Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q4 2014 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Earnings Conference Call. My name is Sarah, and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Sukhi Nagesh, Vice President of Finance. Please proceed.

Thank you, Sarah, and good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Marvell Technology Group's Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2014 Earnings Call. With me on the call today are Sehat Sutardja, Marvell's Chairman and CEO; and Mike Rashkin, Marvell's CFO. We will all be available during the Q&A portion of the call today. If you have not obtained a copy of our current press release, it can be found at our company website under the Investor Relations section at marvell.com. We have also posted a slide deck summarizing our quarterly results in the IR section of our website for investors. Additionally, this call is being recorded and will be available for replay from our website. Please be reminded that today's discussion will include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from management's current expectations. The risks and uncertainties include our expectations about our overall business; our product and market strategy; statements about market acceptance of our products; statements about general trends in the end markets we serve, including future growth opportunities; statements about market share; and statements regarding our financial outlook for the first quarter of fiscal 2015. To fully understand the risks and uncertainties that may cause results to differ from our expectations and outlook, please refer to today's earnings release, our latest quarterly report on Form 10-Q and subsequent SEC filings for a detailed description of our business and the associated risks. Please be reminded that all of our statements are made as of today, and Marvell undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements. During our call today, we will make reference to certain non-GAAP financial measures, which exclude the effect of stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs and certain onetime expenses and benefits that are driven primarily by discrete events that management does not consider to be directly related to our core operating performance. Pursuant to Regulation G, we have provided reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in our fourth quarter earnings press release, which has been furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K, and is available on our website in the Investor Relations section. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Sehat.

Thanks, Sukhi, and good afternoon, everyone. Today, we reported fourth quarter revenue of approximately $932 million, flat from the prior quarter and above the high end of our guidance range. During the quarter, we experienced better-than-expected demand from our storage and networking customers. We delivered the following non-GAAP results for Q4: Gross margin of 50%, operating margin of 16% and earnings per share of $0.29. We also paid approximately $30 million in dividends during the quarter. Before going into my financial commentary, I want to briefly introduce Mike Rashkin, for those of you who are not familiar with him. The board has appointed Mike to serve as our permanent CFO effective immediately. Mike has been with the company for over a decade and we are pleased that he has agreed to serve as our CFO as we drive towards the next phase of growth. Mike is well-liked and universally respected within the company and is a great team player. He has a strong background in finance, operations and tax, which will serve the company well. He is the best choice for the role and for all of our stakeholders, including investors, customers and employees. Now turning to the business. Fiscal 2014 in many respects was the start of a turnaround for Marvell. For the full year, our storage business performed strongly and grew approximately 13% from the prior year. This growth in storage was due to strong growth in our SSD business and the continued share gains in the HDDs despite a year-over-year decline in the overall HDD TAM. Our mobile and wireless end market delivered modest growth in fiscal 2014 after undergoing 2 years of customer and product transitions. And we are now well positioned to deliver strong growth in fiscal 2015. Our networking business declined in fiscal 2014,…

Thank you, Sehat, and good afternoon, everyone. Before I go into the financials, I would like to say a few words regarding my appointment today. I am very pleased to step up and serve as the CFO of Marvell and help build the company to the next stage. Our employees strive for excellence in products and execution. We know that helping our customers succeed will lead to our long-term success. We are a very innovative company and I look forward to doing my part. I also look forward to interacting with all our current and potential investors and the analyst community and sharing the Marvell story. Moving to our financials. As Sehat mentioned, we reported revenues of $932 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, approximately flat from the previous quarter and above the high end of our guidance. The better-than-expected revenue was due to upside from our storage and networking customers that more than offset a seasonal decline in our wireless business and product launch delays by some of our mobile customers. In storage, our overall revenue increased 3% sequentially and represented approximately 48% of total sales. Our HDD business grew as we continue to take share in enterprise platforms and we did see a benefit from pre-Chinese New Year demand. In addition, our SSD revenue for the quarter was better-than-expected due to demand for multiple customers. Our share in SSDs continues to rise. And overall, we expect steady incremental share gains in both HDDs and SSDs throughout the year. In networking, our revenue was up 5% sequentially and represented approximately 18% of total sales. Our networking business performed better-than-expected due to strength from both enterprise and service provider customers. In Q4, our switching NPU and SoC product lines grew, with SoCs and NPUs in particular growing double-digit…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Harlan Sur from JPMorgan. Harlan Sur - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Given the strength of your 4G TD-LTE ramp here with multiple customers, I think, last I counted, you had 6 major smartphone customers. And given what appears to be an aggressive proliferation target by China Mobile, I'm just trying to get a sense on the volumes here in the first half. Are we talking about millions of 4G chipsets being shipped by Marvell per quarter here in the first half and a potentially larger number in the second half? Any way you can help us size your 4G business? And the ramp rate would be great.

