Chuck Christmas
Analyst · KBW. Go ahead
Thanks, Ray, and good morning, everyone. As noted on the Slide14, this morning we announced net income of $8.7 million, or $0.54 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2020, compared with net income of $11.7 million, or $0.71 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2019. Net income during the first six months of 2020 totaled $19.4 million, or $1.19 per diluted share, compared to $23.5 million or $1.43 per diluted share during the first six months of 2019. Proceeds from a bank-owned life insurance claim increased net income in the previous second quarter by $1.3 million, or $0.08 per diluted share. Excluding the impact of this transaction, diluted earnings per share decreased $0.09 or about 14% during the current year's second quarter, compared to the respective prior year period. Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance claims and a gain on the sale of a former branch facility, increased net income in the first six months of 2019 by $3.1 million or $0.19 per diluted share. Excluding the impacts of these transactions, diluted earnings per share decreased $0.05 or 4% during the first six months of 2020, compared to the respective prior year period. Turning to Slide 15, interest income on loans declined in 2020 periods compared to the 2019 period, primarily due to FOMC rate cuts aggregating 225 basis points since the beginning of the third quarter of 2019, with 150 basis point of those cuts occurring in March of this year. Interest income on security during the 2020 periods benefited from accelerated discount accretion from called U.S. government agency bonds, totaling $0.9 million during the second quarter and $2.7 million during the first six months of 2020. In total, interest income declined $2.7 million during the second quarter of 2020, compared to the second quarter of 2019, and was down $3.4 million during the first six months of 2020, compared to the first six months of 2019. Interest expense declined in all categories during the 2020 periods compared to the 2019 periods, reflecting the decline in interest rate environment. In total interest expense declined $2.1 million during the second quarter of 2020, compared to the second quarter of 2019, and was down $2.5 million during the first six months of 2020, compared to the first six months of 2019. Net interest income declined $0.5 million during the second quarter of 2020, compared to the second quarter of 2019, and was down $0.9 million during the first six months of 2020, compared to the first six months of 2019. Provision expense increased significantly in the 2020 periods compared to the 2019 periods, primarily reflecting the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on economic environment. Provision expense totaled $7.6 million during the second quarter of 2020, and $8.4 million during the first six months of 2020, compared to $0.9 million and $1.8 million during respective 2019 periods. The large provision expense recorded during the second quarter of 2020, was primarily comprised of an allocation associated with the newly created COVID-19 pandemic environmental factor, and an increased allocation related to the existing economic conditions environmental factor. The COVID-19 factor was added to address the unique challenges and economic uncertainties resulting from the pandemic and its potential impact on the collectability of the loan portfolio. We elected to postpone the adoption of CECL permitted by the CARES Act. However, we are running our CECL model concurrently with our incurred loss model. Based on preliminary results, we do not believe the loan loss reserve balance determined by the CECL model, is materially different than the loan loss reserve balance, as determined by an incurred loss model as of June 30, 2020. Turning to Page 16, fee income increased in the 2020 periods compared to the 2019 periods, primarily reflecting significantly higher mortgage banking income, which more than offset reductions in certain other fee income categories. Excluding a bank-owned life insurance claim during the second quarter of 2019, fee income during the second quarter increased $5.9 million or 118%, when compared to the second quarter of 2019. Excluding bank-owned life insurance claims and the gain on the sale of former branch facility during the first six months of 2019, fee income during the first six months of 2020, increased $7.7 million or 79% when compared to the first six months of 2019. Reflecting increased refinance activity and the successful implementation of several strategic initiatives, mortgage banking income was substantially higher during the 2020 periods, compared to the 2019 periods. Second quarter 2020 mortgage banking income was $6.3 million higher in the second quarter of 2020, and income during the first six months of 2020 was $7.9 million higher than during the first six months of 2019. Credit and debit card income was lower during the 2020 periods when compared to the 2019 periods, reflecting lower transaction volume during the second quarter, especially during the first-half of the quarter. Activity volumes have been increasing over the past six to eight weeks. Service charge income was also lower during the second quarter of 2020, compared to the second quarter of 2019, and is almost the same when comparing the first six months of 2020, with the first six months of 2019. The lower