Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Fourth Quarter 2020 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's program is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's program, Ashish Saran, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Marvell's Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2020 Earnings Call. Joining me today are Matt Murphy, Marvell's President and CEO; and Jean Hu, our CFO. I would like to remind everyone that certain comments today may include forward-looking statements, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties and which could cause our actual results to differ materially from management's current expectations. Please review these cautionary statements and risk factors contained in our earnings press release, which we filed with the SEC today and posted on our website as well as our most recent 10-K and 10-Q filings. We do not intend to update our forward-looking statements. During our call today, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation between our GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures is available on our website in the Investor Relations section. With that, I'll turn the call over to Matt for his comments on our performance.

Great. Thanks, Ashish, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me start with a quick recap of Marvell's financial highlights for fiscal year 2020. Our GAAP revenue was $2.7 billion, GAAP gross margin was 50.3%, and GAAP income per diluted share was $2.34. On a non-GAAP basis, our gross margin was 63.3% and non-GAAP earnings per share was $0.66. Fiscal 2020 was clearly a challenging year for the semiconductor industry. But against this backdrop of macroeconomic uncertainty, Marvell continues to take bold steps towards becoming a leader in infrastructure solutions. Not only did we achieve the complete realization of synergies from the integration of Cavium in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, 2 quarters ahead of schedule, we announced and closed 3 additional strategic transactions within the year. We acquired Aquantia and Avera and divested our Wi-Fi business. In fact, the integration of Aquantia and Avera is well ahead of plan and this is reflected in our lower OpEx expectations for the first quarter of fiscal 2021, which Jean will discuss in her section. Implementing all the key learnings from the Cavium acquisition, our IT and operations team did an amazing job in completing the ERP integration of Aquantia in 1 day and Avera within 5 days of closing the transactions. In addition to the portfolio transformation, we won a number of key designs in fiscal 2020, which we expect will fuel multiple years of revenue growth for the company. In wireless infrastructure, we started ramping our first-generation of 5G processors at Samsung, won their next-generation 5G baseband processor; and yesterday, we announced an even deeper collaboration with them. During the last year, we also won a fronthaul interface chip and entered into the radio head with processors from massive MIMO. Equally exciting, earlier today, Nokia announced an expanded relationship with Marvell…

Thanks, Matt, and good afternoon, everyone. As a reminder, our guidance for the fourth quarter provided on December 3, 2019 assumed full quarter of results from the Wi-Fi business. Subsequently, we completed divestiture of our Wi-Fi business on December 6, approximately 5 weeks into the fourth quarter. So our results reflect the partial quarter contributions from the Wi-Fi business. We then updated only our revenue guidance to reflect the closing of the Wi-Fi sale. Revenue in the fourth quarter was $718 million, better than our updated guidance of $710 million at the middle point. Networking represented 52% of our revenue in the fourth quarter and the storage contributing 41%. Revenue from our other business was $44 million in the fourth quarter below expectations and accounted for 7% of our revenue. As a reminder, this business consist of products such as the printer solutions and application processes, we have stopped investing, so they will continue to decline over time. In fact, our guidance for the first quarter for fiscal 2021 anticipate sequential decline in revenue in the high teens on a percentage basis from the other business. GAAP gross margin was 42.5%, which included the amortization of both Aquantia and Avera inventory step-up cost. Non-GAAP gross margin was 62.3% of revenue. Our gross margin results in the fourth quarter reflect the negative impact from certain onetime transition costs related to the Avera acquisition, as we discussed last quarter. GAAP operating expenses were $419 million. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $306 million. GAAP operating loss was $114 million. Non-GAAP operating profit was $141 million or 19.6% of revenue. During the quarter, to better align the global economic ownership of our intellectual property rights with our current and future business operations, we transferred certain intellectual property to our subsidiary in Singapore. This internal IP…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Atif Malik from Citi. [Operator Instructions]

A nice job on the results and guide. And congratulations on the expanded Nokia relationship. Matt, the team has talked about $750 million pipeline of site 5G infrastructure sales; $600 million across Samsung, Nokia and then $150 million from Avera, about 20% of the $4 billion opportunity. Can you just talk about with the new expanded Nokia relationship and then the Samsung collaboration, how is the team tracking to those numbers?

