Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the NewtekOne, Inc. Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Barry Sloane, President, Founder and CEO. Barry, please go ahead.

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to our NewtekOne fourth quarter and full year 2024 final results conference call. I would also like to introduce and mention that Scott Price, our Chief Financial Officer will be helping me present on today's call. This is our second full year of transitioning from a Business Development Corp to reporting as a financial holding company owning a nationally chartered bank. We certainly appreciate everyone's patience, enthusiasm and attention to all the information that we provided into the market over the course of the last two years. Today's presentation will be a bit cleaner, a little bit of an abridged version. We look to get through the discussion piece in about 20 to 25 minutes and then open it up to Q&A. So it's clearly more condensed. And with that, we're asking all of you to rely upon the press release information we put out late last night, which pays a lot of attention to detail, which shows strong loan growth, strong deposit growth, strong ROAA performance, strong ROTCE performance, and really good attractive efficiency ratios. We look forward to presenting today and look forward to turning the pages on NewtekOne presentation. You can go to our website, newtekone.com, go to the Investor Relations section, the PowerPoint is on there. Going to Slide number 2. On that presentation, please note the statement regarding forward-looking comments and then we'll move to Slide number 3. Important to note, NewtekOne, Inc.’s mission statement and purpose. NewtekOne is a technology enabled disruptive company that is wrapped in a bank holding company blanket. It's really important to note who we are and what we do. We've taken our technology to acquire clients cost effectively, make we believe better loans in the industry standard with better risk reward relationships that are…

Thanks, Barry, and good morning, everyone. Slide 23 shows our yields and rates on a consolidated basis. My comments will focus on performance in the fourth quarter versus the third quarter of 2024. During the fourth quarter of ‘24, we experienced margin contraction, which was driven by a combination of positive and negative factors. On the negative side, we had higher cash average balances at the Fed and a full quarter impact to the Fed rate cuts that happened in the third quarter. The latter impacted our yields on our 7(a) portfolio as the rate cuts went into effect on October 1 for this portfolio. We also consciously gathered deposits in October and November, holding retail deposit rates steady through most of November as we observed our peers holding or dropping their offered rates. On the positive side, we had growth in all loan categories and growth in the ALP portfolio helped mute the impact of the drop in the SBA 7(a) rates. We also managed to grow our average balances in our business checking and money market products. On our retail deposits, we ended up cutting rates in November and into December and have cut rates further in January and February and expect balances to hold. In 2025, as Barry mentioned, we expect some attrition in higher priced CDs and expect to grow business deposit balances to offset that attrition, that should provide incremental lift to the net interest margin from the December levels. The average rate on our CD portfolio that matures in the first half of 2025, which is mostly concentrated in the second quarter is almost 5%, whereas current offered rates are below 4.45%. Turning to the provision for credit losses. The provision was up for a few reasons, primarily migration to non-accrual and net charge-offs.…

Thanks very much. I'd like to quickly conclude and go to Q&A. But before we do that, Slide number 28, investment summary. Once again, I think it's important to note that NewtekOne is a growth oriented differentiated technology enabled business that has brought its technology to the bank holding company market and the OCC chartered national bank market. And we made this transition to basically offer depository solutions, which are beneficial to our client base and to roll out the Newtek Advantage, which is a very valuable tool for the customer base. What is that doing? It's giving us profitability ratios at the bank of ROAA at 6.5%. I mean these are just very, very strong numbers, particularly consolidating up to the NewtekOne level. I would like to quickly go through one more slide, Slide number 34. When you look at market comparables of our organization, very favorable. And many of these banks are viewed as the technology oriented banks, which in my opinion means they're able to get primarily consumer deposits online. Putting that aside, if you look at our return on average assets, you look at our multiple to tangible book, you look at our multiple of earnings and our dividend yield, it's quite compelling. So for those people that look at our stock price, there's still an interesting opportunity here and we welcome any questions and participation. And thank you all for taking the time to spend 30 minutes with Scott and I to go over the quarter and second year of full performance for NewtekOne as a federally regulated bank holding company owning a nationally chartered bank. Operator, I'd like to begin the Q&A.

