Good morning, and welcome to Nexa Resources Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. The presenters on this call are Mr. Tito Martins, CEO of Nexa Resources; Mr. Rodrigo Menck, CFO of Nexa Resources; and Ms. Roberta Varella, Head of Investor Relations. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Tito Martins. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us in another Nexa's earnings conference call. I hope you and your loved ones remain safe and healthy. Today, we'll be talking about our results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2020. Please, let's move to Slide 3, where we will begin our presentation. In an unprecedented and challenging scenario, we have safely resumed our operations after the mandatory shutdown period. Our financial performance recovered strongly from the first half of the year, although we are still learning how to adapt ourselves to a new normal with COVID-19. We were able to rapidly implement additional health and safety protocols to mitigate the spread of the virus in our operations and projects. We estimate these additional protocols will remain at least in 2021, and part of our employees will continue working remotely. We maintain our efforts to build a differentiated, sustainable and cost-efficient business model, generating value for all of our stakeholders. In 2020, production guidance was achieved. Sales were stronger-than-expected, operational performance and cost reduction resulted from our Nexa Way program. Besides, Nexa Way also have strengthened our inclusion and plurality programs. In this context, we reinforced our commitment of returning capital to the shareholders. Therefore, based on our expected future cash flow and balance sheet stability, we are pleased to announce a dividend payment of $35 million to be realized next March. Please turn to Slide 4. In 2020, we have continued to progress in our social and environmental programs. As mentioned before, we are prioritizing our plurality program. In 2020, Nexa signed a commitment letter with a woman in mind that aims to expand and strengthen the participation of women in the sector. We have created tailings dams websites to improve transparency on our…

Thank you, Tito. Good morning, everyone. Please, let's move to Slide 9. Beginning with the first chart on your left, consolidated net revenue in fourth quarter '20 was $635 million, up 80% from the same period a year ago, mainly driven by higher zinc and copper prices. Adjusted EBITDA stood at $167 million compared with $65 million in fourth quarter 2019. The main factors that contributed to this performance were lower operating costs and expenses, the positive net price effect related to higher zinc prices and increasing by product contribution. The U.S. dollar appreciation against Brazilian real had a positive impact of $13 million. In 2020, net revenue was approximately $2 billion, down 16% compared to 2019, mainly driven by lower ever zinc and lead prices and lower volumes due to COVID-19-related measures. Adjusted EBITDA, however, increased by 15% year-over-year. The solid performance of our operations in the second half of the year, lower costs and the decrease in mineral exploration and project evaluation expenses were the main drivers. The U.S. dollar appreciation against Brazilian real had also a positive impact. On the next slide, we will discuss in further details our segment's performance. On Slides 10 and 11, we will comment on our mining segment operational results. In fourth quarter '20, adjusted EBITDA stood at $87 million, strongly recovering from fourth quarter 2019, mainly explained by the increase in net revenue due to higher production and better metal prices, lower operating and corporate costs and decrease in mineral exploration and project evaluation expenses. In 2020, adjusted EBITDA totaled $140 million compared with $173 million in 2019. Net revenue was $748 million, down 25% year-over-year, mainly affected by lower average zinc and lead prices and the decrease in volume due to the temporary suspension of our operations in Peru, which…

Thank you, Roberta. Good morning, and good afternoon, everyone. I am now on Slide 16. Before we discuss our financial performance, I would like to present our historical EBITDA and EBITDA margin for the smelting segment. As you can see, despite the changing in zinc prices, smelter margins in 2018 and '19 were relatively stable, which means smelter margins are mainly affected by changes in treatment charges and operational costs. As you may know, we applied the benchmark TC for our integrated mining and smelting operations. Also, our purchases for our zinc concentrate from third-party suppliers is mainly based on the 3-year average benchmark TC, which has not changed much in 2018 and '19. Analyzing the year of 2020, TCs increased from 2019 and despite the volatility in metal price, we delivered 2 digits margin. This strong performance, not only reflects higher TC, but also our ongoing efforts on reducing fixed costs. We wanted to bring this analysis to reinforce the strategic importance of being integrated and having smelters in our portfolio. Turning to the next slide. On Slide 17, as demonstrated in the upper left graph, our liquidity remains strong, and we continue to report a healthy balance sheet with extended debt profile. By the end of 2020, our current available liquidity was $1.4 billion, which includes our undrawn revolving credit facility of $300 million. We have overcome the challenges we faced in the beginning of the pandemic. As we recall, we proactively managed our liquidity position by raising additional debt during the first half of 2020. We added about $300 million to our cash balance through export credit notes in March and April. Then we drew down our revolving credit facility, which was repaid with the proceeds of the $500 million bond issued in June. And finally, we…

