Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to CenturyLink's fourth quarter 2017 earnings call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, Wednesday, February 14, 2018. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Tony Davis, Vice President of Investor Relations with CenturyLink. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Ash, and good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our call today to discuss CenturyLink's fourth quarter 2017 earnings results released earlier this afternoon. The slide presentation we will be reviewing during the prepared remarks portion of today's call is available in the Investor Relations section of our corporate website at ir.centurylink.com. At the conclusion of our prepared remarks today, we will open the call for Q&A. As you move to slide two, you'll find our Safe Harbor language. We will be making certain forward-looking statements today, particularly as they pertain to guidance for full-year 2018 and other outlooks in our business. Unless otherwise noted, prior periods are provided on a year-over-year basis. Metrics discussed today on the call exclude acquisition-related expenses associated with the Level 3 transaction. Those metrics are adjusted EBITDA, capital expenditures, free cash flow and net leverage, and we've footnoted the details in our press release and earnings presentation. Pro forma results discussed today exclude the May 1, 2017, sale of the data centers and colocation business and reflect purchase accounting adjustments and intercompany eliminations related to the November 1, 2017, acquisition of Level 3 by CenturyLink. We also ask that you review our disclosure found on this slide, as well as in our press release and in our SEC filings, which describe factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected by us in our forward-looking statements. Now moving to slide 3, we ask that you also note that our earnings release issued earlier this afternoon and the slide presentation and remarks made during this call contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations between these non-GAAP financial measures and the most comparable GAAP financial measures are available in our earnings release and on our website at ir.centurylink.com. And now as we move to slide 4, your host for today's call is Glen Post, CenturyLink's Chief Executive Officer. Joining Glen on today's call are Jeff Storey, CenturyLink's President and Chief Operating Officer; and Sunit Patel, CenturyLink's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Our call today will be available for telephone replay and webcast replay through May 8, 2018. Anyone listening to a telephone or webcast replay or reading a written transcript of this call should note that all information presented is current only as of today, February 14, 2018, and should be considered valid only as of this date regardless of the date heard or viewed. And now as we move to slide 5, I'll turn the call over to Glen Post. Glen?

Thank you, Tony, and thank you all for joining our call today as we discuss CenturyLink's fourth quarter 2017 results, our progress on the integration of CenturyLink and Level 3, and the 2018 outlook for our business. For the next few minutes, I will discuss CenturyLink's continued transformation to one of the world's leading network providers and will also make a few remarks about fourth quarter results and some of our plans for 2018. I will then hand the call over to Sunit to review fourth quarter results in more detail and discuss our 2018 business outlook. And following Sunit, Jeff will provide an operations review of our business, including an update on our sales and operations integration and alignment to date, and the opportunities and challenges he sees in the months ahead for our business. As we move into our first full year of the combined operations of CenturyLink and Level 3, we'll talk for a minute about a look back basically. If you look into late 2016, we announced the sale of our data center and colocation businesses and the acquisition of Level 3, two milestone transactions that helped sharpen our focus on core network services. As you know, we successfully completed the sale of the data centers and colocation business effective May 1, 2017, and of course, the acquisition of Level 3 effective November 1 of last year. Both of these transactions represented significant steps forward and CenturyLink becoming one of the leading network services providers in the world. Upon closing the Level 3 transaction, we immediately began implementing our integration plan to successfully bring the two companies together. I am very pleased with how this integration is progressing. And given our ability to gain additional insights since closing, we're even more confident in our ability to…