Thank you, Barry. At this time, we will conduct the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Crispin Love with Piper Sandler. Crispin, your line is now open.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. First, Barry, can you just provide a little more detail on the cadence of earnings throughout 2025? I understand you typically have a ramp throughout the year, but curious on why the first quarter is substantially lower than the other quarters and versus the first last year. Is it FBA gain on sale driven or is there anything else out there driving that? Thank you.

Yeah. I appreciate it, Crispin. I think that as we took a look at the quarter and we may need to look at doing some revisions. We wanted to be extremely cautious on Q1 relative to the changes in the environment. I think it's important to note seasonally, the first quarter is always our lowest quarter and the last quarter is always the strongest. I've been asking this question for 20 years, like, what's the reason why borrowers tend to -- want to borrow and close their loans more in the fourth quarter than in the first quarter, and I still haven't got an understanding as to what that seasonality is. I would tell you that, from what we've seen so far, we're almost through the first-two months, production is coming in as anticipated. Pricing is, at the moment, and I say, at the moment because we're in a very volatile market right now, so I want to be careful. But at the moment, pricing is actually better than where we cleared in the fourth quarter of last year. So we may need to revise that first quarter number again. I think we've got first quarter and we did have a typo on one of the slides. We've got the range Q1 2025, it's $0.28 in the low, $0.32 on the high. We're $0.55 to $0.65 in Q2. $0.52 to $0.64 and $0.75 to $0.89. So that's where we are and that gives us a $2.10 to $2.5 full range.

Okay. Great. Thank you. So that first quarter is $0.28 to $0.32 not $0.18 to $0.22?

Correct. Yeah. That was a typo. Apologize for that. We had to switch the slide out and it's always difficult to get these things through and we did make that change, right?

Okay. Great. Thank you. And then can you just discuss some of the drivers of the $9.4 million markup on loans accounted for under the fair value options? Just what drove the markup there in the quarter?

Well, look, I think that the fair value of loans, particularly for the ALP product that came in close to $90 million, these loans go into securitizations with huge margins, with great history and that we have them valued and there's your markup on the ALP loans. All that detail will wind up being in the Ks and the Qs.

Great. Thank you, Barry. Appreciate you taking my questions.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Steve Moss at Raymond James. Steve, your line is now open.

Good morning. Barry, I guess, on credit here, I know you were talking about your charge-off expectations for the upcoming year, and I was trying to follow along, but I was just thinking that the bank portfolio seasons here, I realize everything is under two years at the bank here. I'm just kind of curious like how the 2% number, is that just being driven primarily by the loans originated in 2023? Just kind of how are you thinking about the charge-off expectations maybe by vintage, just to get a little bit better sense of how we think about charge-offs for this year and next for the bank portfolio?

Yeah, Steve. I appreciate the question. The SBA loss curve, which we have modeled and Standard & Poor's (ph) has done work on this, which pretty much has a ramp that goes from like 18 months to 44 months. So, we believe that the bank will start to climb that ramp and then it flattens. And we think that what we've demonstrated on Slide 12 demonstrates that at the NSBF portfolio, it gets to a certain point. Borrowers, once they've made payments for three or four years straight, they're just less likely to default. The business has developed a track record, it's made its payments. Unfortunately for NSBF, it was done in many cases in a very low rate environment, it's a floating rate portfolio without a cap. So, what we've done is, we've modeled 2025 going from 1.5 charge-off to 2, and then we put that stress factor in there, which even on a stress factor would, if you took the midpoint and they're hold, held everything else constant, you're still at $1.80 on a $12 and change stock price with a dividend. So I think we're in pretty good shape here, Steve. I'm really not worried about it and this is not something I'm losing sleep over. Hopefully, that's helpful.

And, Barry, if I could add, Steve, we've incorporated the vintage analysis and the projections. So we feel like we've got it between '23, '24 and then the new portfolio coming on in '25. That's fully baked into the projections and so, we're expecting the default rates and the severities to continue through 2025 that we experienced in the third and fourth quarters of ‘24.

