Good day ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Mattel, Inc., First Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Martin Gilkes, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Sabrina, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me today are Chris Sinclair, Mattel’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Richard Dickson, Mattel’s President and Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Farr, Mattel’s Chief Financial Officer. As you know, this afternoon we reported Mattel’s 2016 first quarter financial results. We’ll begin today’s call with Chris, Richard, and Kevin providing commentary on our results, and then we’ll take your questions. To help guide our discussion today, we have provided you with a slide presentation. Both, our earnings release and slide presentations include non-GAAP financial measures. The information required by Regulation G regarding non-GAAP financial measures is included in these materials, and both documents are available on the Investors section of our corporate website, corporate.mattel.com. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that certain statements made during the call may include forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of our overall business, brands and product lines. These statements are based on currently available information and they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We describe some of these uncertainties in the Risk Factors section of our 2015 annual report on Form 10-K, our 2015 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings we make with the SEC from time-to-time, as well as in our other public statements. Mattel does not update forward-looking statements and expressly disclaims any obligation to do so. Now, I’d like to turn the call over to Chris.

Thanks, Martin, and welcome everyone. I would like to thank you for joining us. Today I am going to lead things off with a brief perspective on both the quarter and the full year, and then Richard and Kevin will each provide some additional details. And as usual, we will open things up at the end for any questions you might have. So, let me begin by saying that overall we’re very encouraged by the start of the year and particularly with our ability to hold the top line as we offset the loss of Disney Princess. We also made some good progress against our cost reduction goals, both in cost of goods and in SG&A. The offsetting negative of course continues to be significant headwinds in foreign exchange, both in translation and transaction, which depressed our gross margins in quarter. We also recorded a $26 million charge on other income to recognize adjustments from Venezuela’s currency devaluation, which I think most of you know, has really impacted most corporations with operations in that country. Putting aside foreign exchange the net message is that we continue to make good progress on our strategic priorities and we also remain on track to execute well and to deliver on our outlook for this year. We’re certainly setting up well to restore real growth in 2017 and beyond. Our shipments and POS were closely aligned in this quarter with POS positive and shipments off slightly in constant currency. We’re also encouraged by solid POS trends on key core brands like Barbie, Fisher-Price and Hot Wheels and by a number of our key brands within the Toy Box. Importantly, our retail space also stabilized versus last year, and shelf productivity has remained strong, which we expect will support some expansion opportunities on shelf space…

Thank you, Chris. As Chris said, we’re making progress on many fronts with lots of positive indicators of our success, not the least of which is the attention that tells transformation is receiving worldwide. Consumers and the media are once again focused on our brands and our products rather than our challenges. And while much of the attention we’ve been receiving has revolved around key strategic priorities, we attribute our success largely to quarter after quarter of solid execution. And our first quarter execution demonstrates that we’re off to a good start with consumer takeaway and shipping, giving us even more confidence that we can achieve our 2016 goal to hold the top line relatively flat in constant currency. Let’s review some specifics. We were pleased to see continued positive global POS up 2%, normalizing for the Eastern holiday with considerable POS strength in international markets. One of the most encouraging steps this quarter is that we almost completely offset the loss of the Disney Princess license which represented about $100 million or 10% of last year’s sales. This was accomplished through great execution across the entire organization. And when the impact of Disney Princess is excluded, Mattel’s positive POS performance improved significantly to the mid-single digits with shipping up high-single digits. It wasn’t that long ago that we began to transform the Company’s culture and reset our approach to brand management with the creation of our core brand teams and the Toy Box organization. While recognizing we have more work to do, the first quarter results continue to demonstrate our conviction to fundamentally change our approach to the business. These trends also continue to validate our strategic initiatives, ongoing revitalization of our core brands, the rebuilding of relationships with strategic license partners, accelerated growth in emerging markets and a…

