Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the MYR Group Third Quarter 2017 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference Ms. Kristine Walczak. Ma'am, you may begin.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to the MYR Group conference call to discuss the Company's third quarter results for 2017, which were reported yesterday. Joining us on today's call are Rick Swartz, President and Chief Executive Officer; Betty Johnson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; Tod Cooper, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of MYR Group's Transmission and Distribution segment; and Jeff Waneka, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of MYR Group's Commercial and Industrial segment. If you did not receive yesterday's press release, please contact Dresner at 312-726-3600 and we will send you a copy or go to the MYR Group’s website, where a copy is available under the Investor Relations tab. Also, a replay of today's call will be available until Thursday, November 09, at 11:59 PM Eastern Time by dialing 855-859-2056 or 404-537-3406 and entering the conference ID 2388139. Before we begin, I want to remind you this discussion may contain forward-looking statements. Any such statements are based upon information available to MYR management as of this date, and MYR assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, these statements are no guarantee of future performance. These risks and uncertainties are discussed in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter 2017 and in yesterday's press release. Certain non-GAAP financial information will be discussed on the call today. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP information to the most comparable GAAP measure is set forth in yesterday's press release. With that said, let me turn the call over to Rick Swartz.

Thanks, Kristine. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our third quarter 2017 conference call to discuss financial and operational results. I will begin by providing a brief summary of the third quarter results, and then turn the call over to Betty Johnson, our Chief Financial Officer, for a more detailed financial review. Following Betty's discussion, Tod Cooper and Jeff Waneka, Chief Operating Officers for our T&D and C&I segments, will provide an industry outlook and discuss some of MYR Group's opportunities going forward. I will then conclude with some closing remarks and open the call up for your comments and question. Third quarter 2017 revenues came in strong at $373.5 million highlighted by our C&I segment, that more than doubled as compared to the third quarter of last year. Gross margins in the third quarter improved over the second quarter of this year and backlog remained strong at $701.7 million, an 11% increase over backlog reported last quarter. Overall, we are pleased with our third quarter results, which reflect improved performance of many of our organic growth initiatives as well as the substantial completion of the two projects in the Midwest that negatively impacted our first half results. Our gross margins improved this quarter as compared to the second quarter of 2017 and we continue to focus on further improvement through continuous tension towards operational efficiency gain and in anticipating and responding to our customer's needs. We are producing what we believe to be sustainable returns to our business. With our backlog at historic levels, we remain optimistic about the T&D and the C&I markets, as we head towards 2018. As Tod and Jeff will talk more about shortly the industry is very healthy and with significant bidding activity especially related to the EPC and larger projects we expect to see more opportunities turning into project awards going forward. Our strategy remains the same, and we are confident that the steps we're taking will help us to achieve our goals of ensuring; we are the contractor of choice for our customers, the employer of choice for our workforce, and the partner of choice for suppliers and industry associates. Now Betty will provide details on our financial results for the third quarter of 2017.

Thank you, Rick and good morning everyone. On today’s call I'll be providing our quarter-over-quarter results for our third quarter 2017 compared to the third quarter of 2016. Third quarter 2017 revenues were $373.5 million, another record high quarter. This represents an increase of 31.9% quarter-over-quarter. The increase was primarily due to increased spending from existing C&I customers. Our acquisition of WPE in late 2016 and an increase in distribution projects. T&D revenues were $216 million, an increase of 4.6% quarter-over-quarter. The breakdown of T&D revenues was $143.8 million for Transmission and $72.2 million for Distribution. C&I revenues were a record high for the fourth consecutive quarter at $157.5 million, an increase of $80.7 million or 105% quarter-over-quarter. Our gross margin was 9.3% in the third quarter of 2017 compared to 12% in the same period last year. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to lower margins on certain T&D projects due to weather and lower productivity, as well as project delays and schedule extensions related to a T&D project in Canada. Changes in our estimates of gross profit on certain projects resulted in a gross margin decrease of 90 basis points in the third quarter of 2017 compared to an increase of 70 basis points for the third quarter of 2016. SG&A expenses were $23.8 million, a $600,000 increase quarter-over-quarter. This was primarily due to $1.4 million of cost associated with our expansion into new geographic markets and higher payroll cost to support operations, largely offset by lower bonus and profit-sharing cost. SG&A as a percentage of revenue decreased to 6.4% for the third quarter of 2017 from 8.2% for the third quarter of 2016. Other expense was $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2017 primarily attributed a $.15 million change to contingent consideration related to…

