Good morning, and welcome to the Noble Corporation's Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand today's call over to Ian McPherson. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Operator, and welcome everyone to Noble Corporation's third quarter 2024 earnings conference call. You can find a copy of our earnings report along with the supporting statements and schedules on our website at noblecorp.com. This conference call will be accompanied by a slide presentation that you can also find located at the Investor Relations section of our website. Today's call will feature prepared remarks from our President and CEO, Robert Eifler, as well as our CFO, Richard Barker. Also joining on the call are Blake Denton, Senior Vice President of Marketing and Contracts; and Joey Kawaja, Senior Vice President of Operations. During the course of this call, we may make certain forward-looking statements regarding various matters related to our business and companies that are not historical facts. Such statements are based upon current expectations and assumptions of management, and are therefore subject to certain risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, and Noble does not assume any obligation to update these statements. Also note we are referencing non-GAAP financial measures on the call today. You can find the required supplemental disclosure for these measures, including the most directly comparable GAAP measure and associated reconciliation in our earnings report issued yesterday and filed with the SEC. Now, I'll turn the call over to Robert Eifler, President and CEO of Noble.

Thanks, Ian. Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's call. I'll begin with a brief update on our acquisition of Diamond Offshore, followed by highlights of our capital return program, third quarter results, recent commercial and operational activities, and some market outlook color. Richard will then discuss our financial results and provide guidance for the fourth quarter. Finally, I'll wrap up with closing remarks, and open the floor for questions. As most of you know, we closed our acquisition of Diamond Offshore on September 4, combining two great companies with incredibly rich legacies, and leading deepwater capabilities. I want to extend my appreciation to everyone across both organizations who worked tirelessly to close this transaction in just under three months. This highly synergistic combination brings together over 150 years of combined experience, creating a fleet of 41 rigs, including the largest fleet of seventh generation dual-BOP drillships in the industry, while also adding $2 billion of [well price] (ph) to backlog. As we pass the 60-day integration mark, we are excited to share some early wins, including meaningful synergies realized that have us on track to achieve our stated targets. Tier management has visited legacy Diamond rigs and customers around the globe, while prioritizing a focused commitment to business continuity through safe and efficient operations. Thus far, everything is proceeding very smoothly according to our well-practiced integration playbook. Next, I'd like to highlight additional progress with our Return of Capital program. Following the execution of $250 million of share repurchases in the third quarter, we have completed $360 million of repurchases under our original $400 million authorization. And our Board of Directors has recently approved a second $400 million authorization, while also maintaining our quarterly dividend here in the fourth quarter at $0.50 per share. We…

Thank you, Robert, and good morning or good afternoon all. In my remarks today, I will briefly review the third quarter highlight. And then, touch on the outlook for the remainder of the year and 2025. Contract drilling services revenue for the third quarter totaled $764 million, up from $661 million in the second quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $291 million in Q3, up from $271 million in Q2. The adjusted EBITDA margin for the third quarter was 36%. Cash flow from operations was $284 million, net capital expenditures were $119 million, and free cash flow was $165 million, which was burdened by transaction costs related to the Diamond transaction. All of the aforementioned figures reflect the approximate four weeks contribution from Diamond in September. For your reference, if legacy Diamond had been included in our results for the full quarter, as opposed to just from closing on September the 4th, Q3 adjusted EBITDA would have illustratively been close to $350 million. As summarized on page five of the earnings presentation slides, our total backlog as of November 5th stands at $6.2 billion, which includes approximately $500 million that is scheduled for revenue conversion in the final eight weeks of this year, and $2.6 billion that is scheduled for 2025. As a reminder, this backlog does not include reimbursable revenue or revenue from ancillary services. The Diamond integration is progressing well. We are on the way to capturing the $100 million of announced energy and continue to expect to have 75% captured within one year of closing. Referring to page 10 of the earnings slide, we are providing guidance for the fourth quarter as follows. Total revenue is in the range of $850 million to $890 million, which includes approximately $30 million to $35 million of reimbursable revenue, adjusted EBITDA between…

