Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the MISTRAS Group Incorporated Q3 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] I would like to turn today’s conference call to Mr. Sotirios Vahaviolos. You may begin.

Thank you very much, Kevin. In today’s call, we will review MISTRAS Group’s financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2015 that ended February 28, 2015 and discuss our prospects going forward. As we described in the earnings release, in the middle of implementing our profitability improvement initiatives globally, three unexpected surprises occurred during our third quarter. First, we experienced the nation’s first refinery strike in more than 25 years and this has caused staffing changes and in some cases delays or deferrals of previously scheduled turnarounds and projects. Second, the price of West Texas Intermediate crude fell 50% from its high of last summer. And third, the US dollar has strengthened substantially globally and the European market has been softened than we expected. The magnitude of these changes in a very short period of time has introduced an increased level of uncertainty. Expectations and predictions about the future price of oil vary widely. The refinery strike caused several customer delays and the re-schedule of some previously planned work. Both factors taken together have caused us to be a bit more conservative in our outlook for the next several months as several of our customers have deferred previously scheduled turnarounds and projects. But at the same time this environment has also created new challenges for the oil and gas industry and all who serve [indiscernible] service. Companies focused on service in the upstream market have faced enormous challenges. Comparatively companies like ours that primarily service the downstream refining market have run and maintained contracts with many of the major independent energy companies have had much or busier time of it but also faced challenges in this too. We commenced our third quarter feeling good after a record-setting second-quarter but market conditions changed rapidly and we experienced a great…

Thank you, Sotirios. I remind everyone that the remarks made during this conference call will include some forward-looking statements. The company's actual results could differ materially from those projected. Some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ are discussed in the company's most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in other reports filed with the SEC. Also, the discussions during this conference call will include certain financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Reconciliations of those non-US GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable US GAAP financial measures can be found in the company's current report on Form 8-K filed yesterday. These reports are available on the company's website in the investors section and on the SEC website. Now I will summarize our third-quarter financial results and then I will comment on our initiatives to improve profit margins. Revenues for the third quarter of fiscal year 2015 were $163 million, 7.5% higher than in the prior year's Q3, driven by 12% growth in both our services and our products and systems segments. Total revenue growth would've exceeded 10% had FX rates been constant. Our gains were offset in part by our international segment’s 12% revenue decline of which 10% was driven by FX. Products and systems’ 12% growth was entirely organic while services’ 12% growth was entirely acquisition-driven as services experienced the impact of the strike as well as some adverse FX following the first half which saw services achieved organic growth in the mid-teens, driven by the factors that Sotirios already discussed. International segment’s double-digit revenue decline was driven primarily by the euro’s double-digit decline but international also experienced a slight organic decline for the third consecutive quarter. Markets such as Russia and Brazil continued to pose formidable challenges to…

Thank you very much, Jon. I am very proud of our team and its resilience in these diverse market conditions. They have recognized the opportunity in front of us and have created a plan that we're following to drive improved results. And now I will update you on some key developments in our business. In our services segment, we received new contract awards primarily in the specialty chemicals and power generation sectors tied to our diversification efforts. We were chosen by a global specialty chemicals company headquartered in USA to provide mechanical integrity, reliability and predictive maintenance engineering and consulting services. Our PCMS inspection data management software solution will serve as the new customers’ database worldwide for warehousing and subsequent analysis. In our growing power generation sector, we secured a multi-million dollar contract to provide turbine overhaul inspection services. In addition, we also secured two multi-million dollar contracts to provide quality assurance and site surveillance services for the construction of natural gas combined cycle plants. In the oil and gas midstream sector, we were awarded a large contract to utilize our PCMS system to implement pipeline pressure equipment located in several regions, dozens of pipeline sites. Our products and systems segments continue to focus on improving its business pipeline of aerospace, automotive, power generation and chemical industry opportunities. Specifically, within the power generation sector, we received several important orders, including a major East Coast utility successfully tested and purchased our gas plants leak detection system that is intended to be deployed at more than a dozen sites. Second, the same utility purchased one of our 24x7 acoustic turbine online monitoring systems that has been successfully operated on gas on [GE gas] [ph] turbines and will now be applied to a different platform to identify a different potential component failure. This…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Matt Duncan with Stephens Inc.

