Thank you for standing by, and welcome to MasTec's First Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. I'd like to turn the call over to Chris Mecray, Vice President of Investor Relations.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us for MasTec's first quarter 2025 financial results conference call. Joining me today are Jose Mas, Chief Executive Officer; and Paul DiMarco, Chief Financial Officer. We have prepared slides to supplement our remarks, which are posted on MasTec's website under the Investors tab and through the webcast link. There's also a companion document with information and analytics on the quarter, a guidance summary to assist in financial modeling. Please read the forward-looking statement disclaimer contained in the slides accompanying this call. During this call, we'll make forward-looking statements regarding our plans and expectations about the future as of the date of this call. Because these statements are based on current assumptions and factors that involve risks and uncertainties, our actual performance and results may differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Our Form 10-K, as updated by current periodic reports include a detailed discussion of principal risks and uncertainties that may cause such differences. In today's remarks, we'll be discussing adjusted financial metrics reconciled in yesterday's press release and supporting schedules. We may also use certain non-GAAP financial measures in the conference call. A reconciliation of any non-GAAP financial measures not reconciled in these comments to the most comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in our earnings press release. I'll now turn the call over to Marc Lewis for some parting remarks. Marc?

Thanks, Chris. Good morning, everyone. This is my 92nd consecutive quarterly earnings call after more than 23 years as VP of Investor Relations, and MasTec has unquestionably been the highlight of my 50-year professional career. It's been an incredible ride. I've had the best hour job in America, and I was blessed to heavily in the best corporate life of two years to keep things running at home while I was traveling the world talking about the next big thing in MasTec. There are lots of MasTec people to thank. I'd first like to thank our Chairman, Jose Mas for his leadership in inspiration. Jose taught me that adversity is always only temporary. There are always hidden opportunities and you just have to look for them and explore them to your full advantage. I'd also like to thank our Board and General Counsel, Alberto de Cardenas, who've been a constant sources of guidance and strength. They were steady in good times and bad and ever failed in their leadership and wise counsel for the management team. I'd also like to thank our prior CEO, Austin Shanfelter, who hired me in 2002 and along with prior CFO, Bob Campbell, who both took us through a very challenging turnaround of recapitalization process in the early 2000s, which put MasTec on the path to growth and future success. I'd like to thank my good friend a longtime COO, Bob Apple, who has led a great team of men and women. A great team is always the foundation of a successful company, and their ever-improving performance has made my job easy. I’d like to thank George Pita for his financial leadership as CFO and the hundreds of financial support and operational staff who supported me in my efforts. And now Paul DiMarco, bringing new…

Thanks, Marc. Good morning, and welcome to MasTec's 2025 First Quarter Call. Before getting started today, I'd like to say a few words about Marc Lewis. Today is bitter-sweet. I'm excited for Marc as he begins a new chapter in his life and for his successor, Chris, who I think is going to do an amazing job. But obviously, in some ways sad as well. As Marc said, I became CEO of MasTec in 2007, at the age of 35, and quite frankly, with lots to learn in the Investor Relations world. Marc was a solid constant for MasTec and his guidance and direction not only serve me well, but all MasTec stakeholders. I also want to commend Marc for his leadership through actions. Marc truly loves MasTec and everything it stands for. He personifies our goal for all MasTec team members, which is to not only be an employee, but rather part of a family where you can dream, excel, grow and provide a better future for your own family. Marc, thank you for everything. We will miss you, but know that you will always be a part of MasTec. Good luck, my friend. Now I'd like to review our first quarter results as well as provide my outlook for the markets that we serve. I'm pleased to report that we exceeded guidance in revenue, EBITDA and EPS for the first quarter. We also delivered year-over-year growth despite a difficult comparison quarter. As a reminder, in last year's first quarter, our pipeline business had a strong start as we were completing the Mountain Valley Pipeline. Pipeline segment EBITDA in last year's first quarter was $93 million compared to $45 million in this year's first quarter. So, the balance of our business, our non-pipeline segments, improved EBITDA from $97 million…

