Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) Q2 2012 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Arne M. Sorenson - Chief Executive Officer, President, Director and Member of Committee for Excellence Carl T. Berquist - Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Executive Vice President Laura E. Paugh - Senior Vice President of Investor Relations

Smedes Rose - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division Steven E. Kent - Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Research Division Robin M. Farley - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division Charles Scholes Ryan Meliker - McNicoll, Lewis & Vlak LLC, Research Division Harry C. Curtis - Nomura Securities Co. Ltd., Research Division William C. Marks - JMP Securities LLC, Research Division Felicia R. Hendrix - Barclays Capital, Research Division Shaun C. Kelley - BofA Merrill Lynch, Research Division David Loeb - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division Joshua Attie - Citigroup Inc, Research Division Joseph Greff - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division William A. Crow - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division Ian C. Weissman - ISI Group Inc., Research Division

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Marriott International Second Quarter 2012 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I'll now turn the floor over to Arne Sorenson, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to our second quarter 2012 earnings conference call. Joining me today are: Carl Berquist, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Laura Paugh, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations; and Betsy Dahm, Senior Director, Investor Relations. As always, before we get into the discussion of our results, let me first remind everyone that many of our comments today are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. These statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties as described in our SEC filings, which could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by our comments. Forward-looking statements in the press release that we issued last night along with our comments today are effective only today, July 12, 2012, and will not be updated as actual events unfold. You can find a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures referred to in our remarks on our website at www.marriott.com/investor. I know that first and most important question you may have is, are you seeing a slowdown in North America, and the answer is no. There's plenty of evidence of continuing strength in our lodging business in North America. In North America year-to-date, the Marriott brand special corporate revenue has been strong, up over 8%. Group revenue rose 7% year-to-date, and group bookings for the second half are even stronger. Our strong book of business in 2012 allowed us to drive REVPAR aggressively in the first quarter. But in the second quarter, strong seasonal demand, combined with a continuing recovery, yielded an uptick in sellout nights. While we were pleased to show 6% REVPAR growth in our company-managed U.S. Marriott hotels during the second quarter, we realized that we turned away some higher-rated business because our hotels were full. For example, in Hawaii, occupancy at Marriott-branded hotels increased from 79% to 81% year-over-year in the second quarter, while occupancy at our competitive set hotels grew from 72% to 78%. As our hotels reached capacity, we had less room to grow occupancy than the market as a whole. Looking ahead, this is good news because as occupancies build, further room rate improvement should follow. For North America overall, we expect this strong book of group and special corporate business to yield excellent results in the seasonally lighter third and fourth quarters, and we continue to expect 6% to 8% REVPAR growth for full year 2012. Outside North America, we are fine-tuning our thoughts on REVPAR growth for the rest of the year. In Asia and the Middle East, REVPAR growth rates for a few luxury hotels are expected to moderate in the second half, largely associated with individual market issues. In Europe, third quarter REVPAR will be helped by the Olympics in London and the Euro Cup Championship. At the same time, the weak European economy will likely create headwinds. So we are expecting total international REVPAR to increase 5% to 7% on a constant dollar basis and about 300 basis points less on a local currency basis. We've also reduced our room opening expectations a bit for 2012. In the first quarter, we noted slippage in opening dates from 2012 to 2013 for some new hotels in Asia and the Middle East. In the second quarter, the slippage continued in these markets, as well with as with a few projects in Mexico. We continue to see a lot of conversion opportunities around the world, but they, too, are taking a bit longer as some projects require more extensive renovation before flagging. As a result, today we expect to open 20,000 to 25,000 rooms in 2012. Since this reduction is largely timing, we continue to expect to add 90,000 to 105,000 rooms from 2012 through 2014. Given all of this, we've tweaked our outlook for fee revenue for 2012 down by about $20 million. $15 million of the decline in the third and fourth quarter is associated with REVPAR, unit openings and the stronger dollar, with the balance largely associated with the sale of our corporate housing business. For EPS, the impact of the sale of our corporate housing business is immaterial. Getting back to the second quarter. As I said, North American demand was very strong. Renovations at a couple of large hotels had a negative impact on REVPAR, but we saw double-digit REVPAR growth in the quarter at our company-operated hotels in Miami, Philadelphia, New Orleans, San Diego and Los Angeles. In fact, at more than 55,000 rooms in California, system-wide comparable REVPAR rose 10% in the second quarter. Washington, D.C. is another important market. In fact, D.C. is so meaningful that its weak REVPAR in the quarter reduced our company-operated North American REVPAR by 1 point. But even here, there is good news. Interest in the upcoming election is starting to drive political business to the city. Group revenue bookings in D.C. for the Marriott brand are up 10% for the second half of 2012 and 16% for 2013. 2013 should be a good year overall in this market, but we'll have to see how government demand shakes out. Next year's government per diems will be set this August, and we will be watching this carefully. In total, group business in the U.S. was very strong in the quarter. Group revenue for company-operated Marriott hotels increased nearly 8%. Catering revenue increased 7% and remains quite profitable. Looking ahead for the second half of the year, group booking pace is up 10% and 2013 booking pace is up 8%. Just 12 months ago, our 2013 booking pace was up only 1%. We are very bullish about pricing in North America in 2013. For group business on the books for next year, room rates are running up 4%. On the transient side, we are targeting price increases for special corporate business at a high single-digit rate on average. We saw strong performance in the second quarter, in part due to the very favorable supply environment in most markets. Smith Travel estimates supply is growing at less than 1% in the U.S. this year. And in total, U.S. industry rooms under construction stand at 60,000 rooms, compared to over 200,000 rooms in 2007. Outside North America, system-wide comparable REVPAR rose over 7% on a constant dollar basis or roughly 5% using local currencies. Growth in China moderated in the second quarter but continued to deliver outstanding performance, with constant dollar REVPAR up 8%. Weak economic conditions in Europe, India and Hong Kong constrained growth, and some small markets suffered from oversupply such as Hyderabad in India and Shenzhen and Sanya in China. Occupancies at our hotels in the Middle East improved compared to last year's Arab Spring results. However, travel wholesalers still aren't jumping back into the market, so we are likely to continue to see volatility here for a while longer. Finally, our hotels in Japan recovered from last year's tragic tsunami. Turning to development. Our brands remain highly attractive to owners and franchisees around the world. Our worldwide pipeline remains at roughly 115,000 rooms, excluding the nearly 8,000 Gaylord rooms in the works. We continue to build market share as measured by rooms. According to STR, in the U.S., we have 10% of open rooms but nearly 20% of rooms under construction. Year-to-date, we've added nearly 100 North American hotels to our development pipeline, compared to just 57 in the first half of last year. Most of this year's new projects in North America were limited service deals, but we also added 15 full-service hotels to the pipeline. And that doesn't account Gaylord. But lest you worry about overbuilding, financing remains very tight. Conversion activity is very strong, and our pace of new signings remains less than half of the robust years of 2007 and 2008. It's been just over 3 weeks since our China analyst meeting. We were delighted that so many of you were able to join us in both Beijing and Shanghai as we toured some extraordinary hotels. In China, we talked about a very bright future for Marriott. With 115,000-room pipeline, growth on all continents around the world and REVPAR growth running 6% to 8%, we are seeing the makings of that bright future now. Now Carl will take us through the second quarter quarter's results. Carl?