So you called out sort of three reasons that you fell short in the quarter and I am curious if you can maybe tell us how you would weigh those three in terms of the impact they had between the strike, FX, and then uncertainty around low oil?

Well, definitely, Matt, I will put the strike on the top of the list but Jon, you can give more detailed explanations.

Yes, the strike is the majority of it, Matt, for us, I mean we had people who were reporting in for work at several sites that unfortunately couldn’t do that. So there was a mismatch there between salary expense that we incurred for a time and revenue we were able to deploy. Also, we had certain work that we were queued up to serve during the third quarter and some projects had to get moved because customers told us that they were worried about their facility being subject to a strike. And so that just really wrought some havoc on our staffing capability to really be as efficiently as we ideally could have been. So I think the strike first and foremost. I think the price of oil secondarily comes into play, because that may also for a short time just delay a project or two but really the strike and the lingering impact for the strike is what caused work to move, things to be deferred. And finally FX became more meaningful as the quarter went on. It offset revenue increases by about 3% companywide during the quarter in terms of a year-over-year impact and there was some bottom-line impact of a few hundred thousand dollars as well.

Okay. So with the strike effectively done now, it did go on far enough into turnaround season, I would assume it may impact the May quarter as well, because it didn’t really begin to wind down till later in March. How do you think that strike can impact the May quarter?

I think you're right. It could impact it a little bit but work has been moved. For the first time we heard that there’s going to be a summer turnaround for instance which is very unusual for our industry. So I think that it's a little bit unpredictable of how things are going to move at this point but I think our fourth quarter should be a good quarter. We anticipate it to be a good healthy quarter but there could be a little bit of impact. I think you are right about that.

And then last thing for me just on the guidance. You’re pointing us to kind of the lower end of the revenue guide and saying that you may be below the EBITDA guidance. Can you help sort of home that in a little bit for us? The range is $78 million to $84 million. Are we talking you’re going to be 70 million, 75 million? I mean how far below the range do you think you might be on EBITDA?

I mean I don’t see us being way below the range. But if we miss I think we could miss by a million or two. And the concern there is just the little less visibility both here in the United States but also as well in Europe.

We have taken, Matt, a very conservative approach because of the delays that we saw, for instance, not only in America but we saw the same delays because of Petrobras in Brazil, for instance, we saw the same delays in France also where one turnaround moved into the fourth quarter for us.

Our next question comes from Justin Hauke with Baird.

I guess just going back to the EBITDA guidance and on below, so if we do the math, I mean it looks like – and I know you’re saying it could be below. But if you take 78 at the EBITDA and you put that on the 720 the low end of the revenue, it’s implying the margins for the fourth quarter are up meaningfully by – like it would be like 14%, which should be well above last year, it was closer to 11. So I guess what’s -- why is it that you would assume margins would be up so materially in the fourth quarter? Is there anything that -- it was one time last year, what should we be thinking about?

We have been working on lots of initiatives too to take costs out, to improve contract profitability through acquisitions and so forth. I mean there are few differences in the company's construction this year versus last year's fourth quarter. So I think that we’re looking to some of those reasons, Justin, for why we might have margin accretion in the fourth quarter.

And then I guess on NACHER, you said it was a little bit weaker this quarter because of seasonality. Maybe just I guess two questions. Can you give us the revenue and profit contribution for the quarter at NACHER and then what are you seeing now that we will have seasonality – how is it playing out in the fourth quarter?

Well, first, we are not going to be breaking out NACHER separately. So for competitive reasons, we don’t really think it’s in our best interest to be providing that information in that kind of detail. But what I would say is that yes, we’ve gotten past this slow winter season and so we assume a better spring, certainly a very good summer for them, and that’s the expectation.

Justin, it was expected, December and January are not the good months and we really plan. At the same time there were few delays because of the price of oil but that really now is over and I think we are looking forward to and we are optimistic about the success of our NACHER company.

Can I – just one more on there too, I think this kind of dovetails with it. But the contingency liability reversal that you had, was that related to NACHER or was that something else?

There is no contingent earn-out for NACHER, just to be clear on that. That related to an acquisition – previous acquisition in Europe.

