Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing-by. And welcome to the NCS Multistage Second Quarter 2020 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Please be aware that today’s conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the conference to speaker today, Ryan Hummer, CFO. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Victor. And thank you for joining NCS Multistage's second quarter 2020 conference call. Our call today will be led by our CEO, Robert Nipper, and I will also provide comments. Before we begin today's call, we would like to caution listeners that some of the statements that will be made on this call could be forward-looking and to the extent that our remarks today contain information other than historical information. Please note that we are relying on the Safe Harbor protections afforded by Federal Law. Such forward-looking statements may include comments regarding our future expectations for financial results and business operations and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the global economy, oil demand and our company. I'd like to refer you to our press release issued last night along with other public filings made from time-to-time with the SEC that outline those risks. I also want to point out that in today's conference call, we refer to adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow and net working capital, which are non-GAAP financial measures. We use these measures because they allow us to compare performance consistently over various periods without regards to the costs associated with our capital structure and in a manner that we believe better reflects our operating performance. Our press release and the updated investor presentation posted yesterday, which are both available on our website, ncsmultistage.com, provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to the nearest GAAP financial measure. I'll now turn the call over to Robert.

Thank you, Ryan. And welcome to our investors, analysts and employees during our second quarter 2020 earnings conference call. I hope that everyone listening today is healthy and safe in these challenging times. The second quarter was by far the most challenging one that we faced. The pace of magnitude of the decline in industry activity in response to the reduction in oil demand and pricing related to the global COVID-19 pandemic was extraordinary. During the second quarter, rig counts in the U.S. and Canada reached multi decade lows, and U.S. completions activity fell even more swiftly than the U.S. rig count. This contributed to a reduction in revenue for NCS of 84% as compared to the first quarter, which included declines of 78% and 95% for our U.S. and Canadian operations respectively. Our performance in the U.S. in the second quarter was impacted by the waiting that we have the activity in the Permian Basin through repeat precision, where many of our customers quickly laid down completion crews and suspended completion operations for much of the quarter. Our U.S. performance was also impacted by reduction in our tracer diagnostic services business, especially during the periods when oil prices were at their lowest given the more discretionary nature of the service. While starting from a low base, I'm encouraged by the rebound and completion activity from the trough experience in the middle of the second quarter. And so far in the third quarter, we've seen an increase in demand in the U.S. for our frac plug product line as well as our tracer diagnostic services. The increase in tracer diagnostics work is also partially attributable to a new service we're offering which provides a lower price point to our customers and reduces cost of service on our end. NCS continues…

Thank you, Robert. As reported in yesterday's earnings release, our second quarter revenues were $8.7 million, 78% lower than the prior year’s second quarter. On a sequential basis revenue in the second quarter was 84% lower than revenue in the first quarter reflecting the steep decline in completions activity in the U.S. and historically low rig count and activity level in Canada. Gross Profit defined as total revenue less total cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense was $2.3 million in the second quarter or 27% of revenue. This compares to $16.7 million or 42% of revenue in the prior year’s second quarter. For sequential comparison, our gross profit was $23.9 million or 44% of revenue in the first quarter. Our gross margin percentage was lower during the second quarter of 2020, primarily due to the sharp decrease in revenue, which led to the under absorption of fixed costs partially offset by our cost reduction actions that we've taken throughout the year. Selling, general and administrative costs were $15.5 million in the second quarter, and this was $7.4 million or 32% lower as compared to the $22.9 million of SG&A we had in the prior year’s second quarter and it's also over $5 million lower than the first quarter’s level of $20.8 million. Our reported SG&A includes share-based compensation and certain non-recurring expenses, including certain litigation costs and severance expenses. During the second quarter, our non-recurring severance expenses totaled $3.5 million, while litigation expenses were benefit of $0.4 million due to a $1.1 million in proceeds that we received from our D&O insurance, reimbursing us for the certain legal defense costs. Our just adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was negative $7.9 million as compared to negative $1 million in the prior year second quarter. Our depreciation and amortization…

Thank you, Ryan. Before we open up the call for Q&A, I'll close with a couple of brief comments. We continue to face an uncertain environment and we are focused on the aspects of our business that we control. We've taken actions to structurally reduce our cost structure while preserving our ability to provide exceptional customer service and drive further innovation and value for our customers. We are being very judicious with our capital, but continue to make targeted investments to advance and enhance near and long-term opportunities for our business. We've taken steps to enhance our liquidity and preserve our strong balance sheet. Our revolver is undrawn and we have demonstrated our ability to generate free cash flow. We are positioned to weather the current -- and weather the currently industry downturn and to benefit from a rebound and industry activity. With that, we'd be happy to take your questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Please stand-by, while we compile the Q&A roster. And our first question will come from line now George O'Leary from TPH & Company. You may begin.