Sure. Great. Thanks, Atif. Yes, I think you got it exactly right. Just for everybody on the phone, we started off with a base case that we outlined pre-Avera, which was $600 million, which included the pipeline that we had identified of one business at that point. We successfully closed Avera, which brought in numbers in that approximate range you mentioned about roughly half of that business was 5G exposed. And so the way I would think about it is that the announcements that you've seen clearly add additional revenue on top of that. I think what we're excited about is, we really have now multiple customers for our 5G solutions, multiple products that we're selling to those customers, and that actually layer in over multiple generations, including existing business we're shipping today, new product ramps happening this year. And then as you referenced, even on our announcement with Nokia, a multigenerational agreement where we have products ramping later this year, but then even ongoing partnership to do more in the coming years on a spectrum of products. So I think, overall, it's very positive and clearly represents the announcements we've made, certainly a substantially higher number to what we've already communicated.

And as a follow-up, Jean, the 5% reduction from the virus, can you just talk about storage versus networking? Is it more storage-related than networking?

Yes. So very high level, a lot of things are unknown. So our estimate right now is more like 40% is related to storage side, 60% is related to networking side. Matt can give you more color on the networking side. We have some part of business, which there's a component shortage that impacted our networking business. And storage side, a similar thing. Our customers, they have some supply chain disruption, so that's what we know right now.

Yes. I think, just to conclude, we've tried to size the impact as best we can. And as Jean mentioned, from our side, there's really 2 types of supply chain disruptions: There's disruption to some of our products, which are -- the bulk of the products that we ship every quarter are integrated circuits, but we do have some board business, both in Ethernet NICs and host bus adapters for fiber channel as well as some of the board-level products for smartNICs. And so even though our supplier base is actually outside of China and some of the impacted regions, they're having some challenges in sourcing some of the components. So that's one dynamic we see, but we're working through that. And then the second is, obviously, many of our end customers, factories or subcons are not at full capacity. So it's a fluid situation. But right now, what we're sizing is really what we see as supply chain-related impacts, both to us as well as our customers.

Our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America.

Matt, my first question is on 5G. So the opportunity on the base station side, I think, has been clear, and you've articulated that very well. I wanted to ask on the radio side. What's the opportunity to leverage this kind of beachhead you have with Avera? And I think recently, you also announced a partnership with Analog Devices for some integrated radio solutions, and there's obviously a lot more radios, heightened complexity on that side and perhaps the chance to displace more FPGAs. So talk to us about the radio opportunity for Marvell in 5G.

Sure. Thanks. And I think we very much see our opportunity. It's both in the base station or the base BBU as well as the radio head, and we started to indicate that in the last few calls and even in some of my comments today, where, as an example, with Samsung, we're doing some very customized things with them in the radio head itself, which is really bringing our processing capability up from the base station unit into the radio head. And on top of that, so you sort of pick up, one trend is being processing power, processing, compute, moving up closer to the antenna. But the second is that, at least in some of the initial deployments of 5G, Korea was one example, but there's others. There's quite a high-density of massive MIMO radio heads attached to each base station. And so you sort of think about the idea that there's more processing power moving to the radio head, and then there's more radio heads attached per base station. It does create a significant opportunity. And that's a trend, by the way, that we see more broadly and not just is limited to one customer. So I think that's certainly exciting. I think the second is with respect to Analog Devices, we're sort of seeing each other now in these types of applications, starting with our DFE business that we have, but also in some of these applications where we're being asked to do more customized things in massive MIMO. And if you think about the architecture, where they have one of the leading positions, obviously, in the RF transceiver market and data converter market and us having a very strong position in the DFE, which is basically the digital chip that interfaces with the analog and mixed-signal functions. The coupling of those 2 is becoming even more and more important and so how do -- there's questions from how do we do things like co-packaging products together? How do we align on what the most ideal interfaces are for the chips to communicate with each other? What are the best architectures that we can pursue? And since the 2 companies are extremely complementary in their offerings, we see it as a great opportunity to actually innovate together and provide optimized solutions for our customers who really want to differentiate their products. And so the ADI team has got tremendous experience in this area. We, obviously, have a very experienced team of architects and technologists. And so really, the basis of the collaboration is to be able to address customers jointly and do that in a coordinated manner. So that's what we're doing. So I think the bottom line is we're as excited about the radio head opportunities as we are in the rest of the entire base station system.

Got it. And for my follow-up, Matt, thanks for the color on the storage side. I think you mentioned client is now only about 5% of that business. I forgot whether you mentioned it just for storage or of the entire company. But my question really is, what is the right way to think about your storage business on a 2- to 3-year basis. Is it still kind of a flattish business? Is it a low single-digit growth business? What is the right conceptual way to think about the storage business for Marvell?