Thanks, Arne. In the second quarter, we reported diluted earnings per share of $0.42, a 24% increase from the prior year adjusted results and consistent with our $0.39 to $0.43 second quarter guidance. Our year-over-year comparison adjusts last year's results for the Timeshare spinoff and other charges. There were a lot of ins and outs in the quarter. Compared to the midpoint of our expectations, our fees were about $0.02 below guidance due to weaker-than-expected REVPAR in some markets and the timing of franchise relicensing fees. In contrast, our leased hotels outperformed by about $0.01, with very strong REVPAR growth particularly in London. Timing of branding fees added another $0.01. The remaining $0.01 benefit came from some one-time items, including a termination payment net of a key money charge, the impairment of a property in a joint venture interest and a favorable tax item. Worldwide constant dollars systemwide REVPAR rose nearly 7%, consistent with our 6% to 8% guidance. This growth in REVPAR, together with ongoing cost controls, resulted in worldwide house profit margins increasing 110 basis points during the second fiscal quarter and house profit per available room increasing 9%. Total fee revenue in the second quarter increased by 7%, with incentive fees up 12%. In North America, incentive fees increased 15% despite lower incentive fees in Washington D.C. As Arne mentioned, we expect D.C. to improve in the second half, with stronger group business already on the books. Given the recent strengthening in the U.S. dollar, foreign exchange rates were a more significant issue this year than last. We typically hedge roughly 70% of our exposure to the euro, pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Japanese yen for 1 year at a time. However, we have operations across more than 70 countries in all, including over 30 other currencies. For the full year, our guidance assumes approximately $9 million year-over-year lower fees due to foreign exchange. Owned, leased and other revenues net of direct expenses more than doubled, reflecting very strong performance at leased hotels in Tokyo and London. In addition, termination fees rose $12 million, branding fees increased $9 million. General and administrative expenses included a $7 million charge for key money related to the termination fee I just mentioned and $5 million in new reserves, largely for guarantee payments. Outside of these items, our G&A expense met our expectations. Our company margins improved dramatically. Adjusting for cost reimbursements, Marriott International's pretax margins totaled nearly 35% in the quarter, up 160 basis points from the prior year's adjusted results. EBITDA increased 13% over the prior year's adjusted amount, and EBITDA margins totaled 48%. Return on invested capital was very strong. For the third quarter, we expect worldwide system-wide REVPAR to increase 6% to 8%, with continued strength in group and special corporate demand in North America. Retail demand should also be strong. The recent East Coast storm filled hotels from Ohio to Washington during what was expected to be a slow week. We were glad our associates were able to help their communities. Through the summer, we expect high occupancy from the Democratic Convention in Charlotte and the Republican Convention in Tampa. Better airlift into the markets in the Caribbean and Mexico is also fueling demand. And as mentioned, the London Olympics and the Euro Cup Championship should help third quarter demand in Europe. Incidentally, congratulations to Spain on their big win. We expect general and administrative expenses will total roughly $155 million in the third quarter, largely related to normal inflation and costs associated with some property workout. We completed the sale of our minority interest in the Courtyard joint venture early in the third quarter. Marriott will continue to operate the 115 Courtyard hotels under a long-term management agreement. 2/3 of the portfolio has received the Courtyard refreshing business lobby and most of the hotels will complete rooms renovations in the next 18 months. With this transaction, Marriott expects to recognize about $5 million in fee revenue for deferred base fees and approximately $40 million gain in the third quarter. We've already received $90 million in cash proceeds from the transaction, demonstrating once again our success in recycling capital. Bottom line, third quarter earnings per share should increase 34% to 41% from third quarter 2011 adjusted earnings per share. For the full year 2012, we expect global REVPAR to increase 6% to 8%, EPS to increase 26% to 34% and EBITDA to increase 12% to 17% over the prior year adjusted amounts. Including a $210 million investment for Gaylord, we expect investment spending in 2012 to total $850 million to $950 million. That reflects about $100 million in maintenance spending. We expect to return roughly $1 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends in 2012. We repurchased 10.5 million shares in the second quarter for $400 million, a significant increase from the first quarter levels. To be sure, we continue to look for opportunities for investment in our business. If we find value-creating investments like Gaylord, share repurchases could vary from these amounts. We will remain disciplined in our approach to capital investments and repurchases. As I mentioned at our Analyst Day last month, we expect to share our 2013 earnings outlook with you in February after we complete our budget process. So we will not be providing earnings guidance for 2013 this coming October. We appreciate your interest in Marriott. We are very excited about the future of the company and hope you are, too. [Operator Instructions] Beverly, we'll take questions now.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Smedes Rose with Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods. Smedes Rose - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: It's Smedes Rose. I just wanted to make sure I understand -- the $20 million of lowered fee, did you -- I just want to be sure, it sounds like about nearly 1/2 of that reflects the FX and the balance is just due to slower results at international properties. Is that correct?