Thank you, Richard and good afternoon everyone. As Chris said, foreign exchange continues to negatively impact our financial results in the first quarter. Overall, our results were in line with our expectations. Specifically, we’re encouraged by our top line performance as growth in our revenues of our core brands and Toy Box almost fully offset the loss of the Disney Princess license. We also made significant progress on executing our cost savings programs which resulted in roughly flat year-over-year operating margin on a reported basis. Before going into detail, I want to remind everyone that unless otherwise noted, I’ll be referring to sales in constant currency and adjusted financial results, so they exclude certain items related to our acquisitions of MEGA, Fuhu and Sproutling as well as severance expense. So, highlighting the top line trends, gross sales were down just 1% in constant currency or 6% as reported. This included growth in North America and Europe despite the loss of the Disney Princess license business. We continued to see double-digit growth in China but our Asia Pacific region declined modestly, primarily due to Australia. Latin America also declined as Mexico continues to deliver solid growth, but our business in Brazil has been impacted by macroeconomic weakness, pricing challenges, and inventory overhang. And of course, the underlying trends look much more favorable when we exclude Disney Princess with overall gross sales up high single digits for the quarter. This included broad-based growth across all regions except Latin America where sales were flat; overall, very solid top line performance on an underlying basis. These early reads are very encouraging as continued strong growth in our core brands and Toy Box revenues are the key for us to achieve our goal of relatively flat sales for the full year. Moving to the rest…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Jaime Katz of Morningstar. Your line is now open.

I am curious if you guys would be willing to talk about the contribution from the DC Comic relationship, obviously entertainment has been pretty lucrative for Hasbro. And I’m curious how the read through has been for you guys so far?

As I mentioned, we’re really pleased with the early reads right now of the DC Super Hero Girls collection exclusive at Target Company but we’ll have a broader rollout in June. And we anticipate continued momentum through the year and potentially a much longer franchise as they continue to introduce new characters into the mix. In addition, as we also mentioned, we’re coming off of the blockbuster hit at this point with Batman versus Superman, the toy business is reacting really terrific. We continue to see momentum behind that segment. And as you know, we have a really robust line up over the next several years with Warner Bros and DC. So, we are looking forward to continuing to grow that franchise overall and currently really pleased with the initial leadings.

And then can you -- I don’t know if you guys have gone this yet, but can you talk about how you’re thinking about integrating some of the digital ideas from either Fuhu or Sproutling into the product lines? And what sort of progress actually we might see coming out of those acquisitions?

I’ll take that. I think we’ve got a very active team working on integrating it at this point; a lot of work being done to integrate, both Fuhu and Sproutling with some of the Fisher-Price lines. I think we’ll probably be rolling some things out in the fourth quarter of this year, principally in China as a lead market, but all designed to go after early childhood development, sort of a nursery of the future, if you will, getting a lot of excitement and interest on that front. Additionally, we’re doing a lot of things with the Fuhu learning platforms that we’ll start to roll out little bit more this fall, on their tablet business. But we think actually have some great applications with some partners we’re working on, again starting in Asia. But the early read on both is very exciting and I think are integral actually to the whole childhood development platform we’re going after on Fisher-Price, principally. There is another benefit that I would highlight is that we’re going to have these toys with connected homes and the nurseries, which obviously will give us a great pipeline of data that we can help to manage and mine for consumer marketing, so another key benefit to these acquisitions.

And then lastly, Kevin, I think there is a note coming due later this year, and in light of the fact that debt to cap is around 45%, I think, are you guys thinking about refinancing, letting that mature, how do you see capital allocation?

I think we’ve got a strong balance sheet and adequate liquidity. So, as we look at the full year, our plan is to refinance that in the back half of the year.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Eric Handler of MKM Partners. Your line is now open.

Kevin, I know you gave a little bit of color regarding gross margin. And I wonder if you could just talk a little bit again about the back half of the year. I mean it seems like you’re implying a 52%-53% gross margin in the third and fourth quarters, it’s been a long time since we’ve seen gross margins that high. Is it just the fact that you’re going to see more girls doll business, or are there other factors involved in that?

Okay, I’d be happy to answer that. So, we are still targeting gross margin 50% for the year, as I said, similar to the amount that we achieved last year. And that means moderate year-over-year improvement in our second half gross margin rate versus last year; we achieved gross margins about 50%. And based upon the current spot rates and hedge rates, we believe it’s achievable and well within our three to five-year historical averages. But how we achieve in 2016 will be a little bit different than how we achieved it in our historical averages, which will rely more on pricing and better mix. As we look at the second half of the year, we’re going to really achieve it through the acceleration of cost of goods sold through supply chain structural changes, which don’t impact our price value propositions. So, it’s going to be more about accelerating cost savings on structural supply chain in the second half of the year.

Okay, that’s helpful.

There will be some positive mix shifts versus the first half of the year, which start to come into effect. And I think he also pointed out; we do expect ForEx to moderate as we move into the back half. So, when you ladder those things, I think we’re comfortable getting some more close to that 50% target.