Thank you, Glen, and thank you, everyone, for joining today. I'll provide a brief overview of each company's standalone results, followed by a review of our combined company pro forma results for the fourth quarter. After that, I'll discuss how we will be reporting our go-forward results, and I'll wrap up with a discussion of our financial outlook for 2018. I'd like to start with slide 7. We expect adjusted EBITDA to increase year-over-year. We also expect to be free cash flow positive after dividends in 2018, and we remain confident in our ability to achieve our targeted adjusted EBITDA synergies of $850 million and CapEx synergies of $125 million. Turning now to slide 8 for an overview of CenturyLink's standalone fourth quarter results, total operating revenue in the fourth quarter declined 7.6% to $3.964 billion, primarily due to a decline in legacy revenue and the colocation sale in May of 2017. Core revenues declined 8.4% and strategic revenue declined 6.1% in the fourth quarter. Adjusting for the colocation sale, core revenue declined 4.7% and strategic revenue grew 1.4%. Fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA was $1.471 billion. This is a $74 million sequential improvement compared to $1.397 billion in third quarter of 2017. This improvement was driven by lower seasonal labor and utility costs combined with approximately $20 million of one-time favorable items in the fourth quarter. In addition, we had expected to recognize a $25 million to $30 million favorable carrier settlement in the fourth quarter. But as part of our network optimization integration work for the combined company, we determined it was not in our best long-term interest to enter into this settlement. Capital expenditures for the fourth quarter 2017 were $528 million. This compares to $749 million in the third quarter of 2017 and $963 million from the…

Thank you, Sunit. Good evening, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Sunit discussed the standalone results for Level 3 and CenturyLink, so I won't go into much detail about the former companies in my comments. I would like to start by saying Level 3 had strong results in the fourth quarter, and I'd like to thank the employees for staying focused and finishing strong. I'd also like to thank the former CenturyLink team; their commitment to the success of our business even during a time of significant change has not wavered. From this point forward, my remarks will concentrate on the combined CenturyLink. It's been an exciting few months since we closed the acquisition in November, and we've made a lot of progress with integration in a relatively short period of time. I'm frequently asked if there are any big surprises, either good or bad. The answer is generally no. We had a year of integration planning, and the team did a very good job evaluating what we needed to do. But I have been pleasantly surprised with the eagerness of our employees. Since the close, I visited a number of our offices across the country, large and small. And you can see the excitement from our people regarding the opportunity ahead. They recognize and appreciate the tremendous challenges ahead as we transform the way we provide services and interact with our customers. However, they're excited about the company we're building. While we are actively simplifying and harmonizing our product offerings, among the advantages of bringing the two companies together is a more robust product portfolio our sales team can take to the business market, and our expanded on-net footprint is already creating opportunities. As many of you know, I believe the driver of long-term value is growth in…

Certainly. The first question comes from the line of Philip Cusick with JPMorgan. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. A couple if I can. Jeff what are you seeing from customers who, Glen, had talked about? And I think you as well have been talking about holding back from signing contracts earlier in the year before the deal. What kind of progress have you seen there? And then second on the Consumer side, broadband losses continue. What are your thoughts on the consumer broadband strategy going forward? Thank you.

Sure. Thank you, Phil. Holding back, that's one of those things that we see periodically. And if you look at the sales from customers during 2017, we saw increasing sales through the first quarter, the second quarter, third quarter. Sales were a little bit lighter in the fourth quarter versus the prior quarter, but we're stronger year-over-year versus the fourth quarter of 2016. So, we're starting to see customers recognizing how to work with the combined company. And so I wouldn't say that they are particularly any big deals being held back. Most of that concern from customers is behind us and we should start seeing deals continue to close. From a Consumer perspective and a broadband perspective, we have a significant footprint that has been activated with high speed. We need to focus on selling what we've got. We have opportunities to sell more high-speed or very high speed 100-megabit and above, 40-megabit and above. We need to make sure that we're doing that. We have plenty of footprint out there that we can go and sell. We'll continue to deploy more in fiber into our network, getting it closer and closer to enterprise customers – or, excuse me, Consumer customers and making that higher speed available to the larger footprint. And then we have the benefit of being able to spread that fiber deployment across not only our consumer customers, but our small and medium enterprise customers, our larger enterprise customers, passing more buildings and going into more buildings. And so we believe fiber is good and we'll continue to build back closer and closer to customers. But the primary effort right now for us in our Consumer business especially with high-speed IT is to make sure that that we provide a great customer experience, we reduced churn by providing a great customer experience, and we sell in the footprint where we think we really have a very competitive product.

Thanks, Jeff.

