Good day, and welcome to the MasTec's First Quarter Fiscal Year 2013 Earnings Conference Call, initially broadcast on May 3, 2013. Let me remind participants that today's call is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Marc Lewis, MasTec's Vice President of Investor Relations. Marc?

Thanks, Odette, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to MasTec's first quarter earnings conference call. The following statement is made pursuant to the Safe Harbor for forward-looking statements described in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In these communications, we may make certain statements that are forward-looking, such as statements regarding MasTec’s future results, plans and anticipated trends in the industries where we operate. These forward-looking statements are the company’s expectations on the day of the initial broadcast of this conference call, and the company will make no effort to update these expectations based on subsequent events or knowledge. Various risks, uncertainties and assumptions are detailed in our press releases and filings with the SEC. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from results expressed or implied in these communications. In today's remarks by management, we will be discussing continuing operations adjusted financial metrics as discussed and reconciled in yesterday's press release, filings and supporting schedules. In addition, we may use certain non-GAAP financial measures in this call. A reconciliation of all non-GAAP financial measures not reconciled in these comments to the most comparable GAAP measure can be found in our earnings press release, our 10-Q or the Investor and News sections of our website located at mastec.com. With us today, we have Jose Mas, our Chief Executive Officer; and Bob Campbell, our Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer. Format of the call would be opening remarks and analysis by Jose, followed by a financial review from Bob. These discussions will be followed by a Q&A period, and we expect the call to last about 60 minutes. We have a lot of great things to talk about today, so now I'll turn it over to Jose. Jose?

Thanks, Marc. Good morning, and welcome to MasTec's 2013 first quarter call. Today, I will be reviewing our first quarter results, as well as providing my outlook for the markets we serve. First, some first quarter highlights. Revenue for the quarter was $919 million, a 24% increase over the prior year's first quarter. Continuing operations adjusted EBITDA was $79 million, an increase of 61% over the prior year's first quarter. EBITDA margins were 8.6%, a 190-basis-point improvement. Earnings per share were $0.27, up 93%. And cash flow from operations was $32 million. In summary, we had a record revenue, record EBITDA and a very strong start to the year. Revenue growth was broad-based, with growth across all of our segments with the exception of our renewable power generation business. We are fortunate to be in industries where demand for our services is high. We are experiencing increased opportunities across most of our segments, and our focus today is executing on those opportunities over both the short and long term. As a result, we are heavily investing in our business and gearing up for what we believe to be a very active and exciting future. With our recent upsized bond offering that Bob will discuss later in detail, we further strengthened our balance sheet. We are also seeing an increasing number of what we believe to be very good acquisition candidates. While most of our growth has been organic over the last couple of years, acquisitions give us the ability to increase our resources and better take advantage of those opportunities we are enjoying. Now I would like to cover our segment data. Our communications segment's revenue was $425 million for the quarter versus $389 million last year. EBITDA margin for this segment was 10.9% for the first quarter versus 8.4%…

Thank you, Jose, and good morning. Today, I'm going to cover Q1 financial results and 2013 guidance. And I'll also cover cash flow, liquidity, our capital structure and our recent bond offering. Consistent with prior calls, when I cover our financial results and our guidance, we will be discussing non-GAAP continuing operations adjusted EBITDA and earnings. A full reconciliation from GAAP results to continuing operations adjusted results is included in our 10-Q, in our press release and on our website. The only adjustment to our first quarter 2013 continuing operations results was to add back the $5.6 million pre-tax loss on debt extinguishment related to retiring our old senior notes. The debt extinguishment loss was $3.4 million after tax, which was a $0.04 negative impact on diluted earnings per share. As you may recall, our guidance specifically excluded this cost. Let me share a few thoughts about the economics of issuing our new senior notes and retiring the old senior notes. In the first quarter, we upsized our senior note offering and sold $400 million of new 4 7/8% notes due in 2023 and retired $150 million of 7 5/8% notes due in 2017. The long-term economics of our senior notes refinancing are just terrific. We obtained a large amount of long-term debt capital with a 275-basis-point interest rate improvement, and we extended our senior note maturities by 6 years. Given our organic growth and our acquisitive nature, we expect to use the new debt capital over time and, of course, we expect to deploy it with very good returns. However, we may not fully deploy the additional capital this year. And we, for sure, will incur higher interest costs while we carry the additional debt. The interest costs of additional debt is $6 million to $7 million or $0.04…

[Operator Instructions] We'll take your first question from Andy Kaplowitz from Barclays.

