Good morning and welcome to the AG Mortgage Investment Trust Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Call. My name is Brandon and I will be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded. And I will now turn it over to Karen Werbel. Karen, you may begin.

Thanks, Brandon. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us for today’s conference call to review AG Mortgage Investment Trust’s third quarter 2017 results and recent developments. Before we begin, I would like to review our Safe Harbor statement. Today’s conference call and corresponding slide presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All such statements are intended to be subject to the Safe Harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. Statements regarding our business and investment strategy, market trends and risks, assumptions regarding interest rates and prepayments, changes in the yield curve and changes in government programs and regulations affecting our business are forward-looking statements by their nature. The company’s actual results may differ materially from those projected due to the impact of these factors and others beyond its control. All forward-looking statements included in this conference call and the slide presentation are made as of today, November 1, 2017 and we disclaim any obligation to update them. We will refer to certain non-GAAP measures on this call. And for reconciliations, please refer to the earnings press release and 8-K, which are posted on our website and have been filed with the SEC. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to David Roberts.

Thanks, Karen and good morning to everyone. First, I’d like to share some highlights in the third quarter with you today. Our book value increased during the quarter by 3.1% to $19.35 per share at quarter’s end. Spreads for most agency RMBS residential investment ABS markets tightened during the third quarter, which resulted in an increase in our book value. Our core earnings for the quarter was $0.51 per share, including a negative $0.01 per share retrospective adjustment and $0.05 per share from dollar roll income positive obviously associated with our net TBA position. The $0.51 per share core earnings compares to $0.47 per share in the second quarter. The increase in core earnings from the prior quarter was driven primarily by the rotation from credit into agency RMBS. As we have discussed on prior earnings calls, we view the agency sector as attractive and offering compelling risk-adjusted returns. As such, we increased our equity allocation to agency RMBS in the third quarter to 39.5% from 32.4%. We maintained our leverage during the quarter at 4.2x and we actively managed our duration gap by adding hedges alongside our increased allocation to agency MBS. As always subject to '40 Act constraints, we are continuing to see opportunities to add to our credit portfolio by leveraging the Angelo, Gordon platform. As always, we remain opportunistic and evaluate investment opportunities on a relative value basis. During the quarter, we declared a dividend of $0.475 per share for the eighth quarter in a row and $0.10 per share special cash dividend. As announced in our press release, we are pleased to welcome TJ Durkin to his expanded role as Chief Investment Officer. TJ has a strong track record and deep expertise in mortgage credit investing. I will remain CEO and Chairman of the board, while TJ will remain Co-Portfolio Manager alongside Yong Joe. TJ and Yong, both of whom joined Angelo, Gordon in 2008 that helped manage MITT’s portfolio since MITT’s inception in 2011. With that, I will turn the call over to TJ.

Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone. During the third quarter, the Fed, in its September meeting kept the federal funds interest rate unchanged and maintained a slow and steady path of monetary policy normalization with the commencement of their well telegraphed balance sheet reduction. Progress continues to be made with respect to the Fed’s dual mandate of full employment and price stability. As unemployment remains below 5%, however, inflation has softened recently in response to a series of transitory factors. Due to the removal of some uncertainty around the Fed’s balance sheet reinvestment plan, agency mortgages realized their best spread performance of the year with nominal spreads tightening to benchmark rates by 8 to 10 basis points during the quarter. Our interest outlook remains minimally changed with an expectation of a largely benign and range bound market into year end. Accordingly, we expect a policy rate tightening of 25 basis points in December, with the potential for two more rate increases in 2018. At which point, we see the Fed is running out of room for further rate normalization for this current cycle. We expect to learn who will replace Janet Yellen as Chairperson of the Federal Reserve in the very near future. While this may offer a brief period of volatility, we do not see it materially altering either our economic or rate outlook over the near to medium-term. Spreads for most mortgage and asset-backed credit markets remained well supported during the quarter against the heavy new-issue calendar, strong geopolitical rhetoric and three severe hurricanes, two of which impacted high exposure areas of securitized credit. Spreads tightening was driven by healthy demand for structured credit products coupled by stable fundamentals. Attributes which have continued to position RMBS and ABS has attractive spread products in a market that has been…