Thank you, Jose, and good morning, everyone. We are pleased to report solid first quarter results and to exceed the overall expectations that we laid out in our March earnings call. The macro news flow this quarter has been pretty volatile, and our results illustrate that MasTec sits on a foundation of strong structural demand and stable long-term drivers. This is true even if marginal outcomes can be influenced by macro and sector specific effects from global trade, regulatory or funding factors downstream from us. As Jose noted, we feel very good about our business today and into the years ahead. Let me start with some first quarter highlights. First quarter revenue was above expectations at $2.85 billion, and adjusted EBITDA was $164 million, exceeding guidance by about 5% and 3%, respectively. Communications and Clean Energy and Infrastructure led the way, both exceeding forecasted adjusted EBITDA by double digits. 18-month backlog at quarter end totaled $15.9 billion, up $1.6 billion from year-end and $3 billion year-over-year. This represents another record for the Company and includes a big improvement in the pipeline segment after waning levels seen during 2024 as the completed MVP. As Jose noted, we have solid visibility to support our 2025 outlook, and we are actively building the book for 2026 and beyond. We generated cash flow from operations of $78 million in the first quarter, with DSOs at 66 days, in line with our expectations. Capital expenditures net of disposals in the period were slightly higher than the prior year as we accelerated certain capital investments, resulting in free cash flow of $45 million versus $93 million in Q1 of '24. We completed $37 million of share repurchases in the first quarter and extinguished our remaining authorization in April, bringing the year-to-date total to $77 million at…

[Operator Instructions] We'll go first to Sangita Jain with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Jose and Paul, if you could just give us a little more detail on the oil and gas bookings, maybe the geographies where you're seeing most interest and if these bookings came in maybe a little bit sooner than you were expecting?

So, I'd say a couple of things. I think Paul in his prepared remarks talked about almost a dozen projects. So, I think the surprising part that it wasn't driven by any single one really large project. We had two projects that were over $250 million, as Paul mentioned. But I think we feel great about it. The reality is that we have a lot of other projects that we feel we're in line to win. We have a number of projects that we've been burbly awarded that aren't in backlog yet. So, we actually expect our backlog to increase as the year progresses in '25. And again, we're super bullish on what the pipeline market is going to deliver in '26 and beyond.

Great. And if I can ask a follow-up on capital allocation. I know Paul just mentioned tuck-in type acquisitions or buybacks. Could you help us end markets that you feel would be more suitable for MasTec at this point where you could look for acquisitions?

Sure. I think we haven't changed. We're still super focused on organic growth. I think there's so much upside to our business, both in terms of the opportunities that we're seeing and more importantly, in the margin progression that we think we're going to be able to deliver. With that said, there are still within the businesses that we're in, there's still a number of pockets of geographies where we think we can strengthen. There's still some customers we think we can do a better job of building relationships with. I think those are the key things that we're looking at as we look at acquisition targets. And we think it's been a -- we think it's an improving market. I think there's a lot of interest out there. I think the uncertainty over the course of the last six months have made especially tuck-ins more reasonable, and it's something that we hope we can execute on during '25.

We'll go next to Jamie Cook with Truist Securities.

Congrats on a nice quarter. I guess my first question, Jose, sorry, back on the pipeline business again. I think you said last quarter that given what you saw in terms of booking potentials, you thought revenues and pipeline in 2026 could potentially be at 2024 level. So, I'm sorry if I missed it because there's multiple calls going on. But can you just sort of give us an update on your thoughts there and your confidence level? And I guess within pipeline, just the competitive environment, I would assume it's the projects are yours to sort of lose, I guess, is I would say with no one else in it. And then my second question, just the color on the power delivery. It sounded like the margins were off to a slower start than what you thought. Just a little more color there. And I think you said the same thing on the -- I can't remember what other business, maybe it was Clean Energy, but I guess I'm trying to understand what the true earnings power of the quarter would be if we didn't have that noise and obviously, the implications of what that would mean for your full year guide?