Yes, Harlan, it's Sehat here. Yes, we do. I think the number sounds -- from what you expect is very reasonable. This is -- now, of course, okay, we have to -- of course, okay, that all depends on the timing on how fast, okay, the carriers will push the LTE. But from what we see at this point, yes, millions is in the...

Millions per quarter.

Is very reasonable. Harlan Sur - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Millions per quarter here in the first half?

That's correct, Harlan.

Yes, that's reasonable. Harlan Sur - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Okay. great. And then how should we think about your networking business this year? It was down sequentially 3 out of the past 4 quarters. It seems like enterprise and PON seem to have been sort of the 2 pressure points now. You did see growth in Q4 and are guiding for kind of flattish trends in Q1. Does the team expect to grow networking this year given some of the new product cycles like Xelerated and other trends in provider spending and data center?

Yes, Harlan. I think we mentioned that we are looking at diversifying our networking businesses outside of core enterprise. And we are starting to see some traction in other areas within enterprise, as well as in the mobile infrastructure space, right? And I think we've talked to investors about our Xelerated NPU business growing, our ARMADA SoC business growing and all of these are targeted to non-core, non-enterprise areas. So while we are seeing some weakness in the traditional enterprise space and it's more mainly market-driven, we're also seeing some traction now in the non-enterprise space. So for the full year, like Sehat mentioned earlier, we do expect some pickup in our networking business, but that's probably going to be more to the second half of this year. Harlan Sur - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Got it. And then just one final question. So I think the team articulated the reasons for the OpEx step-up in Q1. And I think Marvell overall was very disciplined on OpEx expansion last year. So how should we think about your OpEx profile beyond Q1? Is the team still committed to driving its operating expense growth at a rate that's lower than revenue growth beyond the first quarter?

Yes. As you know, as we said, okay, the Q1 increase due to this onetime event. And from, okay, what I am familiar to, just like last year, I am committed to do a careful and tight control of our expenses, while we are still improving our execution. So for fiscal 2015, I'm committed to keep our expenses relatively flat compared to our Q1 rate for the rest of the year, I mean, approximately. So this is our commitment. So same as last year. So we need to make sure that, okay, we focus on what matters, improving our investment in areas that is going to bring more revenues to the near and midterm versus spending a lot of efforts on things that may be only 4 or 5 years down the road will pan out. So I hope, okay, that's clear.

Our next question comes from Doug Freedman, RBC Capital Markets.

Could you talk about what levers you possibly could pull, including moving to a multisource foundry agreement and what that -- what impact you could do to margins?

Yes. The product, okay, if you look at some of our products there, okay, some of the products that we do in the smartphone side, we need to accelerate moving to more advanced process nodes. Those are the big -- the single biggest improvement that we can get from the gross margin, as well as getting better performance to -- for our customers, not to mention, okay, better features along the way. So we are investing, basically, most of -- practically almost every product that we build are moving to 28-nanometers as a result, this year. So and then, obviously, next year will be even more advanced process node.

So but we -- I think we have mentioned this to you before, as well. We are, obviously, going to talk to all the foundry guys out there to see who will give us the best price. And so that's a constant dialogue we have with multiple foundry partners. And that should help us out on a case-by-case basis.