level primarily reflects less transactions from business customers, and high average deposit balances from individual customers that alleviated certain monthly service charges. Continuing on Slide 17, overhead cost increased in the 2020 periods compared to 2019 periods, primarily reflecting higher compensation cost, especially related to residential mortgage lending activities. Salary and benefit costs were up $0.8 million or 6% during the second quarter of 2020 when compared to the second quarter of 2019, and up $1.4 million or about 5% during the first six months of 2020, when compared to the first six months of 2019. Occupancy, furniture and equipment costs were up a combined $0.5 million during the second quarter of 2020, when compared to the second quarter of 2019, and up a combined $0.9 million during the first six months of 2020, when compared to the first six months of 2019, and large part reflecting the fall of 2019 completion of our main office expansion. Continuing on Page 18, our net interest margin was 3.17% during the second quarter of 2020, down 46 basis points from the first quarter of 2020, and down 52 basis points when compared to the second quarter of 2019. The yield on earning assets declined 69 basis points during the second quarter of 2020, when compared to the first quarter of this year, while the cost of funds declined 23 basis points during the same time period. When comparing the second quarter of 2020 with the second quarter of last year, the yield on earning assets declined 100 basis points while the cost of funds declined 38 basis points. The yield on loans was down 51 basis points during the second quarter compared to the first quarter, and down 100 basis points when compared to a year ago. And large part reflecting the Fed’s aggregate 225 basis point reduction, and the targeted federal funds rate mentioned earlier. We are recording the origination fees and direct origination cost of PPP loans, equating to a $14.7 million net increase to interest income on commercial loans using the level yield method. Second quarter 2020 net accretion totaled $2.8 million. Assuming no forgiveness transactions, we expect to record net accretion of $2.9 million, and $2.5 million during the third and fourth quarters of 2020, respectively, and $2.1 million, $1.6 million, $1.2 million and $0.8 million during the first, second, third and fourth quarters of next year, respectively, with the remainder during the first-half of 2022. The yield on securities during the second quarter of 2020 and the first six months of 2020, benefited from accelerated discount accretion called U.S. Government Agency Bonds. Accelerated discount accretion totaled $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2020, positively impacting the quarter’s net interest margin by 10 basis points. The accelerated discount accretion totaled $2.7 million during the first six months of 2020, positively impacting the periods net interest margin by 15 basis points. Negatively impacting our net interest margin during the 2020 period, and especially the second quarter of this year is a significant volume of excess on balance sheet liquidity depicted by low yielding deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and a correspondent bank. The excess funds are primarily a product of federal government stimulus programs, as well as lower business and consumer investing in it and spending. Overnight deposits averaged $247 million during the second quarter of 2020, and just shy of $200 million during the first six months of the year, compared to our typical average balance of $50 million to $75 million. We expect a level of overnight deposits to stay at elevated levels for at least the remainder of 2020. The cost of funds has also been on a declining trend, primarily reflecting the following interest rate environment, but in terms of magnitude and scale, not to the degree we experienced on our yield on loans. For our net interest margin for the remainder of 2020, assuming no forgiveness activity on PPP loans, and a steady level of excess funds as we depicted as of June 30, we expect our net interest margin to be in a range of 2.85% to 2.90%. Under normal excess funds, which again we do not expect, but if we did have normal excess funds, our core margin if you will, would be 3.10% to 3.15%. On the next few slides, we talk about mortgage banking. Mortgage loan originations increased substantially during the 2020 periods, and especially during the second quarter of 2020, and large part reflecting significant refinance activity stemming from the decreased interest rate environment, coupled with the ongoing success of strategic initiatives that were designed to expand market penetration, enhance gain activities and operate more efficiently. Mortgage loan originations totaled $275 million during the second quarter of 2020, compared to $80 million during the second quarter of last year, an increase of almost 250%. Mortgage loans originations totaled $408 million during the first six months of 2020, compared to $125 million during the first six months of last year, an increase of about 225%. Almost 80% of the mortgage volume during the second quarter of this year consisted of refinanced applications, compared to about 48% last year's second quarter. Approximately 82% of the mortgage loan originations during the second quarter of this year has been or will be sold on the secondary