Good day, and welcome to the Magnolia Oil and Gas Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Release and Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask question. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Brian Corales. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Maria, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Magnolia Oil and Gas' second quarter earnings conference call. Participating on the call today are Steve Chazen, Magnolia's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Chris Stavros, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As a reminder, today's conference call contains certain projections and other forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Additional information on risk factors that could cause results to differ is available in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. A full Safe Harbor can be found on Slide 2 of the conference call slide presentation with the supplemental data on our website. You can download Magnolia's second quarter 2022 earnings press release as well as the conference call slides from the Investors section of the Company's website at www.magnoliaoilgas.com. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Steve Chazen.

Thank you and good morning and thank you for joining us today. Magnolia just completed its fourth year as a public company. And despite the continued product volatility, our business model remains unchanged. Our ongoing confidence in the business supported by our core values and based on our strong financial and operating results and our team's numerous accomplishments. Over the last four years, we have profitably increased our production while transitioning our Giddings asset to a full development mode. We also continue to generate significant free cash flow allowing us to opportunistically repurchase our shares. Our business model limits the spending on drilling and completing wells at 55% of our EBITDAX and is expected to provide mid single digit annual production growth over time. The remaining unallocated cash flows can be used for small bolts-on oil and gas property acquisitions, share repurchases and dividends. So far this year we have far exceeded our plan. We now expect our full year 2022 production to grow between 12% and 14% while investing less than a third of our cash flows with the excess cash allocated to activities that should enhance our per share value of the company. Our second quarter results set records for several financial and operating metrics, including net income, operating income margins, earnings per share and total production volumes, which exceeded our earlier guidance. We grew company total production 14% year-over-year and 3% sequentially while spending just 31% of our EBITDAX drilling and completing wells and generating operating income margins of 68%. Production for the quarter was of 74,200 barrels per day was at the high end of our guidance due to better well performance in both our Karnes and Giddings assets, ongoing efficiencies at Giddings, which led to more net wells and some additional non-operated activity. Our record…

Thanks, Steve, and good morning everyone. I will review some items from our second quarter and refer to the presentation slides found on our website. I'll also provide some additional guidance for the third quarter and remainder of the year before turning it over for questions. Beginning with Slide 3, which shows the summary of our second quarter, Magnolia continued to execute on our business model as demonstrated by our very strong second quarter 2022 financial and operating results. We established quarterly records for many of our key operating financial metrics during the quarter, including production, net income, diluted earnings per share, free cash flow and most notably operating income margins or EBIT of 68% during the period. These results were supported by the absence of hedges on our production, which provided very strong product price realizations, our efforts around cost containment and supply chain management and stronger overall production growth. We generated total adjusted net income for the quarter of $294 million and diluted earnings per share of $1.32. Our adjusted EBITDAX for the quarter was $393 million and total capital associated with drilling and completions and bringing on new wells was $122 million or just 31% of our EBITDAX. D&C capital was somewhat higher than our earlier guidance due the timing of our activity and more non-operated activity than we expected, which should benefit our production during the second half of the year. Overall company production volumes grew 3% sequentially and 14% on a year-over-year basis to 74,200 barrels oil equivalent per day in the second quarter. Looking at the quarterly cash flow waterfall chart on Slide 4, we started the second quarter with $346 million of cash. Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital was $362 million during the period with working capital changes and…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Our first question comes from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Good morning all. Thanks for the comments guys. Steve, my first question is just wondering how much pressure you got from your wife to boost that dividend? No, seriously, my first question, Steve is just on something you mentioned in prepared remarks, and that is, could you speak to your view, you mentioned about adding value with the dividend, and I'm just wondering how you sort of look at the dividend versus buybacks when you think about or even versus organic or external growth, how you think about all those in context of adding value?

