Good day, and welcome to the Nabors Industries Fourth Quarter Earnings Release Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode [Operator instructions]. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to William Conroy. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining Nabors' fourth quarter 2020 earnings conference call. Today, we will follow our customary format with Tony Petrello, our Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer; and William Restrepo, our Chief Financial Officer, providing their perspectives on the quarter's results along with insights into our markets and how we expect Nabors to perform in these markets. In support of these remarks, a slide deck is available, both as a download within the webcast and in the Investor Relations section of nabors.com. Instructions for the replay of this call are posted on the Web site as well. With us today, in addition to Tony, William, and myself, are Siggi Meissner, President of our Global Drilling Organization and other members of the senior management team. Since much of our commentary today will include our forward expectations, they may constitute forward looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties as disclosed by Nabors from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result of these factors, our actual results may vary materially from those indicated or implied by such forward-looking statements. Also, during the call, we may discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as net debt, adjusted operating income, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow. All references to EBITDA made by either Tony or William during their presentations, whether qualified by the word adjusted or otherwise, mean adjusted EBITDA, as that term is defined on our Web site and in our earnings release. Likewise, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references to cash flow mean free cash flow, as that non-GAAP measure is defined in our earnings release. We have posted to the investor relations section of our Web site a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most recently comparable to GAAP measures. With that, I'll turn the call over to Tony for his remarks.

Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us as we review our results for the fourth quarter of 2020. Before I begin, I would like to express our thoughts and concern for the members of our community who are affected by the severe weather and the related power and water outages. Our rig operations in Texas were essentially unaffected. Turning to our results. I will begin with overview comments. Then I will follow with a discussion of the markets and highlights from the quarter. William will discuss our financial results. I will make some concluding remarks before opening up for your questions. First of all, as we closed the books on 2020, I want to recognize the entire Nabors’ team for its outstanding performance in these extraordinary circumstances. Our company's staff confronted the impacts of COVID and the depressed drilling market head on with perseverance and ingenuity. Those efforts across all of our segments and functional areas reinforced our leadership in our markets. At the same time, we managed to improve our financial strength. We are emerging from the pandemic as a stronger company. Nabors is well positioned to capitalize on the upturn. Our financial discipline paid off in 2020. For the full year, we reduced overhead spending by 24%. This effort began in the second quarter. Our run rate in the fourth quarter represents nearly 27% drop over the 2019 quarterly average. We also made further progress on our twin priorities, namely, generate free cash flow and reduce net debt. We began the year at just under $2.9 billion in net debt. We delevered by nearly $400 million fueled in part by free cash flow generation of $184 million. We ended 2020 with net debt less than $2.5 billion. We achieved this in the face of very difficult market conditions.…

Thank you, Tony, and good afternoon, everyone. The net loss from continuing operations of $112 million in the fourth quarter represented a loss of $16.46 per share. The fourth quarter included $162 million of pretax gains from debt exchanges and repurchases, partially offset by charges of $71 million mainly from asset impairments for a net after tax gain of $52 million. Fourth quarter results compared to a loss of $161 million or $23.42 per share in the third quarter. The third quarter included net after tax gains of $6 million related to gains from debt repurchases, asset impairments and severance costs. Revenue from operations for the fourth quarter was $443 million, a sequential gain of 1%. Revenue improved in most segments with only International and Rig Tech partially offsetting those increases. In the Lower 48, despite some deterioration in the average pricing for our fleet, drilling revenue of $103 million increased by $6.9 million or 7% as our rig count improved by 11%. Lower 48 rig count at 53.6 was up sequentially by 5.4 rigs, which is 2.4 rigs more than we had anticipated. Daily rig revenue in the Lower 48 at $20,950 decreased by about $800 as we continue to sign contracts at current market rates that are lower than the average for our fleet. In aggregate, revenue in our other US markets decreased by $3 million, reflecting a reduction in our offshore activity as one of our rigs finalized its contract in the prior quarter. Fourth quarter revenue fell with a lower rig count as well as with the absence of the demobilization revenue we invoiced in the third quarter. International drilling revenue at $245 million decreased by $3.3 million or 1%. This decrease was primarily related to declines in activity across several markets, as rig count fell…

