Yeah, thanks, John. So following along, turning to Slide 4, as John highlighted, our second quarter GAAP earnings per share were $0.56. [Modest securities] gains were offset by $650,000 of real estate repositioning charges, that's recognized down in the other line. Together, those items netted to about a $0.01 for the quarter putting core operating EPS at $0.57 per share. As you can see, the provision for loan losses, while down from first quarter level, did remain elevated as compared to 2019. Similar to the first quarter, our underlying operating performance continued to hold in very well. Pre-provision net revenue of nearly $51 million was 13% higher linked quarter, 8% higher year-over-year, and our PPNR return on average assets held fairly steady at just over 190 basis points. The results were driven by lower expenses and higher spread revenue on a larger balance sheet. We generated over 400 basis points of positive operating leverage year-over-year, and we demonstrated good expense flexibility during the quarter. Tangible book value per share was up 2.6% and our CET1 ratio improved 44 basis points as compared to the first quarter, underscoring that our strong PPNR generation provides a buffer for future provisioning needs. Turning to Slide 5, you can see trends in outstanding loans. End of period loans were up just over $380 million, that was driven by $510 million of net PPP loans. Excluding PPP, our core loans decreased $130 million or 2%, mostly on managed runoff in our indirect auto book. We also saw a decrease in commercial line utilization and that was really driven by excess client cash, as well as a handful of larger pay downs. Commercial activity has [reset lower] as compared to the robust levels that we experienced in last year’s fourth quarter and the first two months of this year. And you can see that slow down reflected in our quarterly commercial originations, which decreased $20 million from the first quarter’s levels, excluding PPP. That said, we are continuing to see some early signs of increased activity and substantially all parts of our footprint continue to reopen more fully. As John pointed out, we do operate in markets that are less dense and relatively less COVID impacted, certainly as compared to downstate Metro New York, and we're cautiously optimistic around the return to a new business as usual in the coming weeks and months. Shifting to loan yields, the full impact from the change in short-term rates can be seen in the relatively sharp decline in portfolio yields during the quarter and the gradual rollover of fixed rate assets, which is obviously more sensitive to the belly of the curve would be expected to continue to pressure asset yields in the back half of the year. Moving to Slide 6, deposits stood at $8.8 billion, which was up nearly $1 billion point-to-point for the quarter. This increase came despite $135 million of run-off in the CD book. And non-interest bearing deposit growth was especially robust, up approximately $685 million from the prior quarter. Deposits were boosted by the increased liquidity associated with funding PPP loans, and various other government support programs. We have continued to actively manage our deposit costs, both in our exception price book and in [rack rates]. And those actions combined with the higher levels of demand deposits are evident in the decline in total deposit costs to a low 23 basis points. Looking only at the cost of interest bearing deposits, we were able to drive a 50% decrease from 1Q levels to 34 basis points. We continue to evaluate additional pricing adjustments and have some opportunities remaining in the back book around exception pricing and CDs. Core deposit funding has obviously long been a hallmark of the NBT franchise, and we're really pleased with the results of our active re-pricing strategy, which has driven a meaningful reduction in deposit costs in a short period of time, while maintaining our client base. Next, on Slide 7, you'll see the detailed changes in our net interest income and margin. Earning assets increase during the quarter, driven by PPP loans and a meaningfully higher overnight cash position. As you'd expect, the net impact of these assets was margin diluted. NII dollars were up despite 14 basis points of margin compression, and the net drag from excess cash and PPP was responsible for approximately half of that decrease with core underlying margin compression at approximately 7 basis points. And what you see there is a drop in asset yields, partially offset by lower funding costs. As you look to the third quarter, in addition to the asset yield dynamics that we spoke to earlier, we would remind you that our recent sub-debt issuance is expected to negatively impact quarterly margin by approximately 5 basis points over the near term. Slide 8 shows trends in non-interest income. Excluding modest securities gains and losses, our fee income decreased $1.4 million from last quarter and was stable from last year. More broadly, non-spread revenue remained 30% of our total revenue and continues to be another key strength for NBT as compared to peers. On retail banking fees, a slowdown in transactional velocity and