Good day ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Q3 2015 Liquidity Services Earnings Conference Call. My name is Grata, and I’ll be your operator for today. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder this call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Julie Davis, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thank you, Grata. Hello and welcome to our third quarter fiscal year 2015 financial results conference call. Joining us today are Bill Angrick, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Jim Rallo, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and Kathy Domino, our Chief Accounting Officer. We will be available for questions after our prepared remarks. The following discussion or responses to your questions reflect management’s views as of today, August 6, 2015, and will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially. Additional information about factors that could potentially impact our financial results is included in today’s press release and our filings with the SEC, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. As you listen to today’s call we encourage you to have our press release in front of you, which includes our financial results as well as metrics and commentary on the quarter. During this call we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. In our press release and our filings with the SEC, each of which is posted on our website, you will find additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations of these measures with comparable GAAP measures. We also use certain supplemental operating data as a measure of certain components of operating performance, which we also believe is useful for management investors. The supplemental operating data includes gross merchandise volume and should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP results. At this time I’d like to turn the presentation over to our CEO, Bill Angrick.

Thanks, Julie. Good morning and welcome to our Q3 earnings call. Before I began I’d like to welcome to this call, our new CFO Jorge Celaya. Jorge brings the Liquidity Services over 25 years of capital markets, financial accounting, operations and strategic transformation experience with global publicly held companies across diverse industries. Jorge will succeed Jim Rallo, who moving forward will focus solely on his previously announced role as President of Liquidity Services retail supply chain group. We thank Jim for his many years of outstanding service as our founding CFO, as well as Kathy Domino who has expanded her role as our Chief Accounting Officer. We are excited by the addition of Jorge, which adds further focus and depth to our leadership team as we execute our transformation and growth initiatives. Next, I’ll review our Q3 performance and provide an update on key strategic initiatives. Kathy Domino will then provide more details on the quarter. Finally Jim Rallo will provide our outlook for the current quarter. Liquidity Service this report in Q3 results in line with our guidance on both the top and bottom-line, led by our state and municipal government business and a retail supply chain marketplace as we continue to drive operational efficiency. However, we experienced weaker than expected results in our commercial capital assets marketplace, as macro trends in our energy vertical impacted pricing and overall transaction volumes. We remained focused on profitable growth and steps we’ve taken to reset selected programs while disruptive in the short-term are important to ensure proper returns on shareholder capital. Year-over-year results for calendar 2015 will continue to reflect the loss of the rolling stock portion of our Department of Defense contract and the termination of our Jacobs Trading Wal-Mart contract. During Q3 we generated cash flow from operating activities…

Thanks, Bill. This quarter we were near the high end of guidance on GMV and adjusted EBITDA and above guidance on adjusted EPS, due to a strong performance in our state and local government marketplace, which saw a steady growth in sellers and continued penetration into the Western United States and Canada. The Department of Defense has exercised all three 30 day renewal option periods for the surplus contract and the DoD extended the performance period for the SWAP contract by nine months with three months additional renewal option periods commencing on June 9, 2015. In addition the profit sharing percentage has moved from 77% to 65% for the DoD. We continue to have a strong operating cash flow, with $10.6 million in Q3 2015 compared to a cash outflow of $4 million in Q3 2014. Year-to-date operating cash flow of $39.5 million is up 676% over the prior year. Next I will comment on our third quarter results. Total GMV was $193.6 million. GMV in our GovDeals, or state and local government marketplace, increased to $54.8 million or 10.6% as we continue to add new clients, bringing total clients to over 7,800 out of the potential 88,000 in the highly fragmented state and local government market. GMV in our commercial marketplaces decreased to $103.3 million or 27.9%, principally as a result of a decrease in our capital assets vertical as a result of continued low oil prices in the energy sector and lower volumes in our retail vertical as a result of the loss of the Jacob’s trading Wal-Mart program. GMV in our DoD surplus marketplace decreased to $19.4 million or 43.8% as a result of the mix change in property flow from the DoD to lower value product and the cessation of sales of rolling stock. GMV in…