And Phil, let me just add one thing to that. Our major losses on broadband is in where we have low 20-megabits of spectrum available or speed available. And last year – early last year, we made a decision to really focus more on the higher-value customers in enterprise, simplify the Price For Life plan and really trying to drive the higher ARPU, which we've done. And as Jeff said, that the good news is we've got a lot of households of 9.8 million households available with 40 megabits or higher and 4.4 million available on the 100 megabits or more at the year-end, so we have a lot of capacity to sell into and that will be our focus as Jeff said.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Amir Rozwadowski with Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much, folks. Two, if I may. I was wondering if you could discuss your thoughts around the enterprise spending environment at this point. One other provider of services have discussed the potential opportunity for improved spending trends on the back of some of the tax reform we've seen. Are you folks seeing any sort of leading indicators as to where demand trends could go? And then perhaps secondly, you'd mentioned focusing on product and services to win and where winning means something to the company. How should we think about sort of the focus or trajectory of revenues within that context? I recognized that you're not providing revenue guidance, but if we can think about the different moving pieces as to how you can get and achieve that EBITDA cash flow guidance that you've set, I think that would be helpful. Thanks very much.

Okay. So I think I'll take a stab at both and Jeff or Glen might want to add. So on the enterprise spending environment, yes, while we believe that tax reform is a positive, you've heard other people talk about it, at the end of the day, I think we look at the backdrop in terms of the demand environment for the kind of services we are offering and what customers are trying evolved to new hybrid infrastructures for both cloud and bandwidth requirements on their own premises, including how they interact with their customers. So I think that in general, we continue to see bit growth which is why Jeff made the comment about on-net and driving our fiber footprint deeper across to serve all our customer segments. On the second question, I think the key here is, certainly on the enterprise side, I mean we – anyone on the Consumer side for that matter, but more certainly on the enterprise side, our goal is to improve our revenue performance over time in line with the comments that Jeff and Glen made. And I certainly think our position from a network footprint and comprehensive products and portfolios we have and the on-net buildings we have and the continued investments we make, we think we should be able to drive a little better performance over time on the revenue side.

And just to add on the enterprise spending comment. We see our customers needing the products and services that we have. So hopefully, the ability to capitalize infrastructure – to expense capitalize infrastructure and other things will help customers invest. But whether there's a good economy or a bad economy, our customers need the types of products and services we provide, and we've seen that over time that in a bad economy, they want to move to more cost-effective infrastructures, and so they move to newer technologies and move to the capabilities that we have. In a good economy, they're trying to accelerate their growth and make sure that they are able to meet their customers' needs, and so they want our expandable services and our capabilities. And so for a fairly long time, we see customers moving to us because they need our products and services kind of independent of the economy. But we do think and are hopeful that the tax environment will make them purchase more and invest more.

So just a quick follow-up though. It doesn't seem like that expectation is embedded into your outlook currently. Is that a correct way to think about things?

That's correct.

Thanks very much for the incremental color.

Our next question comes from the line of Simon Flannery with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Simon Flannery - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Great, thanks a lot. Good evening. Sunit, on the 2018 EBITDA guidance, what are you assuming for synergy realization going through the year? Is it fair that you mentioned the three-year target, is it fair to take that fairly linearly, or is that going to be more in years two or three? And then I think you'd mentioned recently about a 500 basis point to 700 basis point margin opportunity. Can you just sort of review that for us? And should we take 2017 or 2018 as the kind of the base year for that target?

Thanks Simon. So I think on the synergy realization, typically what we see is the first year is the steepest part of the curve, and then you get the full run rate benefit in the second year. And then after that, it starts tailing off. So usually, we get a lot of the benefit – we should see a lot of the benefit in terms of reported benefit you will see this year and next year, the run rate benefit a little more this year, some next year, and then it tails off in the third year. So in general, that's the pattern we see. On the EBITDA margin, to your question, I think in general, we continue to expect to see the EBITDA margin expand nicely over the next three to five years. I think we said even at the time of the announcement that with synergies and everything pro forma, we should be north of 40%-plus EBITDA margins over the next few years, and we continue to feel quite confident and comfortable with that. So I think you will see the margin expansion in terms of the basis points that you described. Simon Flannery - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Great, thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of David Barden with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey guys, thanks. Congrats on a good quarter. So, Sunit, a couple more questions on the guide, so there's about a $550 million delta between looking at EBITDA minus interest minus pension minus tax minus CapEx and the free cash flow guide. And you highlighted, I think, working capital, which would be a recurring potential benefit; tax refunds which aren't recurring. So if you can bridge us to what that $550 million break down into would be super-helpful. And then just second, I think you called out some one-time items that are going to weigh on 1Q. So I guess people are going to look at the fourth quarter number, take that down, and I guess we're then expecting the EBITDA cadence to be a synergies compound ramping, I guess, over the course of the year. I guess some cadence guidance on the EBITDA would be helpful too. Thanks.

