William Taylor
Analyst · Bill Plovanic
Thank you, Pete. Good morning, everyone. I'd like to start by once again highlighting that MiMedx tissues serve a regenerative medicine function to many different specialties, including orthopedics, sports medicine, ophthalmic, dental, chronic wound, acute wound and surgical anti-scarring markets, besides indicating that our Surgical, Ortho and Sports Medicine tissues were the largest segment of our business in the first half of last year.
Until today, we have not broken down our revenue by specialty areas. Because we have taken the next steps in our growth, we feel it is now appropriate to start the process of giving you more detail. I was thinking, we'll go into more analysis later, but I wanted to highlight the way that we look at our specialty areas, so that you can understand our breakdowns.
The first segment is our Surgical and Sports Medicine area which includes our AmnioFix, AmnioFix Wrap and AmnioFix Injectable, all of which also includes our private label versions of the same. Our second segment is our Wound Care specialty area, which includes EpiFix as well as our plastic surgery grafts. The third area is a bit of a catch-all for our other products and tissues, which would include our Dental and Ophthalmic tissues as well as HydroFix.
Let me follow-up on Pete's comments on our direct sales force and their impact on our increased sales this past quarter. Over the course of the third quarter, we've hired 21 sales professionals, including sales management. Of this group, 19 were hired with the specific focus on government accounts with a specific emphasis on Wound Care. Add them to the national sales director, whom we hired in June, and the total in government sales team at the end of the third quarter was 20 sales professionals.
This government sales team also sells AmnioFix and an AmnioFix Injectable, but they're in the early stages in this area, as current results are predominantly in the wound care space with EpiFix. We've been very fortunate to have been able to attract a sales force with considerable experience in the wound care space with pedigrees from companies such as Pfizer, Advanced BioHealing and Shire and Integra.
On the Wound Care side, our strategy is to migrate to a direct sales force over time. So we'll strategically add sales executives to our team as some of the regional MAC barriers come down over the coming months and quarters. On the commercial front, our strategy is to continue to partner with sales agents and distributors in the surgical and sports medicine specialties, as the breadth and depth needed in the sales channels here are very significant, we believe it's best for us to leverage these relationships with our external sales partners.
As I mentioned, during the third quarter we brought on our direct sales force for the government accounts market, transitioning this away from our sales agents and distributors. In this area, you may -- we still do partner with a distributor, but in a different way than other areas of our businesses.
You may remember that over a year ago, we announced an agreement with the distributor that specializes in work with the federal government. That particular relationship did not prove as fruitful as we expected, so in the mid-second quarter, we ended that relationship and partnered with a new distributor. This new distributor was much bigger and more established in the government accounts, particularly the VAs.
In addition to adding our tissues to an existing federal supply contract or FSS, the company is an SDVOSB, a Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business. Our sales team is the front facing team interacting with the VA physicians. Our distributor handles all the backroom paperwork as well as the contracting matters with the complex government system. Our price structure is different with the distributor in the government accounts, because we handle a larger portion of the sales process than with our commercial distributors.
Another benefit of this relationship with our government distributor is that we have a much better visibility to inventory in the distribution channel. While we still have some more work to do, we generally know how many days inventory our distributor has in the aggregate.
Our goal is to have real-time information on inventory levels, and our IT team is working on a system in conjunction with our distributor to complete this system shortly. With the growth of our business and the addition of a 22-person direct sales force, clearly we need to add incremental personnel to help manage this growth. We're growing faster than we predicted a year ago.
As I mentioned in our last quarterly call, we began the year with about 50 employees, well, we're now around 150. I think this rate of growth of employees should slow a bit over this quarter or the next quarter, as we absorb the people we have. We complete our training and improve the natural inefficiencies that occur with rapid employee growth. This rapid growth brings with it an important facilities topic that Pete mentioned.
As you may remember, we currently have 2 sites in Kennesaw about a 0.5 mile apart, with 40,000 square feet in total, about 20,000 square feet each. Not an ideal situation, but it was the right thing to do early in our growth phase. One building has about 10 months left on our lease and the other, where our tissue processing is done has about 22 months left on its lease.
Based on our progress to date and our growth plan, we've decided to initiate a project to consolidate into a new facility by mid-year, next year, hopefully by late spring. We have identified an 80,000 square foot building, about 5 miles from here that would suit our needs very well.
We've executed a non-binding letter of intent and we'll be asking our board to approve the move tomorrow. If we move this plan by spring, our current corporate office lease would expire, and our current processing facility would then remain operational and serve as a disaster recovery site as well as providing secondary processing capacity from our new site.
Moving on to our tissue processing operations and following up on our expansion that we had in the second quarter, we fully staffed our 3 lines by late second quarter, and we started building some incremental inventory during the third quarter as we planned. Our efficiencies went down, because of all the new processors, but should improve later in the fourth quarter.
You may remember, it generally takes each tissue processor about 4 to 5 months to become fully proficient at all the tissue processing areas, so it does take some time to get back to our targeted efficiencies after tripling our workforce. We continue to make significant progress on our IP, as Pete had mentioned.
During the third quarter, the company was granted one U.S. patent for our hydrogel technology, 2 European patents for our collagen technology. In addition, we filed 11 applications this quarter, including one non-provisional application for collagen, 6 non-provisional applications for our amnion technology, and 4 provisional applications for our amnion technology.
Further, our legal team has conducted several formal discussions with the patent examiners, regarding some of our earlier amnion patents. We remain very optimistic that our first 2 patents will issue later this year.
Moving to the clinical front. In August, we released the result of our first Diabetic Foot Ulcer trial or DFU trial. The results were incredible. As we reported, 92% of the participants, who were treated with EpiFix were healed in 6 weeks compared to 8% of the standard of care patients.
This is very significant, particularly when you consider Dermagraft's pivotal trial, where only 30%, were healed in 12 weeks. So basically our results showed a 3x healing rate compared to Dermagraft in about half the time. As you know, we actually ended the study very early, because the results were so compelling and the principal investigator cited ethical concerns about prolonging the effective treatment on the control patients.
After the study termination, the control patients then were offered EpiFix in a crossover study. Once those results are finalized, which should be, shortly, we'll report those findings as well. One more thought related to the early termination of that study. The concept of terminating a clinical study earlier than originally anticipated is not uncommon. It can be an outcome of trials where it's called adaptive design is applied to the study protocol.
Adaptive design of clinical studies is an approach that can shorten the trial timeframes and get technologies to market faster. In fact, the FDA supports this approach and issued a guidance document in 2010 related to drug and biologics' clinical trial design. Basically, adaptive design allows for preplanned changes to trials, after the study has started. Specific examples listed by the FDA are sample-size, number of patients per treatment among a number of other items.
Drug companies have utilized adaptive design for their clinical studies over the past 10 years. As we've discussed previously, our clinical studies are designed for reimbursement and sales purposes, not regulatory purposes. But even so, we're planning on developing our future protocols using those adaptive design techniques that are advocated by the FDA.
Also in process, as we've discussed before, we have 2 additional DFU or Diabetic Foot Ulcer randomized controlled trials in process as well as a plantar fasciitis randomized controlled, venous ulcer randomized controlled. We're getting ready to start an epicondylitis or tennis elbow or golfers elbow RCT as well.
And we also have an RCT look at AmnioFix as anti-scarring attributes, and we're looking at adding a second one of those, with cranial application late this year or early next year. So we have a number of other studies beyond those that are in the very stages of planning as well.
With that, I'll turn it back over to Pete.