NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) Q4 2014 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Good day, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the NACCO Industries, Inc., 2014 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder today’s program is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s program, Christina Kmetko, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone and welcome to our 2014 fourth quarter earnings call. I am Christina Kmetko and I am responsible for investor relations at NACCO Industries. I will be providing a brief overview of our quarterly results and business outlook and then I will open up the call for your questions. Joining me on today’s call are Al Rankin, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; J. C. Butler, Senior Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Administrative Officer; and Elizabeth Loveman, NACCO’s Vice President and Controller. Also joining me on today’s call are Rob Benson, President and Chief Executive Officer of North American Coal Corporation; and Greg Trepp, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hamilton Beach and Chief Executive Officer of our Kitchen Collection business. Yesterday we published our fourth quarter and full year 2014 results and filed our 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Also copies of our earnings release and 10-K are available on our website at nacco.com. For anyone who is not able to listen to today’s entire call an archived version of this webcast will be on our website later this afternoon and available for approximately 12 months. Before we begin I would like to remind participants that this conference call may contain certain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements made here today, in either our prepared remarks or during the following question-and-answer session. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements, which may not be updated until our next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all. Additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties were set forth in our earnings release and in our 10-K. Also many amounts discussed during today’s call are considered non-GAAP. The non-GAAP reconciliations of these amounts are included in our 2014 fourth quarter earnings release available on our website. Now let’s discuss the quarterly results. On February 13th we filed an 8-K disclosing that our North American Coal subsidiary planned to take a significant non-cash impairment charge related to the long lived assets of its Reed Minerals mining operation. That impairment charge totaled $66.4 million after tax and followed a $4 million pretax write off of Reed goodwill in last year’s fourth quarter. As a result of the impairment charge we reported a consolidated net loss of $40.7 million or $5.57 per diluted share for the fourth quarter of 2014 compared with net income of $22.6 million or $2.85 per diluted share in 2013. Adjusting out the long lived asset impairment and goodwill charges provides a clearer look at the underlying operating results of our business. On an adjusted basis we have slightly higher consolidated adjusted income in the fourth quarter of $25.8 million or $3.52 per diluted share on lower revenues of $297.3 million which compares to consolidated adjusted income of $25.1 million or $3.18 per diluted share on revenues of $312 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. Before I talk about the fourth quarter operating results at each of our business units let me discuss the Reed Minerals long lived asset impairment. We are facing a very difficult situation with our Reed Minerals mining operation. As we’ve said previously we believe that the metallurgical coal market was at a relative low point when we acquired this business in 2012. That has not proven to be the case as the price of metallurgical coal has deteriorated far behind our expectations and demand for metallurgical coal has also fallen significantly since the acquisition. Since 2012 we have made significant investments to improve productivity and reduce operating cost at this operation. While productivity has improved and advancements were made to reduce operating cost during the second half of 2014 the operating results in the second-half of the year were very disappointing and continue to be negatively affected by sustained weakness in the Alabama and global coal markets, particularly the metallurgical coal market. In January 2015, Reed’s largest thermal coal customer clarified to Reed Minerals the plan it will adopt to comply with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's new Mercury and Air Toxics Standards beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015. The customer's plan includes more stringent coal quality requirements than we had previously anticipated and is expected to contribute to an overall increase in coal processing costs at Reed beginning in late 2015 without a corresponding increase in coal sales prices. As a result of these discussions revisions were then made early in 2015 to the Reed Minerals' 2015 operating plan and long range outlook, to reflect this new information about compliance with MATS, as well as to reflect decreased demand and depressed coal prices and the lack of any reliable indicators of a recovery in coal demand or price. As a result of these factors, North American Coal recorded the non-cash impairment charge of $66.4 million after tax for the fourth quarter of 2014. Following the charge the year-end carrying value of other property, plant and equipment is $37.1 million and coal, land and reserve are $7.2 million at year end. Faced with ongoing weakness in the Alabama and global coal markets, and higher anticipated coal processing costs beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, we have made the decision to manage the Reed Mineral’s business based on cash generation. We are focused on rightsizing operations in line with conservative volume estimates, altering mining plans, investigating less costly coal processing methods, managing production volumes to optimize cash flow, evaluating capital employed and considering sales of non-core assets if appropriate. That’s the detail on the long lived asset impairment at Reed Minerals. Now let me discuss the business unit results starting with North America Coal. Including the impairment charge, North American Coal reported a net loss of $59.