Okay. So, we'll start with the dividend. We think we believe that the dividend is integral part of the business and we plan to grow it at least 10% on this base dividend annually. So what you rationally expected in the fourth quarter, we'll pay another $0.10. And then we'll revisit the rate in the first quarter, based on this year's results, you recast the $55. So what that means in a $55 environment, we would easily be able to cover the dividend. So it doesn't really cut into things. The share repurchases are opportunistic. The market is, as you may have noticed, a little volatile. And you know, there is always opportunity to repurchase some shares during the last month – it would normally be a blackout period for us. And a lot of people did that. I'm sure even some company I know, well other company. So, I think we continue to look at share reduction as an important part of it. It's really just saying that the assets we view are worth more this way than that way. And so, our total distribution to our shareholders is the sum really of the share repurchases plus the fixed dividend. If you get to the point where the dividend or the shares or the share price is not reflective, that is too high, we clearly shift to a different approach. But as long as we can – as long as you can say, this is actually pretty cheap. We'll continue to buy in shares in an accelerated rate in this kind of environment. Building cash is interesting, but probably we need to up our share reduction program. We don't know anything about what EnerVest is going to do. Far as acquisitions go, we're sort of picky. If you buy…

Now, thorough details, Steve. And then one follow-up if I could. I haven't heard you talk in a while or maybe give your suggestions on when you look now at that Giddings, you've had a lot now of successful wells. Would you say how much are you able to quantify beyond the original 70,000, how much you've got sort of high confidence or in delineated already? Are you able to talk about that?

Well, what we have and we just don't think about actually the same way that somebody might think about in the Permian. We look at how long a period of forecast period we can forecast and actually pick the locations and they be the same rough quality as the ones that we're currently drilling. And I think in Giddings, we have around a five-year forecast. So we have about five years running, two rigs of drilling activity in Giddings with the same sort of results we're getting now. So that's really my way of looking at, rather than looking at acreage, because not really in a real estate business, lease not deliberately. And so, that's the way we look at it. And that's a lot of locations. And they may not be – maybe five or six here and we're going to drill a pad in the fourth quarter in Giddings with an eight-well pad. So we're starting it now it will run through the third quarter, into the fourth quarter sometime it will go on. So, the scale of the business is growing. We're adding some infrastructure to take away some more of a cost out of the structure. So, it's going to be a bigger business three years from now than it is today. And so, we are pretty optimistic about it. As far as far as this acreage stuff, it's some ways misleading to give you a bigger number because you will divide by something and get a number that's probably not reflective of reality. But if you think about it as five years of inventory and maybe more, but certainly five years of inventory based on what we know now on a two-rig program that give you an idea sort of how much we've got. So I think for five years we're pretty safe and it will continue to grow. The two rigs will continue to exceed the decline, overcome the decline. And so what we have will grow in production every year. So, we're pretty safe, I think, on this, mid-single digit growth. Again, if we could find something that another acquisition of reasonable size, reasonable being, not large size that fit into our business model and we could extend it, we would do that and then add a rig to go with it. But right now we're pretty full up on what we need to do.

Thanks, Steve. Appreciate your time.

Sure.

Our next question comes from Leo Mariani with MKM Partners. Please go ahead.

Yes, hey guys. Was hoping to hear a little bit more about some of the progress on the step-out wells here in 2022. And really just trying to get a sense if you all are starting to maybe kind of increase some of the sweet spots. I know you originally had this 70,000 acres sweet spot there in Giddings, but then you talked about kind of another 25,000 acres that was kind of looking more perspective that could kind of move into that sweet spot category. Just wanted to get a sense of the recent drilling results here in 2022 and some of the progress there.

Basically, there is two things we've been working on. One is spacing. We never really had any good idea what’s spacing. And so we found the spacing for the oil rich areas to be little narrower than we had been drilling closer together. So there is more locations and in the gassier areas, about what we were doing was okay, because the gas flows better. So, we've been doing a lot of that. As far as the areas are concerned, we continue to add to inventory. As I answered the last question, I don't think it's misleading to give you an acreage number because you will divide by something and get a low number of locations. I think the way you should look at it is that we got five years with two rigs running full time in Giddings. That's the inventory of the wells that looked just like the ones we're currently drilling. And going on the extension program has been very successful. And so, we continue to keep a five-year inventory of high quality wells at work in much lower oil price environment than today. So, these wells have very short paybacks and are doing very well. Some of the extensions were better than others, but all of them were economic wells.

Okay. And I guess just in terms of recent well costs at Giddings, I know you guys used to throw out a number of around $6 million or so to get one of these wells down and there has been some inflation, would you guys be able to update us on kind of a rough well cost? And could you also provide a little bit more details on some of the infrastructure projects you talked about at Giddings? Is that more 2022 or kind of more some years beyond 2023 or 2024?