Thank you, William. I will now conclude my remarks this afternoon with the following. As you are aware, Nabors' strategy focuses on three key themes; first, operating premium fit for purpose assets in diversified geographies; second, expanding services at the well site using the rig as a platform; and finally, using technology to unlock value and drive future growth. This past year's results demonstrate the value of this strategy. With regard to our assets, we continue to produce leading margins in both the Lower 48 and international markets. This performance reflects the quality of our assets and the competency of our crews. Our safety record, which has outperformed our competitors, also confirms that our fleet is second to none. In particular, utilization of our innovative pad optimal PACE-X rig remained high throughout 2020. Utilization of the X rig as well as our other advanced Lower 48 models has increased suddenly since last summer. And in geographies as diverse as the Gulf of Mexico and the Middle East desert, our rig utilization has held up better than most. We predicted in late 2016 that the drilling industry could not count on an ever increasing rig count to grow EBITDA. In response, we created NDS. Its mission was to grow by using the rig as a platform. NDS delivers integrated well site services in a more efficient manner, which unlocks value for operators and generates growth for us. Today, NDS is one of the most robust and sizable software offerings. Market challenges since 2016, notwithstanding, we have demonstrated that this is a value creating strategy. Finally, with respect to technology, we have maintained our investment in R&D even throughout the downturns. Those investments have fueled our premium assets and NDS offerings. They yielded the first software, automated directional drilling and fit for purpose downhole tools. We strongly believe that the next wave of value will be created through process automation, including robotics and digitization. ESG and efficiency reasons alone will push operators to resolve the red zone management issue and remove employees from the rig floor. We believe we are uniquely positioned to meet that challenge. We have an unmatched portfolio of assets, technology, geographic mix and people that positions us well for the future. We remain convinced that our portfolio will deliver tangible value to clients and ultimately, back to Nabors' shareholders. That concludes my remarks this afternoon. Thank you for your time and attention. With that, we will take your questions.

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from Connor Lynagh with Morgan Stanley.

I was interested to see the cash payment out of SANAD, I think there's historically been some concern about your ability to extract cash from that. So could you help us understand, should we think of this as sort of onetime and maybe there's not going to be more of these as you start to embark on the newbuild program? Or what sort of generally you're thinking about the ability to continue to pull some cash out of that asset?

I think that we have not been concerned at all about the distribution of cash. I don't know where that's coming from, we've been very clear that excess cash is to be distributed. And we have a mechanism to forecast and decide whether we have excess cash or not. And the only reason this distribution was made is because of that process. And by the way, that was driven by our partner, Saudi Aramco. We did not ask for it. We didn't really need the cash right now. But Saudi Aramco, obviously, tracks that very closely, and they felt a payment of $100 million, $50 million to each partner was appropriate. I think that demonstrates their, obviously, appetite for making sure that SANAD doesn't really sit on cash it doesn't need. Our forecast, and I've been clear on that before is that we weren't expecting to get any cash from SANAD before 2023, 2024 in that time frame because we're going to be building a significant amount of rigs, which are going to be funded from SANAD cash holdings and their own cash flow. We don't expect to fund any of that. So that hasn't changed. I don't believe we will have significant distributions before 2023. But I'll put a caveat on that, that's unless Saudi Aramco slows down the pace of awards of new rigs to be constructed in Kingdom. So if that happens then we would have excess cash that would need to be distributed before that time frame. Does that answer your question, Connor?

Yes, I think so. And just to be clear, that was a market level concern, not your concern I was referring to, certainly some pushback on. So I guess the question then is, if you could just update us on the sort of thinking? I mean, I guess I think you said you had three awards for contracts. Can you remind me, was it five per year cadence or 10 per year cadence that there was supposed to be? And then basically the question is, is three per year, maybe a better baseline expectation or do you think that's not indicative of anything longer term?

Well, I think the cadence is pro forma five per year, but obviously, Aramco has to review its own plans and its own budget allocations, and it's really up to a Aramco to figure out how they want to optimize it. As we mentioned, there's three have been indicated, only one has made it to a PO so far, but the idea is to do five pro forma, that was the original contemplation. The other thing I'd like to mention here is, these awards are a high class problem in the sense that these are the best use of capital in the world in our sector. I mean all these contracts are against full payout contracts. I think we've indicated they're six year contracts with a four year renewal and in the most important development market in the world, and they're all long term and with a great customer who supports the operation. And the size of these things are such that it's very meaningful. And therefore, if and when Aramco decides to do it, we're fully supportive of it and we're happy to be part of the team. And our mission is to help them execute this well and help them build their own programs. That's our role.

Maybe just one more here, just there have been some sort of conflicting reports around offshore activity broadly in the Middle East, maybe being slow or some suspensions out there. It seems like you have a lot of confidence that your activity is going to be trending higher. I guess, can you confirm that? And then just one other question, which is, is there any sort of major pricing reset we need to think about either on the upside or the downside as we think about sort of your major middle eastern market?

Well, with respect to Aramco in particular, the pricing is actually determined by the contract. So as I said, these contracts are full payout contracts, so we don't really have that kind of concern. I think the concern will be, Aramco has to decide whether these newbuilds make sense in the overall plans. And if they decide to go, the economics are already agreed between the parties. So with respect to that, I don't really think that's an issue.