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 compared with net income of $5.6 million in 2013. If you exclude both the long lived asset impairment in 2014 and the goodwill impairment recognized in 2013, North American Coal reported adjusted income for the fourth quarter of 2014 of $6.6 million compared with adjusted income of $8.2 million in the same quarter in 2013. As expected North America Coal’s revenue and adjusted income decreased in the 2014 fourth quarter because of fewer tonnes sold at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company as a result of planned outage at its customer’s power plant and reduced royalty and other income. Also contributing to the decline in adjusted income was the significantly larger loss at Reed Mineral. While we generally do not provide financial detail at the mine level we felt giving further detail on Reed will be helpful this quarter in light of the impairment charge in that business. At our mining operations gross profit includes revenues less cost of goods sold as well as all of the mine operating cost. At Reed this number was a loss of $9.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2014 compared with a loss of $4.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. For the full year and again on a gross profit basis Reed had losses of $22.4 million in 2014 and $11.3 million in 2013. The increases in the losses in 2014 at Reed Minerals were primarily due to the continued deterioration of coal prices, an increase in depreciation expense on equipment acquired during 2013 and 2014 and higher repair and maintenance expenses. During the quarter North American Coal recognized gains totaling $3.7 million after tax for asset sales, which partially offset the decline in adjusted income. This quarter and year were clearly difficult for North America Coal. However in 2015, North America Coal expects overall improved operating performance at its coal mining operation. Before I get into the details of the North America Coal outlook I want to highlight that as of January 1, 2015 we changed the name of Reed Mineral to Centennial Natural Resources. This change was made for coal marketing and other operational reasons. Going forward I will only reference Centennial Natural Resources. Looking forward to 2015 we expect Centennial’s operating results, cash flow before financing and EBITDA to improve compared with 2014 excluding the asset impairment charge. These improvements are expected largely through efforts at Centennial to right size operations for expected volume levels and manage cost and capital employed. We also anticipate a reduction in Centennial's depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $5 million as a result of the asset impairment charge taken in 2014 which will also contribute to the anticipated 2015 improvement. That said we still expect operating results in 2015 at Centennial including non-cash charges to remain in a substantial loss position. Larger losses are expected in the first quarter of 2015 compared with the first quarter of ‘14 as Centennial contends with a customer’s power plant outage and significantly fewer capitalized mine development costs. We anticipate significantly improved results for the balance of the year compared with the prior year, although the improvements will be partially offset by higher coal processing costs in the fourth quarter as Centennial complies with the changes in customer requirements related to the MATS regulations. Cash expenditures in ‘15 will include required final reclamation at some mine areas where mining has concluded. Although cash flow before financing activities is expected to be significantly improved from 2014 Centennial is expected to have a marginally negative effect on North American Coal’s 2015 cash flow before financing activities. While we have not been happy with what has happened to the coal market and our Centennial operations we believe that efforts to manage its business for cash and around conservative volume expectations will help to position this operation to take advantage of any rebound in the coal market that may occur over time. Tons sold and results from operations are also expected to be substantially higher than in 2014 at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company as two significant planned outages took place at the customer’s plant in 2014 and there are no outages planned in 2015. Based on our customers' currently planned power plant operating levels, including production increases at the newer mines we expect tons sold to increase at the unconsolidated mines. While we expect coal mining operations to improve in 2015 we expect lower Limerock deliveries as a result of reduced customer requirements in 2015. However operating results of Limerock operations are expect to be higher as a result of the absence of a $1.2 million pretax charge that we incurred in 2014 to reimburse a customer for damaged equipment. Finally we expect a significant decline in royalty and other income in 2015 compared with ‘14. Overall at North American Coal, excluding the 2014 gain on the sale of assets we expect 2015 income before income taxes to increase significantly over the 2014 adjusted income before income taxes and we expect cash flow before financing activities to be positive as compared with the negative cash flow before financing activities we realized in 2014. Capital expenditures for ‘15 are expected to be reduced substantially from the prior two years to $24.1 million, comprised largely of about $21 million for replacement equipment and land at Mississippi Lignite Mining Company and approximately $1.7 million at Centennial. Coyote Creek Mining Company expects to complete its debt financing in the first quarter of 2015. This will allow Coyote Creek which is an unconsolidated mine to repay the amount due to North American Coal which was $53.2 million at December 31, 2014. North American Coal has been using its revolving credit facility to finance mine development at Coyote Creek and expects to use the repayment proceeds to pay down its revolving credit facility. Before I discuss Hamilton Beach’s result I want to point out that on