That’s very helpful. And just as a follow-up, you pointed to contributions from Toy Box as being a key driver this year. And can you just go through again what have been some of those successes from Toy Box that have got you excited?

Toy Box is myriad of brands, as you know, certainly our license partnership brands are in there as well as the variety of other brands and properties within Mattel. Specifically, we’ve had some great POS and traction on our games business. UNO continues to grow and is a legacy brand in our portfolio and the team there is doing an incredible job of keeping that brand relevant and driving unit. MEGA continues to be outstanding for us overall, had a great quarter internationally specifically as well as the U.S. And we continue to get traction both in the preschool segment as well as leveraging our own properties, American Girl, Monster High and of course as we anticipate the launch of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle movie, we think that we’re going to have a great hit there. Brands like Minecraft also continue to be really terrific and the team’s doing an excellent job maintaining the relevance of that brand. And brands like Dinotrux with our partnership with Dreamwork, Blaze also with Nickelodeon is doing terrific. There’s a lot of great brands within Toy Box that are continuing to be nurtured and developed and are frankly shipping away at our gas but ultimately driving some great growth in their own right. As we continue to develop the strategic partnership profile, not only will we do a continued job driving our existing but we continue to see new relationships as well as renew existing relationships. So, going forward, Cars of course 3 which we’ve talked about lining up even 2018 with Toy Story and others will be revealed shortly.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Arpine Kocharian of UBS. Your line is now open.

Could you talk a little bit about POS for the quarter? The global POS improvement you talked about, is that adjusted for Disney, is it possible to give us at least U.S. Disney adjusted and Easter adjusted in terms of POS?

This is Richard. What we can tell you is ex Disney, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, has performed very well, up single digit increases worldwide; it’s commensurate with our shipping numbers as well. Across our core brand portfolio, we see more positives than not. In fact, in cases like Hot Wheels across the board, we’ve seen both shipping and POS really strong results. I mentioned Fisher-Price had a really strong quarter, both in shipping and POS; brands like Barbie of course turning the corner and gaining more and more momentum. U.S. was a strong performer; Europe is now reflecting positive POS as well as Asia and we continue to work on Latin America. And ex the Disney Princess business, we’re performing quite nicely.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Tim Conder of Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is now open.

Thank you. And Richard, obviously on that a little bit here, any breakdown there on Fisher-Price between U.S. and international, and then maybe the infant portion, you seem to call out but that was remaining very strong and that the infant versus the non-infant portion of Fisher-Price at POS?

Sure. I think as I mentioned across the board, particularly in international, we were really pleased with the Fisher-Price brand overall. Baby which as we mentioned is our biggest and frankly the most strategic piece of the business had a positive POS across all regions. So, we’re really pleased with the response that we’ve -- our child development messaging certainly has been having and also products and pricing has played a great impact in the continuation of the trend with Fisher-Price. Generally speaking, as we sort of look ahead, we continue to leverage the momentum that we currently have, especially in international markets. The strength across the Baby business will continue, there’s some amplified marketing as we continue with our best possible start campaign that’s gotten great traction, the continued brand evolution tied to child development is really rich with content and connectivity, as we’ve said particularly in emerging markets like China. And even as we reenter the preschool learning category more aggressively with our think and learn line the Code-a-Pillar which I mentioned is a key item for us is getting a lot of attention and traction. And we anticipate that that will be just one of many early childhood development items that Fisher-Price becomes well known for. Not to belabor the point of Jonathan Adler’s appointments, but I think the aesthetic piece of what he’ll bring to the overall brand will be important as we move and develop the line with a bit more fashion sensibility. And of course as we mentioned, new content, new partnerships with 9 Story, DHX, all fuel that particular segment of the brand. So, we’re confident in our strategic path going forward and certainly early reads are suggesting we’re heading in the right direction.

So it would be fair to say that Fisher-Price is going to be more of an early childhood development versus -- and maybe the preschool part will be somewhat deemphasized on a relative historical basis?

I wouldn’t characterize it quite like that. I would say that we’re going to put a lot more emphasis on the early child development and the nursery of the future, but clearly the rest of the line will continue to get plenty of focus.

Okay. And one maybe housekeeping item here, the currency impact from Venezuela, was that in or not in the gross margin? I know you called it out on the EPS side and on the adjusted basis, but on a gross margin basis; was that included in your gross margin number.

No, that was in other non-operating losses.

