Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Liz and I'll be your event manager today. We will be accepting questions after management's prepared remarks. One moment please while I pass the call over to Mr. Nestor Makarigakis, Director of Marketing Communication.

Welcome to the MISTRAS Group Conference Call for its Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results for 2018. My name is Nestor Makarigakis. Participating on the call for MISTRAS will be Dennis Bertolotti, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer; Ed Prajzner, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; as well as Dr. Sotirios Vahaviolos, Executive Chairman; and Jon Wolk, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating. I want to remind everyone that remarks made during this conference call will include forward-looking statements. The company's actual results could differ materially from those projected. Some of those factors that can cause actual results to differ are discussed in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports filed with the SEC. The discussion in this conference call will also include certain financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Reconciliation of these non-US GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measure can be found at the tables contained in yesterday's press release and the company's related current report on Form 8-K. These reports are available in the company's website in the Investors section and on the SEC's website. I will now turn the conference over to Mr. Dennis Bertolotti. Dennis?

Thank you, Nestor, and good morning, everyone. During today's call, we will give you an update MISTRAS' business performance. Financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2018, as well as give you our outlook for 2019. Full year revenue was a record and up 6% over 2017 to $742.3 million. Revenue growth was driven by a combination of acquisitions and organic growth, which was about 1.5% or was actually much stronger considering we overcame the non-renewal of a large contract and divested operations. Margin performance was even stronger. As revenue we added organically and through acquisition have been for more profitable operations which are a corporate priority as we evolve our business. Adjusted EBITDA was up 15% for the year with adjusted EBITDA margin expanding nicely from a year ago. This was driven by an expansion in gross margins which have been steadily increasing over the course of fiscal 2018 and reached the three year high of 28.9% in the fourth quarter. I'll go through the detail with several and frequent charges in the fourth quarter which was a major reason adjusted EBITDA was slightly below our 2018 guidance. While our financial performance was strong, more importantly we made significant progress towards realizing our vision. Executing on our strategy to achieve more sustainable growth both organically, as well as from acquisitions as well as leveraging our increased revenue to grow earnings even faster. The core business is strong. We were able to grow revenues by $40 million over the course of the year despite absorbing a $30 million reduction in revenues commencing back at the beginning of the second quarter in 2018. I think that speaks volumes to our strong product offering and industry relationships and clearly illustrates that our services remain in great demand. And…

Thank you, Dennis. It was a very good operational year for MISTRAS Group as the various initiatives and programs implemented over the year resulted in record revenues and significant margin expansion across all segments. Looking first at results for the year on a consolidated basis, revenues were up 6% to a record $742 million driven by a similar 6% revenue increase in our largest segment services which comprises 77% of our total 2018 revenue. More broadly, the increase was due to both acquisitions and organic growth which was up approximately 1.5 % more than earning back the $30 million of revenue losses Dennis mentioned. Consolidated gross profit for the full year was $208 million about 11% higher than the prior year. Consolidated gross margin for the full year was 28% compared with 26.8% in the prior year, an increase of 120 basis points. Reflecting the broad-based improvement across the company for the year, all three segments expanded their gross margin and grew their gross profits. Margin expansion reflects a more favorable service and product mix which in turn reflects a more disciplined growth strategy, selective pruning of underperforming operations and contracts, and an acquisition strategy focused on higher margin businesses. Adjusted EBITDA was up 15% for the full year to $73.5 million with all of our segments again generating a year-on-year increase. As Dennis mentioned, we did have a number of infrequently occurring items during the fourth quarter particularly in late December, which reduced adjusted EBITDA by approximately $2.5 million. This included operating items such as an earlier than anticipated completion of a turnaround and an unexpected weather-related slowdown, as well as non operating items such as Onstream related financing cost and other legal and statutory expenses. The company generated $41.7 million of cash flows from operating activities and $20.5…

