Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Third Quarter 2012 Matador Resources Company Earnings Conference Call. My name is Erin, and I'll be operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes, and the replay will be available through Wednesday, November 21, 2012, as discussed and described in the company's earnings release issued this morning. Some of the presenters today will reference certain non-GAAP financial measures regularly used by Matador Resources in measuring the company's financial performance. Reconciliations of such non-GAAP financial measures with the comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with the GAAP are contained at the end of the company's earnings release. As a reminder, certain statements included in this morning's presentation may be forward looking and reflect the company's current expectations or forecasts of future events based on the information that is now available. Please refer to the forward-looking statement in the company's earnings release for more information. I'd now like to turn the call over to Joe Foran, Chairman, President and CEO. You may proceed.

Thank you, Erin. Good morning, everybody. This is Joe Foran, and I'm joined by the senior staff of Matador, including David Lancaster, Chief Operating Officer; David Nicklin, Executive Head of Exploration; and Matt Hairford, Head of Operations. As a brief introduction, Matador has been in business over 25 years in one form or another, and we have operated on a few simple principles: first, an excellent technical staff and board; good properties in good neighborhoods; and financial discipline. 2012 has been about our development of our Eagle Ford acreage and increasing the oil profile of the company. The third quarter was a good step along that path. We are now about 80% oil by revenue. We have a 2-rig drilling program in the Eagle Ford, and our technical team has continued to cut drilling and completion costs while improving the performance of our wells. This has been accomplished through improvements in geo-steering, reduced chokes and maintenance of bottomhole pressures, improvements in our frac design, including the use of zipper-fracs. If you looked at the data we released earlier this year with our IP rates, along with various choke sizes and well pressures, we think this information really attests to a very strong well performance and operating practices, some of the engineering choices that have had the effect over the course of the year of our bringing to production online more slowly, as you know, than we had thought in the beginning of the year. But this is just a delay of production and not lost production. More important, and as further testimony to that, I'm happy to report that our oil production, as of this morning, is over 5,000 barrels a day, which, as many of you know, is a very exciting milestone for the company and an important target…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of William Butler from Stephens.

Can you all maybe elaborate a little bit more on what EOG is doing on your Atascosa acreage? Is there any update you all can provide on that?

David Nicklin, you're probably in the best position to answer that question. David is our Executive Head of Exploration.

Yes, we do have a forward notice from EOG that before the end of this year, they plan on spudding a horizontal well in the Buda within the Atascosa acreage. We're excited about that. It's a play we're very interested in, and we look forward to moving forward with that.

Okay. And then are there -- is that an area that you all think would have any prospectivity for the Pearsall? Are there any plans for you or EOG there? And maybe just as -- can you speak a little more broadly regarding the Pearsall on you all's total acreage?

Joe, would you like me to take that?

Yes, why don't you continue.

Yes, with regard to the Atascosa acreage, in particular, EOG have been drilling a series of Pearsall wells, and they have informed us that they are interested in Atascosa from the standpoint to the Pearsall, but they have a couple of other locations just outside of the Atascosa acreage to the south of us. And they plan to drill those first before they finalize a location within the Atascosa acreage. So we are very interested in the Pearsall. We are watching it and studying it. There's quite a number of wells being drilled in and around our existing acreage where we do have Pearsall rights. So we -- in more in particular, our Martin Ranch area, there are wells permitted around the Martin Ranch area. And the Martin Ranch area is just to the south of some of the more promising liquids-rich production from the Pearsall. So we have done regional studies, and we are very intrigued and interested. We're not under any pressure to drill immediately, so we will continue to watch the play as it evolves.

Thank you, Dave. That's a good response. I don't have anything to add to that, William, but -- unless you have a follow-up to that...

And your next question comes from the line of Yiktat Fung from Jefferies & Company.

My first question, I was just wondering if you could give us a little bit more color on the '13 CapEx and how that's going to be allocated. Specifically, I'm interested in whether there'll be a significant amount allocated to Haynesville now that gas prices have rebounded.

We're going to really go into that on Analyst Day, and I don't want to try to jump that gun. The biggest I'd say all about the gas prices is the Haynesville is HBP, so there's no rush to get there. And it's largely dependent on prices. In the investor presentation that we're releasing later today, we show some sensitivities of the Haynesville to gas prices and to production costs. And they -- we're certainly getting within range where it's starting to look attractive. But we'll go into any plans for the Haynesville on Analyst Day, but that's about all I can say at this time.

Okay. And then I guess just one more from me. Kind of what are your current thoughts for the Zavala acreage now that you have tested all those different horizons and your results haven't been as exciting as they could be, I guess?

Well, yes, the Zavala acreage was never critical. The critical part of our Eagle Ford development was across that 9,000-foot contour, and we've drilled that and, obviously, very pleased with all of those results. The Zavala was taken as exploration acreage. It's a little more up-dip in a more shallow horizon, so you don't have the benefit of geo-pressure. It's a more shallow depth. The oil is in place there, and on the one Eagle Ford test that we drilled there, it's going to make probably 100,000 barrels EUR not -- of BOE equivalent. But that's a lot to work with, but that's not like the -- as strong as our other Eagle Ford performance. That block of acreage is HBP, all rights, all depths, so we have plenty of time to look at it and study it. But there's oil there, and as you look at activity and look in the investor presentation that will be out today, you can see that's a very active area and other people are drilling. And so I think it still shows promise in the Eagle Ford, but it's at a different level than the rest of our Eagle Ford acreage.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Brian Corales from Howard Weil.