Okay. And then, from an inventory perspective, you called out Monster High, your plan to hopefully exit the year with that stabilized that will still little bit challenge than in the Latin America as a whole. Any pockets of inventory brand wise, geographic wise; you exited the third quarter of last year, you felt good on a global basis and that really showed up in Q4. So, how is that now here in the off season so to speak?

I think we made progress in the only place that we had overhang in the fourth quarter which is Brazil. We made good progress in the first quarter; we’re still bit less but we’ll be through that by the time we get to the important second half of the year.

We’re actually I think in very good shape, Tim, on inventory at this point.

And American Girl, gentlemen, is that do you feel good where that is? I know you’ve got a lot of new stuff coming in the back half of the year.

Yes. I think as we mentioned, we isolated the brand with a diagnosis that we’ve now started to execute against. First half, we anticipated would be challenging as we redo some pricing strategy, evaluate distribution and reengage with some new content, all of which will be executed and revealed in the back half. We’re excited about the programs that we have. I think our partnership that we’ve announced with Amazon is going to bring new content connectivity to the consumer and reach a broader base consumer. And I think some of the work that the team is doing there will show up on the scoreboard, of course in the second half. So, we’re confident with our plans there.

Yes. And just adding to the retail inventory answer, I think what Chris indicated is we’re much better shaped. And I think on a year-over-year basis that’s particularly true in Europe.

And lastly, Kevin, just a clarification on the hedging; you guys have called out the very favorable hedging that you had in ‘15. How is the cadence of that; should we think about -- so the FX a bit more favorable in the back half of the year just from where the rates are? But where did you have the best hedges on I guess would create the most difficult comparisons in ‘15?

Yes, I think that was really in the first-half of the year. As I said in the first-half of the year, the year-over-year gross margin rate was favorably impacted by 100 basis points, where in the second half of the year, it was unfavorable by 200 basis points.

200, okay, you did mention it. My apologies there.

Tim, most of that was in the euro by the way.

Right.

That was step down this year.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jim Chartier of Monness Crespi Hardt. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to circle back on the gross margin, Kevin. Looking at the full year outlook, 125 million to 135 million of cost savings and $46 million realized in first quarter. It looks like the rest of the year, the cost saving would have a smaller impact as a percentage of sales on margins. So, is there more than just the funding our future cost savings embedded in the improvement in second half gross margins? You talked about some structural changes there.

Yes. I think as we said, our funding our future is part of what we’re doing, we’re on track to deliver at the high end of the range but we have incremental programs around structural cost savings related to cost of goods sold as well as SG&A that will be in excess of what the funding our future is. So, as we look at the cadence of the year, the inventory that we’re selling in the first quarter we produced last year. As I said in the call earlier that as we ramp up our seasonal production in second quarter and get peak production in the third quarter, we should see more flow through from the structural savings in the second half of the year and that will help us, as I said to improve our year-over-year gross margins in second half of the year, along with better mix and less impact to foreign exchange in the second half of the year.

And then just wanted to clarify, Fuhu and Sproutling acquisitions, will they be mutual to EPS this year and then accretive next year; is that the plan?

Yes. So, overall, we should be adding top line revenues for the year and we are adding SG&A. But from a perspective of looking at those operations, we expect them to be breakeven for this year and then hopefully accretive next year.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Gerrick Johnson of BMO. Your line is now open.

Could we talk about Barbie for a second? The disconnect between U.S. up 11% and international down 7% and local. We haven’t had a positive quarter in Barbie internationally since 2013. So, what’s there; toys are doing well here or not out there?

I think we’ve always watched them and certainly we have enough history with this brand. North America tends to lead the brand’s narrative, both in messaging and in products and activity as well as retail execution. It tends to be part of the history of the brand. And as we see North America really start to get traction and connectivity, both at retail execution and with consumers, those programs take shape as the tail, if you will, in the international market a bit later. When you digest or at least dissect the international market, there is developing markets, there is developed markets, there is a variety of different things that go into the play of the brand. But overall, what we’re seeing now is Europe getting traction on POS with Barbie; Asia also getting traction on POS Barbie. Latin America is still catching up. We have some work to do in Latin America. But overall, we’re seeing great connectivity. Frankly, the successful campaign that we ran here, the You Can Be Anything campaign that was wildly acclaimed, didn’t get executed throughout international. So that’s still new in some cases and rolling out as we see. Some of the new product that we launched here in the U.S. is also being executed later in certain markets. Our DVD calendar in terms of distribution and marketing is also slightly different in international markets. So, I think overall, I would take a look at the Domino of the business in North America as the least indicator of where the brand should be going could be going. And so far the indications here are very good and the tail and the context of international is catching up.

