Good day and welcome to MediWound's Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Gaia Shamis of LifeSci Advisors. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Chris, and welcome, everyone. Today, before the market opened, MediWound issued a press release announcing financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2024. You may access that release on the company's website under the Investors tab. With us today are Ofer Gonen, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound; Hani Luxenburg, Chief Financial Officer; and Barry Wolfenson, Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q&A. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that statements made during this call including the Q&A session relating to MediWound's expected future performance, future business prospects or future events or plans are forward-looking statements and defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, actual outcomes and results are subject to risks and uncertainties and could differ materially from those forecast due to the impact of many factors beyond the control of MediWound. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Participants are directed to cautionary notes set forth in today's press release as well as the risk factors set forth in MediWound's annual report filed with the SEC for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. The conference call is the property of MediWound, and any recording or rebroadcast is expressly prohibited without the written consent of MediWound. Now I would like to turn the call over to Ofer Gonen, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound. Ofer?

Thank you, Gaia, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today as we are excited to share the results of another strong quarter. The second quarter has been pivotal for our company, as we continue to execute our strategic plan to become a global leader in tissue repair. At the beginning of the year, we set three key goals: First, to complete the construction of our new manufacturing facility; second, to accelerate the revenue growth of NexoBrid; and third, to initiate the Phase III clinical trial of EscharEx. I am pleased to report that we have successfully completed the first goal, and we are well on track to achieving the remaining two. Moreover, we awarded EUR 16.25 million in funding for the expansion of EscharEx indication to include diabetic foot ulcers, significantly increasing the product's total addressable market. We also raised $25 million in financing led by industry leader, Molnlycke, reflecting strong confidence in our technology and significantly enhancing our financial position. Let me begin with an update on NexoBrid, our drug for eschar removal for severe burns. As mentioned, we have completed the construction of our new state-of-the-art GMP compliant manufacturing facility NexoBrid. The commissioning process will begin soon, and we aim to achieve full operational capacity in 2025. The new facility will allow us to support the growing global demand for NexoBrid by increasing our manufacturing capacity sixfold. In the United States, the launch of NexoBrid by Vericel continued to build strong momentum. Approximately 70 burn centers have completed submission to the P&T committees with over 40 centers already obtaining approval and nearly all of them placing initial product orders. Vericel reported a notable increase in hospital orders and the number of patients treated driving a revenue growth of 76% over the prior quarter. Additionally, we…

Thank you, Ofer. Let me begin with our revenue for the second quarter. Revenue for the second quarter of 2024 was $5.1 million compared to $4.8 million in the same period of 2023. This increase is primarily attributed to revenue from Vericel. Gross profit in the second quarter of 2024 was $0.4 million, representing 9% of total revenue compared to $1.1 million, representing 24% of total revenue in the second quarter of 2023. The decrease in gross margin is mainly due to changes in the revenue mix and nonrecurring production costs. Turning to our operating expenses. R&D expenses for the second quarter of 2024 were $1.9 million compared to $2 million in the same period of 2023. SG&A expenses for the second quarter of 2024 were $3 million compared to $3.1 million in the second quarter of 2023. Operating loss for the second quarter of 2024 was $4.5 million compared to an operating loss of $4 million in the second quarter of 2023. Net loss for the quarter of 2024 was $6.3 million or $0.68 per share compared to a net profit of $0.9 million or $0.10 per share in the second quarter of 2023. This change is primarily due to financial expenses driven by the revaluation of warrants. Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2024 was a loss of $3.4 million compared to a loss of $3 million in the same period of 2023. Moving on to our year-to-date financial highlights. Total revenue for the first half of 2024 was $10 million, up from $8.6 million in the first half of 2023. The increase is mainly attributed to revenue from Vericel and new contract with the U.S. Department of Defense. Gross profit for the first half of 2024 was $1.1 million or 11% of total revenue compared…