Yes. So yes, just to clarify. So yes, I was pretty explicit, but I'll say it again. The 5% number I gave you was for entire company. And so -- and for those of you who that have followed us from the beginning of our journey, I mean, I don't know exactly what this number was, Jean, but it was probably 30%, 40% of company back in 2016, so we've really worked on this one. And certainly, 2019 probably accelerated some of this transition that we already saw happening. So as we look forward, I think a couple of things: One is, we're very excited about our growth drivers. We did pivot the engineering 2 or 3 years ago to this nearline and enterprise-type of market for cloud capacity. I think there's a view that, that's going to continue to grow in terms of demand for those types of drives and we've increased our position both on the controller side as well as the addition of preamps. So that's a nice growth driver for us. The second is in SSD, as we've made the pivot from sort of supplying commodity client controllers to NAND OEMs to doing very sophisticated products that are doing things like Ethernet-attached storage or and, certainly, this trend of this do-it-yourself model, where we partner directly with the end OEM to define really an SSD, SOC, if you will. That trend is going very well and that we expect revenue growth from that. And so there's a number of exciting growth initiatives. And so I think, although a lot of the decline in client has occurred, clearly, on the HDD side, there will still be more to go as PCs transition. So the way we think about this business is we do think about it as certainly looking forward, given the exposure we have to client, it's something that can grow, it would be very modest. And we think keeping this in the low single-digit range is a very achievable goal. And given the strategic nature of this business to Marvell and the profitability profile, it's -- I think we got the right balance of investment and growth for this particular segment of our company.

Our next question comes from the line of Tore Svanberg from Stifel.

Yes. Congratulations on the strong results. First of all, coming back to the radio head opportunity. Obviously, it depends a lot on the kind of MIMO architecture, but should we think of content here kind of being in the several hundred dollars range? If you could just add some color there, that would be great.

Well, look, I think, as was indicated in the prior questions, we do have a footprint today in radio head in a number of the applications. Some of those are from DFE or some of those are -- or actually, we indicated this also that certain customers have started using our fusion-based products to do massive MIMO processing while transitioning to more customized solutions. So those are there, and you should assume that these are large, advanced node digital chips. And so we're not calling out ASP specifically, but they're clearly high ASP devices in that, I don't know, call it, $100-ish plus range, and you can go -- you can sort of go multiples of that depending on the complexity and how many units, et cetera. So yes, these are normal large digital chips. And then, obviously, I know from your past, you're quite -- even today, you're still very knowledgeable about the analog market. So I think you know what that TAM looks like. And I think you also understand the interdependencies of the 2 and how critical that is to system design. So yes, it's really about the 2 companies working together and helping pull each other into mutually beneficial opportunities where we can work together. But yes, as far as ASPs goes, they're bigger digital chips.

Very good. And as my follow-up, you've talked in the past about the programmable approach really creating a lot of stickiness for you in your design wins, as we look at these next partnerships that you've announced, especially the additional one with Samsung and also with Nokia, should we think about that, that stickiness still prevailing in a pretty meaningful way?

Very much so, and I would argue that was one of the key technical value props that we've been able to deliver. I think if you sort of think about this OCTEON-based architecture based on ARM present at all hops within the base station, whether it's massive MIMO processing in the radio head, whether it's the transport processing for layer 2, whether it's the baseband processing, it's very efficient when a customer actually goes all in with us. And certainly, these designs by nature are quite sticky because these base station designs are quite complex. It's not a second source business. Once you get in, they last a long time. But clearly, that's one of the key differentiators that our processor team has delivered consistently for 5 generations now of product. So that's absolutely how you should think about it.

Our next question comes from the line of Blayne Curtis from Barclays.

Nice result. I'm just kind of curious, a lot of questions on 5G. Maybe in networking and everything, but 5G, just curious an update on kind of the enterprise channel and that business returning to sequential and year-over-year growth, do you have any thoughts on the -- for the rest of the year?