So, in what markets where the new Fashionista Barbie dolls launched, was it U.S. and what the markets are those dolls currently in?

They’re currently rolling out now. In fact, they’re just hitting shelves in Europe more significantly than other markets. As you look at the Barbie brand, as you know, we have segmentation strategy. So, there is variety of different segments to the brand. There is an ITB segment, there is fairy segment, there is entertainment, there is Fashionista, there is key items. And as we execute against the brand around the world, different countries dial up or down different segments. So, difficult to have a peanut butter approach to the answer but what I would tell you is that the Fashionista collection is rolling out more aggressively in Europe; it will hit Asia shortly, in certain markets in Asia and Latin America probably in the second half of the year.

Okay. And one more on dolls, the DC Super Hero Girls, are those in any market internationally, are they only in target here in the U.S.?

Only in target here in the U.S. and those also will be rolling out the back half.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Taposh Bari of Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

I wanted to ask a question on sales in the quarter versus your expectations. It sounds like you’re pretty pleased with the underlying sales momentum despite the fact that you’ve lost in the Disney piece and the fact that that impacted proportionally large in the quarter. So, can you give us a sense for how POS and/or shipments realized versus your expectations and if Easter has any effect on the reported numbers?

Look, we actually normalize Easter. So, it’s important to understand, we took out any of that effect. And so, the numbers you’re seeing I think are fairly pure as you would look at it. I would say overall, we’re actually very enthused by the outcome of the first quarter. I think we actually probably exceeded a little bit what we had hoped to do. And I think it was very broad-based which was encouraging and not just the core brands but the Toy Box kicked in, in a lot of meaningful ways. So, I think as we try to indicate, we felt we’re well positioned for what we’ve been guiding for the full year. And I think this is just a good early start. But again broad based and both shopping and POS.

And just a follow-up on both the entertainment and the construction segment lines, you have some big increase there, presumably due to some of these licensed properties that you’re taking on this year. Trying to get a better sense for if there was anything unique to the first quarter given that you’re probably still in the channel for some of these product lines. In another words, should we expect to see continued robust growth rates in those segments throughout the year especially as you roll out the DC Super Hero lines and also enter the Ninja Turtles of the optical window?

Well, I think specifically from MEGA, we, as I mentioned, introduced some of our brands into the construction category. American Girl has been a resounding success out of the gate; Monster High also connecting very well in construction; and of course Teenage Ninja Turtles is launching and the movie has started and we’re relatively pleased with that progress. And as you know, the preschool segment of MEGA is robust and doing well. So, we anticipate that that will get better and better, as we execute against those properties and introduce others as time moves on. So, I think overall in general, we’re really pleased with where we’re moving and I think it’s just going to continue momentum.

The other thing I would add on MEGA is a lot of that growth also came internationally. So, it’s not structurally tied to either entertainment property or one of our own brands per structure, it’s we’re expanding, we’re getting distribution, we’re getting better execution against it.

And one last one; last year in 2015 is the year where you’re really increasing spending in terms of supporting the trade. As you think about 2016, it looks like advertising was down. Your sales adjustments were flat year-over-year even though you’re guiding for it to be up. Help us better understand how you’re thinking about supporting the trade in 2016? Thanks.

I’ll just talk about it from a financial perspective and then Richard can talk about it from more on execution. But I think as we did our 2016 outlook, we really said we reinstated our sales adjustment from a planning perspective to be at the higher rate that we experienced in 2014. So, we would make sure that we would drive POS this year. Whether we spend that or not will depend upon how our POS performs in the second half of the year, but that’s the way we put the financial plan together.

And speaking specifically on behalf of the retail execution, we continue to have those reserves and be ready to drive various different forms of execution to ensure retail success, whether or not those application is used or not. And then on the overall advertising side, we continue to get much more intelligent in the context of what works and what doesn’t in our media spend and that will continue to evolve. So, much of our advertising moves around and gets redeployed based on what we believe is going to have better connectivity. And as you know that’s a moving target as our consumer constantly changes and new forms of connectivity are introduced constantly. So we are very much on top of that as well.

And I think going back to our plan, we also planned advertising to be less, getting closer to the midpoint of our 11% to 13% range, but also if we need to drive POS, then we will invest what’s necessary in advertising to do that.

