Ladies and Gentleman, greetings and welcome to the Mirion Technologies Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Eric Linn, Manager of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning, and welcome Mirion's Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Joining me this morning are Mirion's CEO, Tom Logan and Mirion's CFO, Brian Schopfer. Before we begin today’s, prepared remarks allow me to remind you that comments made during this call will include forward-looking statements and actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ are discussed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and in Mirion's other SEC filings under the caption Risk Factors. Quarterly references within today's discussion are related to the third quarter ended September 30th, 2024. The comments made during this call will also include certain financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Reconciliation of those non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the appendix of the presentation accompanying today's call. All earnings materials can be found on our IR website at ir.mirion.com. With that let me now turn he call over to, Tom, who will begin on Slide 3.

Thank you, Eric and good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to announce that we delivered another strong quarter consistent with expectation. $207 million of third quarter revenue was 8% higher compared to last year's third quarter. Adjusted EPS was $0.08 per share. Adjusted EBITDA was $45.7 million with 180 basis points of margin improvement compared to the year ago period. This keeps us on pace for our previously stated adjusted EBITDA and EPS full year guidance. Thank you to the Mirion team for delivering outstanding performance in the quarter. I'd like to start by talking about the evolving macro environment we compete in. The so-called super trends I've detailed over the past several quarters continue to take shape. Recall that these trends in nuclear power and cancer care are expected to be generational in tenor and provide meaningfully favorable tailwinds to both our strategy and execution. Let's start with nuclear power on Slide 4. The biggest news in this vertical has accrued from the so-called Hyperscalers, a moniker associated with large-scale data center leaders like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, who announced a spate of nuclear power deals in support of their Artificial Intelligence business models over the last quarter. These deals include the following. First, the Microsoft deal with Constellation Energy to bring one unit of the decommissioned Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant back online, an extraordinary deal because it adds to U.S. Nuclear generating capacity through the second recommissioning event of a defunct nuclear power plant, requires Microsoft to consume 100% of the output of the plant for the next 20 years and reflects pricing well above PJM prevailing interchange rates. Secondly, Amazon's deals with Talen Energy, Dominion Energy, Energy Northwest and fourth generation SMR developer X-energy to generate up to five gigawatts of additional nuclear energy in the…

Thank you, Tom, and thank you all for joining my call. I'll pick back up on Slide 6. Third quarter revenue grew 8. 2% versus the prior year to $206.8 million. The strong performance was driven primarily by our Technologies Group for nuclear power activity and strong performance from nuclear medicine. Organic revenue grew 6.1% versus the prior year's third quarter. Our Technologies group grew at a solid 7.8% organic growth rate, while the Medical group delivered 3.2% organic growth. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $45.7 million and EBITDA margins of 22.1%, a 180 basis point improvement versus the prior year and the fifth consecutive quarter of margin expansion. We again saw margin uplift from both of our operating groups. Additionally, we brought leverage to below three times. This is a significant milestone, but more work continues. As we approach the end of the year, we have fine-tuned components of our 2024 guide. However, our adjusted EBITDA and EPS guidance remains unchanged. I'll get into more detail shortly. Turning to Slide 7, on third quarter orders and backlog trends. Our third quarter order rate declined approximately 30% versus prior year's third quarter. However, after adjusting for the two large one-time nuclear orders we booked in the third quarter last year, total company orders actually grew 13% with nuclear power orders growing approximately 12%. Recall, we were up against a tough comp this quarter since orders grew 46% in the third quarter of 2023. As we have discussed many times, approximately 75% of our nuclear power business has historically flowed from the installed base. The adjusted orders numbers I shared is a more direct comparison of the underlying order environment. As Tom mentioned, we are extremely encouraged by the large project pipeline and robust customer engagement we are seeing specifically…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. The first question is from Joe Ritchie with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Good morning. Yes. So many questions. I'll try to be succinct. Maybe can we just start with the de booking that you guys booked this quarter or de booked this quarter? Maybe just kind of talk us through the process that you typically go through to book something into backlog and then specifically what happened with that specific order and why was it de booked?