Thank you, Hani. This was a very -- another very strong quarter. We successfully raised capital, collaborated with one of the largest wound care companies in the world, significantly expanded our target market for EscharEx and completed the construction of our NexoBrid manufacturing facility as planned. We are now well positioned with all the resources we need to achieve our goals and look forward to an exciting second half of the year. With this said, I'd like now to turn back to the operator for any questions you may have. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] And today's first question comes from Josh Jennings with TD Cowen. Please proceed.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions and it's great to see all the progress in 2Q. I wanted to start on NexoBrid and congratulations on getting that facility build-out completed. I just wanted to better understand the next steps to increasing NexoBrid capacity and whether that kind of unlocking or eliminating capacity constraints could occur in early 2025 or mid-2025? Just how are you managing expectations from your distributor partners in India and Japan and Polymedics for Europe?

Thank you for the question, Josh. So considering the dynamics around NexoBrid, as you know, we have major market launches recently, United States, Japan, India expansions of indications, including the pediatric population that was -- we were awarded in Europe, and we are waiting for it to be in the United States very shortly. And also, we are working on the military use. And there is also a growing governmental interest. So our assumption that the demand for NexoBrid will escalate rapidly. This is the reason why we spent a lot of export in making sure that we complete the construction of the new state-of-the-art manufacturing facility as planned. We are starting the commissioning very soon. It can be -- it is a 1-year process. It includes six months of stability, so you can't expect it to be earlier. Having said that, as I stated in previous calls, we expect the European approval to be earlier in 2025. And in the United States, we expect it to be at the end of 2025, and our forecast is -- reflects this execution. Did I answer your question?

You did. And just a big deal of the EIC funding for the DFU trial, and I was hoping to get a better understanding of the mechanics of it. And with this funding come in tranches, is it a onetime download of capital to fund the trial? How do you access the capital? And just should we be thinking that the DFU trial could kick off -- the Phase II/III could kick off in 2025?

Thank you for this question as well. So we were just notified about this funding a few weeks ago, and our final assumptions regarding the initiation and the structure of the trial, of course, will be based on the feedback that we are going to get from the FDA and the EMA. We anticipate it to be along this line. We think that the first year will be dedicated to negotiate with the regulatory authorities, MFDA and to do all kinds of activities for this trial. After that, we plan to have a trial which is very similar to our Phase III trial with the diabetic -- with the venous leg ulcers. And it also -- we anticipate that it will take two years, but we need to get clarity for that. As for the funding, it's a mechanism. You will never see those EUR 16.25 million in our balance sheet. We will just would just get reimbursement, I think, quarterly. Hani, is it quarterly? We'll get quarterly reimbursement on expenses, but basically, it should fund these activities.

Outstanding. And then just one last one the SRX Blu pivot study. Sorry if I missed this in your prepared remarks, just -- has the protocol been submitted and approved by the FDA? Maybe just kind of help us think about -- I know you've answered this question multiple times in the past, but just the timing on getting to that kind of two thirds enrollment that interim analysis when investors should be anticipating that initial potential catalyst for this VLU development program?

So as for the Phase III study, we are on track to initiate the trial in the second half of 2024. We are about to submit the protocol for final approval for the FDA. You can look at the presentation that we have in our website showing that this this task is about to be done very shy. We are working on the setup activities, which means signed contracts with all the medical centers. We have 40 of those. But the current expectation is that we will start the trial in the second half of this year. The study itself should be around recruitment with the six month of start-up activities in between after one year or after recording 66% of the of the patients. We should have an interim look and getting an early insight about the efficacy of SRX.

The next question is from RK with H.C. Wainright. Please proceed.

Thank you. So, good morning. Good afternoon. Ofor and Annie. A couple of quick questions. On the -- on getting the facility commissioned for expanding manufacturing capacity. So what else is needed for you folks at this point so that you can get this facility into manufacturing mode. That's question number one. And question number two is on scale for the -- I know you're looking to start a Phase II/III study for that indication. What do you need to achieve before trying to start writing a protocol for that clinical study?