market, up from about 62% during the second quarter of 2019. In recent weeks we have seen an increase in the origination of purchased mortgage loans, and as Ray mentioned earlier, the pipeline of purchased mortgage applications is currently at a record level. On the next couple of Pages, Slides 22 and 23, we talk about asset quality. The standard quality metrics of the loan portfolio remained very strong, with continued low levels of non-performing loans and loan charge-offs. Non-performing loans as a percent of average loans equal only 10 basis points at the end of second quarter. The balance of other real estate-owned was less than $200,000 at quarter end. Gross loan charge-offs totaled $300,000 during the second quarter of 2020, while recoveries of prior period loan charge-offs totaled about $150,000. The resulting net loan charge-offs of less than $200,000 equated to just 2 basis point of average total loans annualized. Additions to non-performing assets totaled just over $200,000 during the second quarter of 2020, with a net reduction of about $300,000 recorded in non-performing assets on an overall basis during the quarter. As shown on Slide 24, we remain in a strong and well-capitalized regulatory capital position. The bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 10%, and a total risk based capital ratio was 13.5%, as of June 30 2020. The total risk based capital ratio was over $113 million above with minimum threshold we categorized, as well capitalized. There was no share repurchase activity during the second quarter of 2020, as in late March we elected to temporarily cease share repurchase activity to preserve capital for lending and other purposes, due to the uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. We currently have about $10 million available in our current repurchase plan. Concluding on Slide 25, I want to make couple of comments on our forecast considerations for the remainder of 2020. Due to the high degree of uncertainty that currently exists, we will not be providing earnings performance guidance as we've done on past conference calls. However, we are able to offer key considerations that should be factored into any earnings forecasts of our company. These include on net interest income, PPP loan and PPP LF volume. PPP loan portfolio totaled $549 million at the end of the second quarter, while still originating new PPP loans, maybe one to three a day, aggregating less than about $100,000 each day. We expect that trend to continue until the planned deadline slated right now for early August. We did borrow about $44 million in late April under the PPP LF program, however, due to a large and growing volume of on balance sheet liquidity, the PPP LF advance was fully paid off in early June. Given current and expected ongoing excess on the balance sheet liquidity, it is likely the PPP LF program will not be as excess in future periods. However, we currently have over $450 million in borrowing capacity if need be. In regards to PPP loan forgiveness, net deferred SBA loan origination fees and direct loan origination costs will be accreted into interest income on loans over the life of loans and a level yield method, as I detailed earlier. The vast majority of PPP loans were underwritten for a 24 month period, the degree to which PPP loans are forgiven and the loans are effectively paid off by the SBA net deferred loan be accretion may be impacted. And of course, any volume of -- any increase in volume of non-accrual loans, the degree to which an increase to non-accrual loans is experienced, loan interest income may be negatively impacted. Provision expense may be impacted in future quarters by items, such as net loan growth, the degree to which loans are downgraded in accordance with our loan grading paradigm, the degree to which loans become impaired due to be in placed to non-accrual or TDR status, and the qualitative environmental or reserve allocation factors are formally reviewed at the end of each quarter, and certainly any changes may have an impact on the required reserve calculation. In regards to fee income, mortgage loan originations for the purchase of homes has been steadily increasing over the past couple of months. And the current pipeline of applications for the purchase of homes is at a record high. However, the degree to which changes in COVID-19 measures are made by Michigan's governor are difficult to predict on our mortgage banking operations. Michigan's shelter-at-home decorations also had a substantial impact on credit and debit card interchange fees, as card usage dropped. However, activity has recently increased. The degree to which changes and COVID-19 measures are made by Michigan's governor are difficult to predict on these operations. And finally overhead costs, any increase in problem loan relationships could result in an increase in collection costs. In closing, while there are many uncertainties that may impact Mercantile's financial condition, operating performance in future periods, we note that we entered a stressed environment with strong asset quality and solid capital position. We are pleased with our second quarter operating results and financial condition, as of June 30, 2020, and believe we are well-positioned to navigate through the unprecedented environment, created by the coronavirus pandemic and other events. Those are my prepared remarks, I'll now turn the call back over to Bob.