Well, I think it's -- to be fair, it's going to be less than that for FX. That FX number is a year-over-year number that we use at $9 million. And the $20 million that we're talking about is basically compared to our prior guidance, so those are not quite apples-to-apples. But FX, relicensing fees -- and relicensing fees, by and large, are driven by the sale of existing franchised hotels. And that volume has been down a bit lower than we expected, a little bit softer REVPAR with some fine-tuning around individual assets. And then the other thing that we didn't talk about in our prepared remarks, the sale of the ExecuStay business. And with it, the elimination of that is a mid-single-digit number millions of dollars on a full year basis, I think. Smedes Rose - Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then when did you guys start to see the trend line for international business start to, I guess, deteriorate and therefore have to bring down your -- the full year outlook for international? And does this bring into question the 3-year outlook that you presented specifically for China just in June?

We think on the second question, it does not bring into question on a multiyear basis at all. And let's stress the words we used in the prepared remarks. This is not a thematic reduction but driven by individual market dynamics. So we talked about Shenzhen and Sanya as an example. When we look at the forecasters' -- the forecast that rolled out through our system here for the end of this quarter, what we saw was individual stories. And every time we looked at it to see whether there was a theme, we really did not see a global slowdown theme. But what we saw was some individual markets, particularly some luxury hotels that were impacted either by supply or by some other specific market conditions.

Your next question comes from the line of Steven Kent with Goldman Sachs.

Just on your -- on REVPAR for this quarter, I just want to understand your full service, and specifically your Marriott Hotels & Resorts brands. The brand reported 6% REVPAR in the second quarter. That's a deceleration from the 7% in Q1, and it's also below Smith Travel results for the second quarter. So I understand the D.C. weighting, but D.C. actually improved first quarter to second quarter. The group side should start to act better. And now we're talking about yield management issues as to one of the reasons why you didn't get pricing. And I guess, I'm trying to understand if there's maybe more of a structural issue here or why we're back to having that question because you're now below Smith Travel again.

Yes. And again, Smith Travel, just as a reminder, is a really blunt instrument. So Smith Travel, you're looking at a broad number of hotels distributed across the United States in a way that which is different from our distribution. And even though we are big, differences in our distribution between the industry as a whole and the performance at individual assets can have an impact on those numbers. So we feel great about the way our sales offices are working and the way our brand is resonating with customers. So I think the best indication of that is the data we've given you on group business and on special corporate, which are up substantially, and there is no sign at all that we've got a problem associated with that. When we look at our headline REVPAR number and we look at the Smith Travel number -- and again, we can run as many theoretical adjustments to this as you can imagine. But the ones that are most significant to us are D.C., which is about 1 point difference, and a couple of big hotels where renovations extended longer and had a more disruptive impact than we thought. And that's probably about another 0.5 point or so to the MHR number, maybe even 0.7 or a point to the MHR number in Q2.

