Good day, and welcome to MediWound Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, that today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Dan Ferry of LifeSci Advisors. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and welcome, everyone. Earlier this morning, MediWound issued a press release announcing financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2023. You may access that release on the company's website under the Investors tab. With us today are Ofer Gonen, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound; Hani Luxenburg, Chief Financial Officer; and Barry Wolfenson, Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q&A. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that statements made during this call, including the Q&A session, relating to MediWound's expected future performance, future business prospects or future events or plans are forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, actual outcomes and results are subject to risks and uncertainties and could differ materially from those forecast due to the impact of many factors beyond the control of MediWound. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Participants are directed to cautionary notes set forth in today's press release as well as the risk factors set forth in MediWound's annual report filed with the SEC for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. The conference call is the property of MediWound and any recording or rebroadcast is expressly prohibited without the written consent of MediWound. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Ofer Gonen, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound. Ofer?

Good morning, everyone, and thank you Dan for the introduction. I'm pleased to welcome you to our third quarter 2023 earnings conference call. Joining me today are Hani Luxenburg, our Chief Financial Officer; and Barry Wolfenson, our Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development. I want to start by expressing a sincere thank you from the entire MediWound family for the overwhelming support through emails, calls, messages that have received from many of you since October 7th, terror Attack. This war has significantly impacted the lives of many of our employees and their families. We feel privileged that our products can contribute to helping victims and make a difference. Our team is working around the clock to ensure we meet the needs of our community, customers, patients, and partners. This quarter marks a pivotal period for us with significant achievements that set the stage for consistent future revenue growth. Next upgrade was successfully launched in the United States and Japan. In Europe, we expanded both our presence and the target population. Global demand has risen, fueled in part by world conflict and governmental actions. We have responded with the necessary relocation of resources to meet this increase and continue with our plans to aggressively expand our manufacturing capabilities. Looking ahead, preparation for the Phase III study of EscharEx are progressing with an updated protocol shaped by both the FDA and EMA guidance. Anticipated enrollment is set to begin in the second half of 2024. A new collaboration with the industry leader 3M Healthcare further validates EscharEx's anticipated impact on the wound care market. Let's have a more detailed look at NexoBrid. It has been a very busy and productive period. Notably, at the end of the quarter, we announced United States commercial availability through our partner Vericel. Vericel’s launch…

Thanks, Ofer. This quarter we secured an additional research collaboration partner for a Phase III study, 3M Healthcare, which is in addition to the previously announced ones by MIMEDX and Molnlycke. Our primary goals in securing these agreements were to ensure that we minimized as much as possible the variability between study arms and to provide best-in-class products for patients in our study. As a reminder, we focused on three key areas of venous leg ulcer management. One, compression therapy; two, advanced wound dressings that provide optimal moisture management; and three, a cell or tissue-based product to drive active closure, which is key to our endpoint of incidents of wound closure. Compression therapy is part of the gold standard for the management of venous leg ulcers and is an essential component in all the validated clinical practice guidelines for this indication, the superior benefits of 3M Healthcare's, Coban 2, and Coban 2 light were confirmed in a recent real-world evidence retrospective study presented at both the symposium on advances in wound care and the European Wound Management Association conference this year. These are the two largest annual global wound care conferences. Given the prominent position of this product in the market, we are quite pleased the 3M Healthcare will be supplying them for the patients in our study, as well as providing the investigators and their teams with the training required to use them appropriately. What happens under the compression wrap system is equally as important. Venous leg ulcers are known to have high levels of wound fluid drainage, and since systems such as Coban 2 are designed to remain in place for up to one week, managing this moisture so that it is all handled by the dressing is key. For this Molnlycke will provide their category-leading Mepilex foam dressings, as well as their Exufiber, Exufiber-Ag dressings. Mepilex is the top brand in the largest category of advanced wound dressings, which are called foam dressings. Exufiber will be included for added moisture management and Exufiber-Ag for the additional management of localized bioburden. Lastly, a key goal of our Phase III study is to demonstrate that EscharEx significantly improves the facilitation of active closure. Due to the sheer amount of clinical data supporting its use, along with its demonstrated ease of use, the cell or tissue-based product to be used in our Phase III study will come from MIMEDX, who will provide EPIFIX their placental tissue allograft. EPIFIX will be used on study subjects as soon as the wound is completely debrided and has a hundred percent granulation tissue when autographing is not an option. As a whole, these three class-leading collaborations underscore just how significant of a trial this is in the field of wound management and to the anticipation of what EscharEx can mean to the market upon its approval. With that, I'll hand it back to you, Ofer.