Thanks, Kathy. I would to take this opportunity to welcome Jorge Celaya to the team, Jorge and I will be working closely over the next several months transition over my remaining financial responsibilities. I look forward to dedicating 100% of my time in serving the needs of our clients. We’ll continue to make significant investments to further serve our selling clients and buying customers through fiscal year 2016, which we expect will drive long-term growth resulting in our commercial business having a more prominent role driving both top and bottom-line growth. We realized that during this transition we will not be operating at full efficiency, however, based on feedback from our customers and team members we are very confident that these investments have feasible results and improve sales performance a superior customer experience and a more efficient scalable operational platform to support our next phase of growth and value creation. We’ll aggressively pursue efficiencies in our operations as we deliver our newly developed systems and marketplace platforms. During this transition phase, consolidated results will be less indicative of our progress. Management providing the following guidance for the next fiscal quarter. We expect GMV for the fiscal fourth quarter 2015 to range from $150 million to $175 billion. We expect adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal fourth quarter 2015 to range from $1 million to $2 million. For the fiscal fourth quarter of 2015 we estimated adjusted earnings per diluted share to range from $0.00 to $0.02 which kind of assumes that we have an average fully diluted number of shares outstanding for the quarter of 30.2 million and that we’ll not purchase shares with the approximately 5.1 million yet to be expanded under the share repurchase program. Our guidance for adjusted EBITDA and diluted EPS for acquisition cost including transaction cost and changes in earn-out estimates and impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. And two, the stock-based compensation cost which we estimate to be approximately $3.5 million to $4 million for the fiscal fourth quarter. These stock-based compensation cost are consistent with fiscal year 2014. We will now answer questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Colin Sebastian with Robert Baird. Please proceed.

Thanks, good morning guys. I guess first off, what are your expectations for flow of product under the scrap contract and contributions to revenues going forward given the change to the term you announced? And then secondly, you mentioned in the script the retail segment is an area demonstrating some progress where you’ve gained some efficiencies and I wonder if that business on a standalone basis can be profitable and looking ahead where the sales force sees opportunities for growth there? Thanks.

Let me just address the scrap programs material compass variety of commodities, alloys commodities in some cases, electronic waste commodities. I think there have number of teaming arrangements that have allowed partners to access electronic waste and metal alloys, it’s hard to predict the overall volume fluctuations. We’ve been in sort of a tight range over the last two years as to future volumes, to some degree that’s affected by delayed policies on what is allowed to be returned in terms of electronic waste is it hazardous is it non-hazardous. So I don’t really have a crystal ball on what future volumes will be just that we’ll continue to provide that full range of capabilities. Before I turn it over to Jim on the retail side of the house, I would say that as a company not just as in retail as a company part of the LiquidityOne transformation process is to finding best-in-class playbooks for each operational area to drive efficiency and to think about what do the clients truly value and how can we become more scalable. So I think one part of the organization is benefitting from that is the retail supply chain group, but I think this is an ongoing multiyear journey and some of it results in the last year are encouraging, but we’re still very focused on capturing these in the future.

Yeah Colin, I would echo Bill’s thoughts I still think we have work to do we’ve accomplished a lot in the retail supply chain side of the business in the last 12 to 18 months. To answer your question specifically, absolutely on a standalone basis this business will be profitable next year. And we had a drag this year as you know from the wind down of the Wal-Mart relationship which has surely caused the drag on the division overall. But again the future will not be affected by that as we move into next fiscal year. I think when you look at opportunities, you can actually in those earlier comments about OEMs, we’ve added to our services and our capabilities over the last 12 months which has made our distribution center network and our systems more attracted for OEM to work with us. We continue to expand those services. And I think it’s - you will see a pickup next year and a number of clients that are again on the vendor side serving a lot of our retail clients today. On the retail side of the business we continue again to expand opportunities. Our clients are coming to us for solutions on various fronts. And I would expect again to see an expansion there both with existing clients and new clients next year.