Thanks, Betty, and thanks to everyone for joining us this morning. The increased T&D bidding momentum that we experienced throughout the second quarter continued into the third quarter. And from what we see at this point seems to show a little sign of slowing down. Opportunities are present in projects of all types and sizes. This includes transmission, distribution and substation construction as well as numerous EPC projects. As I mentioned last quarter, large transmission projects are continuing to come to market and several others are working their way to the regulatory process. We believe we are well positioned to pursue these projects due to our success and experience on past jobs, solid relationships with clients and industry partners and our seasoned manpower resources throughout the country. We know what it takes and what is needed to successfully deliver these types of projects. We believe the main drivers for the healthy levels of activity in the end markets we serve remain intact. Our clients continue to make record capital investments relative to the integration of new generation resources that replacement and hardening of aging infrastructure and the implementation of technology. In particular, many wind-related projects are protected to break ground in 2018, which we believe is being driven in part due to the fact that certain production tax credits are scheduled to expire by the end of 2020. During the recent Barclays CEO Energy Power Conference, NextEra Energy indicated that their renewable development opportunities have never been stronger, and with continued technology improvements in cost declines, they expect wind and solar to be competitive into the next decade. Many of these wind and solar projects are located in remote regions without the required electrical infrastructure to deliver the generation. Our extensive national footprint, depth of experience and strong established relationships…

Thank you, Tod, and good morning, everyone. During our last two calls I shared how MYR is positioning our C&I segment to be the trusted go-to source for helping our clients align their budgets with their designs and create the optimal schedule all during the procurement phase of high-tech complex projects. This form of design assist partnering has been gaining ground up for several years. And while few specialty contractors ready to fully embrace this collaborative approach, this value added service is what we believe differentiates us from our competition. At MYR we're making our primary objective to expand capabilities in this arena and the results are quite evident; six consecutive quarters of record backlog and expanding client base and solid financial performance. We will continue to leverage our strength as a collaborative contractor, knowing this will continue to bring high quality opportunities in all our target markets. Let me give you a few examples. We’ve recently announced the Kiewit Meridiam Partners selected our company to join them as their electrical subcontractor in an exclusive agreement on the Colorado Department of Transportation $1.2 billion Central 70 Project in Denver. KMP involved us nearly a year ago stating clearly their desire to have an electrical partner who could bring value at the procurement phase. We are proud of this to be a part of this exciting and sizable work. Our C&I segment backlog which has increased for the last seven quarters does not include Central 70 Project. C&I segment backlog increased with the award of similar but smaller design assist projects throughout our company. As I've talked about in prior calls, we continue to see a steady stream of projects in the development stage for transit-related projects in California, Washington and other C&I districts. Now let’s move from ground travel to…

Thank you for those updates, Betty, Tod and Jeff. In closing, our ongoing prospects for growth are exciting and we believe that the strong market outlook will continue to present us with a solid pipeline of opportunities, which we are prepared to translate into successful projects in the midst of a constantly changing environment. We continue to raise the bar through ongoing examination and refinement of our strategic and tactical focus. I am confident in our abilities to achieve our goals because we have the right people and teams in place. We understand the importance of attracting, retaining and developing the very best talent to lead the company forward. And I’m proud to be surrounded by such a talented group of people, day in and day out at MYR. On behalf of Betty, Tod, Jeff and myself, I sincerely thank you for joining us on the call today and for your ongoing confidence in MYR. And I look forward to updating you on our progress next quarter. Operator, we are now ready to open the call up for comments and questions.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Howdy folks. And great to see your margins back on track somewhat.

