Great. Thanks, Kim. Your first question regarding breakeven, we are confident on the goal. The goal is that we will achieve monthly EBIT breakeven by the end of this year, 2024. There are a couple of drivers for the breakeven. Number one, historically, part of our loss was due to subsidies to charging users, especially in the early stage of the charging service business. Since January 2024, we have managed to maintain our NTR as positive. Hence, our transaction level become profitable. I'm confident that we will be able to manage this NTR level for the rest of 2024. Meanwhile, energy solution business, continue to contribute gross profit and more gross profit as the business scale up and maintain a stable gross profit margin. Besides, the overhead from our back end, are quite stable and well controlled. So if you put these things together, as a result, with gross profit from our existing business lines scale up and a stable overhead, and with a clear sign of profitability for our main charging service business. Our margin will continue to improve and we'll be able to reach monthly EBIT breakeven by the end of 2024. So, for your second question, Kim, regarding the online user acquisition and GMV growth, how can we sustain that with reduced user subsidies? I have a couple of things to say. Well, let's start. I would like to probably take a step back and look at the market again. China is a very big country with a lot of cities in different tiers. And EV charging service, as we both know, is a localized market. So each city is different. Our experience is that the more balanced of the local supply and demand, the higher the profitability of the whole value chain in the charging space. The natural increase of EV ownership and traffic will gradually yield a higher profitability for both CPOs and for us and further reduce the need and of course, to acquire users through subsidies. So that's a view from the market. Secondly, the view for our operation. We have been making efforts to leverage our market know-how to acquire and maintain users more efficiently. I'll give you a couple of examples. For example, we have deployed a multi-tier membership system that can meet more specified needs for different types of users, such as taxi drivers, private car owners, commercial vehicle drivers, and so on. We also have leveraged our AI technology to further improve our efficiency of the CPOs in our platform by optimizing the real-time charging price for those operators. Our effort is recognized by our fast-improving operating numbers even when we are reducing user subsidies. For example, we achieved a 114% year-over-year growth in charging service revenue, 55% year-over-year growth in charging volume, 48% year-over-year growth in transaction orders, and 47% growth in GMV. These fast-growing numbers suggest a strong user stickiness in the charging business. The third thing I want to say is the ecosystem. It's worth to mention that 68% of our NaaS users overlap with the existing users on our parent company, Newlink Group's gas-fueling app. The synergy between our parent group and NaaS serves as one big advantage for us. So in summary, with the three points that I just mentioned, including market, including operation efficiency, including ecosystem, as an early mover in the charging industry, I believe that with all these points, we will be able to achieve online user acquisition and GMV growth while we reduce our subsidies. Thank you.