December 16 of 2014 Hamilton Beach acquired Weston Brands, a developer, marketer and distributor of specialty housewares products and appliances for consumers for hunters, gardeners and food enthusiasts. While this is not a large transaction we are still very excited about this acquisition because this opens up a new market for Hamilton Beach and provides new opportunities for growing placement as interest in home harvesting and more wholesome food choices continues to expand. Because the acquisition was late in the year Weston did not materially affect revenues or net income in 2014, but we look forward to it contributing in 2015. Hamilton Beach had a strong fourth quarter. Revenues increase 6% as a result of increased sales volumes mainly in the U.S. consumer retail market and commercial market. Net income also increased to $15.4 million from $14.2 million in the fourth quarter of ‘13 resulting primarily from an increase in sales of higher margin products and lower income tax expense, partially offset by an increase in distribution costs, higher product costs and an increase in bad debt expense. We are looking forward to continued improvements in Hamilton Beach in 2015. Although, the economy appears to be improving Hamilton Beach’s target consumer, the middle-market mass consumer, continues to struggle with financial and economic concerns. These concerns and weakened consumer traffic to retail locations are creating continued uncertainty about the ongoing strength of the retail market for small appliances. As a result sales volumes in the middle-market portion of the U.S. small kitchen appliance market in which Hamilton Beach’s core brands participate are projected to grow only moderately in 2015. The Canadian retail market is expected to follow U.S. trends. Other international markets and commercial product markets in which Hamilton Beach participates are also anticipated to grow moderately in ’15 compared with ’14. Hamilton Beach believes the underlying market conditions in the hunting, gardening and food enthusiast markets will continue to generate increasing interest and demand in the categories in which the company’s new subsidiary Weston Brands, participates. Given these market conditions, we expect sales volumes in Hamilton Beach’s core small kitchen appliance business to grow more favorably than the market in 2015 due to improved placements of products. In addition we also believe there are a number of existing placements and market opportunities that can be secured for the Weston business. As a result we expect the Weston sales volumes in 2015 to grow at or above the growth rate experienced by the core Hamilton Beach small kitchen appliance business. Finally sales volumes in international and commercial product markets are anticipated to grow in 2015 compared with ’14 as a result of the company’s strategic initiatives. Overall we expect full year 2015 net income at Hamilton Beach to be moderately higher than ’14. The anticipated increase in sales volumes attributable to the continued implementation and execution of Hamilton Beach’s strategic initiatives, along with the full year of revenue from the Weston Brands acquisition is expected to be partially offset by a full year of operating expenses, including amortization on acquired intangibles, for Weston Brands, costs to implement Hamilton Beach’s strategic initiatives, increases in transportation costs and the absence of the $1.6 million tax benefit realized in 2014. In addition, the negative effects of foreign currency fluctuations are currently expected to increase modestly in 2015 compared with 2014. Excluding the cash paid for the acquisition of Weston Brands we expect Hamilton Beach’s cash flow before financing activities in ’15 to be higher than 2014. Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $9 million in 2015. Finally, our Kitchen Collection business had a very good quarter. Well, revenues continue to decline mainly as a result with the closure of over 60 stores during 2014, results continue to improve. Similar to last year, Kitchen Collection recorded a number of charges during the fourth quarter of 2014 related to upcoming store closures. The fourth quarter improvement and results would have been greater, but we had higher charges for future store closing in the fourth quarter of ’14 than in the fourth quarter of ’13. Nonetheless despite these charges Kitchen Collection’s net income increased to $3.1 million in ’14 from net income of $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of last year, primarily as a result of improved operating margins at Kitchen Collection comparable stores due to fewer promotion mark-downs and a reduction in comparable store expenses and a decrease in headquarters expense. Consumer traffic to all mall locations, and particularly outlet malls, remained weak in 2014 and that weakness is expected to continue in ’15. Kitchen Collection expects continued market softness in 2015 and as such expects to close an additional 28 stores during the year with most of those stores closing in the first quarter. These closing will in large measure complete our program of closing underperforming stores to realign the Kitchen Collection business around core stores, which perform with acceptable profitability. Kitchen Collection plans to maintain a lower number of stores in 2015 and as a result, expects ’15 revenues to decrease compared with 2014. We expect the net effect of closing additional stores early in 2015 and the anticipated opening of a smaller number of new stores, mostly during the second half of 2015, as well as the ongoing evaluation of Kitchen Collection’s expense structure to produce net income near breakeven in 2015. Cash flow before financing activities is expected to be positive again in 2015, but down from the high level generated in 2015. Capital expenditures for 2015 are expected to be $1.4 million. Before I open up the call for questions, I want to know that for the 2014 full year we've repurchased $35.1 million of class A common stock under our $60 million stock repurchase program. Since the program began in November 2013 we have repurchased approximately 680,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $36 million. That concludes our prepared remarks. I will now open up the call for your questions.