Just as a follow-up then on another issue that I'm concerned about that might be structural is incentive fees. Incentive fee growth was 12% in the quarter. We were looking for more like 20%. The REVPAR unit level profits don't seem to be translating into that incentive fee growth. And I guess, again, is there some kind of structural issue here where either the Courtyard or other property management contracts have been revised so much that we're just not going to see the profit increases and those incentive increases as we would have seen in previous cycles? And it does seem like more of them are paying incentive fees, but the amount, the dollar amount, just doesn't seem as much as we used to -- we would've expected at this point.

Yes. And I think we still expect in full year 2012 that our incentive fees will be growing about 20%. And I think that's a more important growth rate than to look at than what we put on the books in any particular quarter. Obviously, a few million dollars more of incentive fees in Q2 would give you a materially different year-over-year growth rate for that quarter. And a few million dollars is easy to miss by because of stories in individual markets. There is not really anything happening here which is structural. I thought it was interesting that in Q2, our domestic incentive fees were up higher than our international incentive fees, which is, I think, maybe the first we've seen that in a while and looks good and feels good. We know that the managed Residence Inn and Courtyard portfolios in the United States have been under a massive renovation program, which as we get beyond that and those hotels no longer suffer from the renovation impact themselves but ramp from that, I think that will be helpful both in terms of the REVPAR performance of those assets. But also hopefully, we'll get back towards incentive fees at some point in time in the future. But we've -- it's as steady as she goes sort of comment from us at this point.

Your next question comes from the line of Robin Farley with UBS.

I just want to get a little more color on -- we're sure having -- lowered the range of international REVPAR but maintain the worldwide REVPAR number. Should we think of that as that you're more likely to come in the lower end of the worldwide range? Or are you feeling more confident about North America? In other words, just wondering why that company-wide range didn't move at all.

Well, I mean, I think to be fair, we've now got 2 quarters in the books at just less than 7%, I think. Year-to-date, it's 6.7%, 6.6%. And so the likelihood of being -- of adding 2 more quarters at 6% to 8% and having the full year math drive us to a high end of that range, I think, is getting increasingly less likely. But we still think 6% to 8% is the right global set of assumptions for Q3 and for Q4. And we think we'll end up within that range for the full year, which is why we didn't fiddle with that guidance range.

But it sounds like maybe more of kind of likely the 6% to 7% than the 7% to 8% seems fair, right? So...

Well, I think 6% to 7% is more likely than the high end of 7% to 8%. But we're not -- again, business is good.

So remember, international on total fees is only about 25% of our total fees, with domestic driving 75% of those fees.

And then just on that international front, what you reported on the quarter, International Luxury looks good in Q2. I mean, the REVPAR is up 11%. I guess, can you talk about when you started to see this kind of inflection point that you're talking about that led you to lower that range today?

Again, to talk about inflection point, I think, is to overstate it. I think what we're talking about is the impact of 3 or 4 or 5 significant hotels which drive those numbers, and they would be concentrated probably in a few Asia-Pacific and Middle East markets. And we are not saying with that reduction from 6% to 8% to 5% to 7% for international hotels that, that should be translated into a view that there is a relative slowdown which is more thematic than that.

Can you actually give a little more specific...

Let's -- Robin, you've done 3 now, I think, so let's keep going...

Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Scholes with SunTrust.

Can you tell us what the most recent -- how your REVPAR index has been doing in the last 2 quarters and how that's been trending? I think historically, you've been around 125%. What's the latest on that?

We are up a few tenths year-to-date. And that's both a -- that's a North America number, U.S. number mix of all our brands.

Okay. So pretty consistent up slightly. And then lastly here, you had a looks like a termination charge of $12 million. Can you just give a little bit more color on that? And I'm sorry, termination fee. And is that the main driver why full year owned, leased, corporate housing guidance is coming up?

Yes. I think if you look at what we said in our prepared remarks, we said termination fees increased $12 million. The biggest part of that was a $14 million termination fee we received related to 1 hotel. But I point out that as I mentioned in G&A, we had about a $7 million charge against that, a little bit of geography between owned, leased and G&A. So it netted to about $5 million then. And that $14 million is part of what's driving the full year owned, leased and other up for the year.

But London and Tokyo are both...

Yes. I think the other thing for the full year, and Laura points out a good point, is our owned and leased hotels are doing very well. And they are -- that's also another big part of that increase for the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Meliker with MLV & Co. Ryan Meliker - McNicoll, Lewis & Vlak LLC, Research Division: Just wanted to talk a little bit about system growth. It looks like for 2 quarters now, the managed room count has gone down, totaling about 2,500 rooms over the past 2 quarters and looks flat basically over the past 5 quarters. Can you give us any color on what you're seeing? Are you seeing -- are you not seeing growth on managed side and it's all coming in franchising as you look out to 2014? And then can you talk a little bit about conversions and give us an idea on the majority of conversions that you're going to see coming in franchising? Or do you think you'll get some of those in managed as well?