Yes, ultimately, maybe -- okay, maybe I should, okay, I can state this. I said maybe like a dozen times in the past. All our designs using our libraries, our standard [indiscernible] analog circuits, or memory compilers. So our design actually are not be tied to any specific foundry. It's just a matter of, okay, as Sukhi said, it's okay, which foundries will give us the right ratio of product quality, cost and volume.

All right. If I could ask a question about the landscape in which the company is operating, we've seen intra-quarter a few material changes. You've got Avago purchasing LSI. We've got the RDA and Spreadtrum acquisitions, where they're trying to, I believe, put those companies together. Can you comment on what, if any, visible impacts that is having in your relationship or your ability to operate in the different markets?

Yes. It's an interesting time for all of us, obviously for us to see that happening. But I -- running, okay, running -- me as the CEO of Marvell, I cannot be worried about what's going on out there. It's more important for us, is to continue to focus in investing in advanced technology that made us to be the leader in the space. So specifically, we talked about the LSI, Avago. Okay, I think what investors probably have questions about in the area of storage. This is an area that, in storage, where we are absolutely, okay, committed. We are not -- okay, we always -- so we have been committed, okay, without any hesitation for the last 19 years that we're in the business. We continue to invest well ahead of the market needs. We say this for many -- a few times, like several times in the past that in SSD, we invested -- starting investing in SSDs more than 6 years ago. And as a result, we are now the leader, okay, because -- okay, because it's, okay, it's not so simple in this business where people can go in, in the business and say, hey, they want to invest. They will not to see the results for another couple of years. So knowing that this is, okay, this is case, okay, we actually decided to increase, accelerate our investment in HDD and SSD even more, okay. So we don't have to worry about what they are planning to do or what they are planning not to do.

All right. Our next question comes from Ruben Roy of Mizuho Securities.

Sehat, just to follow-up on the gross margin question. The PXA1088 LTE that you guys are seeing some traction with, is that shipping at 28-nanometer today or is that a cost reduction that's coming later this year?

The first one was still in 40-nanometer. The 28-nanometer is in the sampling stage.

Okay. And then, I guess, for Mike, just around gross margins. I understand the comment on the 80-basis-point impact that you had in the quarter, but it does seem like with the product mix, the way it went with storage and networking, outperforming perhaps gross margins when you look at your gross margins historically, could have been a bit higher or are there different moving parts as you're shipping more enterprise hard disk drive components than the SSD components?

Ruben, this is Sukhi. I'll take that. First of all, I think, it really depends on your assumptions. As you know, we have never given or broken down our gross margins by product or by end markets, right? And so, I think, to that effect, we can't really make any comments in terms of why the gross margin was lower. All we said was, it was 80 points of impact for Q4 overall because of that inventory write-down we took in Q4. If not for that, we would have been at the high end of our range. And it will probably be reflective of the mix of our business as well.

Okay. And then just a final question. Sounds like you had a little bit of higher order activity ahead of Chinese New Year. Coming out of Chinese New Year, you're still guiding for seasonal down for the storage business. Is that a function more of the PC stabilization that people have been talking about and things are still going well in terms of orders there? Or is that a function of continued enterprise share gains driving that in line seasonal guide for the quarter?

It's a bit of both. We will continue to see our enterprise business do well in storage at the specific North American customer. But you know, if you look at our overall, like Sehat mentioned in his prepared remarks, our storage business actually really did well last year, up nearly 13%. While, I think, the hard disk drive TAM itself was down by 5%. And if you ask a lot of people of what expectations are for this year, they say, hard disk drive units could be flat or down or it could be up. Some people are thinking it could be up this year as well. But we feel pretty confident that we will outperform the storage market this year as well. It is probably too early for us to say how the rest of this year is going to shape out.

Our next question comes from Quinn Bolton from Needham & Company. N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Just wanted to come back to the LTE market. You guys have recently announced a number of PXA1088 LTE wins, where you not only have the SoC, but you also have a lot of support chips, the WiFi combo, the power management or the transceiver. Can you give us some sense when you get that entire bundle, what's the ASP increase on that bundle versus sort of a similarly configured 3G phone? Are we talking as much as maybe 100% lift in sort of your content in those phones?

