Good day, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Quarter 1 MediWound 2021 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Jeremy Feffer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Earlier today, MediWound issued a press release announcing financial results and provided a business update for the first quarter of 2021. You may access that release on the company's website under the Investors tab. With us today are Sharon Malka, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound; and Boaz Gur-Lavie, Chief Financial Officer. Following management's prepared remarks, we will open the call for Q&A. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that statements made during this call, including the Q&A session, relating to MediWound's expected future performance, future business prospects or future events or plans are forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although the company believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, actual outcomes and results are subject to risks and uncertainties and could differ materially from those forecast due to the impact of many factors beyond the control of MediWound. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise. Participants are directed to cautionary notes set forth in today's press release as well as the risk factors set forth in MediWound's annual report filed with the SEC for factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. The conference call is the property of MediWound, and any recording or broadcast is expressly prohibited without the written consent of MediWound. Now I would like to turn the call over to Sharon Malka, Chief Executive Officer of MediWound. Sharon?

Thank you, Jeremy. Good morning to our U.S. listeners, and good afternoon to our listeners in Israel. Welcome to MediWound First quarter 2021 Conference Call to discuss our financial results and business updates and highlights. This quarter, we continued to generate product revenue growth compared with prior year, driven by the procurement of NexoBrid by BARDA for emergency response preparedness and out of U.S. sales as we continue to execute on our global expansion strategy of expanding the use of NexoBrid in additional international markets. In addition, we have gained progress across each of our ongoing clinical programs, highlighted by the enrollment of the first patient in our Phase II pharmacology study of EscharEx and the launch of our new program in non-melanoma skin cancer, while we continue to advance our U.S. Phase II adaptive design study of EscharEx for the treatment of venous leg ulcer. Let me now provide you with more color on the progress we made and review of the first quarter highlights. Starting with NexoBrid. We continue to enroll new patients to the next expanded access program at leading U.S. burn centers with 82 burn victims who were already treated with NexoBrid to date. The expanded access study runs through approval and there is plenty of opportunity to continue to enroll patients across over 20 sites, which will continue to increase brand surgeons experience with NexoBrid. The pediatric study is fully enrolled, and we expect to report top line results from this study in the third quarter of 2021. On the commercial front, BARDA's procurement for emergency stockpile continue to drive product revenue growth, and we are expecting to recognize the remaining revenue related to BARDA procurement of NexoBrid in 2021. We are satisfied with NexoBrid global expansion into new international markets, supporting our top line,…

Thank you, Sharon, and good morning, everyone, and good afternoon to our listeners in Israel. I'd like to start our financial review, noting that we continue to generate strong product and license revenue growth from both the U.S. and ex U.S. markets, as NexoBrid continues to support our balance sheet and clinical development programs. Now I'd like to provide you with an update on our financial results for the first quarter of 2021. Revenues for the first quarter of 2021 were $5.8 million compared with $4.4 million for the first quarter of 2020, an increase of 32%. Revenues from product and licenses were $2.9 million, an increase of 300% compared to the first quarter of 2020, primarily driven by BARDA's procurement for emergency stockpile and sales increase outside of the U.S. Gross profit was $2.4 million or 41% of net revenues compared with a gross profit of $1.2 million or 28% of net revenues for the first quarter of 2020. Research and development expenses were $2.2 million compared with $1.7 million for the first quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily driven by EscharEx clinical development program. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2.1 million compared with $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2020. This was as a result of directors and officers insurance premiums increase. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses were 36%, reflecting 300 basis points decrease versus the prior quarter of 2020. Operating loss was $1.9 million, reflecting a 13% decrease in operating loss compared to the $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2020. The company posted a net loss of $2.9 million or $0.10 per share compared with a net loss of $2.5 million or $0.09 per share for the first quarter of 2020. Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $1.3 million compared with a loss of $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2020, reflecting a decrease in adjusted EBITDA loss of 28%. Moving now to the balance sheet. As of March 31, 2021, MediWound had $17.9 million in cash and short-term investments compared with $21.6 million as of December 31, 2020, and no debt. MediWound remain on budget, utilizing $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2021 for its operational activities. The company reiterates its expectation for cash use in 2021 to be in the range of $5 million to $7 million. With that, I have concluded the financial overview and will now turn the call back over to Sharon. Sharon?

Thank you, Boaz. As you can see, we have several tremendous opportunities before us. We will continue our commercialization activities with our partner, Vericel, and we continue to work with the FDA for the regulatory review process for NexoBrid. We are actively recruiting patients for the EscharEx Phase II adaptive design study, and we are excited to initiate the new clinical study in non-melanoma skin cancer. With that, it is my pleasure to open the call for your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Kevin from Oppenheimer.