Yes. So I think this is a different story for the United States and the rest of the world. United States, our growth obviously in a low supply environment is Sea-first [ph] our limited service brands and probably disproportionately Autograph in the U.S. Those, it shouldn't surprise you, are mostly franchise vehicles. And by and large, we're in a state of the cycle where we're not seeing a lot of new build full service hotels. That's where we're most likely to get managed growth. Obviously, if and when we get the Gaylord transaction closed, which we're still optimistic about that, we'll add a number of about 8,000 managed rooms to the portfolio, which we'll be glad to welcome to our portfolio. And I think those are, by and large, what's driving that. Now we have seen, outside the U.S., by the way, is overwhelmingly still a managed growth story. You take a place like China, we manage every single hotel that we have in our system. Ryan Meliker - McNicoll, Lewis & Vlak LLC, Research Division: Okay. I think that's helpful. And just to refresh our memories, it looked like, I think, at your Investor Day, you talked about roughly 20,000 net rooms through 2014 coming in Asia. How much are we looking at in that 90,000 to 105,000 that you guys are forecasting? Are we talking roughly 50-50 North America versus international and North America will be predominantly franchised and international predominantly managed?

That's sounds about right.

Your next question comes from the line of Harry Curtis with Nomura.

So just a couple of quick questions. The first is if you could drill down a little bit more on your specific REVPAR expectations in China, Asia in general, Europe and the Mideast for the balance of the year.

Let's see, China, Middle East and Europe. We would think Europe will continue to tick along around to that 3% sort of number. Q3 may be a bit better because of the Olympics and Q4 may be a bit worse because we don't have anything like the Olympics, which is likely to help Q4 but still kind of the same rates that we've seen. China, we've been, I think, 10% or above year-to-date. I suspect the right set of expectations would be a high single-digit as opposed to a double-digit growth rate for the balance of the year, reflecting probably a somewhat more modest growth rate there. Middle East, I think, is going to be very interesting. Our team has got some optimism in places like Egypt that we could be pleased to see business coming back a little bit faster than we're planning. On the other hand, we're really wary about building in expectations for a place like Egypt, which are too bullish. Dubai, by contrast, is very strong. It's a safe haven in many respects in the Middle East and, notwithstanding substantial supply growth, is continuing to post good numbers on the books. The rest of the Middle East varies dramatically market to market. You've got political environments, which vary from place-to-place and economic environments which vary from place-to-place. But I think generally, the Middle East ought to be performing reasonably well as the year goes along.

Okay. And then on my follow-up related to share repurchase. You've got $90 million in the door related to the Courtyard transaction. If you get periods or if you see periods where you get greater lumps of cash in the door, do you plan on continuing with a more measured approach to share repurchase? Or do you have the flexibility to spend that as you see fit depending upon the price and the cash on hand?

Well, what we do is we look out, for the rest of the year, look at our cash needs, whether it's capital or what-have-you and what opportunities are there and take into consideration our leverage ratios relative to our credit ratings. And from there, we kind of predict out what we think we can buy versus what we need to hold back, so to speak, for known or expected capital expenditures in that. So it's kind of formulaic that way, but we also take into consideration capital transactions such as the Courtyard one.

Your next question comes from the line of Will Marks with JMP Securities.

I wanted to just ask you about in the press release and in some of your prepared remarks, you talked about Middle East, for one, as impacting the -- going from 6% to 8% to 5% to 7% international. You didn't mention Europe in the press release. But in the comments, I think did I hear correctly about 300 basis points less absent Olympics and the Euro Cup?

No, I think you heard 300 basis points less in actual currency as opposed to constant currency. Remember, our 5% to 7% is a constant currency number so that is not reflected by the stronger dollar. The stronger dollar will work against us a little bit. And just to state the obvious here, when fees get translated into our financial statements, they are in actual dollars, not constant dollars.

That makes sense. Okay. And so is the situation -- or is REVPAR in Europe any different from where you saw it a few months ago?

Generally, no. We still see it as -- it's still the weakest big region of the world, not surprisingly given all the things that they're wrestling with over there. And that's why when we looked at our budgeted numbers for the year, we were expecting Europe at about plus 3%. We told you at the beginning of the year that there was risk in that. And I wouldn't be surprised if we ended up putting numbers in the books which were 0 or potentially even negative. I think we've been really pleasantly pleased to see that we're performing at about 3%. And I guess it's the brilliance of our team over there and their ability to forecast.

Your next question comes from the line of Felicia Hendrix of Barclays.

Carl, did you touch on this? I might have missed this. Did you talk about how in-the-quarter, for-the-quarter bookings are trending?

I didn't, but they're running about 30% of our -- are you talking about how much of our mix is in-the-quarter, for-the-quarter? Or are you talking about the pricing of it?

Well, more the pricing and just wondering in the past, your in-the-quarter, for-the-quarter bookings have been strong. I'm just wondering if you've seen any change there.