Yes, Joe. This is Tom. I'll talk about the specific order and then I'll let Brian talk about just kind of the accounting discipline about as it relates to what we book in the backlog or not, but this related to a project in Turkey where essentially our business here is for electrical penetration assemblies. We are working through a primary contractor that in turn is working for a larger primary contractor building out essentially the four reactors at this project and essentially due to a contractual dispute and I'm not going to get into the details, we lost this business on two units to a regional competitor and our expectation is that there is a reasonable opportunity for us to get some or all of this business back because we think we are in many respects uniquely qualified not only for this project but for this product line globally and so our efforts internally are really focused on that and as we look at production profiles and the like, we are focused on the work package now for the second reactor, but understand that that can be reasonably and easily pivoted to the first reactor if we can again if we can gain some of that business back. It's a bit of an unusual circumstance. Generally, if you look at our history of backlog and again the 21 years that I've been doing this, it is relatively unusual to see a de booking like this, but this one was narrowly tied to again a contractual dispute on the front end. Brian, do you want to talk about backlog?

Yes, Joe, to answer your second question, we're very disciplined about what we put into backlog. We don't put unfunded things in there. We have to have a contractual obligation where it's clear that we have that. So the backlog is strong. I understand, we've had two of these, I guess, in the last 3 years. The other one was obviously completely tied to a macro situation and nothing to do with kind of the underlying business and we're very confident in the over $800 million we have in the backlog and how that will churn to both revenue, EBITDA and cash.

Got it. That's helpful color. And look, I won't have you get into the specifics of the contract, Tom, but just maybe one follow-up question there. Was it a case where you were working for a specific contractor that ended up getting swapped out and that's why you lost the business? Or was this more kind of like a direct relationship and the owner. Okay.

Yes, no, it was really the former. It was really the former, Joe.

Okay. All right, great. Shifting gears, you guys mentioned the Sizewell project, It's great. It seems like that's already -- you're winning on this EDF relationship that you've already highlighted to us previously. I want to make sure that I heard it correctly. So there was roughly $30 million that got pushed from Q2 to Q3 in orders and the vast majority of that was that contract, did I hear that right?

That's correct.

Joe maybe just one other thing. I mean, I think there's still more to come on this contract as the project progresses.

Okay, great. And then look, Tom, your initial comments on what the Hyperscalers are doing, are obviously like there's a lot of buzz around it. It's great. I think ultimately it's going to be really good for your business. I guess, how do you think about that over the next 12 months? And in terms of the types of announcements that you would expect based on what you're hearing? And then also, like how do you think that this ultimately like impacts your orders over the next 12 months?

Yes. So, our efforts primarily over the next 12 months are focused on continuing to, again, broaden the swath of strategic alliances, strategic relationships that we forge with the relevant players in the space, recognizing that there are many dozens of SMR initiatives worldwide and it's a bit of a gold rush environment right now where ultimately there will be a consolidation and there will be fewer over time, but to be clear, we're focused on taking in all of the above strategy and again really extending the stance that we've always had in the nuclear industry, which is to be independent, to be Swiss, if you will, where we support and integrate well with all technologies, all players and that's exactly what we're doing here, but beyond that, we expect that we will see additional funding and commitments on first of a kind SMR build outs, where for us the opportunity set is a combination of reactor instrumentation and control, software that is principally but not exclusively focused on security systems, but that also tends to be a bit of a backbone for some of the other software opportunities that we see in the space and then downstream from that, there's more balance of plant stuff in and around health physics applications, dosimetry, contamination, clearance equipment and the like, but we expect that early on, the biggest action will be in and around reactor instrumentation and control and software.

Got it. That's super helpful. If I could ask one more question, I'll turn it over to everybody else after. I met with one of your competitors in the radiopharma space recently, and it seems like there seems to be a very healthy growth outlook for that business going forward. I think you mentioned your business being up 18% versus 2023. How do you think about the long-term opportunity in this business? Can you kind of keep this like mid- to high teens type growth rate going forward? And just any I know you'll get into this a lot more on December 3rd, but just any comments around that would be helpful.