higher cash balances resulted in notably lower service charges, although ATM and debit card fees demonstrated better resilience than we would have expected. The RPA line benefited from the first quarter of our recent ABG acquisition and new business pipelines for EPIC remain robust. Wealth was soft on market volatility and limited retail cross sell via the in-store channel and insurance demonstrated typical 2Q seasonality. Swap fees remained a strong contributor to the quarter. Turning to non-interest expense on Slide 9, excluding the $650,000 of real estate repositioning charges and other, our total operating expenses were just under $65 million for the quarter, down more than $5 million. As a reminder, last quarter was somewhat elevated due to normal seasonality of the comp line and we did have a $2 million increase in first quarters other expense for unfunded commitments under CECL that was not repeated this quarter. Our net overhead ratio improved to a low 111 basis points, and while we're very pleased with that outcome, we continue to think through the appropriate level of operating expense as we adjust to the new economic reality of a COVID world. Over the last five years, we've consolidated 12 branches and realized several million dollars in cost saves, while continuing to show growth in retail deposits. As client and associate behavior continues to evolve, we remain focused on opportunities to optimize both our retail and our corporate real estate portfolios. Consolidation of a handful of branches later this year is expected to result in slightly over $1 million in annual savings next year. On Slide 10, we provide an overview of key asset quality metrics. As you can see, we remained in very good shape this quarter. Excluding the impact PPP, net charge offs were 30 basis points, that's down from 32 basis points linked quarter. Favorable migration trends and non-performers were driven by the resolution of a single larger $4.2 million commercial credit that we had referenced last quarter. Both NPL’s and NPA’s have returned to year-end 2019 levels in dollar terms, and there continues to be only one relationship in the bank above a million dollars in non-performing status. We believe that the diversity and the granularity of our loan portfolios, our long established track record of conservative underwriting, and the less dense nature of our upstate New York and New England footprint should help us weather the current environment better than most. On Slide 11, we provide a walk forward of our second quarter reserve build and the reserve allocation by loan category. A full reconciliation of our allowance from year-end 2019 is provided in the appendix of today's presentation. Loan loss provision was $19 million for the quarter, which took reserves to just under [150 basis points] of period and non-PPP loans. That's an increase of 21 basis point linked quarter, and it's up 57 basis points from end of year. A quick word on the CECL models themselves; the key macroeconomic variables used were derived from the Moody's June baseline forecast. I think everybody on the line is probably familiar with what's in that forecast at this point. I would just kind of point out there is still a great deal of uncertainty around the path of the economy, the ultimate path of the pandemic, and future government actions, but the model assumptions are now fairly well-aligned with the observed economic reality. If the current outlook more or less holds, we would expect that the path of charge-off activity and our balance sheet growth are going to be the heavier factors and future provisioning needs versus model driven reserve build per se. Lastly, before we turn it over to Amy on the credit side, I'll just provide some quick updated thoughts around the $10 billion cross. Obviously, total assets finished the quarter closer to 11 billion than they did to 10 billion. And while we continue to maintain significant liquidity and flexibility on the asset side of the balance sheet, our optionality on the right hand side has become more constrained, given unprecedented levels of deposit inflows. And we would now expect to remain over $10 billion at year-end. Because we've prepared for this over the course of many years, we would not expect any material increase in operating expense as a result. However, and as a reminder, we will absorb a 50% reduction in Durban related revenue, which works out to approximately $5 million pre-tax in the back half of next year, and approximately $10 million on a full-year basis beginning in 2022. PPP lending fees are clearly going to be a meaningful offset and expected to accelerate later this year, and into next and then also natural growth in transactions and the shift from cash could reasonably be expected to provide a partial offset. Finally, we intend to deploy excess cash into more productive earning assets over the next year. We will continue to evaluate fee-based acquisition opportunities, and as the dust settles around credit, would look to re-engage more actively in selective whole bank M&A. With that, I'll turn it over to Amy Wiles, our Chief Credit and Risk Officer for some additional details on the credit fund. Amy?