Hello. My name is Chris, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Q1 2023 Seres Therapeutics Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Thank you. Dr. Carlo Tanzi, Investor Relations, you may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Our press release for the company's first quarter 2023 financial results and a business update became available at 7.00 AM Eastern Time this morning and can be found in the Investors and News section of the company's Web site. We will also be reviewing new SER-155 Phase 1b study results and we have posted slides on our corporate Web site that will accompany our remarks. I'd like to remind you that we'll be making forward-looking statements, including the timing of commercial launch, the available of VOWST, the commercial success of VOWST, the timing and results of clinical studies, the timing of additional clinical data, final study results, the ability for microbiome therapeutics to modulate microbiome and treat or prevent infection, our ability to achieve certain sales targets and the receipt of future milestones and debt tranches, and other statements which are not historical fact. Actual results may differ materially. Additionally, these statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which are discussed under the Risk Factors section of our recent SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements made on today's call represent our views as of today only. We may update these statements in the future, but we disclaim any obligation to do so. On today's call with prepared remarks, I'm joined by Eric Shaff, Seres' President and CEO; David Arkowitz, Chief Financial Officer; Dr. Lisa von Moltke, Chief Medical Officer; and Dr. Matthew Henn, Chief Scientific Officer. Additionally, Dr. Terri Young, Chief Commercial Officer; and Dr. Dave Ege, Chief Technology Officer, will also be available to answer your questions. And with that, I'll pass the call to Eric.

Thank you, Carlo, and good morning, everyone. On April 26, we were delighted to announce that the Food and Drug Administration had approved VOWST, formally known as SER-109. VOWST is indicated for the prevention of recurrent C. difficile infections in adults following antibiotic treatment for recurrent CDI. We believe VOWST has the opportunity to transform the management of recurrent C. diff infections and provides a meaningful new therapeutic option for patients. We are very happy with the label we received, which includes all adult patients with recurrent CDI, including those with a first recurrence. The approval of VOWST represents an incredible moment for Seres, and we think it is indicative of the therapeutic potential of this new medical modality. We believe that our microbiome approach could address a range of infectious diseases and other serious indications. This will be highlighted in today's call, as we review our new highly encouraging SER-155 data. We believe that the progress we are making with SER-155 is illustrative of the breadth of potential applications for our microbiome technology. With the approval of VOWST, we are now working to commercialize VOWST alongside our long-term collaborator, Nestlé Health Science. We discussed the recurrent CDI commercial opportunity and the VOWST launch plans recently at our product launch approval call, so we won't reiterate all that information again here. However, I can share a few short real-time updates. The Nestlé customer-facing teams have been trained on the final package insert and core materials to enable them to meet with customers starting last week. The reaction to the clinical profile of VOWST in the field has been extremely positive, and HCPs are eager for product availability, which we expect in June. Our patient services hub went live the day following approval with a first call received in the morning…

Thanks, Eric. I will begin with VOWST, our FDA approved oral therapy indicated for the prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection in adults following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. VOWST is a consortium of Firmicutes bacteria in their spore form. This therapy is thought to facilitate restoration of the gut microbiome and thereby reduce the risk of future recurrences of C. difficile infections. Importantly, the indication received is for the broad population of adult recurrent patients. VOWST had a straightforward oral dosing regimen of four capsules once a day for three days following antibiotic treatment and use of a laxative to remove residual antibiotics from the GI tract. VOWST is stored in the original packaging and has no refrigeration requirements. The full label is available on VOWST Web site at vowst.com. The approval of VOWST is supported by two Phase 3 studies; our placebo-controlled ECOSPOR III study demonstrated that approximately 88% of patients did not experience a recurrence at the primary eight week end point compared to 60% in the group with antibiotics alone. We also evaluated VOWST efficacy over longer periods of time, and we observed durability of response out to 24 weeks. VOWST was well tolerated and patients administered the drug had no serious treatment emergent events, or deaths that were attributed to study drug. At the time of approval, we provided a more detailed review of the Phase 3 clinical data supporting the VOWST approval, and I would point you to that event for additional information. Now C. difficile infections create a substantial healthcare burden and having characterized as an urgent health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recurrent CDI is a serious disease that often results in hospitalizations and can even lead to death. There are 156,000 recurrences in the United States per year,…

