Good day. And welcome to the MDxHealth Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Earnings Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to John Fraunces with LifeSci Advisors. Please go ahead.

Before we begin, I’d like to remind everyone that the company will make forward-looking statements during today’s call. Whether in prepared remarks or during the Q&A session, these forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties are detailed in the risk factor section of the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically in the company’s annual report on Form 20-F. I’ll now turn the call over to Michael McGarrity, Chief Executive Officer of MDxHealth.

Thanks, John, and thank you all for joining us for our fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings conference call for MDxHealth. With me today is Ron Kalfus, Chief Financial Officer. 2024 was a transformational year for MDxHealth. Each of our achievements individually and all of them collectively are rooted in and reflect our unwavering focus on operating discipline and commercial execution. As we look at our progress, I would point to a number of defining milestones that reflect the talent, commitment and success of the team across our organization. We achieved Q4 and full-year revenue growth of 28%. And importantly, our revenue growth has been achieved without the expansion of our commercial sales organization, demonstrating increased rep productivity and pathway adoption by our customers. Of course, none of these achievements can be realized without all of our operating group’s dedication to our vision of being the most consistent growth company in the urology diagnostic space. True excellence is measured by performance over time and we believe our consistent and strong performance quarter-after-quarter reflects that commitment to excellence. Before I hand it over to Ron for a review of our financial and operating results, a few comments on the focus and execution of our best-in-class commercial team. Q4 total billable volume was approximately 24,000 tests, representing total test unit growth of 26%. Test volumes for our tissue-based tests, which include Confirm mdx and GPS, came in at almost 12,000 for the quarter, an increase of 50% over the prior year period. And tissue-based tests grew 31% for the full year. For our liquid-based tests, which include Select mdx, Resolve mdx and Germline, test volumes exceeded 12,000, an increase of 10% over the prior year period. And liquid-based tests grew 28% for the full year. The growth acceleration in our tissue-based…

Thank you, Mike. To follow on Mike’s remarks, we are very pleased to report strong performance in the fourth quarter and full year of 2024. Revenues for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2024, increased by 28% to $24.7 million versus $19.4 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Like the prior quarter, all of this growth was organic and delivered without expansion of our sales organization, which reflects the leverage we continue to generate from our sales channel and the greater market penetration of our full line of tests. Moving below the revenue line, our gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2024 was $15.5 million, an increase of 22%, as compared to $12.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2023. Gross margins were 62.7% for Q4 2024, as compared to 65.3% for Q4 2023. The decline in gross margins of 2.6 percentage points primarily attributed to our test mix and timing of payments. Our operating loss for the fourth quarter declined 27% to $4.6 million, compared to $6.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2023, primarily driven by a growth in sales and gross profit, partially upset by a growth of 6% in operating expenses, which were primarily related to an increase in clinical studies. Our net loss decreased 36% to $6.8 million, compared to $10.7 million for the prior year period, driven by our $2.8 million increase in gross profit, as well as a decrease of $2.2 million in net financial expenses. Finally, our fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA was negative $1.4 million, a 68% improvement over Q4 2023 adjusted EBITDA of negative $4.4 million. We believe that we are on track to achieving our goal of positive adjusted EBITDA in the first half of this year. Note that a reconciliation of IFRS to non-IFRS financial measures has been provided in the tables included in this press release. Cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2024 were $46.8 million. And with a pending draw of the second tranche under our OrbiMed debt facility, our balance sheet will be significantly strengthened to meet our 2025 earn-out obligation to Exact Sciences, as well as support the execution of our 2025 business plan. This concludes my overview of the results and I will now turn the call back to Mike.