Well, yes, just as a bit of a tease, we really do believe that what's happening in radiopharmaceutical therapy is a revolution in cancer care. We think it's going to be tremendously beneficial for that market for the individuals that are impacted by this terrible disease and if you look at any leading indicator, maybe the best one is to look at what's in the FDA approval pipeline for Theranostic drugs in terms of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials and it's incredibly robust pipeline that really is reflective of the heavy investment that's taking place in the sector and you've seen the numbers put out by others like GE about the projected exponential growth of this market and we think that's real and it's hard to pick a true revenue CAGR for the industry overall, but understand that a lot of that top line growth is driven by very, very expensive drugs that are $50,000 per dose, $250,000 course of therapy today. Obviously, that will come down, but we do expect that there will be sizable volumetric growth, even greater revenue growth in the space and our focus is to take really our unique data management platform, understanding that today we're the leading provider of data management software in the American market where we connect the drug makers, the isotope producers, the contract manufacturers, the research organizations, the radiopharmacies, the clinicians and ultimately the patient and have really kind of a unique perch in the data flows through this market. That in combination with the fact that we're the global leader in critical instruments that are used for calibration and measuring uptake of radiopharmaceuticals and further augmented by just kind of our baseline capabilities in radiation detection and measurement gives us the ability to create a very interesting and compelling ecosystem where ultimately over time we expect the value of the data that flows through there to become arguably even more important than the capital equipment revenue. And to your point, yes, we're going to unpack this in detail at our investor event, and we'll save any update on guidance at that time, but I will tell you that I'm very excited about this market overall and specifically what we're doing in it.

Great. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. The next question is from Chris Moore with CJS Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking a couple. Yes, I think, Tom, during the prepared remarks, you talked about, I think, $300 million to $400 million in new bids that you hear by the end of the year. Just trying to get a sense of the average size of these deals?

Yes. I mean, they're all over the map, Chris, but what I will tell you, firstly, just to be clear on what I said. I said, in our active bid queue, meaning deals that we've already bid on or in the process of bidding on, for large projects, we see an aggregate quantum of $300 million to $400 million. The scale is all over the board and these are deals that range from at the top end about $100 million to well below that. Heavy, heavy concentration in the nuclear industry, but not exclusively there, but the main takeaway there is that I know there has been some obvious focus on our backlog trends, the fact that we're up only nominally year-over-year and just how that correlates to the overall growth of the business and so, we've tried very hard in the presentation and to a degree in the commentary today to really kind of unpack that and show how importantly revenue is driven to a far greater degree by the flow business, the recurring revenue that we enjoy and I think we've called out pretty clearly what the dynamics are there, but having said all of that, I will tell you that this $300 million to $400 million in our large project bid pipeline is an unusually large amount. That is not typical. This is not what we would see at a as kind of a standard or in range at a given moment of time. It's very exciting to us. We're very encouraged by that. That's how we think about it.

And just to be clear, we think that could trade between now and the end of 2025.

Yes, good point.

Got you. That's helpful. I appreciate that. Maybe switching gears, just leverage is in good shape. You talked about 2.6 by the end of the year. Just kind of your thoughts on M&A at this point in time. Is the pipeline relatively full and anything -- any specific areas really you're focused on?

Yes. As you noted, Chris, we got a great M&A pipeline. We continue to actively develop very high-quality executable deals. We do not expect to close any M&A deals in the remainder of the quarter. Again, as Brian noted, we're very eager to continue to bring leverage down into what we feel is like is a more normative equilibrium in kind of the mid-two percent range, but having said that, we see some smaller deals that would strategically be very important in terms of some of the ecosystems that we're trying to build out, not just on the medical side, but on the technology side as well and we expect that we will be active in M&A next year. Don't expect to do anything beyond kind of the small ball zone that we've been focused on just based on what we see today. Obviously, that could change, but that continues to be our posture.

Perfect. I will leave it there. Thanks, guys.

