Hello, and welcome to the 908 Devices’ Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results Conference Call. My name is Elliot, and I'll be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand over to Kelly Gura with the Gilmartin Group. Please go ahead.

Thank you. This morning, 908 Devices released financial results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2024. If you've not received this news release or if you'd like to be added to the company's distribution list, please send an email to ir@908devices.com. Joining me today from 908 is Kevin Knopp, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, and Joe Griffith, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, our commentary today will include the presentation of some non-GAAP financial measures. These measures should be considered as a supplement to and not a substitute for GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in today's earnings press release, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website. Additionally, I'd like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated. Additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties appears in the section entitled forward-looking statements in the press release 908 Devices issued today. For a more complete list and description, please see the risk factors section of the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and in its other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, 908 Devices disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any financial projections or forward looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise. This conference call contains time sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast, November 12, 2024. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Kevin.

Thanks, Kelly. Good morning, and thank you for joining our third-quarter 2024 earnings call. We ended the third quarter with revenue of $16.8 million, an increase of 17% over the prior year period. However, our financial results fell short of expectations. As we noted in last quarter's earnings call, we expected second-half 2024 growth to be driven by our handhelds, including a number of 20-plus unit placement opportunities internationally and domestically. While we secured many sizable orders and placed a 178 handheld devices in total during the third quarter, placements were less than expected in part due to a compressed spending period resulting from the delay in passing the federal budget and delays with advancing international contracts. In addition, we continue to see softness in the bioprocessing and life science instrumentation market, elongating the sales cycle of our desktop devices. Our prior 2024 guidance contemplated a quicker and sharper recovery in second-half demand, which hasn't yet materialized. Given the muted 2024 spending environment and the delayed opportunity with the ending of the U.S. Government fiscal year, we are appropriately lowering our 2024 revenue guidance to be in the range of $56 million to $58 million representing 11% to 15% growth. Joe will provide more detail on our guidance in a few moments. The end of October marked six months since the closing of our acquisition of RedWave Technology. We continue to be incredibly excited about the union of our two platforms and the rationale for bringing the platforms and the rationale for bringing these two companies together remains absolutely unchanged. As a combined company, we are now better equipped to serve our customers by offering a full best-in-class portfolio of innovative handheld devices paired with world-class service, training and comprehensive decision support. Reflecting back on our learnings over the last…

Thanks, Kevin. Revenue for the third quarter 2024 was $16.8 million up 17% from $14.3 million in the prior year period, primarily driven by an increase in handheld device revenue. This included approximately $3.2 million of RedWave revenue. Excluding RedWave, revenue declined 5% year-over-year. Handheld revenues serving the forensics market was $14 million for the third quarter 2024, up 19% from $11.7 million for the third quarter 2023. This increase was driven primarily by revenue related to our recently acquired FTIR products and an increase in service revenue. We shipped 178 handheld devices in the third quarter, up from 117 devices in the third quarter of 2023, bringing our installed base to 2,796. As a reminder, in the third quarter 2023, we recognized $2.4 million of revenue from our initial low-rate production delivery under the U.S. Department of Defense AvCat program. Our core handheld growth for the third quarter was 20% when we exclude the AvCat delivery and contributions of RedWave in the third quarter of 2024. Revenue from our desktop products serving the life science, instrumentation, and bioprocessing markets for the third quarter of 2024 was $2.8 million, increasing 8% from $2.5 million in the prior year period. Eight desktop devices were placed in the third quarter. We ended the third quarter 2024 with a cumulative handheld and desktop installed base of 3,253 devices, up 20% from 2,714 at the end of the third quarter 2023. Recurring revenue, which consists of consumables, accessories, and service revenue represented 36% of total revenues this quarter and was $6.1 million, a 70% or $2.5 million increase over the prior year period, largely driven by service. Recurring revenue in the third quarter consisted of $3.9 million related to handhelds and $2.2 million related to desktops. REBEL utilization remained at approximately 0.5 kip per…

