Good morning, Woody. Wanted to start off with loans. I saw you guys noted and mentioned earlier that you have a strong loan in deposit pipelines. And I was wondering if you could give a little more color on where that growth is coming from and how you are thinking about overall loan growth for the second half of the year. Sure. Let me start with a short and then give a little bit more detailed 1, if that is okay. The short answer is we have seen a really nice balance in where our loan production is coming from. And on the loan page of the deck, you can see there that we saw, you know, our usual $100 million a quarter in payoffs and paydowns. In the production that we did in the 0.25 of whatever, it is $115 million-ish. Was better than that, but not enough to drive the growth that we saw that we would see. You know, the longer answer to the question is we are seeing some impact as I had predicted in the prior 2 quarters from all this market disruption. Which is a real 2-edged sword. 1 side of the sword is that the clients are disrupted and the bankers are disrupted and there is opportunity there. And so we are definitely taking advantage of that. And, you know, we will see more results from that. We could talk about that more in the Q&A if you want. But the other side of the sword is that we are seeing real price competition on loans. And so, you know, we have made the decision here today right or wrong, but this is what we said is that we are going to be disciplined in our pricing and in our terms. And so, for example, we saw a loan and credit company last week where it was proposed to be priced at 125 over treasuries, for a do not know what a 5 year, 7 year fixed rate loan. And you we are just not gonna do that. That does not make sense to me. And the fact that, you know, others that have entered the market here that want to defend their clients or be really aggressive with pricing, I think, because it is understandable why they could do that. But that does not mean we are going to chase that. So I think we have seen a really nice increase in NIM continue. I mean, the fact that we have done almost a bunch of improvement in the first half of the year in NIM as we did all of last year I think, is a really telling story on how the NIM improvement that we predicted you know, 9 months ago to continue I mean, we did not think it was gonna go this fast, but I think it has because we focused on NIM. So David has some really interesting analysis that we can delve into if you want about kind of the trade-off of NIM and growth. But the short answer is, if we grew $280 million in net growth by the end of the year, And just kept our NIM flat from here. That would actually have the same income effect as growing zero in assets and having 10 basis points a quarter in improvements. Or, you know, if you take the midpoint, $130 million in growth a quarter, and a 5 basis point improvement per quarter in NIM. So I think that certainly got the leadership team here thinking, you know, maybe we back off the pace of improvement of NIM in the second half and see a little more asset growth. So I and we have talked to the front office about that. We had our 2-day annual summit earlier this week, and so we asked the 19-office heads that were here you know, are we missing the market by a little or a lot? And they said, you know, in some cases, a lot, in some cases, a little. And we are a little more competitive. We think we can grow faster. So that is how we are looking at it. And I am sorry that turned out to be such a long answer, but I think it is a great question. Yeah. that is super helpful. Really appreciate all of that color. And wanted to touch back on what you said earlier about taking advantage of the market disruption was wondering what you guys are seeing on the hiring front and how you are expecting this to impact expenses moving forward. Yeah. Another great question. So we have added 12 new front office people into the profit centers so far this year. and 8 new people into the product group areas. And if you look at people that are actually just direct salespeople, we have added 10 of those, which will be included in the 20 I just mentioned. So far this year. You know, 1 of the challenges that we have with that kind of hiring is, you know, our experience over the years is sometimes it takes some time to get those people up to speed. You know, the first day they get here, they do not typically produce a lot of new activity. So we have done a couple of things to try and accelerate that. The first thing we did is we started a program Actually, had this idea in February that, you know, to really try to activate this shift back to the offense that we should get out and call more. And so I said, I would do 100 calls between February and the end of June And Julie got ahold of that and called at Westwood 100. Because we have these Westward initiatives this year. To try and drive growth. And so we ended up I think I ended up doing a 168 calls So I luckily beat my 100-call goal because that would have been otherwise. But I think in the 100 program, we ended up doing what was the number, Julie? 963 or some number like that. Almost 4 thousand calls company wide. And we actually raised the bar on what the call was defined as. It had to be planned. It had to be a face-to-face, had to have a call plan around it and a follow-up in the CRM. Stuff like that. And we had an 88% increase in calls year over year. Yesterday, we had our board trust committee meeting and our trust department which, you know, trust officers are not the ones most famous for being proactive salespeople. Our head of the trust department put a slide in there for the board that said, from reactive to proactive, trust officer calls were up 180% in the first half of the year. So definitely a culture shift in the organization, including on the P&L side. About getting out and making calls. Then if you would allow me, can you talk to me a little bit about this activation program we have for new hires?