Good morning, Tahira.

Good morning.

So, I guess, dramatically it seems in all the utilities really back up really the strength coming back in the electric transmission business. You can never tell with all the permitting and all, but any thoughts around when you can some of these big ones hit your backlog if you had to guess?

I would say, Tahira – I’ll let Tod add on in a minute. But I would say what we're seeing right now is project starting to come to the bid phase. So anything that we would receive would probably be in the first quarter of next year with construction starting towards the second half. It usually takes about six months for those large projects to really kick off once they are awarded.

That’s actually pretty soon. It's not too far away for you guys.

I think we’ll see them start at that point. We’re starting to see come to market. And then, from there on it’s how they rollout and how smooth that rollout is.

Got it. And obviously, this year on the T&D side you have senior margins getting impacted somewhat by all these delays et cetera. As you look into 2018, obviously we're hoping these nuances will go away, so you should see a gap up in margins. But will these projects, the large ones head in time to really help some up margins even more into 2018?

If they all roll out, hopefully it does. Again, we don't have any control how our competitors bid that or what margin they will be looking at. But on the positive side, without the large projects we're starting to see or we continue to see a lot of small midsize projects plus some of these EPC contracts continue to rollout. We should really fill-in any gap that would be there as far as what we see right now if the large projects didn't come to market in that time frame.

Got it. And last question from me. If you really look at what you're seeing shaping up, is it the same scope? Could that have the same potential as the fixed cycle we saw few years back or would that be to optimistic?

I think it’s probably very optimistic to look at anything or maybe too optimistic to look at it like with the Cres – if you go back in time when the Cres projects were going –

Right.

I think you got to kind of level it off from there and not take that. I don't think you’re going to see another Cres happen. During that time it was just abundance of work in one area that drew a lot of resources down. What we're seeing is a lot of steady work in many areas, so we're seeing that consistency at work, not just a blip. So I don't see that, that same type probably margin pressure to go up that we saw during that time, probably more just hopefully steady returns.

Got it. Congrats on the improved execution again.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Bobby Burleson with Canaccord. Your line is now open.

Yes, good morning. Curious extra weather impact what the gross margin might have been in the quarter.

That’s a tough one to get to and I'll let Betty or Tod add to it. That's a tough because we had some projects were impacted negatively by the weather, so we had some in the progress, you had to stop because the weather down in Texas hit us, so some of those were delayed. We had equipment stranded in those and then we had the upside of the storm revenue that came in during the quarter.

Right.

Net-net it’s a positive, but not really. When we look at it overall, not enough to move the needle a whole lot when you look at it net-net.

Okay. That margin impact was still lingering impact on certain large projects?

On certain projects, I wouldn't say, we’re just large, it happen to be where ever the projects are because you got to stop and start plus stranded equipment on those. And then, you have the upside on the other side of the storm revenue and more utilization on the equipments there as far as billable hours in that side, but net-net, like I said, it's a positive, but not a big one.

Okay. And then in terms of the project mix that you guys talked about in terms of size and durations kind of impacting equipment utilization and mobilization, demobilization. Do you expect that trend to become maybe official at some point with the tailwinds rather than a headwind?

We certainly hope so. As far as equipment utilization what I have always said is our equipment utilization was down this year. It's trending in the right direction. But it will be into next year before we really see that back to what I'd call normalized levels. But with the work for capturing our backlog when we take that all into consideration on a weekly basis and we'll look at our equipment utilization, it's definitely trending in the right direction and we see it being positive in the next year.

And the project mix in terms of duration and project size, those factors are more of a tailwind going forward versus where they have been?

We hope so. I mean, you're always trying to capture new backlog. So the good thing is our company is growing. Along with that, we always got to capture backlog and trying to levelize out those gaps. Large projects always helped that in the overall mix. But even without that, the mix of projects we have right now, we see that as something we can hopefully lineup the end of one project to the beginning of the other and continue that trend we saw on this last quarter.