Sure. Yes, no, thanks. And I think -- thanks, Blayne. So in 2019 and certainly in the midst of the dynamics around the trade war, we saw a number of the enterprise OEMs, our customers get whipped around a little bit. And we certainly felt that in our results in a couple of different quarters. We were certainly encouraged after the signing of the Phase I deal that things seem to stabilize. And in fact, we had very strong order momentum, certainly, and bookings momentum in Q4. I think as that situation stabilized and we started to see a very strong recovery in our core business, which I think, as you know, is a very healthy business for us, and it's one that, prior to the trade war, we had actually been growing at a pretty significant rate. I think we had 6 quarters of double-digit growth in that business before we had the pause in 2019. So we were encouraged to see that return to growth, which was more of a, I call it a, restabilizing, but also actually growth. And then certainly, understanding now we're dealing with the coronavirus situation, but it certainly hasn't diminished at all our longer-term outlook, especially as we look through later this year with continued new product ramps. And what we brought in Aquantia, as an example, we paired up their multi-gate technology with our Prestera switches. We see multi-gig is a very clear trend that's happening. Our design win position has been very good there. We've actually brought in new customers, both on the PHY and the switch side in the last few years, which we believe will start bearing fruit. And then finally, what's embedded today in our networking number is also our automotive business, which is our automotive Ethernet. And while those are still smaller numbers today on a relative basis, they're growing every quarter and they're incrementally adding revenue, and we anticipate seeing acceleration in that business as we exit calendar '20, heading into model year '21 where a number of the vehicles we were designed into going back 1 and 2 years ago will start to ramp. So we actually have -- I'm glad you asked the networking question because it's a very large and important part of our business with some very exciting growth drivers to, I think, complement our also equally exciting 5G opportunities. So I think both of those are still in front of us.

And then just maybe a quick one for Jean. It looks like you did a combination of buybacks and retiring debt. Just how are you thinking about use of cash? And are you going to retire any more debt going forward? Any help there will be great.

Yes. I think, certainly, our number one objective is to invest in the business after we close all 3 acquisitions -- 2 acquisitions and 1 divestiture. Right now, we really shifted our focus to return excess cash to shareholders through buyback. Of course, we are very focused on our investment-grade rating, but we think we can generate sufficient cash flow to do both. So priority is to return cash to shareholders and then we'll return -- pay down the debt over time.

Our next question comes from the line of Ross Seymore from Deutsche Bank.

Congrats, especially, on the guide. Going back to the 5G side of things, Matt, maybe a clarification before a question. The Nokia announcement from today there's been a lot of investors debating whether that's just a formalization of the formerly unnamed second customer or an expansion. And I guess the question is, if it is the latter side in an expansion, can you just go a little bit into what's the incremental aspect to it? And forgive me if you captured that in your 5G discussion earlier.

Yes, got it, Ross, and that's not a problem to clarify on Nokia. So first, we're obviously thrilled to have a public announcement about something like this. It clearly makes it a little bit easier to talk about this. And what I would say is, we've had a very good experience in the partnership so far with Nokia. We're very impressed by the team. And I think together, we've really executed well on this first product. And so as you think about what this means, what I would say is kind of 2 things: One is, I would think of it as a broadening of the opportunity and the relationship on the existing program we have, which means, obviously, multiple generation and then broadening our exposure within their products. And then, what the announcement also references is partnering around embedded processing and multi-core -- with our multi-core OCTEON family. So it's really a broadening of one and expansion as well. So we're -- it's a big deal for us. We're fully committed to execute with them to make them successful. And we think it's a great validation of the strategy we put in place a few years ago and the investments we've made. It's very rewarding to see this. We still have a lot of hard work in front of us because these are extremely complex chips and extremely demanding applications, but we're honored to be working with them and, certainly, to have an expanded opportunity set with them is a very good thing.

Thanks a ton for that clarification. And then my follow-up would be one for Jean and it would be on the gross margin side of things. You're very helpful on the OpEx side talking about where that would end the fiscal year. Tons of puts and takes on mix businesses that you sold coming out, et cetera. On the gross margin side of things, how do you think about that progressing over time, especially as the mix of the wireless infrastructure side seemingly would grow as a percentage of the company?

Yes, Ross, thanks for the question. I think to just take it from a very high level, right? If you go back to Q3 fiscal '20, our gross margin was 63.5%, which included Wi-Fi, but not Avera. Then, of course, at that time, the revenue is at almost the trough of the company's revenue level. So our gross margin, if we think about is 2 factors: one is product mix; one is revenue level. Once we close all the transaction, when you look at both Aquantia, Avera and also the Wi-Fi business, the way to think about it is Avera and the Wi-Fi business, they have a very similar financial profile, right? Revenue level, gross margins around 50%. I would say right now that's the major product mix driver for the near term is, when you think about these -- our gross margin should be go back to 63% to 64% level. Going forward, we actually are quite confident about sustaining our strong gross margin, especially with wireless infrastructure side because fundamentally, right, gross margin is a reflection of the IP value you provide to customers and we have a very unique value proposition to our customers across all our product lines and platforms. So once the revenue level is going up, we also get leverage from the revenue level of the company. So overall, of course, we think in the near term, it's going to be 63% to 64%. But in the longer term, we are quite confident about sustaining strong gross margin going forward.

