Good morning. And welcome to the AG Mortgage Investment Trust First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Brandon, and I’ll be your operator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Jenny Neslin. And Jenny, you may be good.

Thank you, Brandon. Good morning, everyone. And welcome to the first quarter 2022 earnings call for AG Mortgage Investment Trust. With me on the call today are David Roberts, our Chairman and CEO; T.J. Durkin, our President; Nick Smith, our Chief Investment Officer; and Anthony Rossiello, our Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, please note that the information discussed in today’s call may contain forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements made during today’s call are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which are outlined in our SEC filings including under the headings Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis. The company’s actual results may differ materially from these statements. We encourage you to read the disclosure regarding forward-looking statements contained in our SEC filings, including our most recently filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and our subsequent reports filed from time-to-time with the SEC. Except as required by law, we are not obligated and do not intend to update or to review or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. During the call today, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our SEC filings for reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures. We will also reference the earnings presentation that was posted to our website this morning. To view the slide presentation, turn to our website, www.agmit.com and click on the link for the First Quarter 2021 Earnings Presentation on the Home Page in the Investor Presentation section. Again, welcome to the call and thank you for joining us today. With that, I’d like to turn the call over to David.

Thank you, Jenny, and good morning to everybody. In my fourth quarter comments, I said that we were proud to have achieved a smooth transition and become a pure-play residential credit REIT. In this first quarter of 2022, we had to contend with a near doubling of interest rates and considerable widening of credit spreads. We can indeed hedge against the move in rates. But when spreads increase rapidly and we have a robust inventory of originated loans yet to be securitized that will lead to mark-to-market losses. That was largely the tail of the first quarter and the main reason we lost $0.74 per share of GAAP earnings. When spreads widened, we move quickly to adjust our pricing on newly originated loans. Despite the rise in rates and spreads, we were able to continue originating new loans at a rapid pace. Much of that is due to the fact that we have continued to rollout new origination programs and channels. As well, we have seen some of our competitors retreat from the Non-Agency origination arena. Finally, our mortgage affiliate Arc Home has continued to build out it’s human capital, taking advantage of an improved environment for attracting talent. Despite our first quarter loss, we maintained a dividend of $0.21 per share. Our dividend policy will continue to be guided by our view of earnings on a going forward basis over a multi-quarter period. I should note that we do not believe that the first quarter movement in spreads will be repeated. In April spreads relevant to our business cease to widen and we’ve begun to see some tightening. During the quarter, we executed three securitizations and we continued our momentum issuing another deal in April. One of our primary objectives is to make the transition from origination to securitization as seamless as we can. While the industry is experiencing an overall decline in origination volume, this factor serves to benefit us, freeing up more capacity in the securitization markets to execute with increased efficiency. This should improve the company’s return on equities going forward. All was not negative. We ended this quarter with ample liquidity to continue to propel our growth strategy at higher asset yields. We continue to be strong believers in our strategy as capable of delivering long-term earnings growth and so we also believe we will be able to report better results as the year goes on. I’ll now turn the call over to T.J. Durkin, our President.

Thanks, David. Good morning, everyone. We continue to be an active participant in the market during the first quarter, acquiring and settling on over $900 million of Non-Agency and Agency eligible loans. We also reduced our Agency RMBS exposure during the quarter through net sales of approximately $225 million. We continue to be disciplined about our warehouse risk and are very proud of the fact that we executed three securitizations during a very challenging quarter. These transactions not only derisk our warehouse lines, but gave us additional quick liquidity to take advantage of the dislocation and opportunity set presented to us since the beginning of the year, as some historical players had to step away from their acquisition programs. Nick will cover our Arc Home in more detail later in the call. But I briefly point out Arc’s continued success and taking market share this past quarter, as many Non-QM originators were adversely affected by the interest rate move with many simply not hedging their pipelines at all. Turning to page seven. As our purchase activity accelerates, the velocity of our securitization activity needs to increase. This past quarters record interest rates sell-off, brought with it much sought after operational capacity, which will provide us with the necessary resources to increase both our velocity and purchases. Much of this capacity comes from other segments of the mortgage market that are more sensitive to interest rates. We have already benefited from this, as large players in the mortgage market are looking for opportunities away from conventional originations and we believe this is just the beginning. We expect the investments we have made in our infrastructure over the past year to drive organic loan growth. As our securitization portfolio grows, our exposure to mark-to-market warehouse financing will continue to shrink, relative to…