Yes, I think as we said so many times in the past, this is a very highly competitive market and it will be unwise for us to disclose, okay, the ASP of the products. But if you're asking about if the LTE has a higher, higher content dollar-wise, yes, you're absolutely right. LTE is what everybody wants to have. So LTE is also more complicated, more work needs to be done. Everything is bigger. Chip is bigger. The transceiver is bigger, yes. So it is true that it is, okay, it brings higher, higher dollar values to the company. And we -- of course, we hope that, okay, the world moves to LTE, the sooner the better. I mean, more and more countries move to LTE is going to be good for us. So this is why we continue to invest heavily into this area. N. Quinn Bolton - Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division: Okay. And then just a related follow-on. Given that you expect you could be shipping millions of LTE units per quarter and I assume higher units in the -- or higher rates in the second half of the year, do you think you might hit crossover between LTE and 3G in the second half of fiscal '15?

So Quinn, I think that's a little hard for us to say at this point because we are seeing demand for our 3G products, as well. For instance, in Q1, some of the pushouts we saw in Q4 are really high-volume devices that are coming to fruition in Q1. And we don't see any reason for that to decline moving forward. So it's a little hard for us to say if there's going to be a crossover point between LTE and 3G devices this year. We're going after both, especially for -- but in terms of growth rate, I think this year, you probably will see a faster, a much higher growth rate for our LTE devices than our 3G devices.

I think that's probably true. I won't be able to guess either this year, but at some point, there will be a time down the road, whether that's next year or the end of next year or 1.5 years from now, we do need to prepare the time when LTE will replace 3G in the vast -- in most countries, most developed countries in the world. So there will be a time, then, we say, yes, you're right, okay, 3G shipments will be lower than LTE.

Our next question comes from Craig Ellis.

Sehat, I wanted to ask a follow-up question to some of the LTE baseband questions that have been asked so far. And it's this, given the breadth of the company's design wins across an array of smartphone OEMs in China, are you getting a sense for what your market share will be? And what would be a satisfactory share of the China LTE market for you in calendar '14?

So Craig, I'll answer that question. We're, obviously, working very hard to capture as much share as possible for 4G LTE in China. And we're pretty well prepared for the growth in the market with our leading products, right? But it's probably too soon for us to comment on market share this year. There are comments out there that's saying, it could -- this will be 100-million-unit market in China this year, it could be 50-million market. It's hard for us to say exactly what the total market is going to be. But I think given our traction right now with multiple customer -- and you've seen some of the announcements we made early this week -- we're probably going to get a sizable chunk of it.

The follow-up is more of a long-term question. And it goes back to the goal to grow at an above peer rate and grow earnings at and above peer rate. As we think about the company being able to do that this year, where should we expect that superior growth to come from on a segment basis? And does the company see that coming from share gain, or is it from SAM expansion? And either on the former or the latter, wherever it's coming, can you help us identify where that will be segment-by-segment?

Yes, I think, you're still talking about LTE. As we said earlier, our focus right now is the mainstream market for the LTE, the sub -- the RMB 1,000 and approximate around that range of pricing. In the long run, if we talk about in the long run, in the long run, we also need to address the much lower cost LTE market. And this is an area that maybe in the past, okay, in the 3G, we did not pay attention to. But, okay, in LTE, we will pay attention to the lower cost market as well when the markets of LTE are exploding. So more likely that's closer toward the end of the year or early next year will be where those, the lower cost market, the much lower cost market for LTE is important to be addressed.

To follow up on your question about growth for fiscal '15, obviously, we're a pretty good company now. We have multiple end markets that we serve. In storage, obviously, we're gaining shares in HDDs. We're seeing pretty good traction in SSDs and even in hybrids. And so I think our view on storage, at least, is we'll probably outgrow the market again this year. A little too early for us to say how the storage market is going to end up playing. On the mobile side, clearly, that's a growth area for us for this year. We are seeing very good traction already for 4G LTE. We continue to see pretty good traction for 3G platforms. And so I think that will probably be our highest growth driver for this year. And then networking, like we mentioned in Sehat's prepared remarks, we'll probably see that business turn around probably closer to the second half of this year.