Jose, I have 2 questions in 20 parts, I think, but I'll try and keep it limited. Can you talk about your wireless business? The growth was impressive, actually. And is it -- I mean can you talk about your penetration into AT&T and also into non-AT&T? And I thought it was interesting that you put Samsung as a key driver of your strong wireless growth. So if maybe you could mention that too.

It's an exciting business. It's an exciting market. All of the major carriers are very aggressively ramping up their LTE programs. With LTE, there's a lot of other things that are happening in the industry in terms of new sites being constructed. The wireless services industry is changing in that a lot of the work is now happening at the top of a tower, which means that having tower climbing crews is the most critical factor in being successful in that business. We've been working on that for years now. We've made some small acquisitions to really bolster our capabilities around that. And today, we think we're definitely a market leader as it relates to that for all customers, right? So whether you're AT&T, or Sprint or T-Mobile or Verizon or whoever needs the work done, we think we're a very viable alternative and a key one. And over time, we think we're going to be a significant player in everybody's build plan. We think the market's going to continue to grow for a long time. We think that the maintenance component of the market is going to change long-term because it's all going to be tower climbing which traditionally, it hasn't been. So we think the business has great fundamentals, great long-term fundamentals. We're gearing up. We're well positioned. We think our business, with both our existing and our new customers, is going to continue to grow over time, and we're really excited about that business.

Do you think it's fair to say that most of the growth is share gains versus the market? I mean, what we see of the market is growing -- AT&T CapEx is growing this year, but not robustly, I would say.

I think with AT&T specifically, yes, we're having share gains. But as an industry, you're seeing a lot more capital flowing to the industry because you've got all carriers beginning a rollout plan of LTE, where you haven't had that in the past. So there are carriers that are rapidly expanding their CapEx, and then there are other carriers that obviously have big CapEx plans, but they're not expanding as rapidly, and we're having success with both.

Okay, that's helpful. So about transmission, maybe your confidence level, Jose, around the transmission backlog growth that you mentioned and your ability to get margins back up into the double digits versus where they were in the quarter. Maybe you could talk about whether some of the weather issues you experienced in 1Q have already gone away in 2Q. Is it just as you transition to spring, things get better and that's kind of the way it is?

Couple of things. First, our first quarter transmission margins were as expected. We didn't perform below what our internal expectations were. We knew we were going to have a tougher quarter in Q1. We knew it was going to be a tough comp. When you look at our transmission business, the challenge that we face right is we've gone through unbelievable growth. We've probably grown at a faster clip than anybody in the industry. But in relative size to the rest of us, it's still a fairly small entity, right? It's a sub $500 million of our business. Because of that, it's going to be highly impacted by very large project awards. So when we're starting a multi-hundred million dollar project, it impacts our business in a greater way because it's smaller. And as we get more of those, obviously you build a bigger base, the business gets bigger and it doesn't affect you as much. In Q1, the projects that we're going to be working on in 2013 happen to be in tougher geographies for weather early in the year. So weather did impact us because of where the geographic components of those projects were. Again, that was expected. And as we continue to grow our base and add more projects, that's going to begin to even out and really balance itself as the year plays out and that's what we expect. For the full year, we expect margins similar to those of 2012. We think that bidding activity has been strong for us for a long time. We're excited about the awards that we've gotten. We've got a lot of things on the plate that we think might happen for us. So we're very bullish on additional backlog expansion. We're very bullish on getting the projects that we have under our belt underway and really performing on those, and we think that's going to begin to flow through our margins in Q2 and for the balance of the year. And we expect to have a great year in transmission.

We'll move next to Noelle Dilts from Stifel. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: First on the pipeline side. Looking at -- it was definitely nice to hear about this ATEX Express award. First, I was wondering given that it's such a long line, if you could comment on how big northern portion is for you guys and in miles? And how long do you think that project will last? And then secondly, you sounded confident that Enbridge will remain one of your top customers this year. Can you discuss the nature of that work? Is it more midstream type small project activity or if there's some large project work involved with Enbridge as well?