Good morning guys.

Good morning George.

Good morning.

The gross margin, the decremental margins in the second quarter were pretty impressive given the magnitude of the revenue decline quarter-on-quarter, you guys, you put out that list of cost reductions that you made in the press release, which is very helpful. I wondered if you could walk through some of the primary kind of structural cost reductions on the costs side of the business. So excluding the SG&A adjustments things like relocating U.S. assembly operations, I assume would be part of that. But any color on structural costs reductions would be super helpful. And then it seems some of those costs may come back a little bit in the third quarter. Is that part of the driver of the more muted than usual incremental margins or is that more pricing headwinds and things like that?

Yes, so we've made a number of moves that we talked about in the press release. And, you asked specifically about manufacturing. What we've done with manufacturing is we've lowered our cost, because we were under absorbed in the manufacturing facility that we had. We have a vendor that's been manufacturing components for assemblies for us for a number of years, and they were under absorbed as well. And so we've constructed a deal with that particular vendor. We're now -- they've taken on the assembly with some of our employees in-house there to oversee that. So we still have full control over the assembly. But however, what we've done is now, between both of the companies were fully absorbed in the manufacturing facility, that move has also reduced our costs -- our internal costs because of the under absorption. So we don't expect that to change for the next 12 to 18 months. As we look out into the future, we believe that we may start seeing some recovery to something later next year. But full recovery may be 150 frack spreads and for mid 400s in rig count. And so what we've done is we've assumed that that's the environment that we're going to live in. And we've made these cost reductions, assuming that that's where we're going to be. And so as far as the costs coming back, we don't really expect that a lot of these costs will come back. We were in the quarter, because a lot of our fixed costs are in cost of sales. We did have these decremental margins, but because of some of the moves that we made, we were able to control that decrement.

Yes, and maybe I'll just follow up a bit there, George. Yes, our cost structure for the Canadian business has always been highly variable. We do have in-house field hands, but we also use a contractor model in Canada given the big swings on a seasonal basis. It's always been a market where we've utilized contractors, which has helped to soften the blow in the second quarter from a decremental margin perspective. But we did take additional actions in the U.S. certainly, in addition to what Robert mentioned, we have closed a couple of our field districts, one in Oklahoma City and one in Corpus Christi. So we're really consolidating our U.S. footprint as much as possible. And then we've also been working with both our vendors on – the field good side, as well as, the contractors to make sure that our rates that we're paying are aligned with market conditions, which has also helped to preserve margins. As far as turning forward into the commentary around incremental, there are a couple things there certainly there has been some pricing pressure throughout the year, however, I think -- yes, that's by and large behind us. What I will say is that we're very focused on using our inventory as a source of cash. So we're really moving some of the goods that we have, and you may see some sales through inventory, which are slightly lower margins versus what we had seen historically as we work to harvest that source of capital and source of cash on our balance sheet.

Okay, great. That's, that's very helpful. Thank you both for that. And then the revenue increase on a sequential basis. And I fully appreciate that we're coming off a low base. But given the activity rebound, seasonal activity rebound in Canada was late to kick-in it's still an eye popping percentage. I wonder if focusing on the U.S. in particular, is the completions rebound you guys are seeing on the plug in the tracer side fairly balanced or is this more of a Permian specific phenomenon at this point?

It's fairly balanced, but the Permian is weighted more in terms of activity. As we look forward, well, looking back, so for Repeat Precision, specifically, the customer mix that had declines in activity hit us especially hard in the quarter. Some of those customers are bringing -- in their customers that we had large market shares with. So some of those customers are bringing activity back on adding additional fracs spread. So we're already seeing the benefit from that. For the tracer business, we've seen -- we went down pretty hard in the first quarter towards the end of the quarter, but then in the second quarter we started seeing activity increases as well. Another thing that drives those two products for us are those areas for so between tracers and composite plugs is the duck activity. So we're seeing more duck completions now. And that's helping to drive activity increases as well.