Thank you, Lisa. The gastrointestinal microbiome plays an important role in preventing pathogen infection, including that of pathogens that can harbor antimicrobial resistance, or AMR. Gastrointestinal microbiome has the potential to transform how we protect people from these microbial infections and address other disease complications more broadly through various functional mechanisms. In the context of allo-HSCT, antibiotics as well as other treatment inserts can reduce beneficial microbes from downstream negative impacts that notably can include domination in the GI by enteric pathogens, which frequently harbor antibiotic resistance. Domination is a state in which a single type of bacteria is unusually abundant in the GI. As shown in the SER-155 Phase 1b day 100 slides released this morning on Slide 9, pellet it all [ph] in 2020 in research supported in part by Seres reported that gastrointestinal bacterial domination events are common across patients undergoing HSCT with events being observed in a majority of patients across four large transplant centers. This study and additional published research from MSK that are noted on Slide 10, have shown that the GI domination by pathogens can be statistically significantly linked to reduced overall survival post transplant and are significantly associated with increases in life threatening bloodstream infections and risk for acute Graft versus Host Disease. SER-155 was designed to target the problem of bacterial pathogen domination in the GI of HSCT patients by preventing colonization and reducing the abundance in the GI of ESKAPE pathogens of clinical concern, specifically Enterobacteriaceae that may have carbapenem resistance, also known as CRE, and Enterococcaceae that often have vancomycin resistance, commonly known as VRE, and further to reduce the potential downstream consequences of overgrowth by these and other potentially harmful bacteria. The 16 strains in SER-155 were selected using Seres' MbTx platform that can elucidate disease associated biomarkers…

Thanks, Matt. The details of our first quarter financials are included in the press release issued this morning, so I won't reiterate all the figures here. Seres ended the first quarter of 2023 with approximately 107 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. With the FDA approval of VOWST to in April, we are due to receive a $125 million milestone payment from Nestlé. In addition, as we previously announced in late April, we entered into a $250 million secured debt facility with Oaktree. We received 110 million in funding at closing, with three additional tranches available in the future, including 90 million in two tranches of 45 million, each available upon the achievement of certain VOWST sales targets, and an additional 50 million will be available at Oaktree's discretion to facilitate potential future business development activities. Of the 110 million received at closing, approximately 53 million retired outstanding debt. And after deducting fees and expenses, the net proceeds to us were approximately 50 million. As a result, our pro forma cash balance at the end of the first quarter was approximately 282 million, which includes the VOWST approval milestone and net proceeds from our debt financing with Oaktree. Once VOWST is launched, we will be sharing equally with Nestlé in the commercial profits and losses. In addition, per the co-commercialization agreement with Nestlé, we have the opportunity to earn sales target milestones totaling up to 225 million. We are responsible for supplying VOWST inventory to Nestlé, and we have been building commercial supply in anticipation of launch. In the near term, we expect to receive payments from Nestlé related to their purchase of the inventory that we have already produced and in the future, we expect a steady pattern of inventory purchases by Nestlé to meet market demand.…

Thank you, David. This is an exciting period for Seres as we have received approval for VOWST, the first ever orally administered microbiome therapeutic, and we will soon begin to commercialize this product. We are also very excited about the progress we are making with SER-155 with the new data we have shared today. We are hopeful that the mechanistic data that we have seen in Cohort 1 will translate into meaningful clinical results, and we are looking forward to Cohort 2 data next year. We also look forward to providing additional information about the progress we are making advancing other development candidates over the course of this year. I'd like to close by thanking the talented and dedicated Seres team for their hard work. It is this team that is responsible for the approval of VOWST and for the progress that we have made advancing new therapeutic candidates to patients in need. With that, we will conclude our remarks and open the call up to questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Mark Breidenbach with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking our question and congrats on the quarter. First one for me it's kind of on the Cohort 2 that you're enrolling for SER-155. I guess I'm wondering if you're taking any steps to standardize GvHD prophylaxis and graft source type and conditioning regimen across the different clinical sites that are involved in the trial. Obviously, those things can have a substantial impact on things like incidence of GvHD and infection rate. And second, I'm curious if you can comment on the three deaths that occurred after day 100. What were the causes of those deaths? Was it like viral infections or underlying malignancy? Any information you can provide there would be really helpful. And the last question for me is just on VOWST. And now that you have the FDA approval in hand, can you comment on any new plans for approaching European regulators following the FDA approval? Thanks for taking our questions.