They're a little lower than in the first quarter because we have a lot of full hotels because of the booking pace we've been having for the -- that we've been talking about for the last 2 quarters being up so high. But for the full year, we would expect the in-the-quarter, for-the-quarter to still represent about 30%, with the other 2/3 coming from booked the previous year.

We are seeing increasing ability to drive rate with group bookings.

Yes, great. And then just getting back to the Europe REVPAR, and maybe you've touched on this a little bit. But I was just wondering to ask very specifically, Arne, if you could quantify for us how much you think the Olympics is having -- what kind of impact or benefit the Olympics in London is having on your international REVPAR forecast?

On the global internationals? I can't tell you. I think in Europe, it's maybe 1 point for the continent as a whole, at least the way we define our continent of positive because of London, which would make it -- Europe is, what, 40% of our international distribution, so I suppose maybe the Olympics drives 0.4 or 0.3 of a point for the quarter as a whole, something like that. It's not huge.

Your next question comes from the line of Shaun Kelley of Bank of America.

Just wanted to go back to the question on yield management and what you guys are seeing in the quarter's REVPAR numbers. So Arne, you called out Hawaii and said -- kind of said that hotels there -- your hotels were full. I mean, does that imply that given how good the group side is, you guys are seeing some challenges on the transient side? Or is it just taking a little bit more time to kind of push rate? And specifically, any comments on resort markets around that?

Yes. I think, and this is probably less the case in a resort market like Hawaii than it is in some other more business-transient markets. But a couple of things to keep in mind here. One is Q2 includes a couple of months which are seasonally very strong, high-occupancy months. I think on one level, the success we've had with group bookings and with special corporate bookings, both of which are driven by these sales offices that we've spent so much time talking about over the last 1.5 years have driven a higher mix into the hotels from those streams of business. As a consequence, we've had a few less room nights than we probably like to have for rack rate short-term business. I think that is overwhelmingly an opportunity. And the opportunity is that we should be able to convert those demand streams into a better-priced business, not just on the rack rates but including on special corporate, when we get to those negotiations in the fall, and the group business that we're booking now and in the foreseeable next few quarters, if not next few years.

Great, that's helpful. And then the second question to kind of dig back in on some of the international comments, you called out oversupply in China, if I caught it in the prepared remarks, particularly in Sanya and Shenzhen. I mean, you guys were just over there and spent a lot of time with your people on the ground there. Everyone's talked about their China pipeline, so could you -- just how big they are and how important it is for kind of unit growth industry-wide. Could you give us just a little bit of a sense of, I mean, how worried should we be about the potential for oversupply and maybe a little bit of a hangover there if demand softens at all from the supply picture in China? That'd be helpful.

I don't think you should be worried at all about oversupply risk in China. You've got -- the markets we called out, Shenzhen and Sanya, Sanya is on Hainan Island, it's essentially the premier biggest China resort destination, coastal. Shenzhen is in the south as well, by and large, an industrial center. It's where Foxconn has got a big operation. This is a city that was a few hundred thousand people 20 years ago, and there's about 8 million or 9 million people today. So it's, in many respects, the sort of emblematic story about China's growth. And that place is booming and it's booming with hotel supply but it's booming with all of the things that drive hotel demand. And so we may see in periods like this quarter or maybe even over the next couple of quarters -- I can't tell you specifically what we're going to see in Shenzhen next month, let alone next year. But we may see periods in which that market is taking in new supply. But the demand is going to continue to grow, and I don't think the supply overhang is likely to be a factor for very long. Compare that to markets like Shanghai and Beijing, which are obviously huge destinations. They have had enormous supply growth, and notwithstanding that, they're posting double-digit REVPAR. And that's a sign about the strength. And one other reference point here. China is probably about 1 million rooms across the country as a whole. The U.S. is 5 million rooms. China will clearly see that 1 million rooms double and then double again over the course of the next period of time. It's going to imply substantial supply growth year-over-year for a number of years to come. But there's every reason to believe that demand is going to be growing with it.

Your next question comes from the line of David Loeb with Baird. David Loeb - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Carl, this is for you. You mentioned the termination fee. But I wonder if you could talk a little more about the other items you called out in owned, leased and corporate housing in terms of timing and whether they're recurring. For example, the credit card and residential branding fees, is that also really one-time? Or are we likely to see a little more of that in coming quarters?

Sure. The branding fees of $5 million that I talked about is primarily timing. And so we would expect that to come -- we were expecting that come in later in the year. It just came in a little sooner than we thought. I think the other items I've pointed out in there, the termination fee that we received, I talked about that earlier. And then the other thing is our owned, leased properties, especially Tokyo and London, did extremely well. When you look to the full year, on the full year, our owned, leased properties will be a big piece of the increase that we're talking about in our guidance for the full year. David Loeb - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: And then for my follow-up, the tsunami BNI payment, are you essentially caught up with business interruption?

Yes. That was a payment from a utility over there that we received as business interruption. It wasn't insurance, so to speak, but...

Your next question comes from the line of Joshua Attie of Citi.