Thanks, T.J., and good morning, everyone. Turning to page eight. As you can see here, we have ample liquidity to support loan growth, which we expect to be further supported by our financing strategy, including cash generated from securitization activity. Our captive originator continues to add relationships through its broker and correspondent channels, which will support this organic growth. Year-to-date, we have executed four securitizations and expect this pace to continue throughout the year. We are currently targeting post-securitization returns of 14% to 25%, which does not include any ancillary income from our originator. Although, this is a wider range than our target ROEs from prior quarters, it takes into consideration the current market volatility, which has resulted in near decade wide spreads in home loans along with the corresponding term financing. Turning to page nine. Looking at the chart on the bottom left, the portfolio mix has tracked our pure-play residential mortgage REIT strategy, which now has over 85% of our equity allocated to residential investments. The top chart outlines the current portfolio yields along with corresponding cost of funds. Over the quarter, debt yields have moved dramatically as risk fee rates have increased over 125 basis points, with credit spreads at the top of the capital stack widening approximately 60 basis points to 70 basis points. Today we see asset yields in the low-to-mid 5%, with term financing in the mid-to-high 4% area. Over the past few quarters, we negotiated higher advanced rates and lower spreads in our warehouse lines. The earliest maturity of these facilities is in November. Although, we intend to shorten our default time substantially, the lower cost of funds on our warehouse lines and higher debt yield will improve our returns during the gestation period. Subsequent to quarter end, we settled on approximately $250…

Thank you, Nick, and good morning, everyone. Turning to slide 12, we provide a reconciliation of our book value per common share. During the first quarter, book value declined by approximately 6.6% as a result of recognizing a GAAP net loss available to common shareholders of approximately $18 million or $0.74 per fully diluted share. Overall, the net loss was driven by realized and unrealized losses on our investment portfolio, resulting from the rising interest rate environment and credit spread widening across asset classes. Aside from the price volatility on our investments, we record a net interest income of $17 million during the first quarter, a 24% increase from the prior quarter, resulting from the continued growth in our residential loan portfolio. In connection with this growth, and the current market volatility, we also increased our interest rate swap portfolio, resulting in higher hedge expense. Lastly, we recognize the higher level of transaction related expenses during Q1, given our increased pace of securitizations previously discussed. On slide 13, we disclose a reconciliation of GAAP net income to core earnings, as well as provide a summary of the components making up core earnings. During the quarter, we recognize a loss in core earnings of $0.02 per share. Overall, net interest income exceeded our hedge and operating expenses by approximately $3 million. However, our investment in Arc Home contributed a $3.6 million loss to core earnings, despite having a profitable quarter. This is because Arc Home’s MSR mark-to-mark gains, as well as gains on the sale of loans sold to MITT are excluded from core earnings. As a reminder, although the gains on the sale of loans from Arc Home to MITT are excluded from core earnings, they are recognized as unrealized gains in our income statement contributing to GAAP earnings. On…

Thank you. And from Credit Suisse we have Doug Harter. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Nick, you mentioned the 14% to 25% expected ROE on securitizations. Can you just remind us what the prior range was and kind of where you see returns on the loans as they’re on the warehouse lines?

Of course. So previously, we’d stated 14% to 18%, which, probably, tracks the guys had been quoting for a pretty long period of time. On the warehouse lines, we still see, call it, very low double-digit ROEs. We have had a decent bit of benefit from negotiating better terms on those, and as mentioned in the script, our earliest maternity one is in November.

Got it. And that return for the securitization, is that on newly purchased loans. I mean, I guess, how does this spread widening higher cost of funds impact the loans that, as you transition them from the warehouse to securitization today?

Yeah. Of course. So that that takes into consideration really, so that is more forward looking. So it’s where we’ve been acquiring loans, call it, for the vast part of the first quarter then to -- into the new quarter. Now, obviously, looking backwards at -- the mark-to-market losses on the loans from the spread widening, that -- given those mark-to-market losses, the RO -- the subsequent ROT -- ROEs are still post securitization in that range.

Got it. That makes sense. And then just to make sure I understand slide 13. So Arc Home made the $3.1 million for the quarter. Does that $3.1 million include the MSR gains? So if you stripped out the MSR gain, would that be kind of a small negative for the quarter?

That’s correct. If you look at that slide, the $4.4 million that that’s being backed out is essentially the MSR mark during the quarter for MITT.

Got it. I guess, how do you think about the profitability both on kind of a true operating basis and then also kind of on a core basis, as we kind of go through 2022, and obviously, the world has kind of changed for originators?