Thank you, Ed. I will conclude with our preliminary outlook and guidance for 2019. Our North American oil and gas customers suggest that their spending in 2019 will improve over 2018. And I am optimistic about our growing aerospace and complimentary mechanical services business and excited about our growth plans to expand further into the midstream segment by leveraging our industry experience and technological know-how. Given the opportunities ahead, we expect to more than compensate for the known challenges and foresee on a full year basis for 2019 and outlook with total revenues expected to be between $765 million to $785 million. Adjusted EBITDA expected to be between $90 million and $93 million. Capital expenditures are expected to be up to $25 million and free cash flow expected to be between $42 million to $45 million. Please keep in mind that our progress and year-over-year comparable won't however be linear throughout 2019 because of the first quarter of 2019 lapping a year ago quarter that included more than $10 million of services revenue from the large former customer site. And beginning late in the first quarter of 2019, we commenced the exiting of the staff leasing business in Germany representing a further reduction of approximately $30 million in revenue in full year 2019. We are nevertheless confident that we can essentially offset the earnings effect of the revenue decreases through continuing margin expansion, particularly in our services segment as we have demonstrated throughout 2018. We stated at the beginning of last year in our guidance outlook for 2018 that we would offset the annualized revenue loss of $40 million to anniversaries in a few short weeks, and have net organic revenue growth for full year 2018. I am proud to say that we achieved and actually exceeded that goal. On the whole and over the longer term, we believe macro-level economic drivers will remain positive and we are confident in maintaining our forward momentum. We will now take your questions. Operator, please open the phone lines.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Edward Marshall with Sidoti & Company. Your line is now open.

Good morning, guys. How are you? So I wanted to ask about bit what the assumptions are for revenue looking at, I guess there's a lot rolling off some acquisitions coming in. So if you kind of give us a sense as to the organic growth rate of revenue baked into your 2019 guidance I'd appreciate.

Hi, it's Ed here. Yes. There is some if you pull off the last quarter of the trouble region and then the German staff leasing that's about $24 million. We had that small product segment divestment as well of $3 million in the year. So if you kind of normalize that and then add an Onstream, you're looking at our outlook has a range of maybe 2% to upper 4% or 5% kind of organic growth kind of assumed in there.

Okay, okay. So the next question is I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks about SG&A and in the particular quarter I mean it was heavier than the rate for the majority of the year. What happened in Q4 and then what's the anticipation for 2019, if you could elaborate a little bit more?

Sure, yes that did go up sequentially. You were about $42 million in Q3; $44 million in Q4. As we mentioned, there was a number of infrequent items there about a $1.5 million of that in Q4 there was --that aren't recurring. There was some non capitalized financing cost. A couple of statutory charges and some bad debt expense we recorded about $1.5 million. If you took that out you could -- you right about $42.5 million that's a pretty good number to annualize maybe $43 million a quarter into next year. That's pretty close to our year-to-date; our year-to-date is 22.5 %. So that's not a bad percentage to be thinking about for 2019.

And thinking about the Onstream, were the intangibles at all in the Q4 number. I don't think it would be maybe of couple weeks of --

Correct. Very little, it was just the two weeks post acquisition. So there was very little activity in the P&L for 2018 relative to Onstream.

So are you planning to materially bring other SG&A cost down to absorb some of those intangibles that might roll through SG&A? So I start to think about next year.

No. This is not too so much a cost out synergy type of acquisitions that there, SG&A will be additive to ours but obviously we're always looking to ratchet down cost and minimize the footprint. But their -- you think you their amortization clearly as being additive.

Got it. And what do you seeing from wage inflation as the industry improves? I mean how's wages look? How does -- how are you being able to pass those wages off to customers et cetera through price increases?