Mark, thanks very much. Good morning. Let me ask Lisa to comment on your first two questions, which is the standardization, the variability, the patient deaths. And then I'll talk about Europe.

Yes. So we're not actively specifying what people need to have to be able to come into the trial. But as you could see from just our results that we are in terms of enrolling, we are getting what is a pretty typical population. And we are seeing consistency in most of the patients in terms of the kinds of grafts, the kinds of prophylaxis they're getting, both in terms of GvHD and even anti-infectives. So we feel pretty good about the fact that we'll be able with -- particularly with the placebo arm to be able to pick out signals in spite of the fact that these patients do have complicated regimens, no question. And then the other question was on the deaths, correct? Yes. So these patients had things related to their disease progression. In one case, it was hospice care for just end stage. Another case it was disease relapse within an infection result. And then a third case, it was actually an aspiration pneumonia in the setting of a disease progression.

And then, Mark, to take the latter, which is just on the European plans for VOWST. And I would say we feel we are as adept as any one of walking and chewing gum at the same time. On the other hand, with Nestlé, our focus really has been on getting to the finish line with the FDA with the approval of VOWST and our resources and energy have been devoted towards that alongside this first cohort of 155. But we're obviously incredibly encouraged by both of those meaningful events for the company. But we will consider next steps with Nestlé as we think about the opportunity in Europe. I think we had mentioned beforehand that our base case was that we expected to run another study. And we will be in conversations with Nestlé as to the timing and approach to that.

Okay. Thanks so much, and congrats again.

Thanks.

The next question is from Joseph Thome with Cowen. Your line is open.

Good morning. Congrats on the data update and thank you for taking our questions. Maybe the first one just in terms of this ESKAPE pathogen domination, what do you think about potential events after this? How important are transient cases versus kind of long-term consistent ESKAPE pathogen domination? I know you mentioned the patients that did have SER-155 treatment, the pathogen domination was transient. Just kind of any additional color on that? And in terms of risk, could these two patients have any predisposing factors that would have led to this transient pathogen domination versus the other patient [indiscernible]? Thanks.

Joe, good morning. Thanks for the question. Let me ask Matt to start and maybe Lisa to comment afterwards.

Yes, Joe, good morning. So with respect to the ESKAPE pathogen domination being transient versus long term and potential additional risk, there are certainly advantages in this patient population to not have durable pathogen domination. Keep in mind, these are highly immunocompromised patients, particularly post HSCT. While they have neutropenia, they are at high risk of infection. So the more domination events that you have and the longer they are, the greater the risk of those bacteria crossing the barrier and becoming a bloodstream infection and a further downstream complication. So the transient is meaningful.

Yes. And then with regard to the clinical course, again, we have small numbers, but it is interesting that these two folks had complexities in their clinical course that could be related. I think we'll know way more when we get bigger numbers.

Perfect. That's helpful. And then maybe one on VOWST. I guess going forward when you start having product availability and sales, how granular do you expect you're going to be in terms of here's VOWST sales, here's how much we're spending on those efforts and here's our profit? Or is it going to be more here's a profit or loss from the quarter? I guess how much can you share on that point going forward?

Yes, Joe. I think Terri has talked in the past about the types of questions that we'll be thinking about from a metrics perspective. Maybe I can ask David to comment on maybe the -- your question's more around the financials.

Yes. Thanks, Joe. Yes, we're looking forward to providing some combination of operational and financial metrics that will help investors and analysts just better understand our progress as it relates to VOWST commercialization. We'll share those at the next earnings call.

Okay. Perfect. Thank you very much.

Thanks for the questions, Joe.