Sure. So with your first question, that number, the biggest portion is tax refund, which we expect for taxes from 2017. So that's why it flows through the working capital – I mean through that working capital line. And then secondly, the second item that I mentioned in my comments was the timing of incentive-related compensation. So for example, one example but there are a couple of things, typically for the case of Level 3, we paid bonuses the year following year end, so 2017 bonuses were typically paid in 2018 in this case. But with the timing of the close, some of those were paid through the end of the first 10 months or those were paid through the first 10 months in 2017. And so we won't be paying them in 2018, so that's a benefit. And then the third thing I had mentioned is just working capital management on receivables and payables, so that's the third component in order of magnitude. And we think there will continue to be opportunities to improve that even next year when you look at the DSOs, for example. So those are the components. I think when you see through that and you go in subsequent years, in general we expect the working capital line to be a slight of a negative. And by slight, I mean in the scheme of things, small compared to our cash flow generation. So I think that helps you get you a sense of as we look longer term. So it will be a little bit a use of cash, and that has to do more with the pension funds and other forced retirement benefit expenses. But some of that will be offset at least over the next year by continued improvement in receivables and payables. And then on the question on transitioning from the fourth quarter to the first quarter, I think in simple terms, we'll see about the kind of magnitude change I talked about, $20 million on the one-time credits that I explained, and then $40 million, which really has to do with a change in incentive-based compensation and typically higher payroll taxes in the first quarter. So when you add that together, it's $20 million and $40 million, it's about $60 million. So I think that hopefully helps people calibrate to the starting point in the first quarter. And then given the guide for the year, I think that helps interpolate that pretty well.

Thanks, Sunit. And if I can just do one quick follow-up, I think over the last couple years, CenturyLink has proven to be apparently pretty notoriously difficult to guide for. And could you give us a sense – and you've expressed this conviction that you feel good about the numbers. But with your fresh set of eyes looking at an old set of books, where does that conviction really come from? What process did you go through that makes you think that you've got it nailed down where for the last few years, it really hasn't been?

I think there are a couple of elements. We've had a year of integration planning and all the various organizations were announced from the summer months onwards. And as we mentioned even last quarter, everyone had their budgets and targets for 2018 by the end of October. And as Jeff also mentioned and Glen alluded to, we have taken a much harder look at capital governance processes, capital allocation processes, return investment criteria. We have spent a lot of time as we worked on integration planning on the synergy plan with respect to things like non-head count expenses. In RFPs, we run with suppliers both for capital expenditures and non-head count expenses on the operating expense side. We have spent a fair bit of time very specifically looking at our plans for network expense reductions and the capital expenditures it takes to do that. So I think on a whole multitude of efforts across the whole organization and the fact that everyone is executing on their plans, and also we hope we've taken a fairly realistic appraisal of the revenue trends looking at more historical trends. Recently, I feel – we feel having looked at all of that and considered it with some margin of safety, we are very confident of the guide that we provided for 2018.

I'd just like to add. We're also using our organizational structure differently, we've organized around the customer and our business units to give us greater focus, greater intensity, greater visibility into each of those customer segments and greater visibility into the profitability of this Customer segments. And so we have organized around profitability. We have organized around driving success with our customers and feel fairly confident about our visibility into the business at this point.

And the only final point I'd add is, I think we'll hopefully try to improve the elasticity of the responsiveness of the organization. So we can manage and adjust levers as we see how we are performing every month. So hopefully, it can be more flexible in how we adjust a little more quicker, so I think hopefully that should also – that also gives us some more confidence.

All right. Thank you all. Good luck.

