Good day ladies and gentlemen and thank you for your patience. You joined the Q2 2016, Liquidity Services Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct the question-and-answer session and instructions will be given at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call may be recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host Senior Director of Investor Relations, Ms. Julie Davis. Ma’am you may begin.

Thank you, Lititz. Hello and welcome to our second quarter and fiscal year 2016 financial results conference call. Joining us today are Bill Angrick, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Jorge Celaya, our Chief Financial Officer; and Mike Sweeney, our Chief Accounting Officer. We will be available for questions after our prepared remarks. The following discussion or responses to your questions reflect management’s views as of today, May 05, 2016, and will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially. Additional information about factors that could potentially impact our financial results is included in today’s press release and in our filings with the SEC, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. As you listen to today’s call, we encourage you to have our press release in front of you, which includes our financial results as well as metrics and commentary on the quarter. During this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. In our press release and our filings with SEC, each of which is posted to our Web site, you will find additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations of these measures with comparable GAAP measures. We also use certain supplemental operating data as a measure of certain components of operating performance, which we also believe is useful for management and investors. The supplemental operating data includes gross merchandise volume and should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. At this time, I’d like to turn the presentation over to our CEO, Bill Angrick.

Thanks, Julie. Good morning and welcome to our Q2 earnings call. I’ll review our Q2 performance and provide an update on the key strategic initiatives, next Mike Sweeney will provide more details on the quarter; finally Jorge will provide our outlook for the current quarter. Liquidity Services reported Q2 results in line with our GMV guidance and above the guidance on adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income. Q2 results were driven by strong performance in our municipal government, industrial manufacturing and retail verticals, which benefited from growth in existing and new customers. We also benefited from the growth of new fee for service offerings during the quarter with both commercial and government clients. We exited the quarter in a strong financial position to pursue our growth initiatives with $117.5 million in cash and zero debt. Our team remains focused on building a better future for how assets are managed, valued and sold in the reverse supply chain which translates into a multi-billion dollar opportunity. Liquidity Services competitive advantage lies in our ability to provide our clients with better service, scale and results. We’re achieving this by making investments in new data driven services, expansion of our buyer base and improvements in our core e-commerce platform to elevate the convenience and value, we provide our customers. First we’re expanding our offering to provide our clients with the data, analytical tools and services to extract more value from their supply chain. For example on behalf on one of the world’s largest, consumer package goods companies, we completed the valuation of over 40,000 assets, using a variety of internal and external data sets. With this information the client is able to make more informed business decisions, on whether to re-deploy or sell assets. For many of our manufacturing clients, we are using a…

Thanks Bill. So as Bill mentioned we finished the second quarter of fiscal 2016 at the midpoint of our guidance in GMV and above the high end of guidance in adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS. Primarily due to better than expected margins and our start municipal government and retail businesses as more clients utilized our value added services and we expanded with key client accounts ahead of our expectations. Next, I will comment on our second quarter results with comparison periods provided on a year-over-year basis. Total GMV was $153 million. GMV and our GovDeals or state and local government marketplace increased to 49.6 million or 10.1% due to an increase in the number of new sellers and additional sales volumes from existing clients. We now have nearly 8,800 total clients further penetrating the $3 billion state and local government market. GMV in our DoD marketplaces decreased to $29.2 million or 30.2% as a result of lower commodity prices and the shift in property mix to lower value of property. GMV in our commercial marketplaces decreased to $74.2 million or 27.6% as a result of the sale of Jacobs Trading Company. The wind-down of the NESA refurbishment business in Canada and reduced product flows in our retail and energy verticals. Total revenue was $86.9 million and was impacted by the same factors as provided for GMV. Technology and operations expenses remained flat at $24.7 million as a percentage of revenue these expenses increased to 28.4% from 24.0% as a result of the decrease in revenue. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 15.3% to $9.1 million, primarily due to costs incurred in the prior year at Jacobs Trading which was divested in the fourth quarter last year as well as to lower staff cost in fiscal 2016. As a percentage of revenue…