This is Susan calling on behalf of Kevin DeGeeter from Oppenheimer. My first question is a clarification on a comment you said earlier. You mentioned that the FDA will not be able to inspect the manufacturing facilities for Taiwan and Chile. Can you comment on how that will affect the regulatory time line for BLA approval?

Yes. Thank you for the question. As we communicated during the call, the FDA accepted the review of the BLA and provided us with the PDUFA goal date of June 29. However, as we see in the industry from recent FDA action, travel restriction related to COVID-19 pandemic are impacting the FDA ability to complete manufacturing facility inspection on time and review processes have been affected. As communicated, the FDA had informed us that due to this travel restriction, it may be unable to conduct the required inspection of our manufacturing facility in Israel and Taiwan, and that it's unlikely to review the CMC information provided by the PDUFA detail within the current review cycle. The PDUFA goal date remains June 29, and the FDA review is still ongoing as we continue to work closely with the agency. However, at this time, we expect the timing of the potential approval and commercial loans of NexoBrid to be impacted, given the different potential scenarios. And we cannot speak for the FDA. Although there are several scenarios, we cannot predict how long the FDA may take to complete the review of the BLA. We are committed to bring NexoBrid to the U.S. market, while our partner, Vericel, continues to make significant progress with the preparation for launch. And given its robust clinical data package, we believe that NexoBrid remains well positioned to become standard of care. We believe both the inspection and the additional information provided are just potential timing issue.

Got it. Just one more question for me. So you're planning to initiate the BCC study in the next, I guess, couple of months. Can you provide any color on -- just on the study protocol, potential enrollment, traits, anything?

Yes. So we submitted already the protocol as communicated to the FDA for a Phase I/II study. This study is for treatment of basal cell carcinoma, nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma, and we plan to initiate this study in this quarter, the second quarter of 2021. The study objective is to evaluate safety and tolerability using different schedule of administration as well as to provide us with the preliminary evaluation of its efficacy as measured by the percentage of target lesions with complete histological clearance. We will have 2 cohorts of patients, while we assess the first cohort and adjust accordingly to the second cohort regarding the administration regimen. And we believe that 005 has a reasonable path to market with a clear unmet need as this clinical plan that we laid out carries relatively low development costs, given the active substance and the intended indication.

Your next question comes from the line of Swayampakula.

This is RK from H.C. Wainwright. It's quite unfortunate that FDA is unable to deal with the -- it's a huge backlog. It's not just for you folks. I understand it's an industry-wide situation and even the GO is looking into this. Having said that, what is the -- how are the conversations going? Because I believe the FDA is trying to figure out how to manage this, even accepting inspection reports from other regulatory agencies. Because you certainly have been inspected by BARDA, at least a couple of times, if I remember it correctly, before the NexoBrid contract came through. Any commentary on that? Or anything that you can provide us?

Yes. Thank you for the question. Specifically, we are not going to discuss the specific details from the interaction of the ADN. We respect the FDA review process. However, with less than 2 months left before the PDUFA date, we feel that at this stage, the inspection is like to occur before the PDUFA date, and this is the reason that we communicated. We can't speak for the FDA, although the FDA has some guidance and are assessing alternatives vehicle to conduct inspections. And although there are a number of scenarios, it is very difficult to predict the impact. We can look at -- to other recent examples across the industry, as you mentioned. It's across the industry now, and now the FDA is handling these type of situations. And outcomes can reach from a deferral, deferred action through major amendment with the extension of review cycle and potentially of CRL. And given the different potential scenarios, we cannot predict how long it will take the FDA to make -- or to complete their review. But we do think that both the inspection and the CMC data provided, we believe, are just a potential timing issue. And hopefully, it will be resolved as soon. As you clearly stated, NexoBrid is approved in Europe and in other international markets with over 7,000 patients that were treated with the product, with BARDA procurement continue and we continue to treat patients in the U.S. under the expanded access protocol NEXT. And given its robust clinical data, we believe that next clinical data that NexoBrid will be approved in the U.S. and our commercial partner Vericel continue to plan for launch.

Okay. Just to clarify, and just -- so I'm assuming that up until the PDUFA date that you will not even know whether this is going to be a 3-month CRL or a 6-month delay, correct?

Correct.

Okay. Fair enough. Then just staying within NexoBrid. On the pediatric study that you were talking about, your expectation for the data in third quarter, could you kind of highlight to us what sort of data we are expecting? And is this steady enough for a label expansion? Or would you need to do any additional work?

Yes. Thank you. So the pediatric study has communicated is fully enrolled. We completed the enrollment stage, and we expect to report the top line data results, which will include the acute stage safety and the 12-month follow-up data in the third quarter of this year 2021. We believe that this data is efficient for a label extension. However, we believe that the submission of the pediatric indication expansion for NexoBrid will be subject, of course, to the review process that is ongoing, and we will get more clarity regarding the BLA review outcome. In general, I can tell you that as an orphan drug. We are waived in the U.S. from pediatric investigational plan. This study was initiated based on our European pediatric investigation plan. But this study is conducted with 2 protocols from the FDA and EMA, and it will be used for both authorities for label extension.