Okay. So just thinking about like the default rates and severities like we think about the 2023 vintage stuff you'd originated, is that like in the 3s? I'm just trying to think about what those default curves look like when I saw them before. Like, the high-2s to 3s is kind of how to think about it and then 2024 vintage is something lower than that kind of blending you out to 2?

Yeah.

Yeah. I don't think we share our model with you, Steve. To be honest with you, you're going to have to create your own. But I think it's fair to assume that the earlier vintage 2023 loans will more likely go before the 2024 and the new loans that we put on, obviously in 2025. So yeah, you're moving in the right direction.

Okay. And then my other question here, just in terms of, also on fee income, the drivers of the loan servicing asset revaluation, the negative $7.3 million.

Yeah. That's a function of just the decay and balance, primarily the 7(a) portfolio at NSBF. So that portfolio is not growing. And so, as the portfolio winds down, we're obviously capitalizing more at the bank. We're putting more on that's also amortizing down. That's also -- and that amortization is included in that line, but that line also includes the fair value changes on servicing as well.

So, Steve, I think you're hitting important point at NSBF. As that portfolio pays down, the servicing asset goes away, that's a write-off although it's non-cash. Premium on the unguaranteed loans pays-off, that's non-cash. You write0down a loan, you liquidate it, that's non-cash. So you got a lot of income write-off at NSBF, which has been a drag on a consolidated basis. So -- and the other thing too is, the NSBF portfolio is financed in securitization, which is about 3 points higher than the bank deposit rate. So the good news about your questions is, you're starting to get into the field for how this works. Do you follow what I'm saying?

Yes. Okay.

NSBF in a declining scenario, which it is, it's -- that's a weight on the company. And at the bank, you're going to have higher charge-off, but you're also putting on new loans, new vintages at higher rates that get stressed at higher rate scenarios. The best loans are made in the toughest markets.

Right. Okay. Appreciate all that. And just in terms of the expense guide for 2025, just maybe curious what kind of investments you guys are looking to make here, and the drivers of expenses for 2025?

Steve, it's another good question. It's funny, I could sit in board meetings and I get one board member like make comments about the expense ratio growing and then like 60 seconds later, less people wouldn't have enough resources. So I'm just making a sort of a joke. I think the important part of it is, we are a company that is growing quickly, but we are poised for growth. And we can continue to add resources in accounting and finance, in compliance, in risk management, in software. I'm knocking wood, we've had tremendous success and hopefully, I haven't jinxed ourselves in the area of fraud problems based upon how we do our business. So we're going to continue to invest in SG&A to make sure that we could grow the business prudently, manage the risk, that gives our regulators and our Board tremendous amount of comfort and we're not doing this on the cheap.

Great. I appreciate all the color there. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Please stand by for the next question. Next question comes from Tim Switzer with KBW. Your line is now open.

Hey, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. I had some follow-ups on the credit outlook and performance here. For your guide on the less than 2% bank charge-offs for’25%, what's the denominator there? And if it's average bank loans, it seems like the $5 million charge-offs this quarter were a little bit above that range. Are there any like one timers this quarter and what would be the driver for the loss rates to improve from Q4 into 2025?

You refer -- I'm a little bit of a loss. Could you repeat the question, Tim? Thank you.

Yes. So I guess first, what's the denominator for that less than 2% charge-offs guide for ‘25?

At the bank, Scott, could you help with that?

Yeah. Tim, the average loan balances we're projecting are right at or just under $1 billion.

Okay. But that denominator is the bank loan portfolio.

Correct.

Bank loan.

Okay.

And if you look at some of the metrics we put out there, for the ALP loans, those are done at fair value. They're typically in securitization, but the loss rates are de minimis. Same thing for 504. So this is -- most of that, stress you're going to see is on the 7(a) portfolio where you get the benefit of the gain on sale and what the government agency gets is they get the fees that come out of the upfront fee that the borrower pays and the ongoing fee for risk from the actual coupon of the loans.