Thank you, Barry. In summary, we're making substantial strides towards achieving our strategic goals. NexoBrid the successfully launched in the United States and Japan and is expanding its addressable markets and commercial presence in Europe. The construction and the commissioning of our new manufacturing facility that will support this increased demand are on track. Additionally, EscharEx has attracted collaborations with industry leaders, three MIMEDX and Molnlycke, and we are well positioned for our pivotal Phase III trial. Finally, our solid balance sheet with $46 million in cash is a key strategic asset that empowers us to successfully execute on our main goals. Increase NexoBrid revenues develop EscharEx through FDA approval and rich profitability. To discuss our financials in more detail, I will now hand it over to Hani. Hani?

Thank you, Ofer. Let me begin with our revenues. In this quarter, the company reported revenue of $4.8 million, which is a decrease from the $5.8 million reported in the same quarter of the previous year. This decrease is primarily due to the absence of a non-recurring income from BARDA. Gross profit for the quarter stood at $0.9 million or 19% of total revenues compared to the $2.4 million or 41.9% of total revenue in the third quarter of 2022. The decrease in gross profit is mainly attributed to the absence of non-recurring income from BARDA. Turning to our operating expenses. The company's R&D expenses amounted to $1.5 million, a decreased from $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2022, mainly due to the completion of EscharEx Phase II study. SG&A expenses were reported at $2.6 million compared to the $3.1 million in the same quarter of the previous year. The operating loss for the quarter was $3 million. We chose an improvement from a $3.5 million loss in the third quarter of 2022. The net loss was reported at $2.2 million or $0.24 per share compared to the net loss of $4.2 million or $0.88 per share in the same quarter last year. This improvement is mainly attributed to a favorable adjustment from the revaluation of Florence. The non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was a loss of $2.6 million compared to $2.5 million loss in the third quarter of 2022. Now let's look at the year-to-date financial highlights. The company's revenue for the first nine months of 2023 totaled $13.3 million, a decrease from $14.9 million in the first nine months of 2022. The operating loss for this period was $11.4 million, compared to the operating loss of $10.5 million recorded in the same period last year. The net loss for the first nine months was $5 million or $0.56 per share, which is a significant improvement from a net loss of $12.1 million or $2.67 per share for the first nine months of 2022. The non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA showed a loss of $9 million, compared to a loss of $7.9 million reported in the first nine months of 2022. And now a few words about the balance sheet. As of September 30th, 2023, the company's cash, restricted cash, and investments were at $46 million, an increase from $34.1 million reported on December 31, 2022. In the first quarter of 2023, the company successfully raised a gross amount of $27.5 million. During the third quarter of 2023, the company used $5.4 million to fund its activities. With the current financial standing, the company's cash reserves are expected to support its operation through profitability. With that, I will now turn the call back to Ofer. Ofer?

Thank you, Hani. This quarter is marked by significant progress for MediWound. Our optimism for NexoBrid's global revenue growth is high, driven by its commercial launches in the United States and Japan, growing presence in the European market, and rising global governmental interests. Addressing this surging demand is our foremost priority in the coming months. We are committed to maintaining our manufacturing targets and expanding our production capabilities. We anticipate a substantial increase in NexoBrid's revenue following the completion of this scale-up. In parallel, our EscharEx Phase III global study is progressing towards the initiation, guided by the FDA and EMA and bolstered by partnerships with three top global wound care companies, EscharEx stands at the forefront of the $2 billion chronic wound debridement market. It holds a promise to enhancing the lives of millions. With that, we will now open the call for your questions. Operator?

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. And today's first question comes from RK with H.C. Wainwright. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, Ofer and Hani. Hope you folks are doing well and your families are doing well. So, to start off with NexoBrid, in terms of Japan, you said you're getting good feedback, and I'm just trying to see if you can expand on that comment a little bit more. And also, in terms of how does commercialization work in Japan for a product like this? So, if you can highlight on both of those, that'll be helpful.