Okay. And then just one more quick one. And renewables seem to be picking up a lot. And what you're talking about is just what we’re hearing utilities and others talk about. And just curious kind of how big of an opportunity that might be for MYR group? How significant? Is there any way that you could kind of quantify what you see over the next few years there?

Well, we see a lot of activity as far as budgeting, as far as potential projects out there. Again, now it’s which projects come to market. Our solidified as real projects over the next year, I think that's going to tell a lot. But we see a lot of opportunities. We're meeting with a lot of customers daily, talking about these projects, providing budgets and moving forward. So it looks like they're in that kind of definite possibility for projects, some of them are probably going a little higher on that list towards being real projects. But again, which ones get permitted and excepted and then how we play a role in that, we continue to explore.

Yes. And as I’ve mentioned the 2020 date that applies to the tax credits for the renewables is certainly driving, that dates more visible now to many of the merchant builders. And people trying to move this renewable generation. So that is what we're seeing an uptick and as Rick mentioned, we'll see which ones go forward and which ones do not.

How quickly would you have to green light those projects in order to kind of make that 2020 deadline?

It really depends on the size of the project. How many miles of transmission needs to be built; is it distributed generation where, just talking about solar in the location where it can be utilized. So it's all dependent up on the size of the project, but anywhere from starting in 2018 to starting relatively a few months before the 2020 completion date.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Andy Wittmann with Baird. Your line is now open.

Great. Good morning. I had a few questions here. On the projects that took adjustments, negative adjustments on the quarter. Where these the same projects as we'd seen earlier in this year or we have newer projects here?

Not newer projects, it was primarily the same project. I mean, Midwest ones were finished up. So Canada, definitely we took about $700,000 approximately hit on that project for the quarter. Midwest, there was a really no impacts as far as that goes. Every quarter though we do kind of net-net on our overall business – give you the results of whether it was a positive or negative add. So we did have some negative weather impacts in certain areas. And then, we have some positives on the other side.

The Canada one wasn’t new either, that was one you had estimated.

Yes. That was existing from before.

Okay, I guess, just on the award outlook. Thank you for going through some of the larger projects that are out there. Your line cut out for all those listening. Maybe you talked about the great northern project, but maybe you didn't. I just was wondering you’re update on that one, your level of confidence and your positioning on that one. And maybe I think that one is still waiting for a permit from Minnesota if I'm not mistaken. But if you could talk about that one as well, since – what you did in the prepared remarks?

The Great Northern project, the bids have been submitted. That's where it stands right now on the transmission segments of that line. We could hear by late November, early December a word on that, but that's where it stands.

Would you guys need – is there any other permits that need to be issued before you’d feel comfortable putting that one in your backlog?

No.

Okay, and then, just on the store maybe Betty, I know you said kind of net, net Rick that the storm was just modestly positive for EBIT but can you quantify the amount of revenue that did come from storm in the quarter.

Now that we have, it really is modest and with the net margins being pretty normal for us, once you net maybe higher margins for storm and offset by some of the negative impacts. But again, that's very difficult to adjust for everything. It's a really not – it hasn't moved the needle that much for us when it comes to this overall storm increase – the revenue increase.

Okay, maybe then on cash flow. It looks like you had a pretty large working capital drain on both billed and unbilled receivables. I'm just curious maybe subsequent to the quarter end have you seen some of the cash come in. Is there a build there in claims or change orders that we should be aware of. Maybe you can quantify that for us to understand a little a bit about the cash trend that you had from those issues or from the line item in balance sheet?

Part of the cash flow and debt levels partly is related to the increased volume, right? The working capital needs for our higher level of record revenues. And then, in terms with respect to billing and receivable payment terms, nothing of unusual. Like that storm work did come in at the end, but it isn’t anything that is significant to impact the overall receivables. But clearly, the storm work was right at the end of the quarter and either just billed or we would start seeing those collections very soon. But nothing – and you asked about the change orders. Change orders are fairly similar to our prior quarter levels. One of the biggest once we talked about was that FMC or the larger project in Canada. And from that perspective, that hasn't changed much.