Thank you, Menck. Please move to Slide 22. Here, we will make some comments about the market fundamentals. During the quarter, zinc prices were up by 10% compared to fourth quarter of 2019, down 13% from the third quarter of 2020. This increase was mostly driven by strong economic activity in China, whose investments in infrastructure continue to contribute to zinc demand and due to a weaker U.S. dollar. In terms of market fundamentals, most lines in China and Latin America have resumed activities in the second quarter of 2020. But concentrate supply has not been sufficient to meet the improved demand from the smelters, particularly in Asia. We can see it clearly by the current level of the spot TCs. In terms of our home market, Latam, zinc metal demand recovered after the decrease in the second quarter of 2020. Demand has been recovered, mostly driven by a mix of pent-up demand, starts replenishment and fiscal stimulus, particularly in Brazil. In addition, the update long-term balance between supply and demand shows that the previous estimated increase in supply should be lower than forecasted, meaning market balance should remain tight. So in our view, metal prices have the fundamentals to remain at higher levels. Moving to Slide 23. On this slide, we present the performance of other metals, lead, copper and silver had a strong performance in the fourth quarter of 2020. Similar to zinc price, the increase in metal prices from the third quarter levels, was driven by a weaker U.S. dollar and a positive outlook for global growth. For 2021, the outlook is positive, given how economies have responded to the barriers, economic stimulus packages. The U.S. dollar performance should also continue to impact base metal prices. Obviously, COVID-19 remains a risk effect to this scenario, and we will continue to evaluate its development and the measures adopt to mitigate the virus spread, including worldwide vaccination. Moving now to our last slide. We have delivered a strong operational result, overcoming the challenges and restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 global outbreak. The performance in the second half of the year demonstrates the resilience of our business, the contribution of Nexa Way program and the commitment of our team with operational excellence and their enthusiasts to transform. As I mentioned in my previous slide, COVID-19 remains a risk factor, and we will continue to evaluate the impact in our value chain. The Peruvian government recently announced a new quarantine period in the country that should last until mid-February. Different from last year, mining and smelting operations were not suspended. We remain confident that the demand for our products will continue to recover. Next, will maintain its priority on capital discipline and cost control. We believe we have an attractive pipeline of projects, and we have been preparing ourselves to generate long-term value, building the mine of the future. Thank you all for your time, and let's move on to the Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Carlos De Alba from Morgan Stanley.

The question I have, Tito, is if you can just clarify a little bit on the Nexa Way. So I think you guys believe that EBITDA was positively impacted by almost $100 million in 2020. And then you see $100 million -- $120 million annualized benefit by the end of 2021. Is this incremental? So $20 million more in 2021? Or is this your full $120 million more throughout 2021? And similar for the additional measures or initiatives that were identified post COVID-19, which you estimate will give you a benefit of $60 million also in 2021. Is this in addition to the $120 million by the end of 2021 mentioned in the prior point in your press release or is this included?

Carlos, this is Rodrigo speaking here. Thank you for your question. It's a very good question. The Nexa Way needs to be explained and to be consistent with what was disclosed before. That's why we have this breakdown. So from the $120 million that we have disclosed as our forecast in the middle of the year, we have already captured $98 million, okay? So that was the one of the fees that we paid back in 2019. So we are connecting with this $120 million. After the program was officially -- had officially ended and was informed -- this was informed to the market by taking in our call for the second quarter, we identified additional initiatives, which might cause us to have additional G&A of $3 million to $10 million approximately EBITDA above that. And this group of new initiatives will generate up to $60 million. So coming back to your question. Yes, the $120 million is until the end of the year of 2021, out of which $98 million are already within capture -- within our results in 2020. So they are within our presented EBITDA. And moreover, we'll have aside from the $20 million, additional $22 million by our accounts will have also additional $60 million. You're correct in understanding that. I hope I have addressed your question.