Our next question comes from Edward Marshall with Sidoti & Company.

So I wanted to kind of just piggyback for a second, I guess I wouldn’t call them a competitor, I’d call them a peer, that reported yesterday, tone of the commentary and outlook was much more positive I’d say and I don’t want you to speak for them but maybe you can talk about, maybe some of the specifics to your company and maybe about what you're seeing, is it cost specific, surrounding pricing heading into the cycle for you specifically or is there outright conservatism on your part as you kind of look at all the pieces that are coming together or did you have more impact with the strike than maybe some of your competitors or peers might have seen?

Before Jon answers, I think we really have taken a conservative approach based on our experience from past years. So we are a little bit nervous about what is happening. As I mentioned in my remarks we feel that in the macro – and even in the fourth quarter we’re very optimistic but we're going to be conservative in our guidance.

Yes, I think that’s fair. Certainly I can't speak to the other companies and what the impact is on them, I know that the strike has had a meaningful impact on us because it caused us to not deploy work people in service of companies as much as we anticipated and with the work moving a bit, that does again as I said earlier in my comments, it does provide for a little bit of disruption in terms of our plants. So having said that we feel good about the fourth quarter, we feel good about the business. I mean we’ve had a short-term market driven hiccup here which is beyond anybody's control but it doesn’t change the trajectory we're on or how good we feel about our ability to serve this market.

I mean everyone basically knows the downstream is still very strong and the refineries are going very strong. We all know that but at the same time we want to be a little bit more conservative because we have seen things shift like in turnarounds and as Jon mentioned before, seeing a turnaround in the summer is very surprising to us.

So if I could summarize basically what I'm hearing, is it really just a function of being a seasonally weak quarter, seeing some signs maybe strike related, maybe deferrals related, some pricing issues and so forth, kind of all summing up giving you kind of a muddy picture to kind of look at forward thinking that things should be good but at the same time you’re not confident enough to really give that in the guidance, is that a clear depiction of what you’re really saying to that?

I think that’s a good summary, yes.

As we move on, I think about some of your cost initiatives and maybe you talked to some of the progress around it. But I guess it sounds like pricing might be the hardest at this point to kind of get through, are you having any success in those -- in pricing discussions at all or are they just basically turning you away from the table and saying, work on your head count and maybe some of your own structural cost issues?

I mean certainly we're doing both. We’re having excellent discussions with customers. So our relationship - in virtually all of our sites we have very strong relationships with customers, we are providing and acknowledge to be providing tremendous value and we’re really excited about what we're doing with their customers. So considering those factors, the ability to have excellent discussions is very strong. The market -- with the price of oil and so forth and really the uncertainty around that because as Sotirios mentioned from the from the end of our second quarter till today the price of oil fell 30% in just three months after mauling 50% before that. So it's been a real difficult time for them I think in predicting spending and so forth and it's a tough environment and we sympathize with them. And we’re working with them. So it clouds and complicates but it absolutely does not stop our ability to have productive discussions on those lines.

And I guess on along the same lines I mean it looks like you are head of pace -- last year's pace on free cash flow which is good to see as being one of the initiatives that you’ve said in place. I guess the question is in your estimation are you having success that you anticipated on maybe collections and I think you talked about some of the international customers. But are you having the success that you set out to or is this more of a function of the slowdown in revenue that allowed you to collect more receipts and therefore higher cash flows?

I think it’s probably a little bit of both. There is an ebb and flow in timing and collections of receivables that will happen. At the end of our second quarter we had a very strong quarter and lot of the revenue were occurred as the quarter went on and so receivables kind of built up. There was a little bit of a lag in revenues compared to what we might have expected this time. So we did have a little bit of cash up there. So I think that's a factor but I also think equally as well that we are focused on this and we have an initiative here in place and there’s going to be a bunch of things rolling out to move things along further in the right direction. So it’s a little of both.

Last one, the currency targets that are implied in your guidance for the year, and I know there is quite a few there but I guess the big ones maybe Canada, European euro, what are implied in your guidance ranges there?

What we're assuming at this point we’re not really guiding on currency actually but what we are assuming at this point is that currencies don’t move from where they are at this point. They are just stable at the third-quarter levels.