Okay. One last question on NexoBrid, and I'll step back into the line. Regarding the global expansion that you have been conducting over the last 6 to 8 months, what can you highlight out of that? Any insight into how we should think about revenues from other geographies?

Yes. So we look at the other geographies as ex U.S., We have the U.S.geography currently with BARDA and later on, upon approval with the commercial market through Vericel. The ex U.S. geography comprised of the European market and the international market. As we discussed during the call, we are satisfied with the NexoBrid global expansion into new international market, which support our top line, primarily by advanced payment or upfront payment as part of the distribution agreement and later on, by selling the product to distributor. We continue upon our strategy to sign additional distribution agreements in Europe and Asia. And just recently in the last quarter, we already received 2 additional marketing approval for NexoBrid, one in Taiwan and one in Chile, and we are getting ready with the distributor for launch in these territories.

Your next question comes from the line of Nathan Weinstein from Aegis.

I just had one question, and it's a follow-up on the international opportunity. And specifically, I was thinking about BARDA and whether there's stockpiling opportunities from other ex U.S. governments?

Yes. Thank you for the question, Nathan. So you are totally right, we are working with BARDA and BARDA procurement for medicine stockpile continue to drive product revenue growth from MediWound. We, as mentioned, we expect to recognize the remaining revenue from BARDA of approximately $6.5 million in 2021 related to the initial procurement of BARDA, and we are pleased with the increase in sales of products and expect it to continue in 2021. Looking at other territories, we are exploring the options of having such a model in other countries worldwide. I can tell you that the ability of the budget allocated for such procurement is different in U.S. and in other territories. However, we are in contact with several governmental authorities worldwide to have such kind of mechanism, but with less significant amount of procurement compared to BARDA's $16 million procurement.

Your next question comes from the line of Joshua Jennings from Cowen.

This is Bryan here for Josh. I also have a couple on the FDA approval process for NexoBrid. Just to start, can you clarify the role of the manufacturing facility in Taiwan? I thought the Israel facility was the primary site responsible for manufacturing. And I guess where I'm going with this is, do you need both facilities inspected before a final decision? Or could you start with just the Israel facility approved?

Bryan, to your question, MediWound is the primary manufacturing facility. We are manufacturing here in our facility in Israel, both the drug substance and the drug product, the API and the drug product as well as the Gel Vehicle. However, because that Taiwanese manufacturing or supplier is manufacturing the bromelain special production, which is the key raw material or intermediate drug substance, it is subject also or required also inspection. And what we've been informed is that the FDA may be unable to conduct that the required inspections of our manufacturing facilities, both in Israel and Taiwan.

Okay. That's helpful. And just on any potential for estimates of time revisions, do you expect to receive any kind of estimate for when these facility inspections could occur? And also, if it turns out that the FDA does not make the June 29 PDUFA date, do you expect there to be an estimated time for a final decision if they do not make that June 29 date?

Yes. So first of all, currently, the review is ongoing and the PDUFA date is June 29. FDA communicated that it anticipated to meet this June 29 PDUFA date. But we can't speak for the FDA and things are evolving in the last few months due to the backlog and other things that they have. And although there are a number of scenarios, it is very difficult to predict now what will be the impact and what will be the result. We will wait for further communication for the FDA, whether it's alternative vehicles to conduct inspection or whether it's scheduling inspections, et cetera. But currently, given the different potential scenarios, we cannot predict now how long it will take them to complete the review, to complete, including, of course, the inspection of the facilities.

Okay. And maybe just one more on the BARDA procurement process. So you're about halfway done with the delivery there. Do you have insight yet into BARDA's plans for potentially additional procurement after this first tranche is completed?

Yes. So as we said, we are on track with the BARDA procurement for emergency stockpile, which continue to drive the revenue growth of MediWound, and we expect to recognize the remaining revenue during 2021, which is about $6.5 million. Our portion out of the overall $10.5 million for 2021. Currently, we have no definitive decision by BARDA regarding the option. The option for additional procurement will be at sole discretion of BARDA. And I assume it will be utilized only when the current procurement will be expired for rotation of expired stock or alternatively, if they will be required to increase the level of safety stock, emergency stock.

Okay. And are you directly in those discussions? Or is Vericel handling those primarily?

We are the primary contract with BARDA. We are the sponsor [indiscernible] of BARDA, of course, and with the FDA. So we are the primary contract with BARDA.

[Operator Instructions] There is no question at this time. Presenters, please continue.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look continuing to executing on our strategy and bringing new therapies to market and to updating you again on our next update call. Thank you very much, and have a great day. Bye-bye.

That concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.