Sure. So, a couple of things. I think as we think about the pipeline business, we haven't changed really our guide significantly for '25. So, a lot of what we're seeing is really for '26 if things play out the way that they should. There's some potential in the back half of '25 to be a little bit better than what we're seeing. But a lot of what we're booking and seen is really for '26 and beyond. We did say last quarter that we were beginning to see '26 shape up to a place where it should be at or exceed '24 levels, we still feel that way. So, we've got, again, a lot of optimism as to what's happening in the pipeline business, and hopefully, that continues. And if gas continues to play a larger role in future energy generation, we're going to be a bigger beneficiary. So again, super exciting what's happening there. And I think what's really important to note there is, obviously, that's our highest margin business. And to the extent that, that business grows, it's going to have a significant impact on the overall earnings opportunity of the Company. And that's probably what excites us the most. And I think maybe something that a lot of people miss, right? It's not just that the business is growing. It's our highest margin business is expected to grow nicely for years to come. On the project side, we actually performed really well in the clean energy side. We didn't have any projects of note to call out. We actually exceeded our margin guidance in clean energy and infrastructure quite a bit relative to our previous guide. So, we feel really good about how that business is performing. We were a little light in revenues in clean energy because a couple of projects started early in Q2 rather than late in Q1. On the Power Delivery segment, we did call out a couple of projects. We did have one particular project that was significantly impacted by weather. If not the margins in that business would have been better. We actually think that the margins would also have exceeded what we originally guided to. When you look at the progression of that business going from Q1 to Q2, it's very similar to what we delivered last year, that business, in particular, had a 290 basis point improvement in Q1 of '24 to Q2 of '24. We're guiding something similar to that. And based on the fact that the margin should have been better in Q1, we feel really comfortable about our ability in hitting that. So, all in all, the quarter could have been better. But quite frankly, I think we've built great momentum going into Q2 and the balance of the year, so we feel great about where we're at.

We'll go next to Andy Kaplowitz with Citi.

Marc, it's been a true pleasure. We'll miss you. Jose, could you give us more color into what you're seeing in Communications? You beat your rev guidance on Q1, raised your outlook for the year. But I think there's some consternation out there that at least fiscal stimulus, whether it's RDOF or BEAD, it could be slowed a bit. I know that BEAD hasn't been in your guidance. It's still wireline growing faster than wireless for you? When do you fully ramp up and all the market share wins that you've had and/or the fiber to data center opportunity?

Sure. So great question, Andy. I think when we think about BEADs because I'd like to cover that. We've always said we didn't expect much impact to it in '25. We do think it will be a catalyst for '26 and beyond with some awards in '25. But there's no doubt that it's AI and middle-mile fiber today is -- it feels like a much better and larger long-term opportunity. And when you think about the size of BEAD, it's actually somewhat unbelievable that we're saying that. So, I think the state of the market is fantastic. I think the opportunity subset is greater than what we expected. Bookings have been really strong. We expect bookings to continue. So, I'm really bullish about the opportunities in that business. I'm bullish about our margin progression opportunities in that business over time. I think today, even in Q1, we hired a little bit more. We're having to hire more people than we probably expected. Training costs are having an impact in that business. But the revenue growth is offsetting that. And I think if that just plays itself really well out over the next couple of years. as we hit consistency and improvement in margins. So, I think we're in early, early innings. To your latter part of your question, a lot of the projects that we're starting on are really the first phases of much larger projects. So again, we feel this is the beginning of what's going to be a very long cycle in support of what's happening predominantly with AI.

And Joe, maybe just stepping back, I asked you this last quarter, but I think I need to ask you again, frankly, it doesn't seem fair after you booked so much this quarter. But you all just mentioned booking more work in clean energy in Q2 than you did in Q1. So maybe you can talk about whether you can continue to sequentially grow backlog in this environment? And have you noticed any changes in your customers' conversations or behavior since Liberation Day?