Okay. And if we look at the $5 million of charge-offs you stated for this quarter, it seems like that's above that 2% range. Like, were there any, like, one timers in there? And what are the drivers for it to improve looking into 2025?

Go ahead, Scott. If you have a -- I've a point, but if you have a point on that, you can go first.

Yeah. I think the important point to note, Tim, is that we do have plans for continued diversification of the loan portfolio into 2025. In the fourth quarter, we originated or we gathered, I want to say, it was around $45 million to $50 million of conventional bank loans during the quarter. We expect that continue to -- that trend at that pace to continue into 2025 and throughout 2025 as we try to diversify the portfolio and water down the 7(a) portfolio. So you've got a function of that playing into the 2025 expectations. As it pertains to 2024 and what we observed in the fourth quarter, we're always going to have one or two loans that might be bigger than the $115,000 to – the $150,000 that Barry quoted earlier on the average 7(a) side. And when those go bump in the might, they're -- in the night, they're lumpy. We have that that bank portfolio. It's got larger loan, average sizes than the 7(a) portfolio. So those things happen. We're not seeing anything in the non-7(a) portfolio that gives us any reason for concern. And on the 7(a) side, we're tracking along as we expected and are going to continue to model it, but we feel like we have the trend pegged for 2025.

Okay. Got it. And Barry, it's still a little difficult to kind of see the underlying credit performance given the season in the book and the growth there. Can you tell us from your point of view, is the pace of which the loans are deteriorating, is that in line with your historical patterns that you've seen over the last 15, 20 years at Newtek or like is there any better or worse? How are you seeing that?

You go into different credit cycles, right? So, I think the credit cycle going into ‘19, '20, '21, and ‘22 was very strong. And now you're seeing a deterioration of that credit cycle just based upon the stress level of rates. As I said on the call, rate levels are higher. I think what's important to note is that given the performance, particularly of the NSBF portfolio, which experienced quite a bit of stress in 2023 and 2024, we're still able to make our numbers. So I do want to point out to you and everybody on the call, first three questions are all about credit. They're all about losses. I get it. But there's another half to the business, which is an income based business, and that is able to offset these types of numbers. So what I can tell you is, we're not in an ‘08/09 scenario, although, the rate stress on the portfolio for the older vintage clearly has shown its ugly head in the NSBF numbers. And frankly, I think if you go back to the summer, most people thought we were going to get a 2% rate cut in the second half of this year and maybe a 2% rate cut in 2025 and all of a sudden everyone's changed their mind, although maybe not in the last week, I don't know. To answer your question, Tim, we are very comfortable with the numbers that we put out on a risk and reward basis. And if you're asking me, do I think that our portfolio and the industry portfolio has experienced higher defaults and higher charge-offs? The answer is yes.

Okay. That's helpful. And then the last question I have is, if we're looking at your non-interest income guidance and the guide for the $500 million of ALP origination, how exactly should that flow through the income statement? And, like, what's the expected revenue you have from that? And I think this is probably slightly related, like, what are the assumptions behind, your gain or loss for the loans accounted for under fair value?

Yeah. Look. I think you can create your own models. We don't create them for you and we don't give out our models. I think what you could do is, you could take a look at where the market clearing yield on these assets are, where they go into securitizations. In the past, I've given out slides that show you what the net coupon is, what the gross coupon is, what the capitalization of the servicing asset is, because those loans have [indiscernible] prepaid penalties. You could see on the 2024 deal, which is public information, you can get the presale memo from DBRS. We had an 11.70% net coupon, 12.70% gross coupon, that's 100 basis points. The bonds were sold at about a 6.6%, 6.7% market clearing yield, that's 500 basis points with pure leverage, no equity in it and an 11.7% net coupon. So, I think you're going to have to figure out that yourself on the model, and you'll see it in the Ks and the Qs.

Okay. Thank you, guys.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Christopher Nolan with Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. The sale of Technology Solutions to Paltalk, was that expected to be accretive to first quarter book value?

On a tangible basis, yes. And we don't expect much in the way of gain or loss. We don't believe it's going to be material in the first quarter.