Thank you, Richard. Before we turn to Q&A, I'd just like to provide a few closing remarks. First, I'd like to thank our employees for your continued effort and commitment to the highly exacting standards that we hold ourselves to with our first choice ambition. This cuts across HSE, operational excellence, reliability, service posture, integration, buy-in, and a culture of supporting one another and making the right decisions day in and day out. Through our journey over the past two years, you have gone much further than just integrating companies and have created an innovative industry leader. At the same time, we have positioned Nobel to deliver differentiated cash flow for our shareholders through variable cyclical conditions, while the slowdown in contracting velocity that we have witnessed over the past year has created a near-term drag on expected earnings growth for the industry. We remain constructive on the multi-year fundamental outlook and also optimistic that the next leg up in the multi-year fundamental outlook and also optimistic that the next leg up in the cycle will begin to come into focus with contracting developments over the next few months, and then build throughout 2025. We will be watching 2025 upstream spending plans closely. But thus far, early indication is that our customers are, on average, planning for higher offshore spending next year. For Noble, we expect the next few quarters to track relatively flat from an EBITDA perspective, before an expected step up in the second-half of 2025. Through this progression, we will look to deploy surplus free cash flow above the current $2.00 annualized dividend toward share repurchases going forward. So, I'll wrap up there. Operator, we're ready to open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question is from the line of Eddie Kim with Barclays.

Hey, good morning. Just wanted to start with your outlook for the first-half of next year, and some of the white-space concerns, you were one of the first to call out white space across the industry. Could you just expand upon the reasons you're seeing for these utilization headwinds in the first-half, some of your peers have talked about customer capital discipline, delayed FPSOs, is that what you're seeing as well? And I guess the concern, which is reflected in the stock prices over the past three to four months, is that this white space could linger into the second-half of next year, and maybe even into '26. So, could you just talk about your confidence level in rig demand rebounding in '26 after what looks like a pretty big air pocket of demand next year?

Sure. And, of course, that's the question on everybody's mind right now. So, I would say they had a little bit of, I think, opposing forces right now. Eddie, you're right, there is obviously white space in the first-half of next year. I think that -- you elicit a couple of reasons, and I think those are certainly explanations for different instances of delay. There are other explanations for other instances of delay. But overall, there is a general lack of urgency to drill right now. And that is, I think, driven by this commitment to capital discipline that you mentioned. And I think that explains the multitude of different individual reasons why a project may get pushed to the right very slightly. But on the other hand, we do see this very large dataset of open tenders of FIDs, of subsea [tree] (ph) orders, a number of different, I call them, forward indicators that all suggest that the work is there. Analysis is readily available that shows that the wells that are planned to be drilled are all FID'd at very low breakeven levels. And I would say that just behind the scenes -- and we mentioned it in the prepared remarks, but behind the scenes I would say the level of conversation has picked up significantly here in the last couple of months, certainly in the last month. And so, we're seeing a little bit of data, we mentioned on the prepared remarks, out there around tendering. We're seeing conversations pick up, and then, of course, we've got all these things that would suggest that the work is there and coming. So, we remain positive and hopeful around the late-'25 and '26 improvement.

Got it, that's great to hear. Thank you. My follow-up is just on your commentary around potentially stacking rigs. You said that if demand doesn't materialize as you expect, you might elect to stack one or more of your 6G units. What are your thoughts at this stage around potentially warm stacking one of your 7G rigs, which we just saw from one your peers. It sounded like, based on your commentary, on having active discussions on all your 7G rigs, that warm stacking wasn't in your plans for next year at this point, but if those conversations don't materialize into contracts, could we potentially see one or maybe two of the 7G rigs potentially warm-stack next year as well?

So, we're back into kind of this sliding scale of definitions around stack. I would say that we certainly will minimize cost when the outlook doesn't support them. That's just rational business. I would not anticipate that we would take dramatic measures around the seventh generation rig. And if we were to define dramatic, that might be one that would make us less marketable against other working rigs right now.

Got it. Okay, I understood. Thanks for the color up. I'll turn it back.

Thanks, Eddie.

Your next question is from the line of Kurt Hallead with Benchmark.

Hi, good morning, everybody.

Good morning.

Hi, thanks for all that color. Always appreciate that. So, just kind of curious, right, we look out into the back half of next year and into 2026 and things start to look a lot more constructive in terms of contract timing and so on and so forth. You indicated an inflection, right, in EBITDA in the back half of the year. Just kind of curious as to what you think that magnitude might begin to look like without giving specifics around guidance.