All right. Our next question comes from Chris Caso from Susquehanna.

Can you speak about the margin implications as the LTE business ramps? I guess, I assume that the LTE margins are better than what you're currently enjoying in the 3G business. Whatever color you could provide there would be helpful.

Yes. So it is obviously clear that the LTE will have higher gross margin. I mean, this is not rocket science to assume that because, okay, we are the -- only the second supplier of the LTE in the market today. They are shipping LTE...

In volume.

In volume. So now, okay, maybe the question should be, what will happen, let's say, 2 or 3 years from now when the LTE becomes mainstream, where more players are -- will be in the market. So this is an area that we are already paying a lot of attention to how we can build our -- build for the ultra low -- the lower cost market. What features that we could remove from our device. What are the things that people cannot live without. What are things that they must have. And by looking at that, we believe that we will also be able to lower the cost of our -- the mass volume ultra-low-cost market later down the road, while still be able to achieve better margins compared to our historical margins in this area when we only focus on the higher end -- the mid to higher end type of markets. So we do have high hopes that, okay, even though when the volume goes up, our margin will tend to go up overall.

That's helpful. And I guess, as a follow-up to that and you mentioned new competition coming in and you're aware -- some of your competitors are talking about new product entries in the second half of the year. I mean, it sounds like what you guys are looking at is growing -- as LTE moves into the lower end of the markets, you gaining some share there. But how do you defend the business that you're winning this year as those new competitors come into the market?

Yes, okay, so without -- this sounds being repeating. So investing in the lower cost segment, as well as, okay, continue to invest in more advanced LTE, the next release, the more advanced releases for the high-end market. So we just cannot blink in the segment. This is -- the market for LTE is going to be so huge, all the carriers are starting to realize that, okay, the cost to deliver LTE to the end-user actually is lower than in 3G. So they have a lot more capacity, okay. They can increase the number of users for frequency bands that they have. So it's clear that, okay, it's just a matter of supply and demand. We can make the products just only incrementally -- okay, like in the next couple of years, incrementally more than the 3G. I think the market will move completely to 3G.

LTE.

I'm sorry, I mean to LTE. Sorry. Thanks, Sukhi.

All right. Our next question comes from Ambrish Srivastava from BMO.

My first question was on HDD. Can you help us understand, just stepping back and looking at the overall market share, what's the market share today and how much more room do you think you have to go? You guys clearly have done a very good job over the years in this segment, but what should be the run rate for share gains? So that was my question on HDD and then I had a follow-up on mobile.

Sure. I'll answer that question. As I said earlier, we -- okay, this is a business that out of any companies in this business in the world, we are the true deliverer in this area. When people say, well, this market is going down or the market is going to disappear, we actually did not blink, we continued to invest in developing advanced technologies in signal processing, okay. We have some of the best, maybe if not the best, the best people in this business in the world to develop technology for HDDs, as well as SSD now. So this is very expensive investment. A lot, okay. That's why people are asking. That's why some people, investors asking, why are you continuing to invest in this area. And we said, look, okay, we have to invest because we do believe, okay, if we continue to make things higher and higher capacity, okay, that could mean you lower cost to the end users. The market will continue to be there, okay. It's just a matter of whether the PC is going to be x86-based or ARM-based, we don't really care, okay. They all are going to need storage, whether you can put HDD or people that can afford, they have a lot of money, they can buy SSDs. It doesn't matter with us. They are similar technologies from our engineering point of view. So this is an area that our team is highly, okay, super focused, laser-focused on the need to invest in accelerating, developing new technologies.

So Ambrish, just to give you a little bit more color on that. In HDDs, at least, we have greater than 60% share today and that has continued to climb. And SSDs, on the merchant market, at least, we have more than 50% share. And that will continue to climb as well.

Okay. Back on the mobile side, I'm struggling with something and just please help us understand from your perspective, back when OPhone started out in China, you had tremendous success early on. And then the competitive dynamics changed and then the share went down. So how should we look out at the LTE market, whether it's from the competitive side or from your product portfolio, which I understand is a lot more robust now. What's the right way to think about why should your LTE share in China be more sticky this time around?