I think the most important thing to think about is a short term and generally speaking, renewables is the fastest dispatchable form of power and the most cost competitive. There's massive power demand, which means renewables are going to be a huge part of new generation for a really long time. I mean, Paul, I think you caught it well, Paul said we expect our renewables business. We have an opportunity to book more in Q2 than we did in Q1. When you look at just renewables, our book-to-bill in the first quarter was 1.45. So -- I mean we're feeling really, really good about our conversations with our customers. We've talked about alliance agreements and how we're really contracting with key customers in that space and the opportunity that we're getting to view their pipeline. Much longer out than '25, we're talking about what they're seeing for '26. We're talking about tariffs. We're talking about IRA, the progression of their business. And quite frankly, I think when we've modeled out '25, we've taken all that into account. I think we've been conservative. I think that if we can get through the tariff talk and we can get through the IRA talk somewhat unscathed, I think there's a lot of opportunity for this business to not only perform better in '25, but more importantly, to perform a lot better in the outer years.

We'll go next to Ati Modak with Goldman Sachs.

Jose, can you talk about the nature of the pipeline projects that you've booked already? You highlighted two larger ones. Are those long-haul pipelines, what's in the small ones? And how should we think about the order sizes in the second half of the year as you look at contracting?

Yes. So, I'd say if you think about the pipeline business in general, right, there's a significant amount of infrastructure that needs to be built for power demand. You've got still takeaway capacity needs. You've got the LNG potential and what we're seeing there over the long term. It's just -- it's an incredibly active market. We wouldn't consider any of the projects that we booked in Q1 would be really large projects. There are large projects coming that we feel that we will be a significant part of. So, we expect really strong further awards as the year plays out with quite frankly, a lot more activity in outer years. So, there's been an unbelievable shift in the perception and the -- just the confidence of that business on behalf of our customers over the last six months since the new administration came in. And I think it's -- we're seeing a lot of project activity that, quite frankly, we didn't expect and I think that's really positive.

And then on the framework agreements you spoke about, can you give us any more color there and how that derisks your forward backlog visibility especially in a world where the market might be concerned about things like IRA, for instance, I think you said framework agreements are across segments. So maybe any color there.

I think it's a big shift, right? I think, unfortunately, and I hate to go back, but we had a tough 2023 with the integration of IRA, but I think that, that taught us a lot about that business. And what was important in that business, which was to really align ourselves with key customers and key projects. I think we've done that. I think it's now -- we're now in our third solid quarter there where we delivered good results. I think a lot of it has to do with how we change that business and how we went to market. I think the evolution of that are these framework agreements and these alliances. I think in those, the goal of that, right, is to kind of guarantee resources to a customer for a certain amount of work over a long period of time. What that does is it allows us to go into that customer and view their project workflow for long periods of times, multiple years and to specifically start working on projects very early on, which gives us incredible visibility into the likelihood of those projects happening what the risks are, what the potential IRA risk are to a project, what tariff risk are to a project, which allows us to really make high assessments of the viability of when that project will go. I think it's paramount to our business. I think it's the most important thing that we do, and I think we're doing a great job at it today. I think the customer relationships and our ability to continue to add alliance agreements quarter-after-quarter has been phenomenal and will continue to help drive our business for a really long time. So, it's a very, very important part of what we're doing.

We'll go next to Steven Fisher with UBS.

Congrats on a great quarter. Just wanted to come back to follow up on Andy's question on the Communications. I mean, clearly, you have a lot of opportunities there and a great setup for '26. But -- and your slide is very helpful. And just looking at that slide shows that your second half of the year in communications is pretty flat with last year. So just curious, I'm sure it's just sort of sort of timing, but why in light of all the trends here, only flat revenue growth in communications in the second half of the year?

Steve, thank you for the question. I think when we think about our business, I think we had a really good first quarter. I think we've got great progression planned into not only the second quarter but second half versus first half as a total company. I think there's a lot of opportunity for things to go better across the different segments in our business. But there's also a lot of noise, right? We've got, obviously, the administration has created volatility. And I think that today, we've taken the position that we'd rather be conservative as we look at '25 versus really pushing a lot of things through with so many unknowns left in the market. Again, we feel good. And hopefully, as some of this stuff settles out, we'll be able to both relook at the second half of the year and more importantly, '26 and beyond.