Thanks, and all the best.

Okay, Taposh.

Were you going to say something, Chris?

No, I was just going to say the one thing to keep in mind on advertising, most of the scale back is in what we would call non-working. So, the actual impact of advertising growing against the consumer is not being reduced, it’s more effectively deployed but it’s the non-working production stuff that we’ve been shaving.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Linda Bolton-Weiser of B. Riley. Your line is now open.

Just to circle back once more on Barbie, again on that international decline in the Barbie shipments in constant currency. When Richard was talking about it, he said that Barbie was I think he used words gaining traction or something in Europe and Asia. So, does that mean improving but still down POS and that down POS correlates to the down shipments or do we still have like some kind of inventory problem in the channel? So in other words, POS is actually growing but you still have inventory too high in certain markets. Can you just explain a little bit more?

Sure, Linda. Let me be more specific. The POS momentum in Barbie is real in the international marketplace, specifically in Europe and in Asia. Now, it varies by country. But overall, we’re seeing great positive traction on POS, some in the lower single digits and some in the higher but generally speaking, gaining more and more momentum. We continue to look at Latin America to some extent catching up, there is some programs that we’re launching there and some various different challenges that we’ve had in that marketplace, but it is moving along, it’s a smaller percentage of the total. But in general, we’re seeing more green shoots with Barbie across the world.

And final point, there is no inventory issue, if that was your other question, Linda.

Okay. So then, I mean we should start to see that shipment pattern improve for the international piece of Barbie it sounds like?

We would expect so.

Yes.

And then can you just clarify how much of the Batman versus Superman products shipped in the first quarter, or is it a significant bigger shipment in the second quarter?

No, I don’t think it’s significantly bigger. I think there will be -- no, because we filled the shelves up in the first and then we’re continuing to restock in the second and introduce some new items. So, it isn’t going to be significantly bigger, no.

And then finally, Kevin, on the cash flow performance in the quarter, you mentioned that working capital, use some more cash than last year. What are your thoughts on that for the full year? Are you thinking working capital could be a modest source or use of cash?

Look, I think what we said when we did the outlook is that in a challenging year, we delivered strong cash flow in 2015 and we expect cash flow to be a little bit better in 2016. And we’re still focused on tightly managing working capital. And I think there is an opportunity for us to as we exit the year to tightly manage inventories; they’re little bit higher than our historical rates. And I think through better information technology better planning process and trying to shorten lead times, we think there is an opportunity to exit the year with working capital being positive.

Okay, that’s it for me. Thank you.

Operator, I think we have time for one final question.

Great, thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Greg Badishkanian of Citigroup. Your line is now open.

So, with the expected second half acceleration in sales, what do you think that biggest driver will be or is it just going to be across multiple brands?

Greg, we’ve described our plan without a silver bullet. So, I mean a collection of core brand momentum I think will contribute to the momentum. And we’ve been pleasantly surprised, as I mentioned with a lot of the Toy Box initiatives, some of these smaller brands are really showing up on the scoreboard and incrementing our expectations. But as we said, Hot Wheels, Barbie, Fischer-Price, Thomas specially are continuing to deliver and certainly will have a strong back half, as planned. And then as we drive some of our entertainment relationships that are incremental like Warner Bros that will drive momentum. MEGA continues to gain traction. And I think as you look at our brands in the construction space, it’s all very new business for us and we’re excited with that continuing to build in the construction category, which is as you know is a successful growing category in the industry. And then as a verity of other new things that we’re excited to introduce, Mixie Qs is a new brand for us that is going to be launching to the Toy Box. And innovative items like the [indiscernible] which we introduced at Toy Fair is getting a lot of traction and interest and symbolizes the innovation and invention aspect that we’re driving as part of our new culture. So, we really got all our ducks in a row. And now as I mentioned, it’s really about the execution of it mattering more.

So, you would expect let’s say maybe the third quarter to start seeing positive year-over-year growth, if I were to put words in your mouth or do you think will be the fourth quarter?

I don’t think that Greg we’ve given any guidance; we sort of told you where we think we’ll be for the year which is fairly flat on a constant currency, so that would be a good model for you to work with.

Thanks everyone. There will be a replay of this call available beginning at 8 p.m. Eastern Time today. The number to call for the replay is 404-537-3406 and the pass code is 74326242. Thanks for participating in today’s call.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today conference. This does conclude the program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.