Yes. This is very good. And this SG&A, the $3 million to $13 million temporary increase in SG&A. Will it happen mostly in the first quarter? Or how should we allocate this in the first half of the year?

First half of the year, it will depend -- the amount will depend on the performance of the initiatives. So they are forecasted to happen in the first half of the year.

Let me add something here, Carlos, thanks for your question. It's Tito here speaking. I think it's important to know that the Nexa Way's ongoing programs. So of course, what we want to see is for initiatives being created -- being generated. And meaning that we actually can make -- generating more productivity and cost cutting, cost reductions or increasing our performance. And of course, naturally, it would generate more expenses fees to pay. Clearly, if it happens, we will have a chance action to speak with the market -- in the market and give some guidance about that.

All right. Understood. And then just my final question is if you can comment on your expectation for TCs in 2021?

It's a $1 trillion question. We've got nobody.

What I have you.

I'll tell you what, in 2019, I was in one conference, everybody was asking about the TC and made a prediction. And I was absolutely right. I was surprised with myself. This year is that way around. What's going on here is, TCs are still very low, below $100 in Asia. We reached some point in the mid of last year that this is actually we're almost 0 in some case. We are guessing that probably the benchmark will come something around $150, it's very difficult to say because -- but we see a huge drop comes from $300 to $150, right. So -- but it's very difficult to be precise as you, very difficult.

[Operator Instructions]. The next question is from Timna Tanners from Bank of America.

Just 2 I wanted to follow-up on. One was regarding the dividend payment of $35 million for March. That compares to $50 million from the prior year. So just wanted to get your thinking on how that's calculated given the market condition seem to be better, and you're talking about improved balance sheet. And then the second question is regarding just the -- also capital allocation. And hoping that you could talk a little bit more about how you think about the projects that you have right now. So going through them, it looks like there's a number of them on hold. So what does it take to restart? What are you looking for to make those decisions?

Okay. Timna, this is Rodrigo here. Thank you for your question. Dividend payment, $35 million. Well, if you take a look on the dividend yields, we're paying as of today, a bit above 2.7% of dividend yield. If you remember last year, the $50 million were 4.5% of the dividend at very moment. When we define an approved proposed and approved our dividend last year, we had a good perspective for the year. It was -- of course, COVID was beginning to increase its effect. And this was in January, right? This year, what we are recognizing here is that, one, we have been paying dividends consistently throughout the year. We have a minimum dividend yield to be pursued according to our dividend policy of 2%. And although we had a challenging year last year, we were successful in managing our cost levels and be profitable by the end of the year. We have a good year ahead of us. We are performing well in the operations. We are being able to hold back our cost level and we are performing well our revised project of Aripuanã. So we believe this is a consistent level of dividend. That's the origin of the amount.

Okay. Great.

Is it clear?

Yes. And then on the projects, if you wouldn't mind, yes, that's clear.

Yes. Timna, Tito here. What do we have? We -- our plans for the year are we are finishing Aripuanã, everything goes as expected, we should be starting up production sometime in between in the last quarter of the year, first quarter '22. In the pipeline, we have following Aripuanã, Magistral. Magistral in '21, we will be ending the feasibility study, the FEL3, the Stage of Magistral. The idea is since we had said in the past, and we assume that we should not start a new project before we finished the one that we are building. In this case Aripuanã. Magistral would be built. Of course, it comes with a potential good return only after we finish Aripuanã. So we will have time along '22 -- '21, sorry -- to finish it well and actually keep working on the project to de-risk as much as possible to come up with the decision, to execute this or not, probably starting up with some time in '22. The other projects we have, we are still drilling Hilarion. We are very confident that we'll be very zinc asset for future production maybe replace Hilarion in the future. And the other two, currently again, we are also keeping some drilling. Puka and Shalipayco, we stopped the development last year because of the market conditions, the situation we were facing in Peru with the lockdown. In my view, we should return to these projects probably after the -- we see more stability in the market. We were being conservative and actually to avoid to invest more in new projects before we assure that our cash generation will be stable, back to stability. By the way, as we have seen today, right? So being optimistic, it should return with those projects, sometime in between '21 and '22.

Yes. The stability of the copper price has been there. It seems like -- it sounds like maybe you're talking about the stability of what the ability to operate in your regions or COVID-19...