The next question is from Tessa Romero with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Hi. Good morning, guys. Thanks so much for taking our questions. One from us on VOWST. While we're coming off of the approval not very long ago, what has been the early feedback you've heard from the marketplace around the price of the product? And then, second part of my question -- if I could just follow up with a second part is just if you can help us understand a little bit better how you're thinking about physicians accessing the product via a medical exception process before payer review finishes? Thanks so much.

Thanks for the questions. I'm going to invite Terri to comment. I'll just preempt the answer a little bit to say that as we had announced the price the morning after approval, we certainly had been doing a great deal of work prior to that announcement in really considering and establishing the price that, for us combines the key metrics of value and innovation and access. But maybe I can ask Terri to comment further on the first and second question.

Sure. Thanks for the question, Tessa. Really the reaction have been very much like reactions we received pre-launch, although for many key piece [ph] standpoint on a much larger scale, because we were quite fortunate to have the DDW Congress in Chicago right on the heels of our approval. So we've had quite a high number of KOL and HCP interactions. And I'll tell you, there's high interest and excitement regarding the availability of VOWST. The feedback specifically on the price from our KOLs has been that it's in the range of what was expected, which tells you again that all the work and all the diligence that we did to evaluate the many considerations factoring into that very important decision for patients and shareholders was spot on. From payers, it's very early days, of course. And yet, it isn't, because again of the extensive work that we did pre-launch on the heels of the receipt of the ECOSPOR III data back in the summer of 2020, we began our work to set the price working with our collaborators at Nestlé. So very, very early days, but my expectation is the feedback will be very much in line with the feedback we've received pre-launch and pre-approval. Regarding the medical exception process, what I can tell you is that this is not unique to VOWST. So that's very important to understand. All products upon approval are subject to market blocks across the different health plans and PBMs until the product can be evaluated and a coverage decision can be made. So during that period of time, physicians have to go through a process that's not too dissimilar from a prior authorization process. And that's the very reason that we established such a robust hub capability in our VOWST voyage patient support services. So we're very confident that we'll be able to support patients and physicians as they go through this process prior to coverage decisions being made. Does that help?

Very helpful. And can you give us a little bit of a sense of if you think the medical exception process will be more commonplace in the first 6 to 12 months here, or just kind of trying to get a sense of kind of how much scope you think there will be there?

Absolutely. Well, that process remains in place until the coverage decision is made. As I've mentioned before, we deployed them over a year ago for pre-approval interactions with payers as they're permitted to do. And part of the goal of that deployment was to determine exactly what the payer coverage process is and what the timing is, so that that team could be ready to go in and get in the queue immediately post approval so that we could get those coverage decisions sooner rather than later. But until those coverage decisions are made, the medical exception process remains in place.

Okay. Thanks so much for taking our questions.

You're welcome, Tessa.

Thanks for the questions.

The next question is from John Newman with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open.

Hi, team. Good morning and thanks for taking my questions. So I had a question on SER-155, really, really interesting program here. Just curious if kind of longer term when we're thinking about the key outcomes, potential endpoints for the study later on, should we be thinking more about reduction in serious infections or should we be thinking more about the reduction of GvHD or maybe both of those things, just kind of curious as to how you think about where and how the 155 can have the greatest benefit for transplant patients? Thanks.

So John, thanks for the question and good morning. And I'll have the quick answer, which is yes. But I'll ask Lisa to expand a little bit more.

Yes. I think both acute GvHD and enteric-derived infections are going to be where we're going to be focusing. And as you heard us talk today about the first 100 days and we could probably even narrow that in a little closer in to the actual HSCT procedure window, that's the time period where patients' microbiomes have been really assaulted by not only anti-infectives, but certainly their chemotherapeutic regimens as well. And so we're really going to be looking there for infections that occur in the GI tract, and particularly those that then launch bloodstream infections from the intestine. And then with regard to the GvHD, the acute GvHD at that time, we'll be looking to see if we actually see a reduction in severe cases and the number of cases that are steroid refractory. And just recall that the infection and GvHD are important causes of death within the entire transplant journey. So we won't be -- I think it's important to emphasize that we're not going to be casting such a wide net in terms of endpoints that it's going to be too diffused to understand. Of course, for safety, we will register things. But with regard to mechanism, it's enteric-derived bacteria infections, particularly those caused by organisms that Matt talked about, and reduction in the severity of acute GvHD.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Yes.