Hey, Ed. Dennis here. They are still --it's still more regionals than it is across the board, but we haven't seen any pushback from customers not willing to accept increases because the industry is actually getting pretty heavy in 2019 for later half of 2019. Spring is probably going to be a little bit lighter than you would see typically, it's going to be about an average spring but we think the fall is going to be heavier. So customers know that there's a lot of regional fighting for labor and skilled labor size. So they are willing to talk to us about - we want a pass through on these things not a -- generous but they're going to do is they're going to allow it to be passed through and be pass through for the labor in fall post last many regions where they're getting tight.

Last one to follow up on that last statement about the spring versus the fall. Is that anticipation of back ending their CapEx or their spent, their maintenance spend to the back half of the year to make sure that they kind of get a wait and see throughout the year? Is it just timing? Is it any comments that you could add to that statement about an average spring versus a heavier fall would be helpful?

Yes. I guess comparatively when you look at last year's I think there was a lot of catch-up activity going on more so than this is a lighter spring. It does seem to be a little bit later in the year. It does seem like it's happening more in late February and March and April than in it sometimes in the year. There's a lot of activity January, February we're not seeing that as much. So I don't know if that's a capital planning or just the way we the projects are rolling out.

Our next question comes from the line of Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc. Your line is now open.

Hi, Dennis and Ed. Hope you are well. So folks as you look at Onstream and you talked a lot about the addressable market and as you bring in the wider bite tools that market band are essentially going up. So can you kind of talk about how much that addressable market is going up by as you bring in the new tools? Is it like doubling in size over the next five years or am I being too optimistic?

Hi, Tahira. It's Jon. I'll take that one. So we have sized, we've been --people helped us size the North American inline inspection opportunity at roughly $0.75 billion per year. And Onstream at the time of acquisition probably addresses about let's say up to about 30% to 40% of that market and at the time of acquisition and we believe that with the tools that Onstream is introducing to the market both in 2019 as well as on the drawing board over the next couple of years that we'll be able to address at least two-thirds of that market size. And we expect the market to grow strong.

I mean is it conceivable between this tool and your traditional business because there has been potentially some pent-up spending or at least it seems like even it sounds a little more conservative, our optimistic about the oil and gas customers picking up spending. Is it conceivable organically? We could see growth in the high single digits for that business from a two to three-year perspective.

Yes, Tahira. We're certainly planning on that. Our underwriting thesis was certainly that we believe Onstream will grow organically at least in the high single digits per year.

Got it, okay. And then just in terms of margins, obviously, you're going to be very specialized in that business as you cover that with your more traditional business. Is there a marginal pricing opportunity for your self?

I think there is a marginal priced opportunity in there because Onstream is a terrific service provider, delivers reports to customers much sooner than the industry standard is pretty nimble in terms of organizing to suit client needs and so forth. And tends to be value priced to an extent. So there is a pricing opportunity that is implied in there, yes.

Got it, okay. And then just wanted to circle back on Safran. Clearly, the Boeings being in the news with the 737 Max. I know Safran has some exposure there. Is this potentially a positive development for yourselves? Will there be more testing in fuselage integrity needs? Or do you see this as net neutral to your business?

Tahira, it's Dennis. I mean I think it's very early from what we see this might be more of a safety device or something than other than an aerospace propulsion issue. Certainly if it became something where an engine component fail or some critical structure be part of the scenario then absolutely more testing will be involved. Right now it's too early to say. I will say so I mean we're not sure. And I will say one thing I mean we've picked the aerospace mechanical and pipeline markets for our growth in the near future. And we see all three really still performing well. So West Penn, Safran all of our aerospace growth we see as being good. Onstream fit inside the pipeline and even the mechanical [blowing over]. So the [indiscernible] been our pillars. We still see as being very aggressive in the next couple of years and a chance for us to really maybe outperform a lot of what you are thinking normal oil and gas or the aerospace market right.

Okay. That's actually good to hear. Last question for me, Dennis. One of your peers has really started talking a bit more about taking some of their inspection tools and technologies and applying them to the upstream space of oil and gas. It's in an area you guys doubled in. It seems from all the customer calls that I've been listening to there is a great opportunity over there. Any thoughts about that or would you rather just digest all the initiatives that are currently in place?