Thanks, Ron. I would like to take a step back and reference the goals we set as a company when I joined MDxHealth in 2019 and that was to build the highest quality growth vertical in urology diagnostics. Along the way, we have taken advantage of growth opportunities through our acquisition of the Oncotype GPS test from Exact Sciences, the launch of our Resolve test, and the introduction of our hereditary Germline testing, all conceived of and fueled by rigor in our diligence process, the strength of our channel and relationships, as well as the access and trust that we have garnered from our urology customer base. That trust is only earned through a combination of not only the highest quality sales representatives, but also the world-class customer support across our organization, all believing quality first, customers always. I would suggest that the evidence for our view is supported by the fact that our five-year revenue compound annual growth rate or CAGR has exceeded 50%. Whether in the sales force, laboratory operations, revenue cycle management, client services, patient advocacy, quality and regulatory, our entire MDxHealth team operates under the mission that there is a patient and family on the other side of every sample we receive. That is what drives our customer base to trust MDxHealth as their laboratory partner, with these critical diagnostic tests that inform patient pathways. Additionally, as we came into 2024, we set the goal of exiting the year on $100 million revenue run rate with clear visibility to operating profitability and we were confident we would achieve this goal without adding additional sales representatives. Moreover, we met or exceeded these goals while controlling our operating expense, which increased at a fraction of our revenue growth rate. We have delivered on our 2024 goals and are…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Thomas Flaten with Lake Street. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good afternoon. Thanks, Mike and Ron, for taking the questions. I’m just curious if you could give us some qualified or, sorry, some qualitative, ideally or quantitative thoughts on how you would expect Germline to contribute to the 2025 growth rate that you’ve laid out with your guidance?

Yeah. Thomas, we’re confident that our Germline offering will begin to contribute in 2025, as we’ve noted. I would say two things. As we’ve discussed, we’re very conservative with initial introductions, revenue recognition, payer experience. Same way we took Resolve to market is the path we’re following with Germline. We do expect it to contribute in 2025, and we’ll expect to update that quarter-by-quarter. I would just say that our guidance is not contingent on significant contributions from our Germline, but we’re very confident. Same diligence and rigor I noted that we apply to any growth opportunities was applied here and we’re confident that it fits very, very well with our prostate cancer menu. In the way, my comment about breast cancer, the way the market is paying attention to not only the diagnostics, but the hereditary risks.

Thank you. And then one more and I’ll hop back in the queue. Ron, how should we be thinking about gross margins moving forward, particularly in light of Mike’s comments that Germline might not be a significant contributor this year?

Well, we don’t give guidance on gross margins specifically, but I think we’ve said in the past that we expect gross margins to start with a 6 and be somewhere around in the mid-60s for the next few quarters.

Got it. I appreciate you taking the questions. Thank you.

And the next question comes from Andrew Brackmann with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe to pick up where you just left off on the outlook for adjusted EBITDA, can you maybe just sort of remind us how we should be thinking about OpEx here over the next handful of quarters? And then I guess bigger picture, as you cross the CASM to adjusted EBITDA positivity, does that change any of your sort of views on how you sort of think about investments or sort of maybe being more aggressive on the spend after you cross that milestone? Thanks.

Yeah. I’ll take that, Andrew. So I think the important point on the gross margin is that it’s where we expected it to be and it’s where our target was to flip EBITDA positive. So we’re very confident that the P&L and you’re seeing what we anticipated, right, the decline in adjusted EBITDA. We reported it for Q4 to give a basis for, A, the progress we’ve made and the path that we have to flip here. As far as the second part of your question, will that catalyze additional investments? I think that our growth strategy remains the same as it has over the last number of years, right? We are becoming more obvious as a potential partner for growth opportunities in the space based on the strength of our channel and our access and influence over our urology and pathology group customer base. But we’re going to be very, I’ll go back to the term rigorous, in evaluating these and I think we have a really good model for how we look at opportunities and how we execute on them. I think unlikely to be transformative M&A, but if you look at the way we’ve put together our menu, we have visibility to opportunities, and we’ll look at them as we go. But no material change to our strategy. I think the business begins to fund itself as we cross operating profitability. And that really ensures that we -- we’re very confident in our ability to operate, execute, deliver results and be funded as a company to drive that growth and meet all of our obligations.

Great. That’s perfect color. And then, Mike, as my follow up here, there’s been a lot of chatter around some of the NCCN guidelines that were published in December for GPS. Maybe just big picture, how has this impacted the business, if at all, over the last two months since that came out? And then separately, how should we be sort of thinking about the potential for you to generate level one evidence there? Thanks.

Yeah. I’ll take the back part first. So, we communicated publicly that we have a plan based on our partnership with Oxford to drive our data and access level one coverage. It’s important to note that I think with regard to the NCCN guidelines, I think, you noted appropriately that I think it created more confusion than directed behavior. I think our results with our tissue-based tests reflect that. I think, you know, as we look at Q4, our growth is actually accelerating through that period. And I’ll be careful here, but I think a lot of positions have been overplayed with regard to that communication and the immediate response. What we’re very, very confident in is our channel checks, our relationships with the way clinicians, our customer base, as well as our target customer base, absorb that information and makes clinical decisions about which test to use for which patient population. I think speaks to our error results. And so we’re very confident that we are very confident in our position with regard to the guidelines. And I think maybe more importantly, our understanding of the way these tests are adopted. And if you look at GPS in particular, we would put our data and positioning in the patient population that we serve most is not only compelling, but best-in-class. So we continue to be confident that the results that we’re presenting today reflect that position and obviously inform our view forward for 2025 for sure and our ability to continue to drive and deliver this test.