Thank you for your question. So let me start with the manufacturing up. So as we just said that the construction is completed as planned. Now we need to start manufacturing, you start manufacturing. It's a process that takes a few months, making sure that everything that you were able to do in 1x scale, you can do it in 5x scale. After that, you need to manufacture a few batches of NexoBrid and go through six months of stability. So it will be practically waiting time to see the NexoBrid is stable after this process of manufacturing. And then there is a submission time basically it takes around six months as well. So this is what needs to be done maybe we did that a few times in the past. So I don't see any potential delays here. As for the second question regarding the we see the results that we see with the diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers are practically -- they show similar results. Like we can see -- we did three Phase II studies, two of them included diabetic foot ulcer patients. We don't see that it works better in this indication or the other. Having said that, we have more patients venous leg ulcer. Therefore, we had a lot of confidence to do a Phase III trial with 216 patients showing -- knowing that we are going to hit the efficacy end point. With diabetic foot ulcer, we have fewer patients. So our thought is, and we need to get clearance from the FDA and EMA about that, that we will do a little bit of a larger clinical trial and look in an interim -- and to see in between, let's say, after again, after 50% of the patients, 40% of the patient to see that what we see in diabetic foot ulcer is very similar to what we see in venous leg ulcers, and then we know that we are on the right track. Having said that, we need to have an agreement with the regulatory agencies about that. As you know, in the past 30 years, no drug was approved for wound care. So it's not something that we know for sure that it will be accepted the FDA.

Very good. And then with the results that you receive -- achieved which is, obviously, good that it's similar to what we have seen before. But how can you utilize this data that either in the U.S. or elsewhere, are there ways that you can use that data for additional regulatory pathways? Or I'm just trying to increase ways to commercialize the product.

I'm not sure I understood your question. So again...

Basically, how are you utilizing the EIC data, that's what I'm trying to...

The EIC data, it's the data we're going to do a Phase III trial, 40 centers, 240 patients, will be a global trial. Half of the patients will probably be recruited in the United States. So it's a Phase III, like the Phase III in the venous leg ulcer. The only difference is timing. We will start it one year later.

[Operator Instructions] And the next question comes from Michael Okunewitch with Maxim Group. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions today. I guess to start off, could you just talk a little bit about how much you're expecting the EIC funding to cover on a potential DFU study? And then with that $25 million from Molnlycke and the other investors, would that study be fully funded essentially given that you're expecting it to be similar to the VLU study?

Thank you for the question. Our assumption is that the study is at zero cost for MediWound. It's a study that is based on all the infrastructure that we have here in MediWound. Maybe we need to recruit another one or two people or three people in order to support that. So our assumption is it will be fully covered. The capital raise we did led by Molnlycke wasn't to cover that. The capital rate from Molnlycke was to become closer to such a giant in the field and to make sure that we are able to financially support all the activities that we have here. All the activities mean NexoBrid. It means the VLU study, it means that the DFU study. But we have now more than a cushion to support those strategic activities.

And then -- so would you expect that you would go through a similar collaboration process for a DFU study like you have with Molnlycke obviously, but also MIMEDX and Solventum? And then if so, would that be the same component as you would need for VLUs? And would you try to use the same partner?

This is a great question. I can tell for you for sure, although we are not there yet, we will collaborate with very large players around this study as well. The interest around the global Wound Care players is huge in EscharEx. Eventually, we'll need to take a decision if we want the same players or others, I can just tell you that the interest around participating in this trial is among all the players in the field.

And just one last one for me, kind of in the same vein about interest in NexoBrid. So I mean you're working with three of the largest players in wound care on that Phase III. You had Molnlycke come on for equity and collaboration and there were those unconfirmed acquisition rumors. So I wanted to ask just about how much inbound interest are you receiving on EscharEx for partnering or MA?

So it's an interesting question. I'm not sure I can comment -- of course, the company cannot comment on rumors and speculations. Having said that, I can tell you that it would be very difficult to find a party or a potential large advanced wound care company in the world that is not interested in collaborating or have access to RX. This is the maximum that I can say at this stage.

And at this time, there are no further questioners in the queue. This does conclude our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Ofer Gonin for any closing remarks.

So thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to updating you again on our next quarterly call.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.