Thanks for the question, John.

The next question is from Chris Shibutani with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hi. This is Stephen on for Chris. Thanks for taking our questions. I had a question on SER-155. I believe it was stated that one of the three patients that died had an infection. I was wondering if you could speak to the other patients that received a transplant, if any of those had infections or Graft versus Host Disease, and kind of what you would expect over that valuable course in terms of what percent would be anticipated to have any of those events. And I believe there's a comment during David's section in the prepared remarks about a focus on driving operational efficiencies and optimizing cost structure. Just curious about, if you can elaborate there, in terms of what steps you're planning on taking. Thank you.

Yes, Stephen, good morning. Maybe I can ask Lisa to comment on the first and then I'll take the second with David and Dave.

Yes. So as we stated in our prepared remarks, this is a really small number for trying to tease out clinical events. We, of course, have some internal benchmarking numbers, but it's really going to be critical to have a placebo-controlled arm which we anticipate will be very reflective of the arm that's getting treatment, right, because as somebody else has already mentioned, there are these other variables and we expect that they will be evenly distributed across both arms. And so we'll be able to get a much better sense of what we're seeing once we have that data set all put together. So I think that's -- and again, we've been looking at our data with the KOLs in this area and we remain amazingly excited about the fact that we're seeing this lack of domination, given the fact that the adjacency between domination and clinical sequelae is pretty well established. There's a very deep literature. But each time we review the data, we are always reminded with such small numbers, it's really perilous to start looking at clinical events. And so we're heeding that advice and we're sticking with our top line messaging. I'll also add that we also want to preserve our ability to be able to present and publish this information when we are able to put it as a cohesive data set with Cohort 2.

And then, Stephen, maybe I can take the -- start the second question, which is to turn on the efficiency side. David, in his prepared remarks, talked about some of the structural changes post approval, including what had been the build of inventory, which flowed through the R&D line, which will not going forward. But I would just say that we have scaled up and put the pieces in place to support VOWST. There are aspects of where we are where we think that there are efficiencies that we can drive. And one of them, as one example, is the shelf life based on the stability of the product that maybe I'll ask Dave to comment on. And then David can follow with any other comments.

Yes, sure. So we were really pleased that the FDA gave us good shelf life, multi-year shelf life for our drug intermediates, as well as three-year shelf life for the final product. So this gives us a lot of flexibility about where we can build and maintain inventory along our supply chain and better manage our production in that way.

And I would just add to that, Stephen. We're looking at a variety of opportunities. For example, we outsource certain donor medical testing. Those are activities that we're looking to bring in-house that will generate some meaningful savings. We're also taking a close look at our office facilities and looking to rationalize that. So those are just a couple of examples. But we are very much focused on this.

Okay. Thank you all for the color. That's very helpful.

Thanks for the questions.

[Operator Instructions]. The next question is from Keay Nakae with Chardan. Your line is open.

Yes. A couple of questions about 155 and the engraftment you observed. First question, is the degree of engraftment consistent across the different component species included in the product? And then in the case where you did have domination, is the amount of engraftment lower than in the other patients? I guess what I'm trying to understand is there's some threshold of engraftment that needs to be achieved in order to provide protection. Thanks.

Yes. Thanks for the question. Let me ask Matt to comment.

Sure. Thanks, Keay, for those questions. So the engraftment results, a couple important points around that. So, one, they confirmed our drug formulation and were as expected. So I think that that's a very important observation. We saw the majority of strains engrafted across the various different patients. And so that was an important observation as well. And that was consistent -- engraftment patterns were absolutely consistent with what we would have expected based on our prior trial results. You asked a question -- and let me just say we're consistent with our dosing strategy as well. You asked the question about whether in the case where we saw domination events, whether engraftment was less. Great question. And actually part of what gives us confidence in the pharmacological activity of this drug is that where we saw the domination event was a patient where we saw the weakest engraftment signature.

Okay, great.

Thanks for the questions, Keay.

We have no further questions at this time. I'll turn it back over to management for any closing remarks.

So thanks to everyone for joining us this morning. We look forward to updating you on our progress. Hope that you have a great day and a great week. We'll talk soon. Thanks very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.