Robert P. Capps
Analyst · Ryan Fitzgibbon with Global Hunter Securities
Okay. Thanks, Bill, and good morning, everybody. I'll begin by discussing the top line of each of our 2 segments, which are Equipment Leasing and Seamap; and then follow with a discussion of the profitability of each of the segments; then conclude with a discussion of our consolidated results and the financial position. First, let me review our Equipment Leasing segment, which includes not only core leasing business, but also non-Seamap equipment sales, such as occasional sales of our lease pool equipment, new seismic equipment we acquire from third parties, sales of heli-transport equipment and sales of new hydrographic and oceanographic equipment from our Australian subsidiary, SAP. Our core leasing revenues in the third quarter were approximately $8 million compared to $11 million in the third quarter a year ago. Now that's down 29%, primarily due to continued low levels of activity coming from Latin America and U.S. land markets, as well as the marine leasing business. But these declines were partially offset by higher land leasing revenues in Europe and Pacific Rim, as well as higher revenues from the downhole business. As Bill said, the Latin American market is showing signs of improvement, which should have a positive impact on our fourth quarter results. The marine leasing business in the U.S. land market is going through challenging market conditions, although we expect the problems affecting the marine leasing business to improve relatively soon. We certainly expect sequential improvement in Canada and Russia over the next few quarters as we move into the winter seasons there. The new wireless opportunities in Canada, as Bill mentioned, should make a significant contribution. However, it's uncertain at this time if this will completely offset the relative weakness we see in Canada compared to last year. Moving on to lease pool equipment sales, revenues were $3.2 million in this quarter compared to $1.9 million in the same quarter last year. Other equipment sales, which include sales from SAP and heli-picker equipment, were $3.7 million compared to $1.1 million in the same quarter a year ago. This revenue increase was driven by sales of SAP and hydrographic and oceanographic equipments to customers in China, the Philippines and Indonesia. As Bill said, SAP is having a very successful year in these areas. Turning to our Seamap segment, which designs, manufactures and sells a variety of products and systems used in marine seismic applications, Seamap revenues were $5.5 million compared to $4.5 million in the third quarter a year ago. And this quarter was impacted by the lack of any large system deliveries due to customer shipment schedules. This was partially offset by sales of aftermarket equipment, replacement parts, engineering services, and ongoing support and repair services. As Bill touched on earlier, an expected third quarter GunLink 4000 shipment was delayed as the customer's vessel was not yet ready to receive the equipment. At this point, it appears that this particular project will not be delivered until the first quarter of next year. However, we do expect to deliver another GunLink 4000 and BuoyLink system to a new-build vessel in the fourth quarter. We also expect to deliver some equipment related to the PGS SourceLink product in Q4, although this will be a small system and result will command lower pricing. Now let me discuss the profitability of each of the segments. Gross profit from our equipment leasing segment was essentially flat between the third quarter of fiscal 2014 versus the third quarter last year with just under $2 million. The gross profit margin of the leasing segment for both periods was slightly above 13%. Gross profit in the third quarter of our Seamap manufacturing business was $3 million compared to $2.8 million a year ago. This represents a gross profit margin of 53% and 58% respectively. Our overall gross profit in the third quarter was $5 million compared to $4.4 million in last year's third quarter. This represents an overall gross profit margin of 24% this year compared to 23% a year ago. And now let me touch on just a few other items in our P&L. Our general and administrative expenses in the third quarter were $6.1 million compared to $5.9 million in the fiscal 2013 third quarter. That reflects slightly higher personnel cost and lower overhead absorption at Seamap. Also in the third quarter, we had a provision for doubtful accounts charge of $1 million, which is primarily related to accounts in Latin America and Southeast Asia, and this negatively impacted our EPS by about $0.07 a share. Also in the third quarter, we had a $517,000 foreign exchange laws, which [indiscernible] our foreign subsidiaries, resulting from the strength in U.S. compared to local currencies. Our tax provision for the quarter was a benefit of $771,000, which is an effective rate of about 25%. We expect our full year effective tax rate to be about 22%. Our third quarter EBITDA was $4.6 million or 22% of revenues. This compares to $6.4 million or 35% of revenues from last year's third quarter. Now please keep in mind that EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and is reconciled to reported net income and cash provided by operating activities in the financial tables in yesterday's press release. Overall, we reported a net loss for the third quarter of $2.6 million, or $0.21 a share, compared to a loss of $1.2 million or $0.10 a share in the third quarter a year ago. Now if you exclude the impact of the charge for doubtful accounts we mentioned earlier, the net loss would have been $1.7 million or $0.14 a share in the third quarter this year. Let me make just a few comments about our financial position, then I'll turn the call back to Bill. In the first 9 months of this fiscal year, we purchased roughly $15 million in new lease pool equipment. As you may have gathered, based on our earlier discussions of new wireless equipment deployments in Latin America and Canada, we purchased, subsequent to the end of the third quarter, about $29 million of new wireless recording equipment. Based on these and other equipment purchases, we're now increasing our capital expenditure guidance for the full fiscal year to a total of about $45 million. Now we had not anticipated these recent purchases. But as Bill indicated, we had a request related to specific projects. We think these additions will allow us to expand some customer relationships, present the opportunity to address additional markets. We expect to fund these purchases with a combination of our cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Mitcham's overall financial and liquidity position remains very strong. At the end of the third quarter, we had over $56 million of working capital, which included cash and cash equivalents of $24 million. We generated about $19 million in cash flow from operations in the first 9 months of fiscal 2014. As of October 31, 2013, we had exactly $3 million outstanding under our $50 million revolving credit facility. Also during the third quarter, we purchased 45,000 shares of common stock under our share repurchase program. These were bought at an average price of $14.91. And with that, I'll turn things back over to Bill.