Good morning. As we’ve reached the midpoint of fiscal 2016, we’re encouraged by the progress we’re encouraged by the progress we’ve made in establishing a foundation for future growth. We’ve stabilized our business for key contract changes we’ve added new client programs, are developing new value added services and have continued to make progress in our liquidity one transformation initiative. Looking ahead our third quarter outlook reflects the seasonal increase in our state and municipal government’s soft service activity. Less project activity than our second quarter in valuation services, less project activity in the industrial manufacturing sector that included significant plant closing sales in the quarter, having less favorable product and service fee mix in our DOD programs, in addition in the third quarter, we anticipate spending on our liquidity one initiative to increase sequentially over the second quarter. Entering the second half of our fiscal year we expect uneven financial performance, due to the project based aspects of our business and the changing mix of activity from our diversified marketplaces and service offerings. Our energy vertical and DoD activity continues to be difficult to predict given volatility and commodity prices. We anticipate costs of approximately $2 million in the third quarter of 2016 as we implement the final round of development for our first marketplace launch, complete the design and testing ramp up our ERP and start implementing the ERP and its interfaces to our client facing liquidity one systems. Management guidance for the next fiscal quarter is as follows, we expect GMV in the third quarter to range from $150 million to $175 million. We expect adjusted EBITDA to range from a negative $3.5 million to a negative $1 million, and the adjusted earnings per diluted shares to range from minus $0.13 to minus $0.07. This guidance assumes that we have diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the quarter of 30.6 million. We’ll now take your questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Colin Sebastian of Robert Baird. Your line is open.

A couple just to start, first on the margins, the better than expected margins in the quarter, I wonder if you can, add a little more detail on the utilization of the value added services as well as the expansion with some of the key client accounts, more facilitated those initiatives is that something that we will see carry through potentially over the balance of the year, I’d ask that impart, given the margin guidance for the third fiscal quarter and then secondly related to the energy segment of the business, I’m curious if you’re seeing, in a more or less green shoots from that segment is, there appears to be potentially at least more opportunity, more supply on the liquidation side from the oil and gas sector, if you have additional comments on that would be helpful? Thank you.

So thank you Colin, starting with your last reference to the energy market, I actually referenced the sale that we did in North Dakota and Wyoming during the quarter, which indicates that we’re seeing early signs of market acceptance that, it’s now time to convert assets into cash and we are benefiting from that, I say it’s early because, there is still choppy planning and decision making going on in that supply chain, but we’re well positioned to serve our clients as they make the decision to move forward with asset sales, we’ve got a lot in the pipeline it is just a question of when market clearing prices are embraced by the community of energy supply chain customers, but we do see the improvement in activity in that vertical. In terms of retail supply chain client expansion, we’ve long believed that one stop convenience is important for our clients not only do they want to access sales channels but they also want us to handle pre and post of logistics, I give them data, they help make decisions on the right channel to sell their and so a lot of the data driven business logic on what's the right disposition channel, what's the right time and season to be selling, how to sell, do they upgrade and refurbished items before they are going into the market we are driving all of that business logic as part of our service offering and that's helping us grow with large big box retailers and increasingly the manufacturers can supply them. I think on the manufacturing side these clients are seeking to exit after sale support and that gives us an opportunity to leverage our facilities, return to management processes and our sales channels to sustain and I think that's a long runway…

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Dan Kurnos of Benchmark Company. Your line is open.

Just a couple for me, I just want to clarify something Bill I mean you're talking about this a lot of here just to people understand, we understand the business is lumpy here and think we've got some color around kind of a seasonality we all know there is seasonal uptick, but it sounds like underlying health of the business in your opinion is improving although the step up from what we've seen is sort of this 125 to 150 range could be at least near term dictated by seasonality and you're not ready to say, we're starting to move back up towards those previous or higher GMV guidance ranges, is that all fair?

Yes, I think that's fair because fiscal ’16 is a transformation period for us. We are very pleased with our business development activities, very pleased with the uptick of our services and high proposition, so that is fundamentally healthy. I believe we are expanding our market share and verticals identity that's not pulling through these financial statements yet because there is still some backlog in that industry. But we feel very good about the business development pipeline we feel very good about the diversification of our business across different industry verticals. And I said we've been investing heavily in our marketing, automation and marketing services. So we're seeing strong retention in growth with our buyer base so all those are very healthy metrics for a two-sided marketplace. Where we're seeing the lumpiness is the fact that we had project spend that is uneven as we bring our liquidity one platform through the testing design and open and launch phase, so given those types of projects spend that will effect margin. We do know that commodity prices have been very-pressured in our DoD scrap business and energy business and that is something that is a headwind. We do know that the mix of properties that we receive in certain industry verticals including the DoD, including in retain that can change in the short term and somewhat out of our control that effects margin and also we’ve in the June quarter, the strongest quarter for our municipal government self service business GovDeals, and the self service business, which is a great model, very scalable does have a lower commission rate and therefore lower margin so, that is over the long haul a business we expect to continue to grow nicely but in particular periods if they are a larger share of the mix effects the margin profile for the next quarter.