Yeah. I mean, I think, what we’re trying to highlight on the earlier slide is, we continue to transition the share of origination towards our Agency products. So, obviously, Agency margins are challenging, they probably aren’t going to get materially better anytime soon. And so as we invest in, the pipeline, if you will and getting more credit product in, we hope that’ll be good for the operational efficiency. I think core earnings, we are trying to, I would say, walk through what’s a bit convoluted from an accounting perspective and Anthony is trying to give you the reversals, if you will of it, but we’re trying to look at it as a holistic versus maybe the traditional, like, core definition of Arc Home’s profitability vertically up into MITT. So that’s why we’re trying to give a little bit more detail on what we have to back out versus what’s really happening on the ground.

Makes sense. Thank you.

From Jones Trading we have Jason Stewart. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks. Just following on the Arc MSR, if I’m doing the math right, does that mean it was marked up at Arc about $10 million quarter-to-quarter?

Yes. Jason, That -- Arc was about $12 million quarter-to-quarter

$12 million. Okay. And can you give us the multiple on that?

Multiple is 49 as of March 31st?

Okay. Great. Thank you. And then, I think, someone else, if you didn’t give it and I missed it, I apologize. Do you have a book value quarter-to-date in 2Q, can you give?

Yeah. Jason, just -- since we’re early in our process for April, we don’t have an exact number, but given the volatility and what’s going on, we think we’re marginally down quarter-to-date.

Okay. And then just pulling back up for a minute, I get the concept of trying to preserve liquidity. I guess two parts to that. One is, when you think about that in the volatility of spreads, were there opportunities, are there opportunities for you to be an opportunistic/I don’t want to call it distress, but buyer of assets in 1Q and 2Q based on that volatility? And then the second part is, have you adjusted sort of the way you think about liquidity and leverage going forward given that volatility?

Yeah. So we did have opportunities to acquire assets that were attractive. I still believe that, given sort of the sell-off that, we’ve gravitated towards positioning ourselves to current coupon. Our view is that in the debt markets, there’s potentiality, that orphaned coupons will just be less liquid. So, we continue to look forward rather than backwards. So that’s our general view there and the nice thing is, I think, we probably said three times or more in our presentation, that as others pull back, that we’ve actually been able to drive volumes there at really what I consider near historic wides and spreads for, call the, past decade.

Thanks, Nick. I wanted to pivot from the origination side to the acquisition side is, is there an opportunity to acquire pools, securities at discounts that are sorted from distressed or non-liquid sellers?

I think there’s more rumors of distress out there than there is actual distress now, obviously, that can change, we have had success acquiring stuff through our bulk channel is -- very recently and in the past so. The expectation that should continue, but quite honestly, probably, at a slow pace, I think, sort of the event and widening is sort of already occurred and the people who are going to pull back already pulled back.

Got it. Fair enough. I’ll jump out. Thanks.

From KBW we have Bose George. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. This is actually Mike Smith on for Bose. Just one on the securitization market changes, provide some color on the volatility and how that’s trended in April. Just wondering if most of the older inventory has cleared and then if you see any changes to loan prices to reflect that volatility?

Yeah. So the loan prices, I think, we -- earlier in the year, I think, they were somewhat stubborn, and then, call it, the back half of January, February, things sort of gapped wider and that’s when we really started seeing opportunity. So for a while, it didn’t really necessarily track what was going on in the debt markets. Now, if anything, it’s on -- sort of flipped to the other side, you can buy assets at attractive low levels where you can sell debt. That being said, given the backdrop of volatility, that can change quickly. We did see some relief very recently, called the past two weeks, three weeks in where we’re selling the IG part of the stack, off pretty substantially tighter than sort of what we saw the wides been, call it, anywhere from 30 basis points to 50 basis points, depending upon what part of the capital stack. So, if anything -- it feels like it was a little bit overdone and if anything that was tightening, where we’re issuing debt, while sort of the markets, broader markets around us actually we’re a little bit weaker. So, I think that plays into things being a little -- maybe a little overdone.

Okay. Great. That’s helpful color. And then just one more, can you just -- is there anything strategic that you’re considering, just given the valuation of the shares? Just wondering if you can maybe talk through how you’re thinking about bridging the gap between the share price and book value

Hi. It’s David Roberts. We do have a share repurchase program that is outstanding and we’re always looking at opportunities to drive earnings growth, and therefore, dividend growth. So it’s definitely an arrow in our quiver in terms of improving shareholder value.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions.

And we have no further questions at this time.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us and for your questions. We appreciate it and look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. Thank you. Have a great weekend.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today’s conference. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.