[Operator Instructions].

While we're waiting for questions let me provide you with my contact information, if there are any additional follow-up questions you can call me after the conclusion of today's call. My number is 440-229-5130. Are there any questions Jonathan?

I guess we have a question from the line of Brian Letter from Keyman Asset Management [ph]. Your question please?

Hi, good morning.

Good morning, Brian.

Just a couple of questions. Thank you for the additional clarity in the press release regarding Reed. That was very helpful. My question revolves, if the market continues to deteriorate and coal, just given where gas prices are going and stringent regulations out there what’s kind of the game plan if you can get cash costs kind of at a breakeven level? I mean can you shutter the mine and supply it elsewhere, can you -- I mean what can you do to kind of mitigate those losses, because the other core business is very good with the unconsolidated mines and what not. So this seems to be kind of the last piece of the puzzle and that really needs to be fixed.

Let me -- this is Al Rankin. Let me comment to that simply by saying that we're going to look at it very carefully, in principle if the prices and volume drop to a still lower level the cash generation or cash used would be greater than we anticipated and at some point if we justify shuttering some or all of the operations at Reed, we would look at it if those conditions occur. At the moment I think what we see is relatively small cash impact from continuing to operate, as we currently see the situation evolving after the first quarter of this year. We're concerned about the costs however that are generated by the MATS standard in the fourth quarter. So we get to look at our productivity levels and a variety of things. And if that causes us to vary dramatically from our expectation of future ongoing modest cash losses we would take appropriate action. Now there are some cash commitments that we have no matter what to do those relate to the continued closure for us for some operations and some cash activities could take a while to play out. But we will simply look at it every quarter and make sure that we're still on the same path that we think we are now.