And let me make a comment on that also, Connor, just to add on what Tony said. We've already renegotiated and reset prices for all of our rigs going forward, and that was already embedded in the fourth quarter. So we don't expect any more resets. In fact, we have already brought back eight of the rigs that were suspended already today, and we expect another five to come back. So we're at 38 right now, we expect to get back to 43. Three more of those rigs are coming in the second half and then we have two more that are coming in January. And Aramco provides us that information on a regular basis. They provided that information at year end 2020 and they basically met those internal plans that they have to bring back our rigs. So we understand, yes, that Aramco has tweaked some of their drilling activity and that affected us a little bit in the fourth quarter, and that they're working on the offshore production and drilling activity. But for the land activity and particularly SANAD, we have been exactly treated like Aramco said they would.

The next question comes from Karl Blunden with Goldman Sachs.

You've outlined a lot of good work that you've done on your balance sheet over the last year or so. I think when folks take a look at it now and you have a little bit of that increase in liquidity available to you from SANAD, you do have a clearer runway ahead of you. But when you think about the revolver, I'd be interested in what kind of strategies you can use to address that revolver draw and ultimately extend that and give yourself more runway.

Karl, yes, you've basically hit it on the nail. I do think our liquidity is not really an issue. At this point, we've done a lot to address that. As I mentioned before, we've cut our near term maturities in our notes by $1.5 billion, and we certainly only have about $86 million worth of maturities in 2021. And the next year is 2023 where we have still about $150 million worth of maturity remaining on our notes for that year. So liquidity itself is quite manageable but there's a couple of things that we need to look at. One of them is our total leverage. And of course, we are still going to be working hard on bringing leverage down, basically mostly through internal cash generation. But if we can find other ways to improve our balance sheet, we will. Part of the issue we have to look at as well is obviously the revolver, which expires in 2023. Good practices, best practices, means that we are going to be working on that in the first half of 2022 to get an extension on or a new revolver with a five year term. That is our strategy. Obviously, before we get to that period, we will have improved our leverage very materially in terms of net debt to EBITDA. As you may know, we finished the year at 4.4 times. If you look at Schlumberger and Halliburton, we're in the same range. Obviously, I'm not comparing Nabors to those two powerhouses, but that tells you that the leverage is on a trailing basis is quite good. And we plan to bring this number down quite materially. Tony's and our objectives, which we have committed to, had been that we would bring it down to the low $2 billion range in terms of net debt. We think that we're almost there, so we think that's no longer appropriate. The environment has changed somewhat in terms of cost of capital and so forth. So we think that number is now clearly now a bit high. We want to get it well below the $2 billion mark. So we think that's achievable over the next two to three years. So again, the plan is in the early 2021 to potentially issue new debt. Remember, we do have available still $230 million of the senior priority guaranteed notes that we could issue, and those are trading today in the 8% range. We also have $500 million of the 2026, 2028 junior guaranteed level, $500 million of those. So those two pockets would allow us to bring down the revolving credit facility. And based on the strength of better leverage and improving our maturity profile, we think we can negotiate favorable terms for our revolver in 2022.

Your next question comes from Chris Voie with Wells Fargo.

Maybe in the Lower 48, I guess, I think you have about 110 super spec rigs. Your market share has lagged a bit in the last couple of quarters or certainly the guidance for 1Q. Just curious if that's driven by higher pricing discipline versus peers, and whether you expect that to flip as we go through the rest of 2021? I know you mentioned expecting the rig count to grow throughout the year. So just curious how to think about market share for you guys as the year progresses.

Obviously, our priority is not share growth but profitable growth. And I think I would note that our daily margins and our revenue per rig are higher than our peers. And if you add NDS content, it's higher still. So what we're interested in is profitable growth and showing that discipline. I would note that the market in general has been disciplined so far, and there's good signs that -- of a deliberate growth pattern as we indicated in the prepared remarks, the tier one kind of customers are looking at single digit. As far as we can tell, currently single digit growth right now for the remainder of the year. Obviously, what can happen given the commodity price moves is there's still budget cycle status openings, and we've used given the commodity price, but that's where we see things. Obviously, in the tier two and tier three the activity is more and so there are opportunities for us to expand. We are sending out 50 more rigs, which I think are the best or second to none, I should say, in the marketplace. And we want to deploy them but we want to do it on a deliver fashion to make sure that the margins on the cover, working capital, the expense of bringing it out, all that kind of good stuff and that's our mission. And so far, we've done a pretty good job, I think, coming out of the downturn, adding to which we have. We're at 57 today, we'll exit the quarter at 60, and we'll take it from there in terms of seeing how fast we ramp up.