Okay, great. And then, on the…

Sorry, Chris. Just relative to where we were at 12/31.

Great. And then on the topic of tangible book, I noticed, the last quarter's tangible book value of $9.50 has been restated down to $8.93 as for third quarter 2024?

Yes. We -- just to note on that, in the initial slide deck that was published, we had included intangible book value, the assets that essentially the intangibles at NPS as though they were already sold. So we've revised that because that's obviously not the case. They just came out of the intangible line item and into assets held for sale.

Okay. Thank you. And then I didn't hear it. I know you guys give the 7(a) fundings for full year 2024. Do you have them for fourth quarter?

Fourth quarter fundings for 7(a)?

Yes, please.

Yeah. I can get that for you. Give me just a moment. I want to say, it was around -- it was north of $270 million or right at $270 million in total guaranteed and unguaranteed balances.

Great. Thanks, Scott. Final question, more strategic question. Congratulations on the strong profitability and given all the noise you guys are still delivering. And the EPS is easily exceeding the dividend. And I know that you're plowing capital back into the balance sheet to grow the book. But could you give us some thoughts in terms of when you might think of increasing the dividend?

Yeah. It's a good question. I would say this and this is a decision that's made by the Board and the Board only. I think that the dividend currently at the current stock price is pretty generous and that dividend was set at a point in time where the stock price was materially higher. And when you look at our return on tangible common equity and utilization of dividend and capital, I don't want to get ahead of ourselves because it's really a Board decision. But given where the stock price is, raising that dividend and the scarcity of capital value may not be something that I'm particularly an advocate of, but that will be a Board decision and not mine.

And Barry, on the topic of valuations, I mean, you guys are trading at a material discount to peers, but your returns are strong. And traditionally, banks I've covered in the past typically are valued more on the deposit base.

Right.

And if that's the case, what's the advantage of being a bank? Would another structure help where you're more valued on earnings or total return or something?

I'm telling you right now, it's not happening. If I lose shareholders, so be it, that's not happening. But the value of being a bank and I appreciate the question very much. And I also I appreciate all the work and all the questions. You're the only one really that's talked about the returns. I mean, I've had three questions and everyone's like digging into the losses and the credit and that's maybe that's the market's concern. We're going to continue to work through it. But the advantage of being a bank was back to that Newtek Advantage. It's depository relationship with the customer. It's the value of being really state-of-the-art in real time payments in the payment space, the connectivity in being able to connect ACH, Fedwire card to a depository account. From a payroll perspective, being able to connect the payroll business to a depository account, things for example that ADP and Paychex haven't done or won't do. Even some of the advanced payment processors like PayPal or Stripe, I mean, they don't own and operate a bank. I think that ultimately is going to be a differentiator for us and the others. See, our customers go to their depository 3 to 5 times a week, 12 to 20 times a month, and that gives them a lot of connectivity and a lot of stickiness and enables us to get money below the risk free rate. I got to ask you this question. Does a non-interest bearing account have a likelihood of going down in interest rate or up? And what does the bank give the customer for the non-interest bearing account, outside of maybe a ticket to the masters or bowling or a dinner, or going into a branch? So this may take some time, but we're going to keep grinding it out, keep growing shareholder value, paying a dividend, and eventually, we hope to have a lot of different questions on this call similar to the ones you've asked today.

All right. Thanks, guys.

I know I haven't made a lot of friends on this, but that's not my job. My job is to just tell the facts the way they are.

It's a complicated story.

That's absolutely true. And that's going to take time to settle in and for people to get comfortable and to understand what we're doing. It is complicated, and we're transitioning portfolios and business from a BDC into banks. So we're patient. I mean, we haven't -- we're liquid. We're in good shape. We're hitting our numbers. We're hitting our marks. We're telling people what the facts are. I'm basically saying my losses are going higher. I don't know how many bank CEOs or bank holding are actually telling the analysts losses are going higher next year.

Well, it's -- hey, we can catch up offline.