Thanks, Joe. I certainly recognize that Q3 orders did not fully meet our expectations requiring a reset on our full year, but our multi-year growth trajectory remains healthy and sustainable. I further recognize that the integration with RedWave is hard work and can be disruptive, but these are near-term impacts and the prize is realizing the clear operational efficiencies and benefits we've outlined and executing on the five identified drivers of growth to transform and scale our business. As we move forward, we will focus on these initiatives, accelerating synergies, further lowering our cost basis, expanding our margin and driving us towards profitability, while being good stewards of cash and importantly setting ourselves up to over perform and win. I'd like to emphasize that we are an innovation-driven company with a robust pipeline of products designed to outperform traditional tools and unlock new critical to life applications. We believe that the strategic update we announced today not only reduces cost, but more importantly positions us for sustainable scalable growth as we aim to be the global leader in point of need chemical analysis across forensics, bioprocessing and life science research. I'm excited, enthusiastic for what lies ahead. With that, we'll now open it up for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Puneet Souda with Leerink Partners. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Hi, everyone. Thanks for the questions here. First one, I understand the challenges of the life sciences end market. We've been seeing that for the last year. But the magnitude of the guide down at this point, even after accounting for AvCat, I mean, it raises a question if there is any structural or competitive issues in the handheld market beyond the agencies that you're selling these products into. So just wanted to understand if the -- is it largely the pushing out of the budgets because of political uncertainty, which is obviously not lost on anyone but just wondering if it is that is the primary driver or if there is any structural competition that you're seeing in the market. And on the desktop side, how should we think about the recovery in first half ‘25? You pointed sequential improvement here. Should we assume that sequential improvement to continue into first half?

Yes. Thanks, Puneet. Thanks for your questions there. Yeah, absolutely. The life science is one part that I'll get to in a moment, but the handheld placements did of course come in light in Q3. And as you pointed out, if we strip out the $2.4 million in AvCat revenues from the prior year period, MX908 actually did see a positive 20% growth in the quarter and we did see continued traction with multiple enterprise accounts and U.S. International and we are also pleased today to talk about our largest account win here in APAC with the Vietnam Border Guard. So, yeah, I agree that it is more of a timing with budget uncertainty that really came into play here and so some of the orders we saw really, call it, fall out of the quarter with that end of the U.S. Government fiscal year. Joe mentioned in his prepared remarks, a little bit around the election, some pausing, just some, call it -- rethink there, always some uncertainty that can develop and absolutely, I don't see any structural, any competitive, any other dynamic playing out here. Absolutely, I don't. These customers all have a very clear need for a certain number of devices, and they're working to get budget to do that in a particular period. In some cases, they were able to win and with them and get an order this quarter, and in some cases, that order was a little bit smaller just due to again lack of timing, visibility, and the ability to actually contract purchases in a very compressed government fiscal year. So no structural change there. From a desktop recovery perspective, yes, it's a little bit like we've continued to see here headwinds in the desktop placements, and largely we haven't seen much change to that, sales cycle taking longer for our novel technology in that preclinical instrumentation space. We did mention that we do expect a quarter over quarter step up in desktop device placements in Q3 and that really is being driven around our partnership initiative that we started formally earlier this year, which gives us confidence in that and it's really kind of a call it a force multiplier as those partners win. So that's coming from, call it, some of the initial placements.

And I think maybe pretty hitting on first half of 2025 in desktop, there is a bit of Q4 step up each year, with the year-end budget. Each year can vary. So over the first half of ‘24, we're about $2.5 million a quarter, so we'll be able to get to that level in the first half makes sense, but probably not at the Q4 step up level, off of the $2.3 million in Q3.

Okay. Then on, the organization being lean, look, if I recall 908 has always been -- traditionally been lean compared to most companies in the space. You had a workforce reduction earlier in the year as well and now additional 11% reduction. So just wondering, the size of the organization, is it right-sized for the current times? And just wondering if the markets were to recover, would you be equipped with enough workforce to capitalize on that? And just wondering if the workforce reductions were within U.S. or more outside of U.S.

Yes, absolutely. Always very sensitive to make sure that, we have the capabilities to take on opportunities as they develop. We really believe we do, and we really believe that, reducing the workforce was across sales and marketing, and it was across R&D and a little bit in COGS, U.S, but definitely some international for sure. In the case of our desktops, really, we just needed to work on rightsizing that a bit. It's been a rough eight quarters in that life science CapEx environment and the timing of that recovery is still a bit more maybe gradual than a sharp snapback. So with that, we really work to resize our team there. But we do think, we have all the capabilities that we need to drive growth. We are continuing to leverage a direct sales force in the U.S. and we do have a hybrid direct distribution approach that we're now going to lean more on distribution across Europe to get a broader footprint than we've had before. And then distribution in APAC, which has an interesting pipeline. It's really been developing nicely for us. And then on top of that, as we mentioned, we're really pushing on those partnerships, really looking at a way to have a force multiplier on top of our direct op efforts. So we believe that we're well-resourced for now and to drive growth in the future. And to be honest, I think by having a sharper focus team, we'll be able to drive efficiencies and just we're now at that point with new products in this environment, you're doing a lot of test and trials, connecting dots, senior-level selling, and I think we're going to be better equipped for that.