So ATEX is a large pipeline that goes all the way from the Marcellus area all the way into the south. Some of that line is actually an existing line that's part of -- a new portion of that line is being built that will feed into that line. So I think the northern portion is somewhere between 300 to 400 miles, and we got a piece of that, So it's an exciting opportunity. It's a project that we will complete in 2013. So it's a fairly quick book and burn, although it's long-haul pipeline construction. As it relates to Enbridge, the work is all large diameter-long pipes, so we're not working on -- this isn't a shale business. This is a long-haul pipeline construction business. We're not going to get into the specifics of the projects. Obviously, they've been a top customer of ours for 2 consecutive quarters now. We expect them to remain there. They have significant plans not just for 2013, but well into the next couple of years, they have announced a number of different pipelines that they're going to be constructing, adding on to and building. They've been a good customer of ours for a long time. We've performed well for them, and we believe that if we continue to perform, we're going to have as much as we can handle with Enbridge. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Great, that's helpful. And my second question, just given all this investment that you've been making in equipment, can you give us a sense of how much of this equipment will be coming online in '13 that you'll be able to use versus -- I know most of the benefit is falling into '14. But if you could just maybe try to help give us a sense of the pace of that equipment? How quickly is it coming online for you guys?

Sure, Noelle. I think it's happening, right, and I think a lot of it has happened. So if you look at Q4, depreciation expense ramped up and a lot of that had to do with the equipment that we bought in Q4. If you look at our depreciation expense for Q1, it was up almost $10 million year-over-year, so a lot of that hit in Q1. Bob talked about our additional spend in Q2. So when you look at Q2, our depreciation expense on a year-over-year basis will be up about $12 million. And then you'll see that number begin to flatten out. So our Q3 and Q4 expectations around depreciation are Q3 will probably be the higher watermark because it will be the first quarter where we've got 3 months of all of the equipment that we purchased. But we'll actually see in our expectation a decrease in depreciation in Q4 as some of the existing purchases that we made start to come off. I mean all in all, our equipment is depreciating at about a 6-year life, so it's probably a little bit conservative. And most of that equipment will be in place in the first 6 months. Obviously, the revenue associated with that will not be. So while we'll be taking the hit earlier on in the year, as those revenues come online in the second half of '13 and beyond, it will begin to offset those expenses that we've been taking.

We'll move on to Alex Rygiel from Friedman, Billings and Ramsey. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Jose, you mentioned that the outlook for oil and gas you're hopeful that you can get, call it, 30% growth in 2013 versus 2012. But I'm trying to figure out where you're maybe being most conservative in your model, and it seems to be it might be with that forecast. Because basically, if we just take your revenue from the first quarter in oil and gas, we assume that revenue number is the same in 2Q, 3Q and 4Q, you're going to get to that up to 30%. But your commentary sounds a lot more bullish. The recent award would suggest that revenues are going to grow in oil and gas and the margin there -- I mean clearly it's your best-margin business. So am I right by assuming this is maybe the single business that's got the greatest upside to your guidance?

Yes. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: And when you think about growth in 2014, are you positioning the company today to grow at 10% or continue to grow very significantly over and above that?

Alex, I think it's going to have to do with the market. I think the market is going to give us the opportunity to grow especially within that segment, in particular, a lot more than 10%. You're right on your earlier commentary. So can we grow the business 40%, 50% this year? The answer is maybe, right, depending on when projects get awarded, when projects start. Depending on how much we grow it next year off of that base will obviously depend on the kind of growth rates that we can experience in the future. But we're not building and making the investments that we're making for what we think will be a 10% growth business next year. But obviously, we think we can grow with it at strong double digits. Now overall as a company, the kind of guidance that we've given in the past is we think we can grow the business at an organic level at close to double digits. Some of those businesses will grow faster than others, and obviously between transmission, oil and gas pipeline and wireless, they're going to carry the growth of this business for the foreseeable future, and even renewables next year with some of the other ones growing less at a more moderate clip. Alexander J. Rygiel - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: And if I can follow up real quick. As it relates to the renewables business, it sort of sounded like you were going to carry some excess expense and body and assets waiting for 2014 to kind of come back. But if I remember correctly, that wasn't the highest margin business back in 2011 and '12. So I don't want to say why not just exit it? But sort of why carry that expense if the margin profile might not be as good as other segments?