Makes good sense. And then a similar question on the pipeline side. Obviously, very strong bookings. It sounds like you've got more to come. And you did only raise the guidance there by about $75 million. So, I'm curious if there were any offsets to that? And I would think, typically, on these pipeline projects, especially if they're not like they're really huge ones, the time between booking and actually getting started is usually fairly short, if I understand that correctly. So, I'm just curious, is that conservatism again? Are there permits that need to be kind of arranged here? Why isn't that ramping up a bit sooner?

We shouldn't see a lot of it in the second quarter. So, the reality is that the potential starts to really bake itself in late third quarter, early fourth. And again, a couple of months slips on a job has a huge impact. So again, I think we've taken a very prudent assessment of what it means for the balance of '25. And again, we're hopeful that as some of this stuff shakes out and settles out, that some of this will be better.

We'll go next to Justin Hauke with Robert W. Baird.

Great. I guess I wanted to ask on the power delivery and some of the large transmission lines that have been announced like in the Texas region. And just -- I know you talked about in the past that you've got capacity to do like another Greenlink and you feel comfortable about that. And I guess I was just going to ask just any kind of geographic strength where you feel maybe you've got a more competitive position on winning something of that size? I don't know if it's just in the West or Texas would include that? And then I guess the corollary to that is just looking at your head count, it's actually down a little bit year-over-year despite the growth. And so just thinking about where you see head count going against kind of the growth trends that you're seeing and your ability to kind of ramp up training and staffing to meet that?

Sure. So, I'd say a couple of things. One is I think the transmission market is incredibly robust. There are a number of projects in the market that will be getting awarded late '25, early '26. We see broad geographic opportunities. You mentioned Texas. The West Coast is extremely active. You think about what's happening in PJM and MISO, just tremendous opportunities across quite frankly, the entire country and the needs are there. We feel we're incredibly well positioned to take advantage of that, both for medium and large-size jobs. So, we feel great about our competitive position. We feel good that we will win another large job and have multiple jobs working concurrently over the years to come, and we think that's a big part of our transmission driver. On a people perspective, the biggest impact has been the hit to our pipeline business. Obviously, our pipeline business employs a lot of people. We have a large union operation there. where we scale up and down based on a per project basis. So, I think our total employee count is down, but our non-pipeline employee count is way up. And as the pipeline business comes back, there will be a significant ramp in personnel related to pipeline as well. So, when we think about people, it's our most important asset. It's one of the most important things that we need to focus on to grow. It's the key to our business. We invest heavily in not just the development of our profit and the development of our management. We've opened up over 45 training centers across the country, and we feel good about not just our ability to develop our people, but more importantly, to meet the demands of our customers. So, it's going to scale up and down. And I'm highly confident that by the end of this year will be at record levels of team members.

My second one would just be, you talked a lot about the indirect benefit from the data center infrastructure, but I know you also have some direct work that you've done for them, I think, about $200 million that you did last year. I guess, just any update on maybe some of the direct work that you've won and thinking about the revenue potential for that business in '25? And that's my last question.

Sure. So, a lot of talk about data centers over the course of the last quarter. Different hyperscalers are doing different things. I think one hyperscaler, in particular, they are shifting their business a little bit. We're highly -- we're seeing tons of opportunities. The opportunity subset is incredible, both direct and indirect. And we feel that we're going to continue to grow our business in both. Some of -- there have been some shifts in '25 that have negatively impacted us as well. Those are built into our models, but we think the opportunity subset far exceeds that.

We'll go next to Drew Chamberlain with JPMorgan.

First one, just on the renewable side. I mean how is that -- to the extent that some of these projects might end up facing delays, so into tariffs or other sorts of policy concerns. I mean do you think you have an ability to pull in other projects or replace teams onto other areas of work to backfill whatever could come of any revenue holes?

That's why alliance agreements and framework agreements are so important because you're looking at portfolio views in addition to just individual projects. With that said, when we've talked extensively about this, but when one of our projects in backlog, it's not -- a lot of the work that we started is under what we call LNTPs. This is a backlog. This is work that's ready to go, projects that have started that are starting in short order. So again, when we look at our 2025 guidance and the revenue that we have in our plan, we do not feel there is much risk at all about any delays or any push outs. When we look longer term to the project subset, that's where we do more management of portfolios versus projects. And again, I think that's been our strength. I think that it's allowed us to deliver 25% growth in the first quarter, which I think is really, really strong relative to the industry. When we look at the balance of the year, we're expecting 20% growth, 25% growth in our renewables business in '25 versus '24. I think that's going to be a great number relative to the industry. And again, I think a lot of that has to do with how we've managed our customers and our projects.