Yes and, maybe I'll just add, I think that was captured to Jean, but I would just add, with respect to Avera, there's a couple of additional things to point out. I think one is the team is laser-focused on that particular segment. And we even highlighted it last quarter that there were some margin-related transition impact when we brought the business over. So there's a lot of specific work going on to improve that gross margin. What I would say, just to add to what Jean said on the relative trade we made between Avera and Wi-Fi, while the revenue levels, you call them similar, and margins were similar from a gross margin standpoint, the operating margin profile is quite different because with -- and that's something that we consciously got our heads around. And we're okay with Avera and the nature of that business comes with NRE funding for the projects, which offsets R&D. So it's a fundamentally higher operating margin business. And I would say, on top of that, it addresses a much larger SAM than we were going after with Wi-Fi, and we think that business has a much higher potential to grow in line with the company over time. And so yes, that was just my few extra comments on Avera.

Yes. Our long-term objective, of course, is to drive profitable growth, right, and margin pool expansion in the longer term.

Our next question comes from the line of Gary Mobley from Wells Fargo Securities.

Wanted to go back to the Nokia topic and delve a little bit deeper into Ross' question. When you're sizing up the opportunity for 5G you're roughly citing $600 million in potential peak opportunity, I think what perhaps was underpinning the Nokia assumption was that you will split that ASIC business and their implementation in the ReefShark architecture 3 ways, maybe 2 other ASIC suppliers as well. The way I read today's press release is that maybe you have some exclusivity with Nokia and perhaps better-than-expected market share at Nokia. Am I reading that correctly?

I think the right way to read it is kind of for what it says, which is the companies have entered into a multi-generation, multi-product collaboration and partnership, where we're going to be working together. We think, as I said earlier, we think that's good for Marvell. We think that's going to mean more business for us over time, if we execute and prove ourselves, then we think it's good for them because of the nature of the solutions we're providing. So I mean, if you think about -- as more and more of Nokia's business shifts to 5G and that becomes more important for them and, certainly, we hope to be part of the equation and helping them achieve their goals, we'll then benefit from the content gain that we have. And so I think that's the best way to think about it is, it's an extended relationship. There's new products we're working on. Teams are working really well together. This is a multiyear thing. And certainly, as 5G takes off for the industry and for Nokia, we'll -- we should be a big beneficiary of that with this rollout.

For my follow-up, I don't think there was any mention about ThunderX2 in the prepared remarks or in the Q&A. So maybe you can just give us an update on where you stand with respect to timing and perhaps magnitude of your first big marquee design win there for ThunderX2?

Sure. Yes. No, it was -- I did have in my prepared remarks, but these were a little bit longer than normal just given all the challenges with corona and the various 5G things. So I apologize for that, but it was in there. What we said was that we -- our ARM server program was on track to ramp in the second half, as we've been indicating before. So we didn't really have a big change there. I think it's pretty consistent with what we've been saying so far. And I think that's the only update I've got on that, that program will -- we continue to work closely with the lead customer, and we're hoping that they ramp us in the second half.

Our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan.

Nice job on the quarterly execution. As NAND storage kind of finds its way into new applications such as gaming, I think, you guys have good exposure to this upcoming game console refresh cycle, partnered up with one of the leading SSD suppliers. Does the ramp for you here on the SSD controller side start here in the April quarter? Or is it more likely the July quarter? And if you can just give us some color on the performance differentiators that enabled you to win with your controller solution for this high-volume design win?

Yes, Harlan, I think the way I think about it is, you're right. I think NAND flash is very much making its way into new use cases and it's replacing conventional or traditional storage media. And certainly, that is one example that you mentioned. I think all we've said so far is we think that, that transition in that market is going to be positive for Marvell. We -- and I think that's probably it. As you can imagine, there's -- on that particular market, there's sort of tremendous confidentiality and sensitivity around that. So all I'd say is net-net, in that particular transition, I think that -- I know Marvell will do. It will be a net positive for Marvell.

Absolutely. And then on the networking side, on the strength of the networking business outside of 5G, specifically on the service side, your lead customer partner here, Intel has seen strong growth in their server business into data centers. And I believe that Aquantia had a strong partnership with Intel on the service side. And I think that core Marvell side, you guys also have some strong PHY and NIC partnerships with Intel as well on servers. Is this server exposure, driving some of the networking strength here in the April quarter, just given the strong demand outlook for this part of the market?