You mentioned targeting high single-digit corporate rate growth for 2013. What gives you the confidence that -- in that number so early in the process particularly since you're postponing giving full year 2013 guidance until February presumably to get better visibility?

Well, I don't think our pricing of special corporate accounts have much to do when we're going to give guidance. But we will -- essentially, what we're talking about for special corporate pricing in the fall, I think our special corporate customers, by and large, know that demand has come back and has come back reasonably strong. And as a consequence, that the power in this negotiation have shifted a little bit to the suppliers of the rooms as opposed to the consumers of the rooms because we're going to all be looking at yielding the various channels we've got to get the best rate of business that we can get. Those special corporate rates are still meaningfully lower than they were in 2007 before the recession hit. And as a consequence, this is a bit about negotiating how fast we get back to those rates that we were at before. None of our special corporate customers likes to pay more than they have to pay, so these will be things that will be negotiated. And your question is a good reminder that we should be careful about putting anything in the books until we get through those negotiations. But we do think it should be a good season for negotiations this fall.

Well, have you started having any of those conversations yet with the customers?

Only in the most -- the softest sort of preliminary way. We're not negotiating any of them now, but I think there's some conversations about what the dynamic will look like when we get to it.

Your next question comes from the line of Joe Greff with JPMorgan. Joseph Greff - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Arne, of the delayed room openings for this year, how many projects does that represent? And how much of this is China? And are the projects that were/are scheduled to open in 2013, I know you haven't guided for next year, are they being pushed out as well? In other words, is the pipeline of 115,000 rooms going to take longer to open up than what you thought 3 months ago?

Yes. We -- our best guess today is that we ought to still be open -- be able to open 90,000 to 100,000 -- what is it, 95,000 to 110,000, 90,000 to 105,000? 90,000 to 105,000 rooms in '12, '13 and '14. And we don't think we need to pull off of those numbers. I think the biggest story in this is China. And it's not the only place where there's some impact. But in China, what we're seeing is with a government-encouraged slowdown in some respects -- and again it's all relative, so we're not talking about recession environments. But in a government-encouraged slowdown, we are seeing some projects, which were previously under construction, where construction has paused. And I suspect that's a dozen hotels, maybe a dozen projects order of magnitude. We -- our folks on the ground there are very optimistic that they will be restarted, that when the government gets through the important political transitions, which are underway later this year, and continues its focus on developing particularly some of the secondary and tertiary markets, that we'll see these projects resume and move forward. We can't tell you for a certainty that all of that is going to work out in a way that causes the '12 openings to be opening in '13 and all of the '13 openings to also be opening in '13 or whether it's possible that some '13 openings will shift to '14. But we think generally that we're not seeing projects get abandoned, and our partners are saying they continue to plan to get those things done. Joseph Greff - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Great. And then for my follow-up, based on to the midpoint of your guidance for this year and sources and uses of cash and assume you return $1 billion of capital to shareholders, where does that put your leverage or net debt position at the end of this year, say, versus at the end of 2Q or at the end of last year?

Well, our leverage, we'll continue to manage our leverage to 3x to 3.25x debt-to-EBITDA so that's what we're targeting for. I don't have a debt number for you right now, but we'll manage to that ratio of 3x to 3.25x. And that's on adjusted debt to an adjusted EBITDA. The rating agency makes adjustments for the peer numbers.

Your next question comes from the line of Bill Crow of Raymond James. William A. Crow - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Arne, I was hoping you could dig in a little bit into the government per diem issue. The rumors and the headlines have been pretty negative regarding next year. And I know we're going to find out something in the next few weeks. But maybe you could talk about the percentage of demand that comes from either government directly or contractors that use government rates and how much exposure your D.C. properties in particular have to that particular...

No. You're right to ask about D.C. particularly because D.C. would be the market which is most dependent on government and government-derived business, if you will. We think that we're probably mid-single-digits in terms of percentage of government business in the U.S. And so this is relevant obviously. The conversation coming out of the government is to try and reduce per diems. And as a consequence, depending on how aggressive they are, they may well be pricing their employees at a level where they will not be able to stay in full-service hotels and they will certainly not be able stay in full-service hotels in center cities and instead will be essentially priced out of the market and pushed to limited service hotels in the suburbs and all the consequences associated with that for their productivity and comfort. And depending on how hard they push, it's quite possible the government could push too hard and they will hear from their folks that it doesn't work. And this will get -- this will be something that gets revisited. We're engaged in conversations with the government to try and do the best we can to manage this. I think the only good news is that in many respects, we would be, in many hotels, looking at yielding away from government business anyway because we're seeing a higher-rated demand come back both in group and transient travel in a way that in a number of markets would allow hotels that have kind of tried to buttress their performance in a weaker demand time with government business increasingly pull away from that. William A. Crow - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Right. But I guess, in D.C., it would be most impacted but also the smaller secondary, tertiary markets, where you do have a presence. I would imagine military bases, et cetera, would have a disproportionate impact. So are we -- do we face the potential then that next year, as we go through the quarters, we're talking about Washington, D.C. hurting your REVPAR again by 100 basis points or 200 basis points because of this change?

