Robert Capps
Analyst · FIG Partners
Okay. Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everyone. Let me begin by discussing the top line of each of our 2 segments, which are equipment leasing and Seamap. Then I'll follow with a discussion of the profitability of each of the segments and conclude with a discussion of our consolidated results and financial position.
First, let me talk about the equipment leasing business. Our core leasing revenues for the third quarter were $14.3 million, that's up 81% from last year's third quarter and up 74% sequentially from the second quarter. All regions, with the exception of Canada, posted year-over-year and sequential gain. As Bill said, the largest-single factor contributing to the increase was a sizable third quarter job in the U.S. that will not impact the fourth quarter. Similarly, there were some significant jobs in Latin America, which will not continue into the fourth quarter.
Leaving the leasing equipment sales -- lease equipment sales, revenues were $475,000 this quarter compared to $3.2 million in the same quarter last year. Our other equipment sales, which include heli-picker equipment sales from our Australian subsidiary SAP, $2.4 million this quarter compared to $3.7 million in the same quarter a year ago.
And now turning to our manufacturing business, Seamap. Revenues there were $5.8 million in the quarter compared to $5.5 million in the third quarter a year ago. As Bill said, there were no large system deliveries during the quarter due to customer shipments schedules. So Seamap's revenues declined solely and sales from aftermarket equipment, replacement parts, engineering services and ongoing support and repair services.
As Bill mentioned, our recently acquired product lines didn't contribute as much as we expected, boosting operating as much as we thought they would.
Let me now discuss the profitability of each of the segments. Gross profit for our equipment leasing segment was $4.1 million versus $2 million in last year's third quarter. This resulted in gross profit margins of 24.1% and 13.3%, respectively. Sizable improvement in the profitability was primarily driven by higher leasing revenues and a positive operating leverage inherent in the high fixed cost structures that we have. This higher profitability was partially offset by higher direct cost related to equipment leasing. These costs increased to $2.3 million in the third quarter of this year from $1.5 million to last year's third quarter with the cost of subleasing certain equipment, as well as cost to reposition our equipment from one geographic region to another.
As Bill alluded to earlier, we have responded to a significant amount of reposition, once you get that [indiscernible], a response to shift in demand. And most of this movement involved moving equipment from Latin America to Europe or Russia.
Additionally this quarter in a couple of instances, we needed to supplement our existing inventory of equipment in order to completely meet our customers' demand and ensure that we're able to utilize the existing equipment that we had.
Now product reach, the amount of purchase this additional equipment. However, given the current uncertainty in the seismic industry, we thought it more prudent to temporarily sublease the equipment even though it had a negative short-term impact on our results.
And moving on to gross profit in the third quarter of our Seamap manufacturing business was $2.8 million compared to $3 million a year ago. This represents gross profit margin of 49% and 53%, respectively.
Overall, gross profit in the third quarter was $7 million compared to $5 million in the last year's third quarter. This represents an overall gross profit margin of 31% compared to 24% a year ago.
Now let me just touch on a few other items on the P&L. General and administrative expenses for the third quarter were $6.2 million compared to $6.1 million in the last year's third quarter, down from $6.7 million in the second quarter of this fiscal year. The third quarter fiscal 2015, we had other expenses totaling about $387,000. Now this consisted primarily of $900,000 in foreign exchange losses that are offset by miscellaneous gains, including the favorable settlement of contractual obligations. Of the foreign exchange losses incurred at our foreign subsidiaries and branches are due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against those currencies.
In the quarter, we had income tax expense of $57,000 despite having a loss before income taxes. This was due to the effective of foreign withholding taxes that we're not able to credit against other income taxes.
Overall, we reported net loss for the third quarter of $397,000 or $0.03 a share. That compared to a net loss of $2.6 million or $0.21 a share in the third quarter a year ago. Keep in mind, however, that last year's third quarter did include a provision for of $1 million, which had about a $0.07 EPS effect on our bottom line.
In the third quarter this year, adjusted EBITDA was $9.4 million or 41% of revenues. That compares to $4.8 million or 24% of revenues in last year's third quarter. But keep in mind that adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is reconciled to reported income and cash provided by operating activities in the financial tables in yesterday's press release.
As we mentioned last quarter, with the ongoing challenges in the seismic industry, we continue to look for ways to implement some cost cutting in our operations. However, there's a large fixed cost component in our structure that limits our latitude in taking aggressive actions during market downturn.
Now I'm going to make a few comments about our financial position, and then we'll take your questions. In the third quarter, we did not make any significant additions to our lease pool. Through the first 9 months of the fiscal year, we purchased under $11 million in new lease pool equipment. For the full year, we now expect our capital expenditures to total about $12 million. This is a reduction from our previous guidance of $15 million due to the ongoing weakness of the [indiscernible] market.
During the third quarter, we purchased 693,700 shares of our common stock as a part of our share repurchase program, which completed the 1 million share program previously authorized. Our total cost for these 1 million shares was about $12 million. We continue to believe that the repurchase our own stock is a good use of capital, especially the prices we've seen recently, which is less than tangible book value. So accordingly, we expect our Board of Directors will consider authorizing additional purchases in the near future.
Mitcham's overall financial and liquidity position remain strong. At the end of the third quarter, we had over $53 million in working capital that included cash and cash equivalents of $9.1 million. We generate $16.5 million of cash flow from operations in the first 9 months of fiscal 2015. And as of October 31, we had approximately $24.5 million of unused capacity under our revolving credit facilities.
As Bill said in his comments, now this is not the first downturn we've seen. We feel that we're well experienced and well equipped to deal with the current market conditions. As just mentioned, we have a strong financial position and good liquidity, which provides us with a great deal of flexibility. Our peak conditions is such that we're overseeing or experiencing offering opportunities for those who are able to take advantage of them, and we think we're in that position. Maximizing our return on capital and return to shareholders over the long term remains our key focus.
And Jesse, with that, I think we're ready to take any questions.