Sure. So you alluded to that. In the past, okay, we only have one product. We have only single core. This was 4 years ago and we were late in developing new -- I mean, moving to advanced process node. So our team is different and it's a much more mature team now, much more experienced. So we are aggressively developing multiple solutions for the different segments of the market. So this time around, we will have multiple products from the mid-highs, to the mid-end and the entry-level as well. And moving also -- developing our plans with modem technology for the future. So at the end of the day, we believe this is a recipe for being successful in any business. We have -- we call it like an order of magnitude or more strength in this area compared to like 4 years ago.

And Ambrish, you also know that even if you just look at a year ago, early part of last year or the end of 2012, we probably had 1, maybe 2 customers, maybe a single product line. Now we have multiple product lines in mobile and we have multiple customers. You're seeing these devices in the markets already. And so -- and we're seeing orders from our customers on those already. So we, obviously, have matured quite a bit, like Sehat said. And so I think that's giving our customers a lot of confidence that we're going to be around in this business for a while and, hence, giving us more business.

Our next question comes from John Pitzer from Crédit Suisse. John W. Pitzer - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: Sehat, I'm kind of curious, as you think about the profile of your LTE business this year, to what extent or how much of it do you think will come from phones in China, sold in China versus the rest of the world? And does that start to change dramatically as we go into the second half of the calendar year?

Yes, I think it's safe to assume that China, okay, will ramp up first. It's because China is aggressively moving to LTE. They know that, okay, I mean, they also did the right thing. They standardized the LTE, TD-LTE across all the 3 carriers. No more in-piping about which LTE modes they're capable of running, so no more argument. So that means that when everybody's speaking the same language, the volumes will ramp up faster. The rest of the world -- you're talking about that -- I'm talking about that if the new developing world, okay, when they see China, okay, successful in deploying LTE, I'm sure, I'm 100% sure that they're going to accelerate their LTE deployment because then they can see that LTE is not just for the expensive countries. So, okay, people that care about cost, could move to LTE as well. So I'm confident that, okay, LTE will move to the mass market at a faster rate than historical trend. When 2G moved to 3G, it moved very slowly. But 3G to LTE, I think things will move a lot faster. John W. Pitzer - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: And then Sehat, you guys have not specifically talked about profitability at the operating level for LTE, but it's pretty safe to say, given where revenue is, that the operating profits are negative in that business. What kind of market share, or is there a point this year where you think that the LTE revenue will allow you to get to operating margin breakeven in that business?

Yes, okay. It's obvious that, okay -- this is a business where scale matters. In the past, okay, it's hard to scale when you compare to 3G, being late in the 3G business, but with LTE, we can just provide at the beginning of the LTE ramp. And as I said earlier, I do believe strongly that 3G will move to a full LTE at a much rapid pace compared to the historical trend. So the scale, talking about scale, we are on the right side of the curve. So we will have the volume on LTE to make this to be a profitable business. So I said, it's the timing, okay, what I've said an hour ago, that we'll work hard to make it happen as soon as possible.

And John, you know that, like we've talked about having scale and unit volume being able to drive to operating profits that are close to what our corporate targets are, right? And so, but we're not seeing this business any differently. John W. Pitzer - Crédit Suisse AG, Research Division: And guys, if I could sneak one last quick one. Unless I missed it, there wasn't any share repurchases in the last quarter. And given as you guys have done such a great job getting capital back to shareholders, I think this is the first time in -- since July of 2010 that you haven't repurchased. Anything I should read into that? Is this relative to the frustration you guys are probably feeling around the court case or is this something that we will start to see resumption of buybacks in the first half of this calendar year?