Yes. Hi, Kurt, it's a good question. Obviously, we haven't provided specific guidance here for 2025. We'll look to do that as we normally do with our year-end results. Obviously, we talked about the first-half of the year being somewhat flat, if you will to Q4. I think one interesting data point is Q3, right, where if you combine Diamond with Noble for the full quarter, EBITDA was closer to $350 million for the quarter, right? And so there's obviously upside to that as well. So, we're talking about a kind of a flat first-half of next year and then the inflection from there on could be significant, but obviously, it's subject to winning some of the work that we're going after right now.

Yes, I'd love to just add, Kurt, that one of the reasons we considered putting out guidance here, but one of the reasons we elected not to and to stick with our kind of normal cadence of putting it out early next year is because we do have a tremendous amount of work under negotiation right now. And it felt like the cost benefit of waiting on that was worth it given just what you're talking about. These outcomes on an individual tender obviously are binary for us. And so, we think kind of waiting and seeing how some of this plays out is right before we put any more color than we have here on this call out there.

That's great. I appreciate that. So, maybe just kind of another follow-up here, right, you indicated that incremental cash flow will go back to share buybacks and you have the $400 million authorization. I'm just kind of curious now on capital allocation now that you have a little bit more debt on your balance sheet than you've had prior to the acquisition. What's your thought process in terms of cash structure?

Yes, we're happy with where we sit today on the cap structure, and we plan to continue, obviously, the dividend, as mentioned. And then, from there, we're looking to supplement with share repurchases as there's excess free cash flow.

That's great. Appreciate it. Thank you.

Thanks, Kurt.

Your next question is from the line of Greg Lewis with BTIG.

Hi, guys. Thanks and good morning. I hope you're doing well on this fine morning. I did have a question around the jack-up fleet. Clearly, you guys have a very core position in the North Sea with the higher end CJ70s, CJ50s. And then, you kind of have a couple of rigs kind of scattered around the rest of the world. As we think about the jack-up market, and it seems like there continue to be buyers and kind of companies looking to get more international, migrating from kind of Middle East positions abroad. Is that something where we could see Noble maybe hunker down in its core North Sea market and opportunistically kind of care off some of the -- hey, they're good quality premium jack-ups, but maybe they're non-core to the strategy going forward?

Yes. Look, I think we're where we've always been. I would reiterate that while at this point, some of the jack-ups do seem more scattered globally outside of the North Sea. They're certainly not inefficient. They're producing cash flow. And as you say, they're good rigs with great crews and good customer, great customers. And so, we have no urgency or motivation to do something. But I think we've shown through history that we're going to make rational business decision when one comes in front of us there. And so, to the extent that, that is the right thing for our shareholders, then we, of course, would consider if there's a strategic move there.

Okay. And then, just following up on the questions around -- and you Robert, you mentioned that there's, I guess, the sliding scale of stacking. And obviously, I don't think we're going to cold stack any of the 7th-gen rigs. But any kind of rough estimates on terms of maybe cost savings around that, i.e., I guess if we were to think about a rig operating at seventh gen cost maybe $150, $160, if we don't see opportunities for work for -- I don't -- whatever the number is, it's probably not 90 days, but if it's three to four quarters, any -- I don't need a number maybe on a percentage basis, how much can we shave off of that cost just as we think about those opportunities for those -- not a handful, but those three or four 7th-gen rigs that may not get work until the back half of the year.

Yes. Let me do this, Greg. Let me give you a couple of the points on the sliding scale might be helpful. So, you mentioned kind of full working OpEx and I would say that, that scale slides down to around $40,000 to $50,000 per day before you need to go into a preservation type stack, a cold stack to reduce costs from there. And so, there's -- depending on the region, depending on where you can stack the rig, there's a lot of different variables along that, that would kind of determine where you end along that scale. But I think those are probably the endpoints, if that's helpful.

Super helpful. Thank you very much.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question is from the line of Fredrik Stene with Clarksons Securities.

Hey, Robert and team. Hope you are well, and thanks for the detailed prepared remarks. I think it's been slightly touched upon already, but I was -- that you're seeing more and more opportunities in the market and that you had -- I understood, particularly over the last month, a good chunk of discussions that could end up in more work that would help utilization from the latter part of 2025. Are you able to share some additional color in terms of geography? Where are you seeing these opportunities? Are there any regions that you're particularly optimistic about, and also, if you can share some light on key regions, not necessarily only in 2025, but also in '26 and 2027 to get the perspective of the longevity of it all? Thanks.