Great. Thanks, guys.

And the next question comes from Thomas Vranken with KBC Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe to start off, I want to build on a previous question. Mike, how do you currently think about the breadth of test menu at this point in time? Should we potentially anticipate any new test additions for 2025?

Well, I’ll hit it again, Thomas, maybe referring to the way I addressed the first time. I think it’s important to note that our current menu and the market opportunity associated with that would allow us to meet our growth objectives for the foreseeable future. And I think our growth rates are speaking to the fact that we are driving growth through both market conversion and market share. Particularly when you look at our tissue-based test, our growth rate has accelerated through Q4 and I think that can only happen when those two factors are working. But the most important point is absent any additional growth opportunities that we would take advantage of, our view on our growth being very sustainable is clear. So we would look at it the same way I’ve commented before, that we’ll be opportunistic. I’ll refer back to my comment that in my view of the last five years, we had to do two things with our business. We had to derisk the business and we had to become more obvious. I think that we have done the former. I think the latter is taking shape. I’m confident that I’ll reserve any comments on the current market evaluation other than to say we are very confident that we focus and execute and deliver results quarter-after-quarter, business begins to fund itself. We like our balance sheet position going forward that that will also offer itself and that’s what everybody here on the team is. We would update on additional growth opportunities as they present themselves to us and we execute on them, but we are -- our guidance does not contemplate any additional growth opportunities through 2025 for sure.

Okay. Thanks. And I also wanted to quickly check in with regards to Select. It’s been a couple of quarters now since Medicare reimbursement has been put in place. Do you see any impact or any consequences on that on the commercial coverage side as well? Do you see that picking up or what’s the sentiment there or what are the trends there?

Yeah. I think across our menu, if you look at our unit revenue growth as they complement each other, we’ve clearly seen the unit growth across our menu for the year in both liquid and tissue. And our pricing is holding or accelerating across our menu. We don’t, obviously, report that test-by-test, but our market access managed care team has done a really nice job of continuing to drive expansion of coverage across our menu with commercial and private payers, and we expect that to continue. So our revenue growth, as you can see, unit growth drives the day, but we are seeing really solid footing on the pricing side. We would expect that to continue. Again, no heroics required on the pricing side to drive our 2025 revenue view, but we’re confident that we’ll operate and execute on both of those.

Okay. That’s great. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Thomas.

And the next question comes from Jason Bednar with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon, guys. I’m going to pull on some threads that have already been talked about here. But maybe as we think about the phasing of the performance throughout the year within the 20%, 22% revenue growth, I think, it sounds like the phasing of the year is probably similar to how we’ve seen past years play out, no unique timing factors or anything. Maybe Germline helps a bit more in the second half versus first half, but I guess is there anything you’d call out sequentially as we think throughout the year and model revenue, again, 1Q through 4Q, again any -- just anything you would call out to make sure our models are all in the right spot here getting going in 2025?

Yeah. Jason, I think -- I don’t think I would call out anything specific as we go through the year and history would inform Q1 and Q3 can always be a little bit of wild cards with regard to pay-or-mix and seasonality. But I would say that we feel really good about where we are in the uptake in sustainable adoption. I think that’s one of the main -- the progress we’ve made over the last two years to three years where I think quarter-by-quarter was a little bit more getting solidified with our customer base. I think what we’re seeing today and hopefully our results reflect it, as well as our view forward is that, I don’t want to refer to it as compliance to our pathway, but we really -- the programs we’ve put in place with our customer base allow for really sticky, sustainable adoption of our menu. And when you think about large urology group practices, the reason I think we’ve been able to drive the growth without expanding our sales organization, that only happens if the adoption is sustainable within a practice. And some of these larger urology group practices that have five, 10, 15, 20, 25 urologists in the practice, that begins to really drive growth as a function of driving adoption within that practice. So I don’t think there’s anything we don’t measure, metric, or analyze in our sales organization and our adoption profiles of our customer base, I should say. And so we like that the way that looks as 2025 unfolds and we will look forward to reporting our Q1 results along that way. I think your assumption on Germline is a fair one. I mean, that’s the point I made on our guidance isn’t counting on significant contribution there, but we do expect it. I think back half the year is a reasonable thing.