Okay, it looks like receivable days by our calculation is about 67 days, last year it was about 60 days, they were about 57 at the end of the quarter. So, is that just normal seasonality then that you're pointing to, because even if you normalize for the revenues, it feels like it's up little a higher?

I think of the things Betty mentioned were the terms with some of our contracts. We do have of a few new contracts that have terms that are dependent upon the type of work you get and how long it takes to complete those projects and they are available at the end of each four quarters. So we have a couple of very large ones right now that are not finished up.

Gotcha.

But inline with the contract terms just change in terms of mix.

All right, so that speaks to a little bit about the competitive environment then as well. That's a term change. What are you seeing in terms on the T&D side specifically, I guess, to be curious about kind pricing environment. In the last couple of years, 2015, 2016, I think we saw a little bit of softness. And there wasn’t as much demand, with demand picking back up. Has the pricing terms – have they improved slightly in your latest for T&D?

I don’t know. For broad statement like that, I probably wouldn't take it across the country. I'd say if you look at some geographic areas, there is definitely some areas that there is more I guess, movement on margins than we've seen in the past and then there is some that remain very competitive even though there is abundance of work in that area. In those areas people are still striving to get their backlog filled up. So there is not too many areas. I’ve heard one say they don't want any more work. But I have seen a few areas with increased margins.

I am going to do one more. Just on the buyback, it wasn’t a lot of stock in the quarter but it was at a different price point, than you guys had previously been in the mid-20’s. I guess I wanted to get your commentary and thoughts around stock repurchase that was executed in the quarter. And if this is after not using in the last few quarters if you return to the market here is signaling anything or not stimulating, but what was your thought process about buying the stock in the quarter at that level versus skipping the prior couple of quarters at a little bit lower level?

Well our stock buy back program, as we mentioned last quarter with the new program that came out, our grid was not that significantly changed. But as you know, the stock price had gone down. So it – we bought back this quarter the 35,000 shares at an average price of $23.86 as we show on our 10-Q. Besides for that, we have the typical kind of stock purchases. But the stock repurchase program itself was in line with our historical board authorized grid and it really related to the price in the market.

Got it. Thanks.

Our next question comes from Noelle Dilts from Stifel. Your line is now open.

Hi guys good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning, Noelle.

I was late to the call, so I apologize if you guys have addressed any of this and feel free to tell me to just to read the transcript but, so C&I performance has been impressive particularly given what I would say we're hearing some concerns with the non-res market could be slowing. So I was hoping if you give us some more thoughts on how much of the growth you are seeing is coming from just the core kind of legacy Arizona and Colorado markets versus some of your more recent greenfield expansions and then, on top of that are there any particular verticals where you're seeing strength. I know you talked about DIA in airports, but everything else sort of notable there?

Well we are seeing a lot of growth in this legacy markets, that's true. And the legacy markets have been somewhat impacted in prior quarters from the organic startups. Now we're seeing backlog in those organic areas, and so we're really offsetting that drain on some of those margins with the good work in the new areas as well. So it's pretty robust market across the board we're – among others, I didn't list that we're seeing a lot of wastewater grow dramatically in manufacturing seeing opportunity there as well, so quite a diverse market growth where we're at right now.

And then I'd just add in addition to that, we have the acquisition, we talked about the organic growth. This is the quarter that we had WPE wasn't in there last year.

Yes.

From an organic growth standpoint, I would say, we're seeing some positive results out of a few of the areas that we've done, somewhere still a draw. There’s still a draw on us a little bit, but we see opportunities there. So we're continuing to move forward. Previous quarters I’ve said, we wanted to make sure that the revenue they were receiving would cover their overhead by year-end. We're on track for that. It's still trending that way. But a few of the areas are above where we thought they would be and a few are behind a little bit. But net-net, we hope to have that revenue covering their cost by the end of the year.

Great. And then we’ve been hearing generally about just tightness in labor that serving the non-res market kind of across the board. What are you guys seeing on that front? Are there any issues finding the right folks with the right skills to the job? And then are you seeing in C&I any real improvement in pricing?