Sure. There's the answer is that there's not a whole lot of interesting color to provide there. There are opportunities globally. They are more abundant in the Golden Triangle. And honestly, not a whole lot has changed from color we've given previously where the U.S. is definitely more flattish. And then, we see more growth in South America, particularly [CARICOM] (ph), and then West Africa with a smattering of other incremental opportunities outside of the Golden Triangle. I think in the key regions, honestly, are the same as welcome, you've got -- for '26 and '27 to your question, I mean, you've got Suriname coming online, I think, in earnest. You have a number of opportunities up and down the West African coast, eventually Mozambique on the East African coast in that kind of time frame. And I guess, I should have called out Namibia more specifically on the West, but not a whole lot of change from what we've kind of seen and forecasted. So, we're probably more focused on tracking to make sure that these things actually come through in the time line that we're hoping than tracking any meaningful changes in where they might occur.

No, that's helpful, nonetheless. Also, since you're a mixed player with floaters and jack-ups, have anything, call it, changed lately in how you would rank the different segments against each other? Are you more confident about floaters than you currently are about jack-ups, et cetera? Any thinking you can provide around how you weigh the two on a relative basis given your market and market outlook?

Yes. I mean we've -- our growth has been more focused on floaters, obviously. And we've seen a lot of upside in that market in certainly continue to see that, particularly at current valuations. The news cycle has been much more negative around jack-ups here recently than floaters. I don't know if trading has matched that as much, but I would say that there's probably more market concern on the jack-up side recently. However, if you look at numbers, numbers have really held up quite well in the jack-up space. That may be due to a larger total denominator there. But utilization is still up above 90%, 93%, I think we quoted. And so, we're looking closely at reactions to the North Sea. Like I said, we have some kind of early indications, but it's really it's a little too early to tell what direction probably 2025 takes in the North Sea. And so, we're watching that very closely. And then, we've, of course, said probably all the color we can and have on the floater market where we're hopeful.

Yes. Thank you very much. Just a final super quick one, on the integration work with Diamond, you have a target of $100 million, if I remember correctly, 75% done within a year. Do you see, at this point, chances that you'll actually get more synergies out of it than the $100 million you're budgeting?

Yes, Fredrik, there's obviously a good chance that that's the case. Obviously, in the Maersk transaction, we announced $125 million and then it increased that after about a year to $150 million. So, I would say that the integration is progressing as expected, and there's definitely opportunities to increase, to achieve more than $100 million of total synergies here.

Perfect. That's all from me. Thank you and have a good day.

Thank you.

Your next question is from the line of David Smith with Pickering Energy Partners.

Hey, good morning. Thank you for taking my question.

Good morning.

I was glad to hear about the active conversations for the discoverer and the deliverer. I'm curious about the developer though, which I think last worked in September '23. Could you talk about your outlook for that rig and what the operating costs look like during this extended idle period? I'm guessing that could be lower than an idle 7th-gen drillship.

Yes. So, we've -- fill in. We have moved to minimize costs on there. And I would say as well that we kind of lump all of the D rigs into the same outlook. And so, I think we've got a number of leads. We will continue -- we will obviously have quite -- we have had quite space, and that will continue. And no change around the color we've given around first-half of 2025. But from there, there seem to be a number of additional opportunities starting in late '25 and then probably also later in '26.

Yes. And Dave, from a cost perspective right now, think about that kind of in the $100,000 a day kind of range from an OpEx perspective.

I'm sorry, for the Developer, that operating cost per day?

Yes, correct.

Okay.

Well, yes. So, essentially think about the scale from fully operating it call it close to 150, down to the more kind of -- [multiple speakers]

Okay. Yes. Yes, thank you. And a quick follow -up if I may. Just wanted to circle back to your comments about the Globetrotter rigs being in active conversations for well intervention work, I wanted to make sure I understood correctly. Are you seeing potential demand to keep both the rigs working in '25? And, would you expect those to stay in the gulf?

Yes. So, there is work globally. I would say there is probably higher focus in the U.S. Gulf right now. Yes, we are talking about both rigs. Again, we are not talking about first-half '25. But, we are talking about active conversations to the extent that -- and historically intervention in P&A tends to be more susceptible to moving to the right even the drilling which has been obviously shown a propensity for that here recently. But that said, if it becomes obvious that that's more of one rig market than two, then we said in the prepared remarks, then we'll take appropriate action quickly.

Great. That's all I got. Thank you.

At this time, there are no further questions. I would now hand today's call back over to presenters for any closing remarks.

Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. And, we'll look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Have a good day.

Thank you.

This concludes today's call. Thank for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.