Thank you. The next question is from Andy Kaplowitz with Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. Tom and Brian, I think your previous guidance regarding backlog was that you could reach flattish to year end 2023 by the end of this year. Is that still what you're thinking? Or with the addition of Sizewell C and maybe some incremental activity given the excitement around nuclear, you could even grow backlog year over year in Q4? And then the $300 million to $400 million of large nuclear projects you mentioned, can you give us a bit more color regarding the geographies and market share expectations that you have for the pipeline?

Yes. Maybe I'll take the first one, Tom can give some color in the second. Look, first off, Sizewell was always in the deal flow for this year. So that's not like a bluebird that we weren't expecting. I think the timing for us just shifted a little bit between candidly Q2 until we booked it in Q4. Yes, I said at the end of last quarter, I thought we could get to flattish. That was we were not expecting the QU headwind from an orders front. I do think when we look -- when we get to February and look back on December, I think we will be in the zone of flattish. I think there are opportunities to be ahead for sure, but I think we have a lot of work to do to get from here to there. So I think that's a little bit of a -- I understand that's probably a little bit more of a squishy answer, but I think at the end of the day, I do think we're still in the zone of being flattish. I think there's opportunity to beat.

And then, Andy, in terms of the composition, geographically, I would tell you that the center of gravity is in the U.S., so more than half of that total quantum that we talked about even at the upper end of the range would accrue from U.S. related opportunities. The balance is kind of split, a lot in Europe, a little bit and the Arab Gulf region. So it's a bit more diversified.

Helpful. And maybe I want to ask Joe's question in a slightly different way. He asked about the next 12 months. Like if I look at your commercial nuclear revenue growth forecast, you raised this year to high single digits, but does the excitement around commercial nuclear actually support that high single digit run rate lasting? Obviously, we know when you dispatch you had a lot lower forecast than that. So maybe any comments on if you can sustain this kind of run rate that you had in 2024 moving forward?

Yes, I would say three things, Andy. One is, we'll talk about this in detail at the Investor Day, but again just as a bit of a Day, but again just as a bit of a tease to that overall. Talking about two things that have changed a lot since we initially set that guidance during the de speck. One is the overall health of the nuclear industry. This is the most important factor and fundamentally, like in any other industry, when operators are making money, then they tend to be a little bit more free spending on CapEx and OpEx. A decade ago, most of the nuclear operators globally were losing money. Today, they're all making money, and you even see some truly extraordinary turnarounds, none more so than EDF in France, which has always been one of our leading customers where last year they had a very tough year, this year they're doing extraordinarily well and this also creates an incentive beyond the baseline of just having better financial resources. What's happening today is because of the favorable dynamics in terms of operating margin that the operators are enjoying, they want to run the reactors hotter meaning at higher capacity factors, they want to life extend them, and in certain cases they want to operate capacity and all of those things are beneficial for us and have not only kind of a long-term bearing, but also impact the cadence of replacement cycles for certain product categories and just kind of the broader demands for services and software within the industry. So, first point there is that the industry is considerably healthier than it was three years ago when we de specked and had our public debut and again, we're going to talk about what we think that means…

Tom, I just want to ask you one more question about the de booking. In the past, you said it was unusual, which I agree with. In the past, we've seen one or two of these. They've been as a result of geopolitical conditions changing or maybe new sanctions. Did the Turkey de booking have anything to do with that or was it just purely competitive?

No. In this sense, there's only one that was geopolitical in nature and that was the loss of the Finnish project that used Russian technology that occurred in our debut year as a public company and that was kind of a gut punch for us because it's a great project, positioned to be kind of ratably recognized in our first year as a public company. That clearly was geopolitically driven. In terms of what we've seen since then, the other de bookings are related to military IDIQ business, which we no longer book in the backlog because of the ephemeral nature of some of them, and the specific project, which was purely a contractual matter and again, we like our odds of getting some or all of this back overall. So, it's not part of a broader geopolitical exposure, but I would note, that when we look ahead at the election next week, that could have implications for the rapidity with which the Ukraine war is settled and that if there is a settlement near term, meaning in 2025, that would be a significantly beneficial event for us. If coupled with that is kind of a general rapprochement between Russia and the West, a reopening of Russian markets, an opportunity to come into the Ukraine market and help rebuild the nuclear infrastructure there. It would be a very, very beneficial event for the industry overall and for us. In terms of the Russian market, it would not only be on the nuclear side, but also the medical side. That's probably the biggest kind of geopolitical potential event that we see in the near term.