So couple of things. One, the excess cost and burden that we're carrying there has a lot to do with G&A, so you'll see that our G&A spiked up a little bit in the first quarter. Some of that was due to, as Bob spoke about, the bad debt expense. But a portion of that was also some of the SG&A at the businesses in particular in that area and that's going to keep SG&A a little bit higher than last year as a percentage just because we're going to be carrying some extra resources. So it's a great question, Alex, in terms of why is it that we want to be in renewables long-term. And I think we've taken a very macro view of that business, and we've talked a little bit about it in the past. But our goal is to be a power generation contractor. Part of it is renewables, but the reality is that we want to penetrate the other parts of power generation. The work that we do in renewables and the customers that we do it for in renewables will be the same customers that we try to build out our power generation business with. So the reason that we continue to want to be in renewables is because the relationships that we're building due to our renewables business, we think is the one that's going to open up doors for us long-term on other power generation service offerings, which is where we want to be. So it's important for us to serve those clients because that's where our long-term goal is of getting within those clients other pieces of the power generation business.

We'll move next to William Bremer from Maxim Group.

Appreciate the color in the Q regarding the segment breakdown. Want to start there first in terms of your -- if you would care to provide possibly some targets to each one of these segments in terms of margin targets for '13. And then my second question will deal with the backlog. Is it safe to assume that pricing in the backlog is better than, say, a year ago? And how is that trending outside of power gen?

Okay, so let's start with your margin question. What we've been saying all along is we expected our communication margins to continue to grow in '13 versus '12, primarily driven by wireless. I think we saw that in Q1, and I think we'll see that continuing as the balance of the year progresses. So we expect '13 to be up in margins relative to '12 in communications. As we look at our oil and gas business, we spent a lot of commentary last year talking about our troubled projects and what that would have meant to margins without them. So I can expect that you're going to have a full year of flow-through in our oil and gas business as if we wouldn't have had troubled projects, so we expect strong EBITDA growth in that business. In our transmission business, we're expecting comparable margins to 2012. And in our renewables business, we're expecting margins to be down because of utilization levels. And I think when you throw that all in, it kind of comes in to our guidance of the 10.6% versus the 8.9% last year. And I think that's the puts and takes from it. As it relates to backlog, our backlog is growing, particularly in our oil and gas business had nice backlog growth. We expect to have continued backlog growth in our transmission business. We've been positively talking about pricing in both of those markets for a long time. And I think that in the case of oil and gas pipeline, you've already seen it begin to affect margins. I think you'll see it affect margins in transmissions as the year plays out. So we think that our backlog is strong and more importantly, the jobs within our backlog, all the margin profile that we expect and we want, and that's why we're guiding to the numbers that we're guiding to.

Okay. Secondly, on the acquisition front, you called that out, are these potentially going to be more bolt-ons or are we looking for new technologies to integrate into some of these segments?

Well 2 things. One, we've been very vocal and very clear about our acquisition strategy in the past, the type of company that we want to buy, the type of multiple that we want to pay. That will be our mantra. We're not get away from what's made us successful so you can expect that we're going to buy midsized companies. We're going to buy them at aggressive multiples. We're going to buy businesses that we think we can help grow substantially, which is something that I think we've been able to demonstrate over the last few years. So I don't think you should expect us to stop or to do something different than what's really gotten us here. And two, we're going to do it within the businesses that we're in. So we're not necessarily looking at penetrating new markets like the acquisition that we made last year. Sometime, we're looking at having some more verticals within the markets that we service. But quite frankly, there's so much opportunity in what we do and we're not everywhere. We're not geographically dispersed enough. We think there's a lot of add-on that we can do and help bolster those companies with added opportunities that we can bring to them. So that should be your expectation.

Moving on to Tahira Afzal from KeyBanc.

First question is on pipeline. The enterprise award is pretty notable in terms of size and its NGL/ethane focus. Jose, if you look at your opportunity set of potential awards over the next, let's say, 3 months, 4 months, is there a sort of orientation in terms of whether they are more natural gas, NGL-oriented or whether they're crude-oriented, is it the sort of spread across the board. And is rail as an alternative impacting maybe the fees of some of the crude opportunities you have?

So lot of questions. When you look at our pipeline business, we're doing well over $1 billion now. So in essence, we're impacted by all of the different forms of natural resources, right, so whether it's straight gas or NGL or oil. Now we're working on all forms of pipelines and they maybe different in one shale, may have more one than the other. So I think today, we've got great visibility, and we're working on all forms of it, and we're going after all forms of it. So there are opportunities in each of those areas, and we're going to pursue them all. So we're not necessarily looking at one more than the other. Obviously, some of the larger projects could be more of one than the other but today, we're looking at them all. As it relates to rail, there's no question when you look at what's happened in Bakken and the effect that rails had on the Bakken shale and the lack of pipelines there. I think, over time, that will change, but today, rail is a huge method of exporting a lot or moving a lot of those resources out of the Bakken. And I don't think it makes financial sense so I think over time, pipelines make a lot more sense. And I think we'll see that. So yes, it -- I mean is it slowing down the rate of pipelines? I don't know the answer to that, but it's definitely a way that people are getting around the need for pipelines today, but I think it's cost-prohibitive in the long term and pipelines are going to be required to do it.