Our next question comes from the line of Scott Goldman with Jefferies. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Thanks. I guess, just wanted to follow-up to David's question on free cash flow and make sure I understand, Sunit. It sounds as though you're saying there's a decent working capital benefit that rolls through in 2017 on the back of tax refund and the timing and other working caps stuff that you just laid out. So as we think about sort of exiting 2018 into 2019, is it fair to sort of back out those and say that sort of the starting point? And then you have initiatives around DSOs and that type of thing going into 2019. Just want to make sure I understood that properly? And then secondly, just on the broadband side of the equation, seems like sort of a tale of two cohorts there, with obviously, the lower speed guide is churning off and showing success on the high-speed guide. Wonder if you could help give us a sense for where that base is today? I'm trying to just size what the potential risk is within that base on the low or the opportunity to move them up into the high-speed would be going forward? Thank you.

Okay. So I'll answer the first question and Jeff, maybe you can do the consumer one. But in essence, I think as I said, the biggest component is the tax refund from last year's taxes followed by the incentive-based comp I talked about. And I think I just summarized it best by saying when you go forward, generally working capital should be neutral to slight use of capital going forward as you look in future periods. And that includes the pension expense funding that we talked about or takes that into consideration.

And Scott, I don't have an exact mix of how many customers are below 20 megs and above 40 megs. But it's a fairly large number below 20 megs that are churning. But our opportunity is to continue – those are customers that have been around for a very long time and our opportunities continue to improve our network, improve the speeds that we offer to those low speed customers. And they are moving from that low-speed onto the high-speed capabilities. And so we'll continue to focus on that as Glen said, we have a significant number of households past that are addressable with very high-speed, and we will continue to sell to those customers and position our products and services with those customers and continue to upgrade for the very low-end.

And one other point on the guide, remember we said that outlook does not include integration expenses, and we gave you a sense of that and there'll be some in the capital expenditures side. But those expenses will be more one-time in nature and then obviously, there will be a benefit in future periods when you look at your forecast after taking into consideration integration costs.

And just one quick follow-up on the Consumer broadband side. As you think about the non-Price-For-Life customers, what's the thoughts or strategy around pricing as you go into 2018, Jeff?

Well, the strategy has moved to Price For Life. One of the things that we saw – in 2016, we put in a lot of promotions and discounts and what that feels like to the customer is these promotions and discounts roll off six months after they signed them. They don't feel like, now the discount's gone, they feel like we gave them a rate increase. And so it's not a very customer-friendly way to do it. But it also drives activity within our business, drives calls, drives dissatisfaction from the customer. And so we will move – continue to move to Price For Life for those customers and for making it simpler for them to buy and consume our products.

I'll just add to that, that even for our 20-meg and below customers move more towards the Price For Life, simple pricing, favor for those lower price. Speed customers, of course, had lower price plans. So we are seeing some success in those markets where we've rolled that out.

Thank you.

And we have over 1 million customers. We rolled Price For Live, I don't know, less than six months ago or so, maybe a little longer. And we have over 1 million customers on it already, so it's been very successful. Our customers have reacted well to it and it makes the experience they have with us feel better for them.

That's very helpful. Thank you, guys.

Our next question comes from the line of Brett Feldman with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Brett Feldman - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Thanks for taking the questions and just one hopefully last clarification on the cash taxes. Your guidance does say you'll be paying cash taxes of $100 million. I think you're sort of saying that the refund and that payment are two distinct things. Is that the right way to interpret it?

It's the right way to think about it, because the cash income taxes, pertains to taxes that we expect to pay for 2018 income. The refund was a refund from taxes for 2017, so the refund would not show up to the income tax line. It shows up in the working capital line, so that is correct. Brett Feldman - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Got it, thank you, okay. So I know you're not giving formal revenue guidance, but we can kind of infer what you're expecting based on the CapEx range you gave and the reconciliation and the CapEx intensity and if you sort of do math on that, it sort of suggests you guys think you're going to have a pretty sustainable top-line on a pro forma basis in 2018. So I was hoping you can maybe just provide a little more context around where you see things firming that gave you that conviction? And then, Jeff, hopefully as a component of that answer, you can maybe just address MPLS because it feels like that's a big mystery for investors. They're not really sure how to assess the extent to which there is still demand, or which there may be a risk to that business as we go ahead. I'm not sure people really even understand how much of your business comes from MPLS. So sorry, a lot in there, but it will be helpful to get that color.