Hi. Okay. I hope you're well as well. Thank you for the question. So, as I said, in Japan, a Kaken Pharmaceutical has successfully launched a NexoBrid commercially. The Japanese market is quite substantial. And more than 6,000 patients that annually receiving the treatment of severe burns and the majority of them undergoing Eschar removal as a critical first step. The initial feedback, as someone who licenses the product, we get periodically input from them. So, the initial feedback is very positive. They're working diligently to secure contracts in key hospital systems. In Japan, they are something like 420 relevant hospitals. For instance, in the United States, the number is only 120, or give or take, so there are 400 hospitals they approached already, all of them and they exposed the products and gave training to many dozens of healthcare professionals. In the first -- after deploying them, the first few batches, they increased their order. But as we say, and as we said in the last quarter or two, currently there is much more demand to NexoBrid than we can actually manufacture and supply. So, we will keep our initial commitment according to the contract, but the Japanese launch is going as better than expected.

Very good. Then with the added indication of pediatrics in the Europe and the new collaboration with Polymedics, how is this going to work for you folks? And do you think that Polymedics collaboration will give a little bit of a win especially since you have been in Europe for a while?

So again, it's an interesting question. So, the recommendation for the label extension to include also a pediatric indication is quite substantial in Europe, because around 30% of all the burn patients are considered the children. And we got 100% of what we asked from EMA, the label that we got is exactly what we aim for. The collaboration with TMI, of course, the impact in the near-term will not be substantial, because Europe reflects what we see in other territories. We have much more demand than we can actually supply. But we are looking now to 2025, 2026. We want to have a very strong presence in Germany, Austria, Belgium, Netherlands, and the Luxembourg. In 2026, we're supposed to have full manufacturing capabilities. We want our spread in Europe to be as strong as we can. And PMI is quite an ideal partner. If you go to European Burn Association Congresses, you will see very few strong companies in wound care. Maybe wound by the way is one of them, but the PMI is very strong there and we think it'll justify this collaboration.

And then the last question is on the manufacturing piece. So, as you said, you have larger demand than what you can supply. And you were saying by early 2025 you should have manufacturing from the new plant. Do you think you have enough material to support commercialization till then it so that you are not losing on any contracts between now and early 2025?

So, this is a tough question. We have a commitment to support our clients and our partners, and we also currently, our schedule to complete the GMP compliance state of the art facility is by mid-2024. And we hope to reach full-scale manufacturing capabilities in 2025. By the way, in EMA, it can be quicker. So, we need to set priorities and I think we are very clear with that United States and Japan are our top priorities because these are considered the most important market. After that we have Europe, EU5, and the rest, they need to wait. And we might lose some partners in very small countries, but it is what it is.

And our next question comes from Francois Brisebois with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. So, in terms of the EscharEx trial, can you help us understand maybe the timelines, you talked about an interim assessment what the start of the trial, the enrollment starts second half of next year, but do you have an idea when that interim assessment could happen and what could we expect to see there in terms of outcomes? Is there a look on potential efficacy? Is there an opportunity to end the trial early because of overwhelmingly good efficacy or just any color on timing and interim assessment expectations? Thank you.

And I appreciate the question. Yes. The Phase III protocol, we have been going back and forth with EMA, and ABA in and the FDA to make sure that they are both aligned with the same requirements because we want EscharEx to be approved globally. We managed to approve an interim assessment. This is our plan after 67% of the participant that completed the trial, we managed to reduce the number of patients. Last time we said, we will need to recruit 244 patients. But now, especially due to the fact that we have an interim analysis, we're able to do a shorter trial. So now we are guiding a shorter trial, not for 24 months rather than 18 months. And the interim assessment will be something like after 15 months and the data will -- it would be an efficacy data, not a safety data, but there isn't a scoping rule. It is an interim assessment. If we see that we don't have enough power for succeeding in the endpoints. We might increase the number of patients, but we will not be able to decrease it. So, the plan is for 216 patients, and I hope I answered your question.

Yes. Thank you. And obviously, very unfortunate the reasons for why NexoBrid isn't in such high demand. But can you maybe help us to quantify maybe by a multiple? Or how much is the demand superior to the supply? Is it 2x, 3x? And will the manufacturing capability and building be enough for the supply? Or is it kind of a surge in supply? Just any comment there on manufacturing goals? Would it completely resolve the greater demand than supply? And what would that do to your balance sheet? Thank you.