Thanks, TJ. Overall, for the quarter, we reported net income available to common stockholders of $32.6 million or $1.17 per fully diluted share. Core earnings in the quarter, was $14.3 million or $0.51 per share versus $12.9 million or $0.47 per share in the prior quarter. It was a negative $0.01 retrospective adjustment in the third quarter due to the premium amortization on our agency portfolio, which was unchanged from the prior quarter. At September 30, our book value was $19.35, an increase of $0.58 or 3.1% from last quarter due to the reasons David previously mentioned. To give you a better sense of our current $3.5 billion portfolio, I would like to highlight a few more specifics. As described on Page 4 of our presentation, the portfolio at September 30 had a net interest margin of 2.57%. This was comprised of an asset yield of 4.69% offset by finance and hedging costs of 1.80% and 0.32% respectively for a total cost of funds of 2.12%. Net interest margin increased from the prior quarter primarily due to asset rotation credit into agency MBS as overall cost of funds declined with increased use of lower cost agency repos, which was partially offset by lower asset yield of agency MBS relative to our credit portfolio. As of September 30, we had 39 financing counterparties and are financing investments with 28 of those counterparties. Funding continues to be plentiful with new entrants in both the credit and the agency space. At quarter end, we had ample liquidity of $156 million, which was comprised of $62 million of cash, $82.5 million of un-levered agency whole pool securities and another $22 million of un-levered agency IO securities. Additionally, at quarter end, our estimated undistributed taxable income was $1.59. This was a decrease from $1.74 in the prior quarter primarily due to the $0.10 special dividend that we declared during the quarter. The special dividend was largely related to the settlement by Bank of America with RMBS investors related to mortgages sold by a countrywide unit in 2016. This event generated additional taxable income for us in 2016 and the declaration of the regular common dividend of $0.475 and the $0.10 special dividend fulfills our 2016 taxable income distribution requirement. Given that this was a one-time event in 2016, we don’t anticipate that we would need to pay special dividend in 2017. We also utilized our asset equity offering program, or ATM. During the quarter, we issued approximately 360,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of roughly $7 million. That concludes our prepared remarks. And we would now like to open the call up for questions. Operator?

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And from Credit Suisse, we have Douglas Harter. Please go ahead.

Thanks. TJ, can you just talk about how you are looking at the trade-off between risk and return when thinking about sizing the duration gap for the portfolio today?

Yes, sure. If you go to the slide that we have on Page 14, you will see that just our credit book has a cash flow or modified duration which we show you that the market doesn’t necessarily trade in a lockstep basis point for basis point with the types of credit assets we own like it was for the agency book. So, another way to look at this slide would be the agency has 2.68 year duration, we would subtract the hedges of 2.2 years and you are looking at more of a 0.45 or 0.5 interest rate gap on the agency book and you would need much bigger moves in interest rates for our credit spreads to react to interest rates. It’s a much more higher credit spread book and so that’s how we look at it.

So, I guess would that then sort of translate down to the table below where you show the interest rate exposure to a rate shock?

Yes. So, I think that’s more of a theoretical model driven approach to how our credit book would react in ascertaining shock. I don’t think that the market would actually price that, but that’s the way a model driven sort of scenario analysis outputs the risk parameters.

And I guess is there a difference in the credit portfolio in legacy versus kind of new issuance in terms of any of those sensitivities or would they act behave relatively similarly?

Yes. So, again from what we own, I think legacy has been more resilient, but generally speaking again, what we are putting into the portfolio here is higher credit spread product that is less sensitive to interest rates. And the scenario off at the bottom does have all of our credit book assuming just again a raw 100 basis point shift in interest rates without really taking in consideration that the credit spread was probably marginally tightened in that interest rate scenario for some of our assets. So, we don’t factor that in.

That makes sense. Thank you, TJ.

From KBW, we have Eric Hagen. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning, TJ. Congrats on your expanded role. Was there any earnings accretion that you guys expect from refinancing the NPL deal during the quarter?

Nothing material now. It was more of an extension of the debt and we got a slightly tighter interest rate on the senior debt from refinancing in the current market from 1 to 2 years prior.

Yes, it was pretty early in the quarter as well.

Got it. Okay, great. And then following up on one of Doug’s questions, can you just give us the breakdown in the, I think, it’s $473 million or so prime RMBS, what’s the breakdown between legacy and 2.0 securities, roughly?

I don’t have the exact breakdown that the majority would probably be geared towards legacy.

Okay, thanks. And then how did credit spreads fare during the month of October?

Generally tighter.

For all assets or just…?

Yes, pretty consistently across the board that the CRT sector that we mentioned also tightens again further we have gone away from the hurricanes, the better that space is traded.

I guess it calls into question, do you guys expect some seasonal widening given the hurricane attention that was focused on at the end of September, I mean is there – should we expect that going forward end of summer widening, if you will?

You mean on a forward-looking basis?

On a forward-looking basis, yes.

Yes. I mean this is the first year as they started to issue, the GSE started the program in 2013 and this is the first year we have experienced, I guess weather-related volatility. So, it seems fairly episodic.

Okay. Thanks for the comments.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And from JMP Securities, we have Trevor Cranston. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks. In the prepared remarks, you guys mentioned that you are evaluating some credit opportunities on the less liquid side in both the resi and the commercial spaces. Can you elaborate a little bit on what type of collateral you are looking at in those investments, particularly if it’s like legacy loans or new issue? Thanks.

Yes. I mean, we haven’t closed those transactions. I would say that they are of similar investments that we put in the book over the course of the past 2 years, but I don’t want to comment too much as we haven’t closed any of the transactions mentioned.

Okay. And if things sort of go well as you evaluate them, are those transactions you would expect to close in 4Q or could that potentially be a 1Q event?

Most likely fourth quarter it works to you when the mandates go through diligence.

Okay, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Alright. It looks like we have no further questions at the movement.

Okay, great. Thank you. We look forward to speaking to you all next quarter.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.