Okay. Great. Makes sense. And then just I appreciate the revenue color for '25 from Greenlink there. I think that might have been a bit more than some folks had been thinking was going to come in, in '25. Can you just talk a little bit about how that project is starting and what additional color you can provide about revenue cadence throughout the next couple of years there?

Yes. I think it's within the previous that we put out, it's a tighter range than said, maybe towards the upper end, but within the range that we had previously stated. I think we feel great about the start. We're on multiple -- both segments of the transmission line with multiple substations. It's a long project. Again, we're -- we feel really good about the first six months or so that we've been on it. We started it late in the fourth quarter. A lot to do, a lot of opportunity there. We expect that that's going to grow considerably in revenues in years to come on an annual basis. So again, a perfect project for us. And again, our goal is to begin to hunt for the next one and have to at least start with two concurrently.

We'll go next to Liam Burke with B Riley.

Jose, you touched on in one of your earlier questions on LNG. Is your pipeline business seeing any benefit now? Or is that something on the holdback that we can expect in the future?

I think the truth is those are longer-term projects. There's a lot of projects out there that are being discussed, priced out preliminary pricing, but not part of what we're expecting when we talk about either current backlog or even backlog growth within '25.

Great. And on the regulatory front, there's been a lot of chatter, obviously, about the renewables, but have you seen any positive benefits of deregulation?

I think that there's optimism relative to what's coming. I don't know that anything has been done that has significantly changed the permitting environment today. But I think that, that is one thing that can be done that could have a huge positive impact on the business. There are a lot of people in the administration focused on that, on ways to do just that. There's a lot of conversations happening, but I wouldn't say it's impacted the market yet.

We'll go next to Brian Brophy with Stifel.

Just one for me. You guys took down depreciation guidance a bit here. And obviously, it's already down a bit from last year. Can you talk about the drivers for that change? And then how you're thinking about any structural changes to the capital requirements for the business?

Brian, this is Paul. So, I mean, I talked a lot of the focus on depreciation. From a pure comp perspective, it's pretty clear that our depreciation was running at much higher levels. We've continued to focus on that. We continue to evaluate our useful lives. We still had gains on sale in this period despite the changes we made to our depreciation policy last year. So, it will continue to be a focus and the amount of capital we deploy, as we've talked about, is going to be driven by utilization and making sure that we're having high efficiency out of the fleet that we have. So, I think we're still at a moderated level. The growth of the pipeline segment can be a driver. It's obviously our most capital-intensive segment. But our guidance for the year, we took CapEx up a little bit. Really to take advantage of some of those opportunities we see, but we'll continue to evaluate the appropriate level of depreciation. And I think it's a downward trend relative to our revenue should be expected.

And maybe just to add, I think that as an overall theme, right, we're hyper focused on improving margins. And obviously, fleet utilization is a huge driver of that and one that we're super focused on.

We go next to Joseph Osha with Guggenheim Partners.

Just sort of a two-part question. First, looking at your leverage, it ticked back up a little bit. I'm wondering how we should think about the longer-term target. I know there's been some talk about maybe continuing to drive that lower. And then secondly, looking at the buybacks, Jose, you talked about picking up the stock when it falls below intrinsic value. Can we think about some rough time frame in terms of executing this new $250 million? Or is it going to be dependent upon the price of the stock?

Yes, I'll answer the buyback question and then let Paul talk a little bit about leverage. I think a couple of things to think about, right? We're not -- I mean, first, our balance sheet is in great shape, and it's getting better. I guess is the overarching theme. So, it gives us tremendous flexibility to not just think about buybacks, but to also think about M&A. I think specific to buybacks, the way you should think about it is we're not habitual buyers. We only buy when we feel the price is dislocated from the opportunity that exists. The last time we bought was in 2002 at $72 and before that, it was in 2020 at $33. So, we view ourselves as opportunistic buyers. We felt that the opportunity that presented itself here in the short window was too good to pass up and we'll continue to manage in that capacity. Paul, do you want to cover the leverage?