Thank you for that, Frank. So, as I said, our current sales are limited only by our production facility. We have almost zero inventory. As you can probably see in the financial statements, you see that, they are always marginal. We have at least 3xdemand more than we can produce. The scale-up is planned to do 6x. So currently, it seems okay. But this scale-up, if we work in two shifts, it's actually 11x. So, we don't see a reason why this manufacturing facility will not be enough to manufacture everything that NexoBrid needs in the foreseeable future. And just answering the second part of the question. So, if you look at our -- if the demand today is 3x on the anaerobic [ph] manufacturer, we don't see why a reason why in the year 2025 and 2026 when we have full manufacturing capabilities, why we are not able to sell 4x or 5x because currently, we are just limiting our sales force, in order to be able to keep as many partners happy. We cannot supply everything.

And our next question comes from Michael Okunewitch with Maxim Group. Please go ahead.

Thank you for taking my questions today. I guess, first, I would just like to follow-up on the discussion around the manufacturing scale-up. And in particular, does this -- how this play into your guidance for tasks supporting you through profitability? I would like to get a sense of what timelines are kind of baked into that assumption. Is this kind of the expectation here that the manufacturing scale up given the excess demand could push you into profitability relatively quickly after that's fully up and running?

I think Michael, I think Hani will take that question.

Hi, Michael. I appreciate your question. So, our cash-restricted cash and investment total to $46 million as of the end of the quarter. As we have two major expenses going forward. The first one is the Phase III program, which will probably cost approximately $30 million. And the second is the remaining cost of the facility scale-up, which totals to about $6 million. And we accept about $1 million to be covered by BARDA. So, assuming we meet the scale-up timeline according to plan, which means that the construction by mid -- will be end by mid-2024, and full scale-up manufacturing in 2025. So, the next sub-upgrade is expected to generate meaningful revenue in 2025, and going forward. Accordingly, we anticipate that profitability in 2026, 2027.

Alright, thank you very much. And then, I'd also like to ask a little bit deeper about the research partnerships in particular, now that we have 3M joining in. Do research partners get earlier access to the data or get to follow the trial more closely? I'd like to get a sense if there's some benefit here for partnering or even potential acquisition discussions. And the reason I ask is because EscharEx seems like it could be a really attractive compound for someone, especially like 3M if they're looking to compete with Santel.

Right? So, that's a very important question and Barry, can you please provide more detail on that?

Sure. Thank you. Thanks for the question. As far as the data that they're going to get, they won't have any early look. At the time that we file the BLA, they will get a package of information that focuses on their specific product, and how it fared across the couple of arms in the study. For them, they get a solid amount of data. There's not too many Phase III studies that are done in this space. Certainly not too many studies at all with the rigor with which this study is being done. So, they'll get a good set of data in an actual controlled study. And they'll have the marketing capability to say that in the most important Phase III study to come around in wound care for decades that their product was used as standard of care. So that's kind of what they get out of it. As to the question about M&A licensing, any kind of business development activities? You're right, I would add, just as a little bit of flavor that 3M as you probably know, is splitting off its healthcare division into a listed entity. Sometimes I believe in 2024. They just announced the new name of this entity the past week. So, it's becoming a reality and the intent of that spinoff is to really unlock innovation in that division, which does about $8 billion, I think in sales a year. So, would they be a potential good acquirer or a licensor of EscharEx? Absolutely, obviously, our stated intention at this point is to not only bring EscharEx across the finish line, but to commercialize it as well as we believe that is what will maximize value for our shareholders. But of course, when we get there, we'll always be open to see what the prevailing wins are and what the market bears. Alright.

Thank you very much. And then just one more and I'll hop back into queue. I'd like to see if you could expand a little bit on the exploratory studies for EscharEx. Would you be more geared towards generating additional marketing data in VLU or potentially towards layering in additional indications?

So, when we are speaking about exploratory studies at this stage, we're speaking about guidance that we got from the FDA. FDA is interested in us showing that the PK profile of the drug, this study, relatively a small one, 20 patients. And also, there is since EscharEx is a drug which is going to be used at home. FDA also wants us to do something which is called human factor study. Just making sure that they're enabling to read the patients are able to read the information of use. Again, a very small study, even without patients only healthy volunteers, we might, and we are thinking about it, do additional one or two studies that will serve the market access making sure that we are able to charge as maximum as we can after EscharEx is approved. But when we know exactly what we do, we will share it with you and the public.

[Operator Instructions]. And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to over to Ofer for any closing remarks.

Thank you everyone for joining us today. We look forward to updating you again on our next call.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.