Yes. I think you're right. We've -- both companies Aquantia and Marvell have been -- had partnerships with Intel for some time. And what I would say is that the networking strength that we saw with bookings in Q4 and certainly our Q1 outlook was broad-based, but I would say for sure that the dynamics you mentioned, and that the server recovery and growth was quite strong, and that's certainly benefiting those particular businesses for us, both the Aquantia piece as well as us on the NIC side.

Our final question for today comes from the line of John Pitzer from Crédit Suisse.

Thanks for sneaking me in. Matt, I guess my first question is just on the radio opportunity. I'm just kind of curious, how do we think about kind of the timing to sort of meaningful revenue? And you guys have been doing stuff pre to collaboration with ADI or at least the announcement. Is the ADI stuff later on as we think about the radio opportunity? And of the $750 million kind of outlined for 5G, how do we think base station versus radio head? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes, I think the way to think about it is the announcement with ADI was really a desire for us to just make the market aware, all the stakeholders in the ecosystem, that the 2 companies, the teams were working together. We are already sort of jointly getting pulled into things, so I wouldn't sort of tie an ADI engagement to a new design win per se. I would say that we're pursuing opportunities, they're pursuing opportunities. We tend to show up in the same place. So this is a way for us to add value to our customers. But as I mentioned, as far as silicon for radio head, we have Fusion-based processors, right, that are shipping today. We have next-generation parts, which we've done a bunch of customization on with our customer IP. We see that trend continuing. We also have digital front-end ASIC-related content. So there's actually quite a bit that's going on there. So I would just think of it as an ongoing trend that we will see both growth in the digital unit as well as the radio heads. And to the extent that massive MIMO influx, and it becomes a major trend globally, and you think about the out years as our content grows both in the DUs and the radio heads, we think it just adds to the opportunity for Marvell. Certainly, more attach of massive MIMO means more capacity, more users, more silicon and more chips, and that's all the positive for us. So I don't think we have a split right now of like how do we think about how much is in where. And quite frankly, those lines, John, are blurring because a lot of the new standards from 3GPP in terms of the splits and where does the processing and the files actually sit, in what part of the network, in what part of the base station unit, it's fairly dynamic. And they have things like O-RAN coming, which is also defining a new way of doing processing. So a lot of diversity in the applications. We think we're well suited for all of them. But probably more to come on that as we go forward with our different engagements we're pursuing.

That's helpful. And then, just to have my follow-up, I want to go back to kind of your guidance around the coronavirus and caveat it by saying, I appreciate the fact it's very fluid and any question I ask is going to be best guess. But I just want to make sure I understand the 5% cushion in the April quarter is what you've already seen. The wider range is the uncertainty and you've characterized it as more of a supply issue than a demand issue, and a lot of your peers have as well. I'm just curious it feels like the peak of the supply disruption was right after Chinese New Year, and week on week things are getting better. Is that not putting words in your mouth? Is that how you would sort of describe the situation to date?

Yes, great. Let me take in 2 pieces. So I think the first is you got it right. So the -- and again, sorry for so many 5s. So the first 5% number was our estimate of how much we -- now that we've guided to $680 million, we basically backed that down about 5% from where we were prior to corona hitting, where we saw Q4 -- sorry, Q1 lining up. So we did that in a fairly detailed way, just looking at the bridge from where we were to where we're guiding and the moving pieces. And as you mentioned, today they're all supply chain-related. We have really no way to know if there's been any demand disruption? Where it would occur? What's actually happening? I think that's to come. Certainly -- and then on the -- by the way, on the plus or minus 5%, that's independent. That's just saying, hey, at the midpoint, we normally guide plus or minus 3%. Given just how volatile this thing is, we don't know does it come back? Does this thing become more of a nonissue? There's a couple of them quite serious, even more serious today. So that's why we widened the range. And so yes, I think I just conclude by saying, I read the same probably reports you do, and we certainly see the activity that says factories are gradually coming back online. People in China are gradually going back to work. But we don't really know what the ripple effect is to the global economy candidly from this disruption. So we just don't know. And so that's why I think probably ourselves and peers are not hesitant to call the demand change. We just don't know. And so I think that's what's going to probably play itself out here over the coming quarter.

Thank you. This does conclude the question-and-answer session of today's program. I'd like to hand the program back to Ashish Saran for any further remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today, and we look forward to speaking with you next quarter.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.