Is there any reason why you couldn't get a better pricing structure given the quality of coal, change the contract, change -- is it just the market itself? Could they go somewhere else to get it cheaper, I mean how does that dynamic work?

Well there are two kinds of coals that are involved, one is steam coal and there is a contract structure that governs the prices for the steam coal for a period of time until it reaches renewal and those prices are not going to change despite the MATS standards, and metallurgical coal prices are simply extremely low at this time. And they're governed by the overall Alabama market and there is -- so the answer of your question is we believe that we're maximizing whatever the price opportunities are already.

Is there any financial penalties or anything that locks you into that contract? I mean how long is the contract? I know it wasn’t disclosed but is there anything you can tell us about that contract because that seems to be the one that’s the biggest problem?

No, it’s something that we believe would be a significant issue if we make other decisions than what we expect to make at this time.

Got it. All right moving on to Hamilton Beach, you guys haven’t called out FX headwinds last quarter. You did this quarter I'm assuming you still have the headwinds, is there a number around that?

I'm not sure whether we have a number around that but Jay [indiscernible] that to the extent that we have operations in Canada and in Mexico those are the largest of our international operations and there is some headwind there that is affecting us now to the extent that our costs which are denominated in a currency that mirrors the dollar more or less Chinese currency we are trying to increase our prices to put us in a more even position and we will continue to try to do that as we look forward. But we -- in quarter-on-quarter in the fourth quarter there were some FX issues but they weren’t really significant in that fourth quarter compared to what was already difficult in the fourth quarter of the previous year.

Okay, how much of your sales, I know you guys haven’t really disclosed up on an annual basis is international?

We really don’t disclose those numbers for Hamilton Beach but I’ll just say they are certainly significant.

Okay and then is there any update on the agreement with Sub-Zero Group and how’s that progressing, because new products should be hitting or being rolled out probably as we speak or pretty close?

So we have Greg Trepp on the line and Greg would you like to give an update on the progress of that program?

Yes, certainly. We expect to introduce Wolf Gourmet or Wolf Gourmet line really in the early part of this year and distribution will build as the year goes on quarter-by-quarter and you’ll start to see it more broadly in the marketplace, sort of second quarter, third quarter and certainly in the fourth quarter and our Jamba brand is also rolling out, probably sort of a basically about a quarter behind in terms of impact and visibility to Wolf Gourmet line. The Wolf Gourmet line is online is on track to have a meaningful rollout here this year.

Great, has there been significant amount of costs involved so far to-date for the rollout of those two programs or nothing kind of meaningful in the way that it’s something that will be recouped later down the road?

Well, we had investment cost and the design of the products, I'm not sure that you called them out as hugely significant but they certainly there have been development costs along the way. It’s caused our overall budget to go up a little bit, I think Greg but on balance we think of it as a tolerable [ph] R&D budget for the business and that’s now one piece of it in a way that it wasn’t before. Greg, do you want to add anything to that?

Yeah, I think that’s right Al. I think we’ve been, as we prepare for this rollout we’ve been in investment mode here for about two years and now we’re moving into that point we will have some revenue that should begin to offset that and move us in a very good position as the year goes on.

Great, that was it from me, thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. And this does conclude the question-and-answer session. I would like to hand the program back.

Al, did you want to say anything else?

No, I think that concludes what we have to say. I guess if I were going to add anything it would be that we think we are at the beginning of a point now at the coal company where we are going to see progressive improvements over the next few years. There would be significant excluding the impairment at Coal Company in 2015 we will have improvement at Hamilton Beach and we will have improvement at Kitchen Collection and I think as we look into 2017 we see further improvement in each of our businesses. We feel that things are headed in a sound direction in each of the businesses and will be the most difficult situation of course is managing the Centennial business and as we have indicated we will manage that in a highly disciplined way for cash as wisely as we can think it through. That concludes my comments.

Great, thank you everyone for joining us today. We appreciate your interest and if you do have any follow-up questions please feel free to give me a call.