Let me start with revenue. As I said, I mean, I think we think that we should be able to drive slightly better revenue performance over time. And the story is – you mentioned is a little different in various each of these customer-facing areas. So won't go through that in detail other than just say that I think that given our position as a second largest wireline carrier serving enterprises in our fiber network, in our footprint, in our products and services, we should be able to do a better job of gaining share from our competitors who are principally more focused in other segments like wireless and content. So I think we've tried to be realistic with that. So I think that's all I'll say on the revenue side. And I'll turn it over to Jeff for the other question.

On MPLS, MPLS is an important product for us because our customers wanted, they need it. They need secure communications between large branch offices, it's scalable, it meets their needs. We can put multiple applications over the top of it. But we are also very excited about things like SD-WAN. We have a great capability that we've been working on in CenturyLink for a couple of years and we think that's going to be a huge product for us. Our customers have networking challenges that are not solved by one-size-fits-all or one product fits all. We will sell MPLS where that makes sense. We will sell the waves where that makes sense. We will go to our customers with SD-WAN where that makes sense. One of the things that we've become very good at, at CenturyLink is the migration of other old technologies onto new technologies. And I don't think it's an either or between SD-WAN and MPLS. I think it's both. But we have a very good at making sure that we sell the right product to the right customer for the right applications. And we think MPLS is important in that, and we think other products are important in that. So I don't know if that fully answers the question, Brett. But we think it's going to continue to be part of our product portfolio that's significant for us. Brett Feldman - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: All right. Thanks for the color.

Our last question comes from the line of Batya Levi with UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you. Can you provide a little bit more color on your comment about aligning CapEx with revenue performance this year? You mentioned on net focus. Should we expect any significant changes versus where CapEx was spent last year? And maybe also if you could update plans to how many consumer locations you plan to reach with fiber? I think CenturyLink had plans to do about 3 million homes by 2019. Thank you.

All right. So I think on the capital question, I think just to quick thing, we are seeing the benefit of the synergies in the CapEx. We think the guide we provide on CapEx addresses revenue growth and other needs. We have to keep driving profitable growth. So most of it will be success based. The allocation of capital, I think as I talked about, we're going to shift harder in making sure it's for return profiles that are higher, more, take advantage of our on-net footprint, predictable whether it's a cost reductions or driving profitable margin growth. We've changed our governance process. So from an allocation perspective as we've also said, we aim to continue to invest in the Consumer business, but it being more directed towards where we can extend our fiber footprint and enable – both enable more higher-speed broadband households plus work on penetrating the ones we've already enabled. So I think that's really the summary on capital. And then, Jeff, I don't think – do you have anything to add?

I don't think there's anything to add to that.

Double opportunity. We've got to do well with the households that have enabled with higher speeds, which has increased quite significantly over the last couple of years with the money that CenturyLink has spent on whether it's a factoring or bonding or just pushing the fiber footprint deeper. And two, we continue to believe both with CAF funding and other more specific market opportunities, we've got the ability to invest money to push the fiber deeper in both enable more households and succeed better with them.

Okay, thank you.

I would say, really good. The very disciplined approach to capital allocation and that's where we're headed and we can drive returns profitability, we'll certainly do that. But we have a lot of previously built capacity built into and sell into this year.

I will now turn the call over to Mr. Post for any concluding remarks.

Thank you, Ash. CenturyLink is now the second largest domestic communications provider serving global enterprise customers, and we believe we are well-positioned to deliver a great customer experience and a wide-array of communication products and services to gain market share over time. We are confident in our ability to successfully integrate CenturyLink and Level 3, and we're excited about the opportunities that lie before us. We do expect to drive long-term shareholder value through free cash flow growth, return of cash to shareholders via dividend and most importantly, by providing our customers with the products and services that they need to operate effectively in a digital world. Thank you for joining our call today. We look forward to working with you in the months ahead. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Post. We would like to thank, everyone, for your participation and for using the CenturyLink conferencing service today. This does conclude the conference call. We ask that you please disconnect your lines. Have a great day, everyone.