Well, I mean, we gave you the figures on group bookings for Washington for next year because it is actually a substantial piece of positive news. The other bit of positive news we'll have for Washington is just the fact that there will be an inaugural next year, there will be a new administration. I don't mean that. There'll be a either a new President or a reelected President who will be starting a second term. And they will be a sort of a fresh start associated with that, that tends to be a reasonably good year for government demand. And so we ought to see some positive moves towards D.C. But you're right to ask about per diems because as you get to the -- through to the broader D.C. market, where you're looking at some of the Northern Virginia hotels which are heavily dependent on government business which is not political but is more like government contract business, that's the place where our fiscal issues in the federal government will continue to be relevant, and we don't know how they'll get resolved.

The next question comes from the line of Ian Weissman of ISI Group.

Just 2 quick questions. You've set a fairly bullish tone for the balance of the year, but I didn't hear you mention anything about concern over fiscal cliff. How does that go -- how do you factor that into your thought process on guidance and fundamentals? And have you seen any -- and do you think it's been an impediment to businesses, booking business going forward?

I think that if you're talking about the fiscal cliff of the expiration of the Bush tax cuts, the Obama employment tax cuts and maybe deficit impact, as well as the government cuts...

And impact on -- and the potential impact on the economy and how businesses are basically position themselves.

And I would say today that there is no impact of that threat on the numbers we've put on the books or the bookings that we're seeing. And we have certainly not made any effort to factor in a what-if. And obviously, we haven't given you '13 guidance anyway. But I think, by and large, this is going to be a question about what happens politically and how that translates into a U.S. economic performance in 2013 and beyond. It may be that it becomes relevant in the fourth quarter, but I doubt it. I think this is much more likely to be a question of how it gets factored into real economic growth, maybe a little bit attitude and sentiment as we're doing bookings in the fourth quarter but doubtful in terms of the impact to actual Q3 and Q4 numbers.

Okay. And finally, there's a lot of focus obviously on the gateway cities. I think last quarter, you addressed at least some of the differences between the performance in gateway cities, and obviously in some of the secondary and tertiary markets that you operate in. And you're starting to see healthier operating results in those markets. Maybe you can just kind of talk about some of the Tier 2 markets and how they have performed to date.

Yes. And I would -- rather than be wrong here, I would encourage you to look at the Smith Travel numbers by city. And you've got some interesting dynamics. I mean, Chicago has been a reasonably good performer. The West is strong broadly. But I'd look to that Smith Travel and you can look at it sort of city-by-city and you'll see what the results look like.

Well, I guess, my question is, are you seeing as healthy a recovery in secondary markets as you are in gateway cities?

I would say generally yes.

Your next question comes from the line of Nikhil Bhalla of FBR. Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Scholes of SunTrust.

Last question. I'm going to ask a macro question because I think this is important for the recovery of the overall domestic economy being that the service sector is such a large part. What do you see going forward for the rest of the year as far as property-level hirings? I mean, is that really starting to ramp up now as far as year-over-year growth rates? What are your expectations for the rest of the year?

Well, that's a good question. I mean, I think we will obviously see hirings track our openings as the year goes along. And we had opened into our system, whether it's managed or franchised, obviously will have an influence on precisely we'll be doing the hiring, whether it's our franchise partners or whether it's us directly. But we'll end up hiring -- I would think the system would hire a few thousand people, maybe 5,000 people, something like that associated with new unit openings. This is a U.S. number only. I think the high occupancy we had in the second quarter is a sign that we're probably also hiring to meet demand as it moves through there. But in Q3, Q3 is not as high an occupancy quarter as Q2. And so I don't think occupancy is likely to drive significant hiring in the very, very short term. I think as we go into 2013, we will see that the hiring, by and large, is driven by new unit growth and less significantly by occupancy growth since I think increasingly as the recovery goes forward, we'll see that the shift of REVPAR growth is driven more by rate than it is by occupancy. As group business grows, so we will see that we're hiring some folks to deal with F&B side of the equation. I don't know if that's responsive to you or not. But generally, it's a positive trend in hiring. It's just a question of how positive.

On your typical, let's say, hotels in existence today versus, I guess, sort of high peak staffing levels in 2007, how far off are you? How much -- I imagine you have less employees today. Can you sort of quantify, like percentage? Is the average hotel have 5% less employees today than it did in 2007?

A typical hotel would be fairly close. I think the permanent reduction in headcount will probably mostly be around management staff and how heavy that is and how much we've been able to do above property and do a little bit more efficiently than used to be done on property. But that is likely to affect a relatively small number of people in a hotel. The restaurant staff and the housekeeping staff and the other key members of the team that are focused on serving our guests as occupancy has gotten back to and now beyond peak levels. So we're performing at occupancy levels which are in excess of the 2007, 2008 levels. I suspect we've seen staff income most of the way back to where it was before.

Okay. Well, we all want to thank you for your participation today and keep on traveling. Go ahead, Beverly.

Thank you for joining today's conference call. You may now disconnect.