Got it. Okay. My second question is in regards to acquisitions. You talked briefly about that to an earlier question. But as you grow larger, which is great and you've done a phenomenal job of delivering the midsize means also a little larger than it was maybe 3, 4 years ago. And your footprint around the U.S. and your traditional market has grown. So if you were to think a little outside of your comfort zone as adjacent market, would it be fair to say if I were to look at the market most adjacent to yourselves? You've talked about power generation. You might be going on to the processing side. Are those fair markets actually within your current capabilities?

So at the end of the day, there's two things we look at. One is the market opportunity, and two is the actual target opportunity. As we look at the target opportunity, a, it needs to be in an area where we think there's a greater market opportunity. But more importantly, what do we think we can do with that target? So how do we help that target significantly increase its business, improve its margins and ultimately, be able to buy it at an attractive level and turn it into a big win when we can grow revenues, grow margins and get into it at a fair multiple? So I think it plays a little bit into both of those. There are definitely areas that we want to continue to grow into. So that's part of it, but it's more driven by the actual target and what we ultimately think we can do. So midsize, when I think of midsize, yes, midsize is growing obviously. If you look at some of the last few acquisitions we've made, they're generally getting a little bit bigger. But at the end of the day, it's not about the size of the business when we buy it. It's about the size of the business that we think we can make it. And as we buy these companies that we're buying, we think there's substantial opportunities for growth, and that's what really excites us and interests us about these opportunities.

Liam Burke from Janney Capital Markets.

You're building up a fair amount of capital on the debt deal. This year, based on your earnings guidance, you should generate some healthy free cash flow. On the other side, you've got decent visibility on projects, and you mentioned earlier that you're a disciplined acquirer. You won't overpay. In terms of the amount of capital you anticipate laying out, could you give us a sense of the return requirements you're looking at vis-a-vis your cost of capital?

Well again, we've been very disciplined. Rate of return on our acquisitions has been off the charts, and that's our expectation. So it's not about -- we're not -- when we buy a company, we're not looking at savings of synergies. We're not looking at multiples off of some future cash flow. We're looking at multiples of today. So we think we're buying right, and then our job is to grow those businesses and turn them into home runs, right? I mean we're not looking for singles and doubles. We're looking to, worst case, hit a single or double, and best case, be in positions to really do a lot better than that. I think the typical size of our acquisitions have gotten a little bit bigger, right? I think that in that hundred million dollar purchase price range is where you should expect us to continue to play. And again, it's got to be the right target with the right fundamentals and that gives us the opportunities to grow those businesses and get, in over the long-term, what would be a very, very, very attractive multiple.

Okay. And then just on the project side. I mean, as Bob highlighted, between capital leases and CapEx this year, it's in an anticipation beyond '13 of projects, are you still looking at these projects as having to generate a minimum return similar to where you'd look at an acquisition?

Yes, and obviously, they're different. The capital that we're buying -- there's 2 ways to grow, right? One is you grow strictly through acquisitions, which we haven't done because most of our growth has been organic. But over time, you've got to fund that organic growth. And when we look at -- we always think that growing our business organically will give us far better returns than growing the business acquisitively. But again they're not mutually exclusive. We can do both. So we're investing on our business for organic growth. We expect to invest in our business via acquisitions and really continue what we think is going to be a very strong growth profile.

Adam Thalhimer from BBT Capital Markets. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Jose, can you talk a little bit about with regards to the tower-climbing crews, the opportunities for you to switch some employees from maybe climbing wind towers to climbing cell towers?

