Bob Bondurant
Analyst · Janney. Your line is now open
Thank you, Leanne, and to let everyone know who is on the call today, we have Joe McCreery, our VP of Finance and Head of Investor Relations, and Wes Martin, VP of Commercial Corporate Development - excuse me. Before we get started with the financial and operational results for the first quarter and the year, I need - excuse for the first quarter, I need to make this disclaimer. Certain statements made during this conference call maybe forward-looking statements relating to financial forecast, future performance and our ability to make distributions to unit holders. We report our financial results in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and use non-GAAP financial measures within the meanings of SEC Regulation G, such as distributable cash flow or DCF, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization or EBITDA and also adjusted EBITDA. We use these measures because we believe it provides users of our financial information with meaningful comparisons between current results and prior reported results and it can be a meaningful measure of the partnership's cash available to pay distributions. We also included in our press release issued yesterday, a reconciliation of EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow and quarterly adjusted EBITDA guidance to the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Our earnings press release and our 10-Q which was also filed yesterday are available at our website martinmidstream.com. Now I would like to discuss our first quarter performance, compared to the fourth quarter and also discuss our quarterly performance, compared to our guidance. For the first quarter we had adjusted EBITDA of $46.8 million, compared to $52.3 million in the fourth quarter. Our distributable cash flow for the first quarter was $30.3 million, which provided a quarterly distribution coverage ratio of 1.68 times on the actual distribution paid in the first quarter. Now by segment, I would like to discuss our first quarter operating performance, compared against the prior quarter and discuss our operating performance, compared to our segment guidance. In our Natural Gas Service segment, our first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $20.7 million, compared to $28.1 million in the fourth quarter, including in our Natural Gas Services Segment was an adjustment of $3.8 million in unrealized mark-to-market gains in the first quarter and $3.8 million in unrealized mark-to-mark losses in the fourth quarter. These derivative instruments are used to hedge our NGL inventory. Also included in adjusted EBITDA was $1.2 million in distributions from West Texas LPG in the first quarter and $1.4 million in distributions from West Texas LPG in the fourth quarter. The significant portion of the decrease in cash flow between quarters for our natural gas services segment was primarily from our Butane Logistics business. Our butane margin per gallon contracted 35% between quarters, and spot demand from our refineries fell, as the butane blending season began to wrap up in late February this year. As a reminder, we build butane inventory for our refining customers in the second and third quarters and we sell these customers butane in the fourth and first quarters of the year. We primarily utilize our North Louisiana underground storage facility, which is serviced by truck and rail to facilitate our logistic services for these refinery customers. The bad for the Natural Gas Services segment, cash flow decreased, was from our wholesale propane distribution business as spot demand for propane fell in the first quarter, compared to the fourth quarter, due to very warm weather in our geographic market. This negatively impacted our margins between quarters. Now compared to our first quarter guidance, our natural gas services segment, miss-forecast by 9% or $2 million. The largest portion of the miss was $1.4 million from our wholesale propane business, as a result of the warm weather, we experienced in our market area, which negatively impacted, both sales volume and margins. Our butane business slightly missed its mark by $600,000, due to reduced spot demand from refineries. These forecast misses were offset by positive performance, at Cardinal Gas Storage, as it exceeded forecast by $700,000, primarily from interruptible services. Finally our distribution in West Texas LPG missed its mark by $600,000, as a result of reduced volumes on the pipeline during the quarter. NGL volumes average 175,000 barrels a day, versus our forecast of 109,000 barrels per day. Currently for April volume has improved as we have average of 187,000 barrels per day. So going forward we should see cash flow improvement, when compared to the first quarter. Regarding West Texas LPG's rate hearings in front of the Texas Railroad Commission, a hearing on our rates was held in front of the hearings examiner, during the week of March 27th of this year. We believe the hearings examiner will make a recommendation to the railroad commission in August and a final road solution on this matter is expected before the end of 2017. For our Natural Gas Services segment, as laid out in our quarterly guidance slides, posted yesterday, we will experience reduced cash flow in the second quarter, as a result of the seasonality of our butane logistics business which services our refinery customers. We have begun our butane inventory purchases and we'll build inventory during the second and third quarters, before significant refinery sales return in the fourth quarter. Now moving to our terminalling and storage segment, our first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $14.6 million compared to $16.7 million in the fourth quarter. The primary cause for the reduction of cash flow between periods was from the loss cash flow from our Corpus Christy crude terminal which we sold in December 2016. This accounted for $2.4 million of the decrease. We did experienced increased cash flow in our packaged lubricant business of 1.1 million, due to increased volume and increased margins. Now compared to our first quarter guidance, our terminalling and storage segment exceeded forecast by $800,000. Our shore-based terminals exceeded guidance by $600,000 due to increased marine lubricant margins. Additionally our packaged lubricant business, known as Martin Lubricants exceeded guidance by $500,000, also as a result of improved margins, compared to forecast. Offsetting this was our Specialty Terminals Group which missed guidance by $500,000 due to unforeseen repair and maintenance cost. Now, looking towards the second quarter our guidance forecast, our terminal storage segment's adjusted EBITDA should be similar to the first quarter. In our Sulfur Services segment, our first quarter adjusted EBITDA was $13.5 million compared to $8.7 million in the fourth quarter. Our fertilizer business had an increase in adjusted EBITDA of $4.9 million while our pure sulfur byproduct business adjusted EBITDA was flat between quarters. The increase in our fertilizer adjusted EBITDA was primarily from 120% increase in sales volume between quarters. This was a result of the anticipated seasonal increase in demand from our customers to service the agricultural planning season. Now compared to the first quarter guidance, our Sulfur Services segment exceeded forecast by $3.1 million, primarily from outperformance of our fertilizer business. This outperformance was primarily result of the stronger fertilizer margins than were originally forecasted. Now, looking to our second quarter Sulfur Services guidance, we anticipate a reduction in cash flow from our fertilizer business, relative to the first quarter, as we expects sales volume to decline, as demand should weaken late in the second quarter due to the seasonality of the planting season. In our marine transportation segment, we had adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of $2.2 million, compared to $2.5 million in the fourth quarter. This decrease was primarily from the inland side of the business. Our inland utilization fell from 91% in the fourth quarter to 86% in the first quarter, as a result of one of our truck boats, being in the shipyard for scheduled maintenance. On the positive side, we did experience an improvement in average day rates by approximately $100 dollars per day. Now, when compared to our first quarter guidance, our marine transportation segment exceeded forecast by $600,000 primarily as a result of reduced operating expenses. And looking towards the second quarter, we are forecasting a slight reduction in adjusted EBITDA from our marine transportation segment, as we anticipate an increase in some operating expenses. Finally, our partnership's unallocated SG&A cost, excluding non-cash unit compensation expense was $4.2 million in the first quarter, compared to $3.9 million in the fourth quarter. This was also slightly higher than guidance due to diligence cost and professional fees, associated with the Hondo dropdown which occurred in February. Our maintenance capital expenditures and turnaround cost for the first quarter totaled $6.1 million. Also we sold some of our assets held for sale, raising $1.5 million in proceeds. We are still carrying $14.3 million of assets held for sale on our balance sheet, the majority of which are contracted to be sold, pending appropriate diligence processes for each of the assets held for sale. Now I would like to turn the call over to Joe, to discuss our balance sheet, bank ratios and additional information related to our quarterly guidance.