And then just, on the retail side, I know you talked about pretty high level penetration teams in both big box and omni-channel, are there any specific, could you give us any specifics or granularity on particular verticals, I know that we went through a kind of a period of, some intentional churn a while back and may be some areas where some of your previous endeavors or investments to make teams are starting to payoff now?

Well we know that there is a lot of complexity with customers, buying online, returning to the store, I think retailers would love that, because when a customer enters the store, they are exiting a product for whatever reason they don’t want, but they are getting an opportunity to shop the aisles, but those products coming back, it’s not a great fit for retailers’ core business, so the more they can rely on partners like us, they can get that product renewed and then focus on moving to high margin new product, interim product. So what we’re seeing good receptivity in the do it yourself home improvement channel, a lot of bulky items, high value items, we’re doing a lot of work in with OEMs and audio visual, home entertainment, 4K televisions, gaming systems and the OEM is very sensitive to their brand, it's how it's portrayed in the secondary market and we can ensure that any product that is pulled from a store will return is certified to the manufacturer specs staff and then we can extract a lot of value for those clients by moving it through, different channels, B2C, to end consumers, to business customers and export markets to completely insulate the client from any brand and channel conflict. So if there is lot of interest from OEMs in the consumer electronics and audio visual, and home entertainment vertical, we are also increasing our presence in the home appliance world and there is a macro trend of the big players that have been very active in the traditional consumer electronic space, I think these are, home is the next place where they can add quite a lot of value with smart appliances that communicate with each other, so there is a lot of technology being integrated there and again that’s not a great fit for the OEMs to handle returns after sale activity, and so since we have had some great success in that vertical as well.

Just one last one if I could, just on the expense side just also may be clarify a bit with the step up in the liquidity one transformation spends in the coming quarter, and the expected launch of your first marketplace in fiscal Q4, just how we should think about, the pacing of further expenses, when we start to get, some more leverage and when we get through, sort of the bulk of those, upfront expenses and kind of want more of a steady state, behind the scenes back on expense profile looks like? Thanks.

Well the important thing is to have a quality integration and a quality product and we certainly are focused on having that done, in a timely fashion, but what’s more important for us is rather than managing the precise amount of money we spend, is to ensure that we get a great product that can transform the buying, and selling experience and you know that, fiscal ’16 will continue that spend, as we stand up new marketplaces, I think we’ll have a better opportunity to address, what the tail of that spending is, because when you take products to market, you learn a lot about, how well the product market fit is, and whether there is additional adjustments that are necessary which translates to whether there is additional spending that’s necessary and so I can’t give you precise views on, whether we are at the tail end of the spending yet, I think let’s review that in a couple of quarters, when we have our first marketplace, live in Q4.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Craig Lukin of Roumell Asset Management. Your question please.

My question is in regard to the DoD surplus contract you recently awarded, is there any concern of growing competition in that area or is it true that DoD determined that it was only you and I believe around the plant had the capability to execute and so follow on that, if you can give us any color on the economics of the deal and how happy are you with it?

So certainly the competition is done and we have several years I think it is a five year contract, so the competition at this juncture is probably less relevant to where we're with the business. I think as we have interacted with DoD over at least three re-competes in each case you had have different circumstances and what the clients’ expectations are the scope of work that they're asking us to perform and their logistics requirements based on their facilities and in each case Craig we have focused on adjusting our operations and our services to meet their needs and to so profitably and we expect that to be the case with our current DoD relationship and programs today.

Okay and so I mean can you shed any light on the economic related deal and how satisfied you are on that?

Well as you know that we did aggressively to retain the program, so the margins in the program are lower than what they once were. Having said that it's a terrific program and we're satisfied that we're going to extract a lot of value from the program from the vantage point of buying, buying the property that's available onto the program feeds on marketplace and is very interesting for many of our industrial customers and our other verticals because we have had great success in categories like aerospace, transportation, biopharma, test and medical equipment, machine tools all of which are covered under DoD. So both on a standalone basis and as it relates to an integrated marketplace on the liquidity one, we're very satisfied with that program.

Thank you. At this time I would like to turn the call over to Ms. Davis for any closing remarks, ma'am?

Thank you. Thank you to everyone for your participation on our call today. We will now be available for any follow-up questions. Thank you and have a good day.

Thank you ma'am and thank you ladies and gentlemen for your participation. That does concludes your program. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Have a great day.