We now turn to Matt Larew with William Blair. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Q –Sam Martin: Hi. This is Sam Martin on for Matt Larew, from William Blair. Just two quick questions. One, just focusing in on really how a new administration might really change things on the handheld side in terms of priorities and timing, and just kind of thinking about the different puts and takes there. What sort of impact are you anticipating initially in terms of further reductions, further pullback in spend, and is there any way that this administration could also impact some of the demand and some spending on the desktop side, given their priorities, in terms of funding might be a little bit different? And then on the desktop side, I think you referenced about eight quarters of CapEx weakness in the life sciences space. So just in terms of the rationalization of bioprocessing instruments, so near-term, are you kind of looking across your portfolio and seeing what might be stale, what you might need to cut? And then long-term, is it sort of changing what you invest in and what you're not investing in or how you invest? Thank you.

Yes, absolutely. Starting first with the handheld and the election piece there. Yes, I think when it certainly can cause a little bit of a shift, particularly amongst the, call it, middle ranks that are getting their priorities depending upon the administration and, of course, across those senior ranks. I think if you look across the DEA and military spending since 2000, you'd see that there's been a consistent low mid-single digit growth range really regardless of administrations. So I think there are some experts out there predicting that we may have an increase in the U.S. Defense budget and I think one of the areas that we may see a positive is on the contracting delays. We mentioned part of our Q3 difficulties in getting some of these opportunities closed within that window of time has been that the government has delays in their passing of their budgets each year, and that can last till spring and then the money actually doesn't reach to our customers' accounts until approximately midyear and then our customers know what the priority is, and then they know what there is to work on, and they only really have four to five months to get through the purchasing process, which can be quite complex with these larger enterprise opportunities. And so I think if you look from the election results and you look at maybe the alignment, House, Senate and the presidential side, you may see that there could be a chance to maybe accelerate some of that process, perhaps get budgets actually done on time at the end of the fiscal year in September. So I think maybe there's more positives than negatives where we're at right now on that. And I think there's also a feeling out there that there's a maybe…

Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. And -- yeah. On that one -- sorry. I didn't address that, immediately here. So we're really excited that we have a pretty fresh desktop portfolio, right? We've got four products. Two released just last year. These are all PAT tools. They're fundamentally driven by the needs to control the process and better those outcomes. Yeah, we don't really see a change in that or a rationalization of those products. A lot of hard work is going on, as I said, to get through test and evaluations. We mentioned that some of our Maven pipeline now that we're calling it a couple of years into that product is starting to develop. We are talking more about GMP deployments. We are talking more about things on our multi-unit orders and opportunities within our pipeline. So, really, we're heads down there, trying to smartly get through evaluations and engage folks on how it can be deployed across process development and manufacturing.

Our next question comes from Jacob Johnston with Stephens. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi. This is Hannah Hefley on for Jacob. Thanks for taking the questions. On the CGT end market, you've announced a number of partnerships with hardware innovators in your space. How should we think about these relationships driving desktop growth in coming years? And is there any way to frame up any initial contributions from these relationships?

Yes. Thanks, Hannah. Certainly, that area of strategic collaborations and these partnerships in the cell and gene space, but even more broadly into the biologic hardware innovators too. There can be some near-term revenue impact, but we really believe that it creates a lot of value longer-term, as we get through and scale with these partners. We're working to get our technologies designed in, partnered, or in some cases, more of a co-marketing relationship with these organizations, really working to get these new novel technologies developed in by our collaborators. We announced Solaris and Terumo and that we're actively engaged with those accounts, but we're working with a handful of others that are quite exciting to us as well and really trying to get alliances there for the simple automated PET tools that we provide. So, as you know, cell therapies really need to address cost and access, and we believe, we're really directly contributing to that, and we're providing these real-time monitoring solutions, and we really don't have sampling risk on it. So, ultimately, this strategy really should impact our revenue. And I mentioned in Q4, we do expect it to be helpful to us, and those were really should be thought of as, call it, initial collaborator placements, initial engagements, call it, the first steps with those companies. But this integration strategy could create an inflection point for us, as we go because again it's really an ability for us to scale out in a little more efficient way. And then, yes, so I think it's a great strategic effort for us. It's an effort we started just formally in Q1, and it's already starting to bear fruit, and we've become more and more convinced it's the right thing to layer on to our direct sales.

All right. Thanks. And then, as it relates to desktop demand, have you seen any changes in the competitive landscape for desktops, or do you think that this is still just largely macro-driven? And then, could you update us on how consumable pull-through is trending for desktops?