Well, I'll answer the labor market issue first and its regional. It depends on where you are. There are some locations where it's tough to get the cruise that you need, so we have to be very careful about what we go after in those areas. And other areas, there's plenty of folks to do the work. So we're just watching it area by area. Margin improvements, because there is an abundance of work, there are better opportunities. We could be a little more selective in some of the work that we pursue. So we're starting to see some improvements in the type of work that we chase and our ability to improve those margins.

Great, that’s helpful. And one last question just shifting over to the T&D side, last quarter, I think you talked about may be pursuing some recovery on that Canadian project where there have been issues. How are you thinking about that now just in terms of the potential for recovery of some of these costs?

It hasn't changed a lot from last quarter. I mean, we're pretty well on track, as I said, finished the job under the new schedule. We're substantially complete right now, down to just a few people doing what I call punch list and a few final items on the project. And then, we continue our discussions with the client. And we have those discussions every week. We have formal meetings with them a couple of times a month and we'll see what it develops into and whether we end up pursuing a claim or we come to a settlement before we have to go to that stage, but we're pursuing in all avenues.

Great, thanks again.

Our next question comes from Jon Braatz with Kansas City Capital. Your line is now open.

Good morning, everyone. Rick, is there a metric you can provide us in terms of equipment utilization, what it sort of stands like this year versus last year and if the trends continue, what it might be able to move towards in next year?

No, we did not provide that. We tell people it's trending in the right way. It is trending in the right way. It is something with mix of our work. I personally like the mix we have right now and where it’s headed. But again, we have always got to the replace that backlog and keep going but we don't disclose utilization to the market.

Okay. And Betty, obviously, you weren't – your tax rate was up in the quarter, you weren't able to utilize the losses in Canada. What is the outlook going forward in terms of Canada and the profitability in taking advantage of the losses?

Right now, when it comes to the Canadian operations, Rick just mentioned that job is coming to a close. And it all depends on the final negotiations. Clearly, we go through that process of estimating our – what we think is the most probable at least what we can recognize is most probable so our anticipation is not to continue with any significant losses otherwise we would have recognized some already. And so that shouldn't be a drop, when it comes to the rest of the Canadian project, I don't know if anything else to add when it comes to those Canadian operations. We shouldn’t see as much of a tax – effective tax rate impact as we did in the first half, in this last quarter.

Yes, and we continue to pursue work in Canada. We do have other project going up there on the T&D side. So it is something we continue to pursue. But again, that market is still pretty tight as far as how people are going up to work. And how they're attacking at the locals up there I would say and the local companies. So we continue to evaluate that. And again, as with all our projects, we really try to understand our cost upfront as we bid these. And then put a fair mark upon it. It's been very competitive in Canada over the last year.

Okay.

Just to kind of close that to the extent that there was – you are asking about the future use of it, to the extent that there were pretax gains, we'd be able to utilize those previous losses, so that would be beneficial to our tax rate.

Yes, yes, okay. All right, Thank you, Betty.

[Operator Instructions] And we have a follow-up question from Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hi, thank you. So just to follow-up on T&D margins again, if I was to mix out a lot of the nuances we have identified over the last three quarters. It seems like they contributed over 100 basis points plus maybe in terms of an impact. So I guess, if I look out to 2018, if I lay those on and to the extent you get the projects may be potentially in the early half of 2018, can you see margins sort of picking back up for that segment back in the 7% range?

Certainly our goal to get those margins backup. It comes down to the consistency of work and what we capture in backlog. And again, we focus on our cost, we really try to understand our cost of doing these projects and then put what we considered a fair mark upon it and move forward on some of them we see, in some areas we see a little more competition than we would like. And in other ones I think we got a little more freedom. So yes, Tahira, that's definitely our goal to get our margins backup. We're not happy with the levels they have been in any way shape or form. We're not happy with those. So we're driving to get those margins up.

Okay, thanks a lot.

And I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to the speakers for closing remarks.

Thanks to everyone for participating on today's call and for your continued support of our company. I don't have anything further. We look forward to working with you going forward and speaking to you again on our next conference call.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude your program. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.