Helpful time. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question is from the line of Yuan Zhi with B. Riley Securities. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Tom and Brian. Congrats on a good quarter. Thank you for taking our questions. The first question is around the backlog dynamic, maybe two parts. First, can you break down the backlog by segments? We are curious about the pattern of backlog for technologies as well as the medical side. Does the medical technology side have more recurring revenue and then on the medical side, they are more short-term orientated?

Yes. So I'll take that. Look the backlog is 75%, 25% and I think we've said that before 75% technologies, 25% medical. So there is a significant piece that's medical. I don't think anything has changed from how we think about backlog rolling into revenue. We've always said 45% to 50% of the next 12 months revenue is sitting in backlog. I think we probably right now are kind of at the midpoint, the high end of that range as we think about the future going forward. Yes, it's true that a majority of the revenue on the medical side kind of is more book and bill, but I would remind you that 25% of that business is also just imagery services and very little of that actually sits in the backlog. They're evergreen kind of recurring revenue contracts, deferred revenue components, etc. So that's a much more kind of faster churn business, but also has a very high repeat content. So that's kind of how we think about it and like I said, I think we really like where we're sitting right now.

Got it. Probably you have covered my second part of the question. I will pivot to the relationship with EDF. Can you provide more color on this relationship? And how did you leverage this relationship to get this Sizewell C contract? Maybe use this as an example to show how you can leverage other similar relationship to get more bids on more orders?

Yeah, the EDF relationship is a very important one for us. They are the largest operator outside of China of nuclear power plants globally with nearly 60 reactors under operation and they made it very clear and the French President Emmanuel Macron has been very clear that France would like to build up to an additional 14 nuclear reactors in country and continue to be very active on the export markets. With the specifics around the Sizewell deal is that that was really a follow on to the work that we did at Hinkley Point C, which we've talked about before as being a project where we booked on the front end more than $80 million in backlog tied into again instrumentation and control, things like electrical penetration assemblies, various health physics applications, etc. So, Sizewell is really a follow on to that and importantly, you may recall that we announced a strategic relationship or a strategic frame agreement with EDF a couple of months ago. This falls outside of that, meaning that we had begun the work and the negotiation on Sizewell independent of the strategic frame agreement with EDF, but on that point, the very nature of the strategic frame agreement is that we effectively become a sole source of supplier of a significant mix of overall content to be used in EDF, EPRs, they are third generation plus reactor technology and we expect that it could cover up to 20 reactors, those in France, those that are associated with export activities over the next two decades or so. The advantage of that is that again everything is in terms of terms and conditions, economic parameters, etc. are pre negotiated and it makes it far more efficient, speeds the overall process of building a new reactor for EDF and we're thrilled and honored to have that relationship with them.

Got it. Thanks for the additional color.

Thank you. As there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the conference over to Tom Logan for closing comments.

I will end today, firstly by thanking the team for delivering a truly great quarter, thanking all participants for listening in today and particularly the Q&A that we received. I just want to reiterate that again when you look at the dynamics impacting the company right now that we are fortunate to have what we believe will be very robust and sustainable tailwinds in our two key vertical markets and as noted, we're working very, very hard to continue to evolve and improve our positioning in those. I believe the company is executing well. We've demonstrated that through a variety of measures including margin expansion improvements and working capital velocity and some other measures and again noting that we understanding that we're still relatively young public company and people are trying to understand the correlation between our backlog dynamics and top line growth, revenue coverage and the like. Today, we provided more detail in and around how that works and our outlook overall for backlog growth which is bullish, but fundamentally, how the demand drivers particularly as we look at NTM growth really go well beyond the overall backlog metrics. So hopefully, we advanced understanding there a little bit. We feel good about our positioning. Again, happy about the quarterly performance, the outlook and we appreciate your time and attention today. So thank you for all of that and we'll look forward to speaking with you in the next quarter.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. [Operator Closing Remarks].