Sure. From a leverage perspective, our financial policy is below 2x. It's really rounding for the quarter. I think we talked about we did accelerate some CapEx into Q1 to plan for the needs of the business and to hedge against tariffs a little bit. But we think with just the normal cash flow generation that we will continue to generate we'll delever naturally and given ourselves plenty of opportunity again to deploy capital to the manner that we see most attractive at the time.

We'll go next to Kashy Harrison with Piper Sandler.

So based on the commentary today, it sounds like you're expecting continued bookings growth through year-end despite all the tariff uncertainty. What's behind that viewpoint? Is that just based on discussions you're having with your customers? And can you share your perspective on why that tariff uncertainty isn't driving more delays in order activity?

So, a couple of things. I'd say, generally speaking, and forget about order activity for a second. Do I think that there's going to be impacts to the market. I think there's no question that the market has already been impacted. I think that you see it in suppliers. You see it in other companies associated in the space. It's not like the market is off and running. There's no question that there's hesitancy across certain buyers. There's projects that have been pushed out. I think we are bucking the trend. And the reason we're bucking the trend is because we made an enormous amount of effort and gains in aligning ourselves with the right customers and the right projects, that would be well ahead of these potential issues. So, I'm not making market statements. I'm not trying to sit here and talk to you about the state of the market because I think there's risk in the state of the market. I don't think there's risk in our portfolio and the projects that we have, the backlog that we have and the revenue generation that we expect both from '25 and even for 2026. So much of our '26 revenue will be from projects that we started in 2025. So, we feel good about and we've gotten in painstaking detail with our customers about potential tariffs, what items could be tariffed, where they're at in that cycle and what it means to the projects that we're expecting to do, and that's why we're so confident in our ability to manage through this. But again, we're not sticking our head in the sand. We're not blind. We understand that there could be market risk. We just think that they're not going to affect us to the level that they may affect others.

That's really great color. And then just for my follow-up question, just going back to the discussions on pipeline. You talked about potentially revisiting 2023 revenue levels or greater in the -- sorry, yes, '24 levels, sorry, by 2026. Can you help us think through the path towards -- or if there is a path towards your prior 2017 peak of $3.5 billion or even the more recent peak of $2.5 billion. Just trying to think about where that business could go, not necessarily in one year, but on a multiyear basis?

Look, based on the activity levels that we're seeing, the truth is that, that isn't out of the question. And it's quite remarkable that we'd say that because we -- a year or two ago, you would have asked us that question, we would never have dreamed to given that answer. I'm not saying that we're there. I'm not saying that activity levels are the same, but with what we're seeing in potential future projects, the opportunity to maybe one day get there again, it is possible. So again, that's why we're so bullish. We don't have to get there, quite frankly. But if we can get anywhere near those levels, it's a monumental shift to the earnings potential of the Company.

We'll go to our next question from Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis.

Good quarter, guys. Marc, congratulations on your retirement. And Chris, welcome to the call. Most of my questions have been asked, I did want to ask you on Power Delivery. The market challenges you saw in distribution last year, are those behind you yet? And as you look at the year-over-year comparisons, when does that flip from a headwind to a tailwind?

Yes. So, thanks for the question. I think that things were officially better. We talked a lot about, especially the Midwest utilities and kind of a lot of the rate case resolutions that they went through in the fourth quarter. Obviously, that doesn't get all fixed in a quarter. So, we actually expect an improving environment throughout the year, although in the first quarter, it was slightly better than where it had been in the second half of the year, but still a tough comp on a year-over-year basis because a lot of that thing start to post Q1 last year. So, we feel good and quite frankly, expect it to get better. So, I think we're in a great spot.

There are no other questions at this time.

So, I'd just like to take this opportunity to thank everybody for joining us on today's call. We look forward to updating you on our second quarter call. And again, thank the men and women at MasTec for their hard work, commitment and dedication. Thank you.

This does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.