In terms of Eagle Ford costs, can you maybe just talk about kind of what you're seeing maybe trending down and maybe a guesstimate for what your future AFEs are going to be for '13, maybe by maybe LaSalle and then the DeWitt area?

Ryan, would you like to take this?

Yes. Right now, our Eagle Ford costs are in the -- on a normalized basis in our LaSalle area, it's the $7 million to $7.5 million range. And in the East, it kind of breaks out in 2 different costs. You have your deeper, higher-pressure, high-temperature wells that are in the $10 million cost with resin-coated sand and the third string of casing. On the shallower side of our Eastern acreage, it's in the $8.5 million to $9 million range. And 2013, looks -- it's going to start off around the same and maybe, as we shave a little bit more here and there, maybe 10% less on top of those numbers.

Okay. And then just switching to the Permian. Is there a lot of other kind of these smaller packages maybe that others kind of -- are below the radar screen for? Are there other things that you all are looking at in the Permian to try to add to that inventory?

I'm not sure what you're asking there, Brian.

Is there other, like, packages? You all added, I think it was, like 3,000-or-so acres. Is there other packages that you all are looking at, potentially can get? I think most of those may be flying -- are below the radar for some of the bigger players in the Permian.

You mean acreage packages?

Acreage packages, yes.

We're going to be opportunistic. That's one thing that has been our -- has been a little delay in setting the capital spending for next year is to try to get a better view on what we wanted to spend on acreage acquisitions. This year, it was about $25 million. And we're seeing an increased number of opportunities all around. So no, I mean, we're -- Brian, as you know, we're always very optimistic, particularly on land, but -- and we're seeing more, but we haven't really committed to anything other than what we've announced.

Okay. But you all don't see anything out there right now that gets you excited?

No, we're -- sometimes, it's things that get you excited, but it's a matter of price and negotiation. So we're seeing a lot of, I think, very attractive acreage opportunities in a number of locations, but just trying to determine which is the best and being selective has been more the concern.

And your next question comes from the line of Stephen Shepherd from Simmons & Company.

Just real quick, is there any leasehold spend baked into your '13 capital guidance at this point? Or does the modestly lower language from your press release pertain specifically to drill bit CapEx?

Can you clarify that, Steve? I'm not sure I understand.

I'm just asking -- in the press release, you mentioned that capital spending will be modestly lower year-over-year. Are you talking just with regard to drill bit CapEx, or is that a total CapEx number? And if so...

It's a total number, Steve. Last year, in 2012, we spent about $25 million, so it was less than 10% of the total budget. I'm not sure what it will be this year. But when I talked about being modestly lower, I'm talking about just the whole budget itself.

Okay, that's great. And one more, if I could. You mentioned earlier that, that 4Q oil production had surpassed that 5,000 barrel mark. Was that something that you all achieved just within the past few days? Or was that sometime earlier in the quarter, in October? Just wondering if you could kind of frame that up a little bit for me.

Stephen, that's just recently.

And your next question is a follow-up from the line of Yiktat Fung from Jefferies & Company.

Just a couple more questions. On the acre spacing, 80-acre spacing test, can you remind me where that is and how much data you have gotten so far in terms of how long those wells have been on and if you see any interference so far?

David Lancaster, would you like to try that question?

Yes, sir, I'd be happy to. There'd been a couple of places now where we've, for sure, tried the 80-acre spacing. One is on the Love tract that we have in DeWitt County, and the other one is on our Northcut tract that we have in LaSalle County. And we drilled most of these 80-acre offsets recently, so we don't have a great deal of information from them yet. I'd say the 2 Northcut wells we probably got on the order of a couple of months now, and on the Love wells, probably just a couple of weeks. But I would say, so far, so good. I don't think we're seeing any evidence of any interference at this point. I would have been surprised if we had, frankly.

Okay. And just one last one. Did you recently bring a couple of new wells online? Or kind of what does the quarter -- what is the quarter looking like in terms of when the new wells are coming online?

We expect to have 4, maybe 5 wells come online during these last 6 weeks of the quarter. And that would be 2 on Martin Ranch, 1 on Northcut and the Lewton #2.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This ends the Q&A portion of this morning's conference call. I would like to turn the call over to management for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Erin. Just -- we want to remind everybody, for a little more color, there'll be an investor presentation that will be released today and available on our website and will be 8-K-ed. And then finally, I'd like to close by simply saying I'm now the largest shareholder in the company, and I want to say how pleased and proud I am of Matador and how it's doing and how well the staff has performed this year. We have a great staff, we have some great properties, and we believe we have a great outlook for the next year and hope you'll join us on Analyst Day, December 6. Thank you all very much for listening in, and hope to see you all soon.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation today. This concludes the program.