I assume there is a natural hedge with costs in the local currencies but is there any chance for you to hedge from financially?

There is always the chance to hedge but the problem of doing a hedge is that you're making a bet that you can help think the market, and I don't like to do that in general, unless I am really really sure, even if I am really really sure, I have done in the past and most hedges don’t seem to go the right way. You talk to the banks who hedges, they are the first to acknowledge that most of the time they are receiving cash in these things, rather than paying it out. So we’re not in a rush to do a hedge at this point. We think most of the move has occurred already. Certainly there's a lot of Draconian predictions of the euro going to $0.90 by some of the investment banks, but some of those might be driven by the impetus to try to get trading revenues out of us as opposed to a real-life expectation.

And the natural hedge of your currency exposure how much is naturally hedged - cost versus revenue?

The vast majority of it is, the biggest exposure we really face is where we’ve got balances between our subsidiaries that are denominated in the dollar and then you’ve got a devaluation on the other side, so you’ve got a transaction loss there for short-term inter-company items.

Our next question comes from Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Good morning gentlemen, this is Sean on for Tahira today. Most of my questions have been answered, there are some good ones ahead of me but I’d just like to get your thoughts on Shell and BG merger and if you think there's any implications for MG and your experience as M&A activity which are large customers impacted the company at all?

Whenever you see the transaction like this, there may be sometimes opportunities but right now we really have no idea.

In the past, can you just characterize, has there been any modulations as the companies go through this type of deals or any comment there would be helpful?

The only thing really that happens is – you have two companies that are trying to transact and you’re doing business with them. There is a delay of work. That's the only thing we've seen in the past. We are not really customer – the customers of both of them, so therefore there is little effect, from past mergers, and we will assume there will be no effect here either.

Our next question comes from Jason Borg, DLC [ph].

Given the prices of oil and drop-in during the fourth quarter, could you guys come up with low oil cost initiatives? And the second question is how much is the Alaska BP job impact given the bidding process you guys went through to win that one?

Regarding the first one, I mean some of our customers are very impacted by the price of oil but most aren’t. The ones that are major and integrated and have upstream operations are obviously more effective than downstream customers who don't have upstream operations. So we don’t have a price of oil initiative per se as much as we’re just trying to do the initiatives that I have already spoken on. And with regard to the second part of your question was what again?

Given the I guess the nature of how you guys bid the job with the Alaska BP work, how much is that impacting your margins this year?

I am not exactly sure what you are referring to there but it's true that yes over a year ago we were in a competitive bidding process, we were awarded a bunch of work with BP in Alaska. We’re very satisfied with that partnership that we have with BP and we actively work to sell – to serve them and things are going very well with that customer.

Our next question comes from Steven Howard with Morgan Stanley.

First question would be reading some of the industry publications, it seems that the department of transportation’s pipeline and hazardous material, safety administration issued a couple of proposals in terms of revamping pipeline maintenance standards. Are you guys following there in terms of maximum operating pressure and more regular testing, what you thought about the potential of business opportunity there should the regulations get a little bit more stringent?

I am not going to report on the regulation, midstream or not. That’s the solution but from our point of view yes, it has affected and I think I mentioned one contract that we got – a very recent contract.

And then the strike itself was well on your hands but I was interested in terms of the timing of the impact and whether or not it was kind of all systems go for your customers and then late in the quarter there was more of a surprise by the way, this is not going to go as well as we thought it was, I just wanted to get a sense of – how the strike progressed from demand from your services?

Yes, it was essentially as you said, things are very well and then really the beginning of February and it’s still lingering at certain sites, there’s still potential for additional sites. I mean you’re just not sure how this is going to go. But we’ve worked directly with our customers to ensure that the staffing was in place, with every customer it was different scenario, and at every site it was a different scenario but we’ve work very closely with them to ensure that they were covered and we could try to be as efficient as possible while servicing them.

You also keep in mind also we have more evergreens, we run and maintain contracts in these locations that – annual order of our competitors. End of Q&A

And I am not showing any further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the call back over to our host.

Thank you very much, Kevin. I would like to thank everyone for listening to us and we wish a great day. Thank you very much.