Well, I am really not familiar with the one you're talking about. But what I can tell you from our point of view, we do see there's possibilities of growth for us in upstream or anywhere else in the oil and gas through our digital capabilities. We're trying to grow the digital to become a valued player and find ways to save money and be more efficient. So I'm not sure if that's a company -- if that's kind of idea that the other company is looking at, but what we are looking at more efficient we can become and give data to them quickly and smartly and something they can react on very quick in the field versus weeks or days later. So much the better. So we definitely are going down that path. Somebody else I can't speak to but --

Our next question comes from a line of Chip Moore with Canaccord. Your line is now open.

Good morning. Thanks. Hey, guys. I guess on Onstream now that you've had them for three months or so can you talk about accelerating their presence in the U.S. and in the shales? How do we think about investments to help accelerate that and timing?

Yes, hi, Chip. This is Jon. We are really in Onstream shares our excitement and the U.S. growth of that Onstream is starting to experience now and more importantly the potential market that's out there. Now Onstream really has earned its reputation and grown to its present size largely on the back of the Canadian market that is about 30% the size of the total North American market. And as we think about the applicability of Onstream in the United States there's lots of opportunity. What we're doing is focusing and focusing on our path to make sure we don't try to boil the ocean, but we're very excited about the uptick that we're seeing and the potential that exists.

Chip, it's Dennis. Our recent growth in PCMS and many other platforms prior to Onstream were in exit midstream. So we have a lot of connections and customers in the U.S. market that we always thought would be a very strategic benefit for us to help them grow in the U.S. And just like when we try to go into Canada took us while to kind of understand and know what that market is about how to best work within it, it would take them similar types of time to understand the U.S. market. We have the ability to put them in every place that they need to be every zone that they're looking at. We have people and customers already in.

And Chip as you mentioned the investment there. We have scaled up to CapEx. We've been running a $20 million last couple of years. So we're envisioning up to maybe $25 million this year for CapEx. Fairly modest in the greater scheme but this is not going to require major CapEx to expand into the U.S.

Got it. That's great guys. And maybe if I flip over the balance sheet, obviously, leverage stepped up with the deal. I think you talked about more of a focus on tuck-ins. How do we think about dry powder and pay down on the debt?

Hey, Chip. Ed here. We ended the year at pro forma about 3.5 leverage. We would at this point use free cash flow in 2019 to pay down the debt. So if we didn't do any acquisitions you'd probably get to 2.75 or so by the end of the year. So we've got more than enough capacity. The current facility allows us for leverage. So we can do the tuck-ins as they come along. But we're really focusing on the business at hand. What's in front of us here and the tuck-ins as we focus on them will happen. The balance sheet is there if you need it.

That's great and maybe one last one on the outlook. Given some of the headwinds you called out in Q1 and where we stand here halfway through March. Can you talk a little bit more directionally on Q1 at least revenues, would you expect those to be up year-over-year or anything you can do to help us calibrate that? Thanks guys.

Well. I mean as the outlook kind of indicated as we talked about it on the call you're going to see kind of a growing in the back end of the year. Again, we have some of those comparable little challenges in the first quarter and second quarter. So you'll see some strength in the back end of the year but we feel very good about the outlook and our ability to achieve.

Chip, it's Dennis. I think Q1 is going to be our struggle. I think Q2, Q3 & Q4 will probably come through with year-over-year growth. The percentages right now I'm not so sure. I think they will build up from the second to the third as far as the growth year-over-year but we think really Q1s are really only struggle at this point.

I'm showing no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Dennis Bertolotti for closing remarks.

All right, thanks, everybody. We appreciate your interest in MISTRAS. We look forward to updating you on our next call. We'd like to thank everyone for listening and have a great day. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program and you may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.