Yes, Chris.

Yes, Leo it's been running about a 1,000 per lateral foot in terms of the drilling costs. Now we've picked up. The length of our laterals has obviously sort of risen through the year and over the last year or two. So, we're doing a lot more on that. I mean, as a follow-on, on what you were asking before, I mean we've picked up a lot of momentum in terms of our drilling results through operating efficiencies and other things which Steve mentioned has added a lot of new wells. So, the well performance or the production, you can sort of see it in the volumes that we've had through the year. It's pretty indicative of the momentum we've picked up just in terms of some of the efficiencies, effectively added new wells. And so, we've gotten a lot better at this. Steve referenced the eight-well pad that that will be coming on later in the year or late in the year. So there is a lot to be said for that.

Okay. And just any details around infrastructure.

We've added some infrastructure maybe something about $20 million. About $20 million of the capital was spent on infrastructure. We had originally planned that. The deviation on the both the production frankly, and the capital is this non-op stuff, because it's not predictable. We can't predict when, if they're going to drill the well, we can't predict when and we can't predict when they turn it on because they had their own reasons for turning it on. So – but it's picked up materially in the back half of the year. Somebody woke up and said, oil's a $100 maybe we should drill some oil wells. But that's really a lot of our inability to predict both capital and at least generally, now we're not short of money on the capital. So I view the money as very well spent extra $20 million at capital. It is just going to give us more production next year. So production next year should be quite strong again based on where we are now.

Okay. That's helpful. And I guess maybe just on to follow up a little bit on the infrastructure, I mean, is that kind of a rough number where it's relatively small, I'll call it $20 million a year for the next couple years. Just trying to get a sense of you look forward; do you see more significant infrastructure needs?

No. You won't see that. I don't think. I think this was a one-time opportunity to lower our costs basically to haul less oil by truck.

Okay. Thanks guys.

Our next question comes from Umang Choudhary with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good morning.

Good morning.

My first very thorough answer on the – on creating value for the organization and on capital returns. Wanted to do a quick follow-up there, so let's envision a scenario where oil prices remain at 100 and gas prices remain about 4. In that scenario if, like you have a $0.10 dividend, you plan to recast it at $55 oil and $2.75 oil and gas. If the share purchases don't come through more than the current pace of deployment is the plan then to build cash on the balance sheet for a future day? Or will you look to kind of make the investors hold through one-time special dividend at the end of the year?

We expect to be able to retire the shares at a higher level than the 1%. I mean, we've actually been sort of twice that, so there's, you go through – goes to these noisy periods in the market, the market acts sort of oddly or you can buy a lot of shares. So now I think what's happening is somebody's selling – shorting the shares and selling them to us, but I don't know where they're getting the shares from, but we continue to buy the shares and we expect to continue without regard to what EnerVest does. We shouldn't have any trouble spending all the money, most of the money. As far as a special dividend goes that's the point where we're not going to build cash and the balance sheet. The only reason we have it up so high is an expectation that we'd be able to make some – acquire some shares from EnerVest over time. But generally our cash balance couple of $100 million would be plenty. We can survive easily in any environment. As far as the dividend is concerned we'll – we have a bias on the dividend to pay more dividends as was pointed out by the first speaker. My wife doesn't – my wife doesn't look at the stock price. I don't have to mark-the-market, but she does count the dividend. So this will be a good year for her dividend program.

That's great, awesome.

I think if you try to forecast forward to some other environment where you can't buy the shares, I don't know exactly what we would do in that environment because you'd have to, the question simply is, is the $100 oil and $4 gas sustainable is, or is it going to be some other number? But I think as the sort of progresses, you're going to find – we're going to find some small, I mean, $25 million, $30 million, $40 million acquisitions to build the business as we get closer to $100,000 a day in production. So that in Giddings is not – not off somewhere, but there's a fair number of sort of family ownership out there, that's been sort of sticky and we may be able to do some of that to use some of the money. But generally speaking it's just hard to forecast what you would do in a very different environment, but right now I think reducing the share account is a valuable thing for the people who want to stay in the stock

Makes a lot of sense, and I appreciate that comment. I guess just following up on getting sense pacing, can you remind us where you were before on a spacing and where are you heading right now in the oily part of the Anchorage? I mean, one could argue that you probably have more than five years of inventory in the core acknowledging that your planning for statistics five years into account right now?