Not on the copper. Zinc as well. Not copper only, but zinc as well.

Right. Right. So the price is there, but you're looking for other factors, I guess?

I'm sorry, say again.

I was saying the price has been accommodating, right? The price of the commodity is positive. So it looks like you just want more evidence or more evidence of the ability to operate given COVID-19.

Exactly. Exactly that. Exactly that. As you see, we are operating in normal levels today, everywhere. COVID has not impacted us anymore, but we always have this uncertainty about the exogenous factors, right? Lockdowns imposed by government or municipalities and things like the contamination of contractors and employees. So we need to see more -- a more normal life. That's good as well.

[Operator Instructions]. The next question is from Daniel McConvey from Rossport Investments.

I have a COVID question, I guess, and three components to it. First, is there -- when you did your forecast for 2021. Is there -- was there much in the way of hangovers from what you had from 2020? What I mean by that is in terms of maintenance catch-ups, in terms of stripping catch-ups, how much was that a factor in your forecast for 2021? Second component, what you probably answered this, but what's more difficult now in your operations, both in the smelting side and the mining side as a result of COVID, whether it's getting the right resources, the right technical skills, people across the border, et cetera, both in Brazil and in Peru. And then the third component is, is there anything as a result of the crisis that you're actually doing different is actually resulting in some productivity increases?

Thank you for your questions. Menck, do you want to answer the first one about the guidance? The catch up?

Yes, yes, please. Daniel, thank you for your questions. About this cost hangover, as you called it, actually, for the estimate we have for the year is pretty much covering the continuous protocols that we have in place, considering that these health protocols will be maintained throughout the year for the whole year. So we are not considering in any circumstance, the reduction of those protocols due, for example, to broad vaccination. So these are the additional costs. In terms of the costs on the operational side, I believe, once we had the ramp-up in the middle of the year, we came back to the normal course of business.

I would add to that. The only thing that actually -- there is -- comes from 2020 is some of the CapEx that we had to delay and postpone given the issues we were facing with the COVID. Some sustaining CapEx that was delayed, and we have performed -- we will be performing along this year, right? Okay. Regarding your second question about the deputies, I would say, our main concern in terms of operations, either in Brazil and Peru has to do with the conditions of our employees and contractors. We set-up lots of different protocols, depending where and how we are operating. And we need to follow those protocols. And the concern we have is, for example, sale mainly is in and out sites. So we have shipped every 14 days. And the people stay at home -- employees will stay at home for 7 days. So we have to test them. When they come in, we have to test them. They are -- after 7 days, they are there at the site. So this is a big concern, to have less people available to reach our operations. We had that last year when we were ramping up returning to operation. Just to give an example, I remember in the beginning of August, certainly we were supposed to take to the site 1,200 people. And we were only able to take 700 because the other 500 tested positive. So this is, I would call, the major concern we have in terms of operations and the impact of COVID. The third question, is there anything we are doing differently, yes, our offices, we are still in home office. We have decided already that we should not have everybody returning to the offices after the pandemic. We used to have part of the team being able to work from home from time to time, but it was not a very regular system. It will become regular ordinary for us. We will be saving with real estate costs. And we're also looking at some improvements in the way we travel, we are avoiding trips, we are -- there will be, at the end of the day, some sales. If you don't ask me how much, we're going to generate -- we don't have this number yet because we still operate under the pandemic, but the idea is to bring beyond some learns we have during this time.

I guess it's kind of surprising that with all the constraints of last year that getting 700 employees to site versus 1,300, whatever the number was, some things weren't dropped, it had kind of a catch-up this year, but it's pretty impressive if things are recovering that smoothly.

The next question is a follow-up from Carlos de Alba from Morgan Stanley.

Tito and Rodrigo, so given where copper prices are and obviously, fiber and let alone thing. If your cash flow generation is strong, would you consider paying a special dividend or another dividend throughout the year?

Good question, good question.

It's a great question, but our dividend policy currently states that we pay once a year. So we do not forecast at this point in time to pay anything in addition to the payment that we are announcing now.

All right. Well, hopefully, you guys delivered on the top end of your guidance and you saw practice with a dividend later in the year.