It's a good question, John. I think I'll just reiterate what Sehat said, we are fully committed to returning cash to shareholders through dividends and opportunistic buyback. You also have to put this question in a little bit of different perspective, right? I mean, we spent 200%, 150% and 100% of our free cash flow in the last 3 years in share repurchase. So this is significant. As you know, this is significantly better than most of our competitors. In addition, we are now paying a healthy quarterly dividend to our shareholders. So we will continue to be opportunistic in our share repurchases, there's no change in our policy, but we also have said that returning over 100% of our free cash flow generation forever is probably not a feasible option for us. Over the long run, we expect to return maybe, approximately, what the industry averages to our shareholders. And that, I think, most people say it's around 40% or so.

Our next question comes from Srini Pajjuri from CLSA Securities.

On the gross margins, Mike, as we look out to the next 3 quarters, obviously, you gave us some sort of guidance on the business mix. If networking is relatively flat and storage grows a little bit and then mobile is relatively strong, do you see room for improvement just based on the mix? Or will the improvement have to come from somewhere else, like the cost side?

Well, we really don't give guidance beyond the one quarter, but we have said that our target margins are between 50% and 55%. And there are a lot of things we could do to improve our margins. And we're working on all of them, on the cost side, on the design side. And so I think there is room for improving margins. We're working on them. And I'm sure we're going to be within our target, our target margin range, as we go along.

Okay, great. And then, Sehat, maybe for you. You mentioned that your 28-nanometer LTE product is sampling. When do you expect that to ship into the largest in the market?

In the next quarter or 2, it should be starting to ramp up.

Okay, great. And then one final one, if I can. You actually talked about your video business. I'm just wondering, would it be possible to quantify that as a percent of your total business? And also, what do you think the drivers are for that business this year?

Yes. It's a little bit too early to talk about it, probably strategically it also doesn't make sense for us, okay, to disclose that detail. This is a new business. A lot of things changing rapidly. The way -- I mean, products, the way how these things are being deployed in the market is also changing rapidly. So we are working very hard, okay, to try different types of solutions with the idea that, okay, something, one of those -- one or two of the flavor that we are working will stick, become the de facto standard in the market. So it's too early to talk about, okay, any specific, okay, let's say market share or even products, okay, what products is going to be the survivor at the end.

Our next question comes from Steven Chin from UBS.

The main topic I want to drill down on was your networking division. Given that some of the growth expected from that segment is more second-half weighted, I wanted to see what kind of opportunities you guys saw in the data center vertical in particular. Is it switching or microprocessors? And also if you could talk about some of the opportunities in PON and other broadband access, how is it going? That would be great.

Yes, so Steven, I think on the data center side, it will be -- our primary focus is predominantly on the switching side, as well as the SoC side. We're working on designs for those, so with a few customers. And hopefully, we should see some traction there.

Right. And then, nothing -- again, assume there's nothing in the server side because that's way too early to talk about anything like that. On the PON side, I think people continue to deploy fibers to the home and that will continue to be -- it should be a steady business for -- we also introduce new products in this area. Our latest product that we introduced late last year was very, very advanced. So they also have good traction in some of the -- in new customers.

Do you have a follow-up, Steven?

Yes. I just had on operating expenses, given some of the earlier comments on OpEx over the course of this year, I just wanted to tie that back in with some of the other comments on further investments on TD-LTE product line and also perhaps more 20-nanometer broad capability this year. I was wondering if that would -- that the investments would perhaps lead to some further upward pressure on OpEx, or do you think that overall that there's enough moving pieces where...

Yes. I was -- actually, yes, I didn't make that clear. So it is true that, okay, the investments on the 28-nanometer is going to increase -- I mean, the cost of the 28-nanometer tapeout, it's going to increase, not to mention, okay, we have invest in even more advanced process nodes. In costing, this will, of course, increase drastically as well even more than the 28-nanometer. But taking those into account and taking into account that we are cleaning up our product roadmaps, meaning there will be fewer products, but higher volume products that we will be building. And -- or in assuming that we are going to -- okay, so assuming flat compared to the Q1, I do believe that we should be able to manage that throughout the year.

All right. Sarah, we're done?

Yes.

Okay. I would like to thank everyone for their time today and their continued interest in Marvell. We look forward to speaking with you in the coming months. Thank you and goodbye.

All right. Thank you.

Thank you very much. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.