Okay. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

Okay. See you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Paramanov (ph) with Freedom Broker. Your line is now open.

Hello, everyone.

Hey, Mark. How are you?

Yeah. I'm fine. Thank you. Thank you for taking my question. My first question is on funding structure. You plan to grow deposit balances by $250 million in 2025. And net interest income guidance assumes 50% growth implying interest earning assets must expand by at least that much. So it appears to be a funding mismatch. Does this signal a shift toward corporate borrowings? And the second question, how do you assess the impact of recent yield curve steepening over the past few months? Thank you.

So a lot of the loan growth, the ALP growth is funded by lines of credit and securitization on a match funded basis. The loans that are funded at the bank are the 7(a), the 504, which are originated and then sold. The second-lien gets taken out by debentures. The first-lien gets sold with a 50% LTV. And then, the conforming CRE and C&I are funded by bank deposits. So I think what you did pick up is the ALP loans are funded at the holding company through securitizations. But because of the margins I laid out earlier and I just came from an asset backed security conference out in the West. We've got a deal that we hope to be bringing at the end of the first or the beginning of the second quarter that's I'll use the word hypothetical. It will be funded there. So that will be where a lot of the ALP loans will be funded. Relative to the concept of the yield curve steepening, the yield curve steepening would be beneficial to most banks that do benefit from that. I would say, we're fairly agnostic in our business model to rates going higher, rates going lower or an inversion of the curve or steepening curve. We prefer the curve to be steep slightly, but it won't make a huge difference in our business or in our business model. Although, particularly where the consumer high yield savings deposits are versus prime, which would relate to a little bit of a steepening, it would be somewhat beneficial in that area and you might actually get better gain on sale for the sale of the government guaranteed bonds in the 7(a) business. But we basically try to position the company to be rate agnostic up or down, or steepening or flattening.

And I'd point out that we have $350 million of cash on hand at year end, which needs to be deployed. And so that will account for some of the funding mismatch that you mentioned.

Okay, Great. And one more question. Based on SBE data, loan approvals significantly exceed actual loan distribution. What causes this mismatch and can you walk me through the approval process from SBA approval to actual loan origination? Thank you.

Yeah. My guess is, Mike, that what you're looking at is SBA data, which the SBA data means, you go in and you get what's called a guarantee number or a PLP number that shows up. Those loans are forward. They're in the pipeline. Some get funded and closed and others do not and they ultimately get eliminated. So I think if you're looking at approval data from the SBA statistics, there is a disconnect between the approval data and current fundings.

Yeah. But there is both approval and distribution data. And I mean that approval amount significantly exceed the amount of distribution or origination and does it mean that you have some shortage in your funding structure or maybe?

Yes, everybody…

It also by risk management.

Yeah. So every lender when they get a loan application and they put it through the process, they put it into underwriting, and then they get a guarantee number, that doesn't mean that loan funds. Sometimes the loan doesn't get approved in committee. Sometimes when you go to close it, a lien pops up that wasn't disclosed. The appraisal doesn't come in. So I think the point I was trying to make is that I believe that the information that you're looking at with a disconnect between approvals and between fundings, there is a disconnect that's true for Newtek and every other SBA lender based on how the program works.

Okay. Thank you, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn it back to Barry Sloane for closing remarks.

Well, I want to thank everybody for participating. Greatly appreciate, the work that people are putting in and for the investment community that has invested in our company over the long-term. We greatly appreciate the interest and the patience. We believe strongly that we've got the risk and reward measured correctly. In our two years of operating this business, far more confident today than when we did the acquisition relative to how we sit in the marketplace. And I think that the market will discover that having an organization that doesn't do things manually and does things using technology, automation to exchange data, make loans, take deposits without that infrastructure is extremely important that the types of loans that we make, which are risk adjusted returns that we've done for over 20 years and we've been through ‘08/09 and other types of markets. We do know how to effectively use our tools, our resources to be able to manage the risk effectively. So, we thank everybody for participating and look forward to reporting our first quarter earnings going forward. Thank you very much.

Again, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may now disconnect.