We still have -- we do have -- my guess here, let me do something here. My guess is, let's assume that price remain at a higher level throughout the year, and we are able to produce as planned. And we generate more cash. We still have to deal with the debt was raised last year because of the prices, right? And of course, we want to return to the level of indebtedness. We have before it. So priority would be to look at the debt and manage it.

In conversion, the levels of leverage that we have before the investment.

The next question is from Orest Wowkodaw from Scotiabank.

I wanted to ask you about Cerro Lindo. In my view, it's your biggest and most important asset in the portfolio. Based on kind of 2019 reserves, I think that mine looks like it's going to deplete around 2027, '28. I'm just wondering if there's going to be a focus on trying to grow those reserves to extend that mine life. And sort of what kind of focus is that going to have over the next couple of years?

So thanks for your question, Orest. Yes, you're right. Cerro Lindo is our main asset. We've seen along the last few years, a drop in the grades there, which made the production more difficult because we have to increase the throughput to generate the same levels of production we had before. In parallel, we've been investing -- I don't have this number here, but we've been investing a significant amount of money in drilling exactly to expand the resources and reserves available there. If you look back, so we need to maybe 3 or 4 years ago, had a similar profile of price. Life of mine by that time was forecasted to be between 7 and 9 years. And today, as you mentioned, we are forecasting 8 years of life of mine. So our efforts to increase the availability of results has been proven to work because we are producing and keeping some room to enhance the potential life of mine.

Do you see on that, do you see a significant upside to the current life of mine? Or should we think about this as maybe you can -- maybe you can add a couple more years? Or do you say this is actually here...

The difficulty we have there -- the difficulty we have there has to do with part of the drilling is done all around, right? So you need to develop the mine to increase your knowledge about what you have ahead of you. So we -- actually, we performed two types of drillings. We have this -- the drilling that follows the growth of the mine, all of the route of the mine. And we have external drillings, which gives us less possibility to identify more resource. So my view is Cerro Lindo showed less longer than anybody expects because it's the area -- it's a rich area in [indiscernible], but the big challenge we will face in some years, maybe in between 5 and 10 years, will be related to our capacity to generate more run of mine, to keep up with the same levels of production given the grade drop.

[Operator Instructions]. There are no more questions in the queue. This concludes our question-and-answer session. Now we will hand over to Tito for his final remarks. Mr. Martin, please go ahead.

Thank you. I would like to thank...

Sir?

Oh, Menck. Okay. Go ahead. Make a comment here.

Just 1 second. I would say, as we didn't have a specific question, I'll take the opportunity to clarify something on the smelting segment cash costs. One about the quarter and one about the year impact. And although the year cash cost is mildly above the guidance that we gave for the year, it was 4% above. It increased much less than proportionally to the zinc price increase, which is the factor that impacts the most of cash cost, which was 17% higher against our initial estimate. So we were estimating $0.99 per pound and the zinc price at the end was $1.16 per pound. So the difference was pretty much the operational cost efficiency that we have been disclosing and existing that we are focusing on. The second comment is quarter-on-quarter, although on a yearly basis, the price effects tend to be neutral as we try to show on Slide 16 of our presentation. On a quarterly price basis, the price volatility might cause the kind of cash cost variation you saw between the third quarter and the fourth quarter, due mainly to mark-to-market and QP setting effects as we have opened invoice, both on the side of concentrate purchase and the metal sales. So sometimes, when you see this type of variation, it's not only that the costs have jumped, but also this price effect, it's good to have it in mind when we are talking about the quarterly evolution. Thank you for the opportunity. And Tito, please, back to you.

Thank you, Menck. I'm sorry, I forgot to planning to make this statement. I would like to thank all of you for being here. Just saying that it's a difference from some of our -- the view of some of our analysts. We believe that 2020 was a surprising year for us because based on what we went through in the first half of the year with the lockdown in Peru, the problems we faced, the year ends up being a very good year. Even it's better than 2019 and mostly -- the main reasons for that were, of course, price, the price helped a lot, the second half of 2020, but also cost reduction and productivity. We are showing that the Nexa Way is working and bringing results for us. We are very happy to see it happening. And we are confident that even having the COVID still impacting everybody, we should have hopefully, a more stable and efficient year in '21. Thank you for being here. I hope you see healthy and safe. And let's move on. Let's have a better '21. Thank you. Bye, bye.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.