Well we have more than five years probably for sure, but five years we can lay out. We're part of sort of agnostic, we don't pay much attention to whether it's an oil area or a gas area. We just look at – we think it's all about money and so what we find is in the gas, we're drilling some gasier wells and some oilier wells, and it really isn't – it's almost strategy free. It's sort of how much money can we make and how can – and how easily can we deploy in some area. So we may drill more gas wells, but it really isn't shifting based on product price. It's really shifting based on what we can do quickly or what we can organize and how we can bring the land position together. So I think we're right now by sheer chance, we're sort of splitting between the oilier areas and the gasier areas, but it could shift to more oilier or more gassy, just, again not necessarily driven by product price, not the price of natural gas falls to $0.50 or $2 we probably have a different view, but with a $4 or better number pretty unlikely that will pass on any gas locations. We'll continue to be active in that, but the oil area also is good. It's just a little more complicated than land, that's all.

Now that makes a lot of sense. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Austin Aucoin with Johnson Rice. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Steve and team. Thank you for taking my questions.

Sure.

With CapEx of $122 million in the quarter and a midpoint of $110 million for the 3Q guide, going forward should we think of about $110 million to $120 million run rate guidance range?

Yes. Our ability to forecast the non-op activity is shown to be non-existent. So you can use a number like that if you'd like and you're probably just as accurate as we are, because we just can't. We just can't. We just can't. It's not a lot of money; it's just a lot of noise. And that's – and so we've adjusted for the inflate – we don't see any more inflation than we outlook last quarter. We're drilling more net wells or participating in more net wells, we'll get more net production and production of $100 oil or $90 oil is pretty attractive. And so you get your money back certainly in six months. So I don't see why we would cut back on that activity just to make some imaginary number that somebody has. We got a lot of money. Money is not our problem.

I appreciate the color. And have a follow up. Would it still be hard to get a new rig? Last quarter you said it would be, but the industry seems to be adding a rig every week, has anything changed?

Well right now we would with two rigs running, if we wanted to add another rig it might take six months to add a rig. So if we don't have any plans to do that, there's no real need to do it right now. But if there were, it would take us about six months to add a rig. And at some point in the future, we'll have to add a third rig, but it's certainly not imminently.

That's all for me. Thank you for the time.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from Nicholas Pope with Seaport Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone

Good morning.

You guys gave a fair amount of detail on Giddings inventory. And as you kind of shift back to Karnes, how do you think about the inventory and the runway that you have in that asset right now? And is there – I mean, I know it's very blocked up with operators, is there opportunity to expand on that side of the Eagle Ford for you guys?

Frankly, not a lot some operated in the more of it in the non-op area. And sometimes the wells aren't competitive with the Giddings Wells. So, we stay away from them and the Giddings Wells basically give better returns for us. So, we could go into a mode for a year or so where we just relied on the non-op and take the rig, basically for a whole – both rigs for a whole year in Giddings, and probably do better than fooling around going to drilling some wells in Karnes. There's always some more in Karnes, it's a gift that keeps giving. But right now the wells simply aren't competitive with what we can do in Giddings and we'll probably stay with that sort of plan for a while.

Would there be any interest in expanding outside of that concentrated area, or just not think it's competitive in other parts of Eagle Ford, even in nearby?

Well, the question is how do you do that? There is a number of fairly large stuff out there in private equity that sort of thing out there. But the drilling locations, well, you buy the PDPs and you get bigger, I guess. But the drilling locations tend to be not competitive with how else we would spend the money in basically in Giddings. So we wouldn't drill the locations that these promoters put out there. So, I think there might be some small deals, but it is certainly not a focus for the company at this point, because it just too expensive. You basically got to buy PDPs and I don't think you make a return a more than 7% or 8% on a PDP acquisition, which is not something that's real exciting to us. We can cook the books a little bit, so it generates some free cash. It looks like a lot more free cash because we're depleting this asset. But as a business matter, doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

Got it. I appreciate the comments. That's all I had.

Thanks.

Thank you.

This concludes our question-and-answer session and today's conference. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.