I think until third quarter, though, we outperformed. In the last two quarters, we saw, obviously, our peers getting a bit more aggressive given the ground they lost up through the third quarter. So what Tony mentioned that we want to be profitable. So how do we look at this? We look at this that, if we can't get a pricing for a rig, that gives us a margin that pays within the year for the cost to bring the rigs back and the working capital, then we're not going to do it. So basically, we are being selective. And we're focusing more on clients that want to add incremental revenue on the solutions side that are willing to do performance contracts. So we're not chasing pricing or just any rig out there or any customer, we are focusing on trying to generate cash in the next 12 months with a contract. Anything that doesn't do that, we just don't go for it.

That makes sense and good to see the discipline. As you mentioned, the guidance for $8,500 a day. Just curious if you could give a little color on maybe the mix of pre-COVID rigs in that, and how leading edge now compares to that guidance in 1Q, if there's going to be a further decline expected in 2Q and maybe just some sense of the magnitude?

So obviously, our average day rate this last quarter was about $21,000. I think in the last call we said that we're seeing rates in the high teens. I think the good news is, given what I just said about rig count, is we are starting to see the trend of crossing the $20,000 threshold in terms of pricing. So the gap for us between the average current rig count and the spot price is actually narrowing pretty dramatically. And I'll leave it to you to figure out how soon those things can cross given the progression as the rig count goes forward. Obviously, there's a bunch of estimates out there where rig counts ended up at the end of the year. Anything north of $4.25, $4.50, there will be pretty dramatic price escalation, I think, there. In the meantime, of course, we are benefiting from the backlog of current contracts we do have which have higher margins in them. So to the extent we continue to add rigs at even this spot rate, there is going to be margin degradation a bit. So that will continue.

And to add to Tony, the $21,000 does include about $1,000 of reimbursable revenue which doesn't contribute to the margin. So if you look at high teens, which we're seeing, anywhere from $17,000 to $19,000 per day that means $18,000 to $20,000 per day in terms of revenue per day, and that compares to the only $1,000 that Tony mentioned earlier. So we are converging. And we expect to see -- we could even see convergence and inflection sometime this year in terms of revenue per day.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Sean Meakim with JP Morgan.

So maybe first just a follow-on to that discussion, but thinking about potential sensitivity in terms of activity in the back half of the year. In the Lower 48, I think one of the big open questions is how your customers will react later this year if oil prices can hold near current levels. So what's your expectation in terms of potential upside to rig activity in the back half? And do you expect your customers to remain disciplined, or do you expect them to react to the relatively strong oil prices much stronger than what’s in their price [decks]? And if you could distinguish that between the majors, largest small public and private EMPs, I think that would be helpful as well.

Sean, if I knew the answer to that question accurately, I'll play the futures market and I'll quit my job. I mean like I said, the party lines thus far from the tier one customers is to abide by the commitments that people making their free cash flow. And therefore, the steps that we've taken for whatever value you want to put on, it has been today to only see delivered growth in the single digits. And that obviously does not take into account a big change in the commodity price. But we haven't yet seen people. We haven't seen that mirror crack yet, Sean. I'm not going to say it won't crack, and history has as it does crack, but that's in the Lexicon of language today. With respect to second and third tier operators, yes, they are being more aggressive, and there is the prospect of more activity in that group of people, because they respond up and down, as you know, quite much faster. So that's the way I would look at it.

And then maybe a little more on free cash flow. Last quarter, you guided $21 million free cash, if I recall correctly, to be in the tens of millions, or I guess to be interpreted anywhere between $10 million and $99 million. So in William's comments earlier, he noted the slip of some collections in 4Q. It sounds like those are being recouped in the first quarter. Some other moving parts in 1Q, so let's say, neutral on cash. But how do we see free cash progressing in the balance of the quarters? And if you have an updated guide on the full year for '21, I think that will be useful.

So I'll give you an updated guide. I mean I think I'm comfortable doing that based on the strength of our performance, Sean. I'm usually a company's harshest critic, even harsher than you, if you believe that. But I mean at least I'm accused of that. But this quarter and this year, I really have very little things to criticize about. I think we had a great quarter. Our operations guys really delivered. I'm much more optimistic on NDS and our performance offerings. And our total cash flow generation actually -- and by the way, this is the last time I will say this to the team that's sitting around here, because, obviously, it's not my job to be cheer leading. But based on that performance and what I'm seeing and what I'm seeing already in the first quarter, I think I'm more confident of our free cash flow this year. Obviously, the $30 million from last year helps because we believe that will be collected this year. And as the year progresses, and our clients are a little bit less scrambling for cash themselves, we feel this year end will not be as impactful negatively as this one was. A lot of our NOCs were sitting on their hands at the end of the year and not affecting the payments that were due. So I think I said before tens of million. I think I'm comfortable saying now between $50 million and $100 million. So there you go, I narrowed the the forecast.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to William Conroy for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Tom. We'll wrap up the call there. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for joining us this afternoon. If you have any questions, please give us a call or e-mail us.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.