Got it. And then just one more if I could. On the free cash flow side, he has done an impressive job thus far generating free cash flow. And the guidance for full year 2020 to be free cash flow positive is helpful. Whereas working capital is probably a headwind in the second half, but there will be some tax benefits hopefully that you guys will get in the second half, as you alluded to on the call. How do you think that we are -- you targeting like our free cash flow neutral program. So that $19 million is kind of what you get for the year, is there a chance that your free cash flow positive in the back half as well?

Yes, so George, I think working capital, as you said, is likely to be a little bit of a headwind, certainly in the third quarter. And we're still working our way back from the profitability level in the second quarter towards something approaching EBITDA breakeven as we get towards the latter part of the year. So I'd expect a little bit of a negative free cash flow quarter in Q3 getting back to more or less breakeven on a quarterly basis as we approach the fourth quarter. So full year will be a little bit lower than the $19 million that we're at right now.

Got it. Thank you both very much.

Thanks.

[Operator Instructions]. And the next question will come from the line of Kurt Hallead from RBC. You may begin.

Hey, good morning, everybody.

Hey, Kurt.

Good morning Kurt.

Hey, on the questions I have, at least initially here was -- you mentioned your $21 million in debt exiting the second quarter at 230, given the changes in the revolver, given the change in your cash balance, can we assume that the reduction in your cash balance is predominantly related to debt reduction?

Yes, you can assume that with the $15 million reduction to the revolver associated with the amendment that the cash balance went down one-for-one associated with that. If that's the question?

Yes, that that is that I appreciate that. The other thing that and Robert, you gave good kind of overview on what's driving the revenue dynamics in the U.S.? But, I'm still sitting here scratching my head not specifically with NCS, but, from a number of other companies where you're looking at average rig count, average frac activity being down sequentially in third quarter relative to the second quarter. Yes, prospect for revenues to be improving on a quarter-on-quarter basis usually activities can be down on average. And the exit rate on activity was lower than the entry rate. I just -- I guess I'm just looking for a little bit more as to really what's driving that sequential revenue increase given the fact that average activity and exit rates are going to kind of be lower as we get in third quarter, so any additional color around that be really helpful?

Yes, for -- just to address Canada, we haven't talked about that yet. So in Canada, we had -- the weather was bad that coming out of spring break up, we had rain, we got delayed about three weeks, three to four weeks in activity increases there. The rig count went down to the single-digits, it was really, really tough. Now it has rebounded low numbers, but it's four times higher than it was well four to five times higher than it was at the low. And so we -- the rigs that are coming back on our rigs that we've had higher market share with. The customers that we have higher market share with. In the same kind of dynamic in the U.S., if you look at where we were gone in frac spreads from the mid-40s to up around in the 70s, the frac spreads that came off, on the way down those re-frac spreads that we had to higher – our market shares with customers and in both pressure diagnostics and with composite plugs. And so as frac spreads are coming back on its customers that we have our market share with. Just as an example, our market share for composite plugs went from the low teens down to about 5% as we -- as activity went down. But now as those frac spreads are coming back on, the market share is actually increasing above where it was before. So it's all about the customer mix and the activity increases. So our revenue is going up at disproportional right because of that.

Okay.

On the completion side, we really -- we saw the activity really start to move meaningfully lower in early April. So we didn't have that slope down that you might have seen, you're talking about completion spreads, were very heavily weighted to people that went on frac holiday early and we're talking even about production curtailments within Texas and we're being quite vocal about it.

Got it. That's great color, appreciate that. Maybe one follow-up here. Can you -- is that Ryan, -- what is the liquidity covenant on the new revolver?

We need to maintain $7.5 million of liquidity. And liquidity is defined as cash on hand and the controlled accounts related to the facility, as well as the unused portion of the borrowing base, the combination of the two.

Okay, great. Yes.

Kurt, one more thing I'd like to add. So another dynamic that we have for this year, we've talked about litigation expense over the last year, we've had a lot of litigation expense, and it's been on a number of different fronts. We've got intellectual property, we've -- most of the technologies that we're using today are technologies that we've developed in-house, they've been novel and we have high market shares with them. And so there are another -- a number of companies that we believe may be all sides on our IP. So we've made the decision to spend the money to defend our intellectual property. So we have a number of lawsuits ongoing around IP. And we've just entered into a license agreement with one of the companies that so we're able to settle the lawsuit there. And we're in discussions with a number of other companies. So we believe that ultimately we end up with a revenue stream from royalties that will offset some of the market share gains losses that we've had over the last couple years from some of these other companies. So we intend to continue to defend our intellectual property and defend it stringently.