Well, part of climbing towers is the fear of being very up -- very high up in the air, and the wind business is obviously down significantly in the U.S., not just with MasTec, but with really all of the major contractors. And tower climbing in the wireless side is an excellent avenue for those employees. It's a great place to work. There's no question that they need to be trained differently for it and there's different nuances on the job. But their work skill, the skill set and the characteristics are very similar so we have moved a lot of people from our wind business into our wireless business and we're actively recruiting people from within that industry into our wireless business because we think it's a short training process. So it's absolutely an area where we're looking to increase our resource base. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: And I also wanted to ask about electric transmission. Jose, does it feel like that the [indiscernible] opportunities there continue to accelerate or does it just feel like it's so good that we're just kind of plateauing at a very healthy level for the whole industry?

I think we're definitely at a very healthy level for the whole industry. We did see it increase a little bit from our commentary at the end of the year to our commentary now where we're actually seeing a little bit more in terms of the total opportunity size. But again, we expect it to be a very healthy market long-term, and we think there's plenty of work out there for everybody and it's going to be a very, very good next couple of years in that business.

Up next, John Rogers with D.A. Davidson. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Just following up on the -- Jose, on the transmission side of the business. I mean you had great success in communications, I mean, across the board. But how long before that could be a billion dollar business? And do you have to invest a lot more to get there?

So John, that's our goal. We've been saying that we're not in this business to be a sub $500 million business. We want to be in businesses in MasTec that can approach $1 billion, right? Really, today, our only billion dollar business is, in theory, is our oil and gas business. We need to win more work. We think we're well in our way of getting there. We're not going to get there in the next year, but we think we're going to have substantial growth there and we think within the next couple of years, that business will absolutely be at least approaching that number. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: But can you do that organically?

We think so. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay, okay. And then the other thing, just on the communications side of the business. I know you've seen a lot of growth out of the wireless side of it. But there seems to be more interest potentially over the next couple of years into upgrading them, the in-ground business and especially, fiber connections and things like that. Is that an opportunity for MasTec?

It is. That's where we started. MasTec was started in the wireline telecommunications industry. We still have a significant presence there. There's been a lot, obviously, in the last few months from different carriers about their plans. So do I think it's an opportunity? The answer is yes. Has that opportunity hit in yet? The answer is no, but it's coming and we will be a player in it. We'll determine at the time, as we see the opportunities and the scale of the opportunities, we will decide how to play in them. But it's absolutely -- it's an improving market. No question about it.

We'll go to a follow-up from Noelle Dilts from Stifel. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: My follow-up question is just trying to understand the underutilization in the wind business. Can you walk us through by quarter when you think that's going to be most severe in the second quarter and that gets a little bit better as we get to the back half of the year. Can you just help us out a little bit there?

The 2 challenging quarters for us are going to be second and third, so we expect revenues to be down about $145 million in the second quarter. When you look at year-over-year in the third quarter, it's probably a similar number or maybe just slightly higher. And then a much better number in Q4, we'll still be down in Q4, but we'll be down a lot less. And then with the comps that we'll have this year versus next year, '14 should be a fairly easy comp year for that business compared to '13. But the high watermark is going to be somewhere between Q2 and Q3. So both Q2 and Q3 are going to be affected greatly and then Q4, it should really soften out. And again, because of some of the commentary around our transmission and pipeline work, we're in a much better position to offset that decline in Q3 than we are in Q2. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. So on the operating profit line where you had a slight loss in the first quarter, do you think it could be maybe a little bit worse than the second quarter and third?

I don't think it's going to drastically be different because the actual -- we've done a good job of rightsizing the operational side of the business. We're carrying a little bit of excess CapEx -- I'm sorry, of excess G&A. But outside of that, we'll manage it okay. We expect it to be a little bit worse here going forward, but not much worse.

Your last question in the queue will come from John Rogers from D.A. Davidson. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Just one quick follow-up, Jose or Bob. The bad debt expense, what was that? I know it was a modest amount, a little less than $3 million and is there a significant debt there?

No. I mean, we routinely quarterly, of course, take a look at our bad debt reserve, and we do it on a global basis. We look at all of the accounts. We look at the aging and we felt like we needed to add to it. We're also a larger company and still a relatively modest amount of total bad debt reserve. If you look at the numbers, I think it's about $15 million as a company. And for those of you who may not have seen it, we added about $3 million to our bad debt reserve. And it's more of a look at overall than like account-specific. We do look at specific accounts, of course, but then we make a global judgment. So it was just good accounting, good solid accounting.

That does conclude our Q&A session. I'd like to turn the conference over to Jose Mas for any closing remarks.

All right. Thank you, everybody, for participating and we look forward to updating you on our next call.

Again, that does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you, all, for your participation.