sales process will go, it will be at market value and that is still to be determined. But we are confident our book value is solid.

So you think that you can recover the $303 million as you are not sticking your neck out and saying the copper price is better or the gold price might be better and you get a couple of pennies more?

Well, John, we have been fortunate. We are not motivated sellers. And as we have watched the copper prices increase over the last year, that certainly brought along a corresponding increase in the interest in Galore. So I think we remain patient and I think our shareholders will be appreciative of that fact. So when the time is right, we will monetize it. But we have certainly got --

Greg, I am going to kid with you a little bit.

Okay.

Do you want to do some exploration in Sudan?

Well, John, the more I watch what's unfolding throughout the industry in countries that were considered investable, the less intrepid I would be inclined to be.

The reason I make that point is that part of your commentary was not factually current and you might have expectations or your controlling shareholder might have expectations that are too high and make it hard for you to sell assets at the right time. Sudan had the highest growth in world gold output last year. It ranks 10th, ahead of Uzbekistan, behind South Africa. It's a 100% RT on mining. 103 tons. They don't a penny to a 43-101 company and they don't get fleeced on 100,000 ton at the grinding mills and capital overruns and maybe if you went there, you would have a much higher return on capital on the kind of projects you go.

Well, John, I appreciate you raising that opportunity. But you know, we --

It isn't all about the great big projects. And you have got a couple extra months time on your hands until Barrick and Teck move.

Well, one of the real elements of the investment thesis behind this company is that our assets are located in safe jurisdictions and our major shareholders, they invested in this company because of our strategy and our focus on assets in safe places And I think it would be certainly a kind of a breach of our trust with them is we deviated from our strategy.

I think that engineering contractors are more dangerousness than Islamic terrorists. I am just messing around, Greg and based on your thoughts. Take care.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Lucas Pipes of ‎B. Riley FBR. Your line is now open.

Yes. Thank you for taking my follow-up question and apologies for the bad connection. I wanted to follow-up specifically on Galore Creek. I know it came up in an earlier question as well. But I wanted to place the question in terms of the interest that you are seeing at this time. Has it been picking up? Are you getting inbound increase? So if you wanted to sell, would you be able to? Thank you.

Well, thank you Lucas. The line is much clearer than it was a few minutes ago. There has always been a simmering level of interest in Galore. But not typically under terms that we would sell, stock deals or approaches to that effect or approaches that really were at a price that we were unwilling to consider. Our understanding with our Board is that we would not contemplate taking forward an offer less than $200 million. I think Dave highlighted the book value of Galore and that's the neighborhood that we view this asset at and we are very patient, Lucas. We have got plenty of cash to carry the company for the next few years and frankly until we make a construction decision. So we are very patient and won't sell Galore unless we get full and fair value. And all of the jurisdiction issues that faced the gold mining industry are equally as complex in the copper industry.

Yes. Absolutely. Great. Well, Greg, I really appreciate the color and good luck.

Thank you Lucas.

Thank you. Our next question comes from David Lazinski [ph], a private investor. Your line is open.

Good morning, Greg. Just a few questions. Galore Creek, do you have the permit in hand for Galore Creek at this time? Are you expecting it in the future?

David, thank you for your interest. Galore Creek, many of you may remember, had actually started construction before the downturn hit. So it was, at one stage, permitted for that activity. We are not permitting at Galore now and our environmental people tell us it would probably take 18 to 24 months to reactivate the permits at Galore Creek. But again, that's not our focus and we don't plan on starting those activities.

So then it's safe to say that if someone acquired Galore, in all probability they would get the permits to reactivate the mining operation. Is that correct?

Yes. That's correct, David.

Good. I have been listening to a lot of your conference calls and I am looking for a fair estimate on when you expect to get the permit, the main permit, the decision by the Army Corps of Engineers. You said before the end of the year. Is November safe? Or is it safe to say, by the end of the year, you will have the go ahead for Donlin?

David, it's certainly safe to say that by the end of the year. Right now, we expect that the final EIS will be noticed in the Federal Register in about a month, give or take. And then we have been advised it will take about four months to write the Record of Decision. So that puts you in the September, October timeframe. So certainly it's safe to say, by the end of year.

Okay. Maybe you could answer one question. I have tried to contact Barrick Gold five times and nobody calls me back. And maybe you might be able to answer this for me. In their last earnings publication, they indicated 62 million ounces of reserves. Now, are they allowed to count their 20 million ounces from Donlin? Or are they restricted on doing that until such time as there is a permit? In other words, would Barrick Gold's reserves, would they be able to uptick into 82 million once they get the permit for Donlin?

Well, David, I think that's a question best posed to Barrick. Each company has --

They don't call me back.

Companies have different views on where permitting fits into what they declare as reserves and resources. And I don't think it's constant with all companies. So gain, that's a question best posed to our partner.

Okay. That's about it. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next comes from Stephen Walker of RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you. Greg, just a follow-up on Galore Creek. My understanding is that Teck Corporation have a right of first refusal as part of the joint venture. Is that in fact the case? And I know I can't remember where Teck's involvement occurred and whether that is in fact part of the current agreement?

Stephen, yes, they have a right of first refusal. And the way it would work, if we have an offer that's acceptable to us, we have to advise Teck and they have, I believe, 60 days in which to match the offer.

Perfect. Thank you Greg.

You are welcome.

Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Greg Lang for any closing remarks.

Well, everyone, thank you for taking the time to participate in our first quarter investor call. As you can see, it's shaping up to be very exciting year for the company. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.