Thank you, Francois. We're extremely pleased to have submitted our de novo request to the U.S. FDA for the Thermo Acoustic Enhanced UltraSound Liver System known as TAEUS. The clinical data submitted as part of our de novo application compared TAEUS estimates of liver fat fraction in 24 subjects to MRI liver fat fraction scores, also known as MRI-PDFF scores in those same subjects. The study data submitted was consistent with our study design and only included study participants where the TAEUS, UltraSound and MRI data was obtained successfully. The data was collected at a U.S. site and involved volunteers with liver fat fraction ranging from healthy, normal to severe fatty liver disease. The BMI of the subjects range from 24, which is normal to 42, which is severely obese. It is significant to note that no subjects were excluded because of high BMI or liver fibrosis. TAEUS estimates of liver fat fraction were highly correlated to MRI-PDFF scores of liver fat fraction with an R-value of 0.78. The sensitivity of the TAEUS flip system in detecting fatty liver disease was 90% with specificity of 71%. To provide some reference of performance, the sensitivity X-ray mammography in detecting breast cancer is approximately 87% with a specificity of 88%. The negative predictive value, which is the probability of a negative test being correct, was 91%. Negative predictive value is an important measure of test performance because in a low cost, in a cost constrained healthcare environment, it's often as important to correctly identify healthy subjects as it is to correctly identify those with the disease. We believe the submitted data with 24 subjects sufficiently supports our de novo application. In an additional submitted study of intra and intra operator variability, no statistical significant differences were found between operators in estimating liver fat fraction with the TAEUS flip system for either an individual with normal liver fat fraction, or an individual with moderate fatty liver disease. All operators demonstrated a highly statistically significant difference in comparing a healthy individual to an individual with moderate fatty liver disease using the TAEUS flip system. This is extremely encouraging and we're very happy to submit this data. This is an incredibly important technology milestone for ENDRA. There's a growing interest in point-of-care quantitative measures of liver fat fraction among clinicians. Quantitative attenuation and back scatter applications for estimating fat fraction are now available from several vendors of premium diagnostic ultrasound system. Although, their use is largely limited to liver imaging in radiology, the interest in these quantitative measures goes far beyond radiology. ENDRA's thermoacoustic based approach to estimating liver fat leverages unique capabilities that potentially provide four significant advantages when compared to conventional ultrasound based point-of-care approaches for assessing liver fat fracture. The first of these advantages is molecular signal contrast. Unlike ultrasound approaches that are sensitive to structural changes in tissue, both TAEUS and MRI are sensitive to chemistry when differentiating fat from lean tissue, that means that thermoacoustic signal is directly related to the accumulation of fat molecules in liver cells that underlies the progression of fatty liver disease. The second advantage of our approach is its insensitivity to fibrosis. Fibrosis is an excessive accumulation of extracellular proteins that is a common comorbidity of fatty liver disease. Fibrosis is a significant confounding factor for ultrasound based techniques and hinders their ability to estimate fat fraction accurately. In contrast, thermoacoustic signal generation is relatively insensitive to the addition of extracellular proteins to lean tissue, and thus the presence of fibrosis is largely inconsequential for thermoacoustic. In our clinical studies, we did not exclude any TAEUS exams with fibrosis. The third advantage of TAEUS is tissue depth penetration. The loss of signal in obese patients is significantly lower for thermoacoustic signals than that of conventional ultrasound for two reasons. First, the distance thermoacoustic signals travel is half the distance of that, that conventional ultrasound pulse travels. And secondly, thermoacoustic signals detected with the TAEUS flip system are much lower in frequency than the standardized three and a half megahertz transmit receive signal in conventional ultrasound approaches to estimating liver fat fraction. Thus, the difficulty to image patients large or obese patients conventional signal attenuation in ultrasound can be many orders of magnitude greater than thermoacoustic. As a result, thermoacoustic methods are potentially more effective than ultrasound based approaches to quantifying fat fraction in high BMI subjects. We excluded no subjects from our FDA submission for reasons of high BMI. And the fourth advantage of TAEUS is within image calibration. ENDRA's TAEUS approach to estimating liver fat fraction is unique in that each measurement has its own integral calibration data derived from the individual's own fat and muscle that is contained in each measure. That ensures measurement uniformity across individuals and across devices. Several other point-of-care devices in the market require periodic calibration and have varying efficacy across patient size that should not be present with the TAEUS device. In terms of next steps and timeframes for the FDA review process going forward, there are a number of elements that should be considered. First, ENDRA submitted its de novo request via the FDA's electronic submission template and resource tool known as the eSTAR, which guides applicants through the submission process with a standardized online format, ensuring the submission is complete and structured in a way that facilitates efficient review by the FDA. Second, we can expect back and forth dialogue with the FDA. The FDA's published goal is to make a decision within 150 days of submission. Investors should remember that the FDA routinely engages in interactive discussions with companies in seeking additional information or clarification. One factor that may benefit ENDRA during the review process is the FDA's familiarity with our previous 510(k) submission and our interactions in that review process that detailed our technology's principle of operation and safety profile. Naturally, ENDRA will keep investors informed of material updates as we advance through the FDA process. Now, I'd like to turn the call over to Irina to review the financial results for the second quarter of 2023. Irina?