Yeah. I haven't seen a change in the competitive dynamics. I mean, I think when we think of the macros and look across definitely some encouraging signs with consumable-driven companies and organizations with some of our large tool peer set there and I think that's a positive indicator of things kind of normalizing out, but maybe not a perfect read through up for us, because our recurring elements of our desktops was about 10% of our total revenues in the quarter, and maybe 14% over our first nine months. So consumables are important, but the placements are incredibly needed and to grow. And so, that device placement, life science implementation into preclinical. We've just seen those challenges with prolonged cycles with the availability of CapEx. So I wouldn't say, there's any competitive dynamic, we've seen. We're not seeing anything or new surprises on that. Of course, we've got new technologies, so you have to always go out and prove your worth compared to what's out there with our MAVEN and our MAVERICK, but nothing new or concerning to report there on my radar.

And from a consumable revenue perspective or recurring revenue, it's really been consistent over quarters in on revenue utilization. It's remained at about half a kit per month for active users, and our recurring revenues in total about $6.2 million for the quarter, about $2 million of that was related to our desktop. So we're seeing a path to being in the mid-30s as a percent of total product and service sales. A lot of that is service driven, but also an important piece is the desktop consumables, which I mentioned, it's about $2 million in the quarter.

All right. Thanks. I'll leave it there.

Our final question comes from Chad Wiatrowski with TD Cowen. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. This is Chad on for Brendan Smith. Just on the MX908 sort of next gen instrument, what are the main pain points that you're seeing that would drive that replacement cycle among the existing customers? And then beyond that, would the product enhancements also have the chance of expanding that market?

Yeah. Thanks for the question. The next generation of our MX is certainly an exciting one for us. I mean, if you just think of our handheld devices when we launched our MX908, it's now been about seven years, and we were able to have a CAGR of 27% between that 2018 and 2023, so good growth there and now we have over 2,500 actually, more than 2,700 of our MX908 out there. So we really think it is a great opportunity to disrupt that once again and kind of bring an upgrade cycle. These customers do value outside of, call it, just CapEx refreshment cycles, which you expect to be in that 7 to 10-year period, right? We're getting up on that now. But you can also drive some of these cycles earlier in our opinion by operating a step change of things. It could be size, weight, performance in terms of simplicity, workflow, user operations. We're working to do all those things and at the same time trying to do it with the lower cost of goods and having technology and connectivity capabilities in there to help us further have recurring revenue opportunities over time that we can develop on it. So, to us, it's a major new release that will be coming in the next couple of years and it's absolutely one of our priority R&D projects for us and we think it should get exciting given the growth we've seen over the last seven years and then the number of placements throughout there. But then in addition, I would say we're very fortunate and pleased that we have a fuller portfolio with the RedWave acquisition. We now have four products across that space, including our Explorer that we made in our prepared remarks that's been growing really, really nicely. So I think all of these help broaden, the groups that we can get to, broaden out the number of customers that we can get to as well as addressing those immediate replacement cycles.

Thanks. And then just on some of the updated commercial strategy, like are these try before you buy program and approaches that you've taken from RedWave, are these built in place today and able to be executed, or is this going to take a few quarters to build out these technologies and transition them over to the legacy 908 devices?

Yeah. Look. I mean, we're six months into the acquisition. I think we're still very excited about it. We see all sorts of synergies that we tried to articulate today, definitely revenue synergies in addition to cost synergies. Definitely learnings that we can do to better our ability to get more efficiently at these customers. You touched on two that we think are straight out of the RedWave playbook, if you will, Try Before You Buy, more virtual demos, a little bit into your last question as we kind of broaden with the Explorer, the number of customers that can see a need and capability requirement for it. It helps us get there. So, yeah, one of the three structural adjustments that we're talking about today is really to align all of our sales force efforts, desktops teams, but also within our handhelds team to take advantage of such programs. And you're right, those are preexisting for RedWave products. We're going to look to see how far we can use those, in the -- with MX 908 products, but importantly, making sure that we're embracing and scaling those within the 908 commercial engine for the FTIR products as we go forward. So, yes, it will take some time. Obviously, we're six months in. I think we've made great strides on the integration. We announced some further big steps we're taking today, there, but, yes, a lot of -- lot more to come.

We have no further questions. I'll now hand back to Kevin Knopp for any final remarks.

Yes. Thank you all. Thank you all for joining our call today, and we appreciate it, and have a great day.

Ladies and gentlemen, today's call is now concluded. We'd like to thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.