Got it. Thanks, Robert.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from line of Chris Voie from Wells Fargo. You may begin.

Thanks. Good morning.

Good morning.

First, I was wondering if you can update on the product mix in North America we think about frac spread their [indiscernible] spectrum tracer, can you give maybe some kind of percentages or a ranking of the size of those and what you expect going forward?

Chris, that's information that we really just give out on an annual basis. That's obviously given the seasonality and candidate tends to move a lot quarter-to-quarter.

Sure that's there. And then maybe think about the CapEx budget down to $2 million to $3 million. Could you help us think about how sustainable that is, specifically, if you think about frac which I think is a decent share of a mix now? There's -- that there's a sense of a lot of innovation and new products in the market all the time. Is that enough to keep your product lines competitive and enough innovation the product line going toward or is that [CapEx exposure] to kind of have to come up a little bit next year?

Well, that that number is sustainable, Chris. So when we think about CapEx and when we really don't have a lot of CapEx, the majority of that CapEx is machines that we're buying for a new product line that we're starting. So that's -- X that we'd be spending $0.5 million bucks kind of thing. I mean, we were buying vehicles that was -- that's been a big part of our CapEx budget in the past. We're not buying vehicles now. In fact, we've got about 30 or 40 that we're selling right now. So it is somewhat sustainable.

Yes. Chris, I mean, we've maintained a [capital like] business model intentionally, really since the inception of NCS. So you can think of maintenance CapEx being a $1 million or less quite honestly. But there's obviously a distinction as far as product development between what's required for CapEx and the spending that we're doing on R&D. And we're certainly continuing to put forward very significant effort in research and development both with our in-house engineering team as well as the relationships that we have with respect to third-parties for testing that all goes into develop -- continuous development of new products. So the spending for both sustaining engineering as well as new product development you really see in our operating expense line and not in the capital expenditures line?

Okay, that's helpful. Maybe squeeze one more in. You mentioned maybe the 200 frac crew or less environment going forward potentially in lower 48. Obviously, that's causing cost reduction issues for a lot of companies. Just curious if you can get an update on what you're seeing lower 48 in terms of consolidation conversations and whether you guys would potentially be open to a merger of equals type situation, anything like that just an update?

Well, my belief is that there are too many service companies out there today. And I think there's a lot of people that believe that as well. There doesn't seem to be much of an appetite today to action things unless a company has a gun to their head. But it's going to have to happen there's too many management teams, there's too many service companies. But there's a lot of service companies, I believe that are sitting on a lot of inventory. And as they burn through that inventory, profitability is going to matter. And I think it's going to take getting that excess inventory out into the market. And once that happens and people have to get to profitability, again, I think there's a lot of companies that are going to have that proverbial gun to their head. So I think we'll see it. We just won't see it anytime soon, I don't believe but it will have to happen over time. As far as our view on consolidation, I -- we're open to anything that makes sense. We have liquidity that will get us through the environment that I earlier mentioned that I thought we were going to be in for the next 12 to 18 months. We've got liquidity enough to be able to get through that kind of environment. We've got technology, we've got a growing business internationally. And so we have the wherewithal to say we've got a new product pipeline that still working albeit -- it's a little bit more muted paced than it has been in the past. But we do have new products that will be coming out over the next the next few months. So we intend to weather the storm, if there's a situation that makes sense. We're open to it, but we're not going to do something silly.

Yes. Great, thanks. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. All right, I'm not showing any questions at this time. I’d like to turn the call back over to Robert Nipper for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Victor. On behalf of our Management Team and the Board, we'd like to thank everyone on the call today including our shareholders and the research analysts who cover NCS but especially our employees and our former employees. I'm very proud of our team at NCS which has reacted swiftly to the changing in the industry environment. We've made significant adjustments to our headcount and cost structure to match the current market activity level. We continue to operate safely with zero reportable incidents so far this year. We're providing excellent service and continue to innovate in order to add value to our customers. A large part of our organization is working remotely and is taking on additional responsibility as a result of the workforce reductions. The team has done a tremendous job in managing the myriad of challenges that come with double whammy of COVID-19 on-life in general, as well as the direct impact on our industry in NCS. We're only as good as our people and I believe we have the best team in the industry. We appreciate everyone's interested in NCS Multistage and we look forward to talking again on our next quarterly earnings call in November. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.