Okay. Perfect. And just as a follow-up, maybe combine a couple here, but since we’re basically on the cusp of seeing you guys turn EBITDA profitable or adjusted EBITDA profitable, what’s the next KPI or mile marker you want the investment community to focus on, Mike? And then for the OpEx spend, I heard the comment on not needing any sales -- any additional sales investments to hit the targets last year. I didn’t, yeah, were you willing to make the same comment for 2025 if you did? Sorry if I missed it. Just kind of trying to figure out what functional areas are consuming incremental OpEx spend here this year? Thanks.

Yeah. Jason, I think your assumption is correct. We feel like our sales channel will actually all be together here next week. It’s probably my favorite few days of the year, but we feel very good about our sales organization individually and collectively, and they will be the group to take us through 2025. So we’re very confident we can deliver that. As far as broadly on the P&L OpEx investment, we haven’t cut our way here and we don’t anticipate cutting our way going forward. But what I would say is that, when you look at our business, based on what we’ve put in place and the productivity across our organization, but particularly with the sales channel, it really begins to provide leverage. Really, our OpEx expansion is largely scaled through our laboratory and RCM group. So we would expect our P&L just to continue to improve for the business to begin to fund itself and yet we’ll be very prudent with growth opportunities. But again, our market -- our current market opportunity, we’re very confident that we can build -- continue to build a high growth vertical into the U.S.

Anything on the KPIs you want to stab in mind, Mike, or you want to hold off on that until you get to keep it at profitability?

I think I will look to follow up with you over the coming quarters. I think the only thing I would say is what we feel gets the question often, is there something coming, some value-creating milestone that we can look to? We view positively that we don’t have a binary event coming, that we’re counting on to drive our view of our ability to continue to accelerate from a growth perspective and build value as an asset for the company. I think that’s the way we view it.

All right. Perfect. Thank you.

Jason, thank you.

And the next question comes from Mark Massaro with BTIG. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. This is Vidyun on for Mark. Thanks for taking the question. So just one on GPS. That test seems to be posting pretty healthy growth. From my understanding, it’s a bit more of a mature test. Just how should we think about current levels of penetration there, any potential detail looking at 2025 or do you think those growth levels should be sustained? Thanks.

Well, I think, when we look at the market opportunity for GPS and I made a comment that we’re seeing growth two ways, market conversion and market share. And when I speak to market conversion, when you look at the market for GPS type testing in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer, it’s probably plus or minus 40% penetrated. And so when I speak to the two levers of growth, it’s market penetration and market share. The market penetration is driving that market penetration up for those tests which we’re seeing, particularly with GPS and low, very low, low intermediate risk patient population that we serve. And but also, I think, our growth rate would suggest that we’re also driving growth on the share side. So we actually view significant continued opportunity for growth in GPS and do not view it as mature or decelerating as we go forward. I don’t think we could provide a view of 20% or greater growth, not only for this year, but our goal is to have that be very sustainable without both those opportunities in front of us to drive a market conversion and share.

Perfect. That’s super helpful color. And then just one on the adjusted EBITDA positivity. Any reason we shouldn’t think about that being pulled into Q1 2025 rather than Q2? And can you just remind us about any other assumptions that are embedded into that target? Thanks.

Yeah. There’s nothing between us and flipping adjusted EBITDA positive here in the first half, which is clearly Q1 or Q2. And we don’t need to make any changes to the way we’re operating, investing. It’s continued execution, which I hope you’re getting the sense. We have high confidence.

Okay. Great. Thanks for taking the question.

Thanks, Vidyun.

And the next question comes from Dan Brennan with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. My first question is, as far as Exact Sciences, what is baked into your expectations this year regarding your earn-out to Exact Sciences? And can you provide any update on potential timing of when the first earn-out payment comes due this year?

Yes. I’m sorry. Is this Dan or Kyle? I’m sorry. Is it Dan? Neither. Yeah. The Exact earn-out is 2025, 2026, 2027. That payment will likely fall in Q2 each year. So we’ll continue to update that, but we’re confident that our setup allows for a meeting between our debt facility, the business, the operating cash flow of the business, which commences here this year as we go forward. So that obligation and earn-out is incorporated into our full view forward as a company for our growth and full P&L.

Thank you.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.