And I think just let me add, you’ve seen a lot of industry sectors folks maintain their intellectual property and the brand and outsourcing everything else and so that create stress and after sale support and that’s where we stepped into that void and create a lot of value.

Thanks. And one quick follow-up maybe housekeeping related, but just looking beyond November on the surplus business, t is that the point in time where you sort of set to the terms of a new surplus contract or is that still influx?

So we have partially phased in certain sites under the new program notwithstanding that there is ongoing discussion around operational requirement of the contract. And we expect that the two parties will move to resolve those aspects by the November timeframe. And yes Colin we would expect to move forward exclusively under the new terms.

Okay, great. Thanks guys.

And your next question comes from the line of Gary Frank Prestopino with Barrington Research. Please proceed.

Yeah, good morning. Another question on the scrap contract, that was renewed for how long and then when does the next start [indiscernible] go up or am I mistaken that or it was extended? And is there another RFP coming up or am I wrong on that?

Gary there will an RFP at some point in the future, we’re operating under a nine month extension that nine month extension was announced last month. There is additionally three month renewal option. So a total of 18 months this is a program where the majority of the net profits are distributed back to the DoD clients. And I think it’s been a high level of service. And so, they’re working through their own organizational mission impact issues and so the extension was in the investment risk of the government. I do suspect and expect and our team will come at some point, I just don’t know when.

Okay. And then when does the impact of the Wal-Mart Jacobs trading was to that contract. When does that annualized out?

So Gary we ended operations or I should say ended receiving goods under that contract in December as we previously announced. So from and we are still consulting goods since then obviously we've had and you've seen the result of our inventory has continued to come down with that product flow. We will be selling some into next year but for the most of that product will be done by the end of this fiscal year. So it will be a full year if you would before we can completely last out the year-over-year results.

But the bulk of it is going to be done by the end of this fiscal year is that what I understood you is that?

That's correct. We bulk of that inventory will be out by the end of this fiscal year, correct.

Okay. And then is it possible under your commercial business that you could give us some idea of the break down between energy, retail and then industrial on a GMV basis?

So Gary, as historically we have given some breakdown if you listen to Kathy Domino script. I think that breaking down specific verticals doesn’t really sort of benefit us, when I say benefit us I mean we’re managing the business under a common set of operations. We’re managing the business under a common set of sales teams and so forth. So you certainly have as Bill indicated different verticals that are moving up and down, a lot of that is cyclical and I don’t see us breaking that out at this point in fact with our LiquidityOne transformation which you really getting is we’re completely fully integrating everything. So breaking things out is less relative as we move forward.

There is a couple of comments, I mean one is opportunities revealing itself our ability to cross sell services within large multinational manufacturers, certainly if consumer good and so we have situations where we might initially have sold capital assets for the production of the consumer goods and then we are being invited into help these OEMs protect their brand in the resale supply chain and those opportunities results in more overlap in the nature of the accounts that we managed. We do provide a table in our press release that breaks out commercial consignment business and at the margin consignment is continuing to grow in both capital assets and our retail supply chain group. But really we think about Liquidity Services as a single brand delivering global service scale and results for these clients and they may elect to use one or more of our capabilities to handle finished goods or equipment and that’s how we deliver our servicing and you see that in our new brand message and sales materials and when we go into formal RFPs that’s very well appreciated and we’re seeing a high win rate when we have these formal RFP situation.

Okay. And then just two other quick questions. In terms of the energy business which obviously is having some issues. Is it really an issue of product flow or pricing that is taking the energy area down, I would just assume that if there would be a lot of product flow out there but the pricing has really come down dramatically.

Gary, I think that’s a great question and we’ve all seen the announcements of the major energy exploration production companies. People are dialing back some CapEx and that certainly results in idle assets. So our team as I noted is a market leader recently hosted its energy insights conference where we attracted numerous major players in upstream and downstream production. They are all looking for advice and strategies on how to assess valuation and the ultimate disposition of these assets and we’re sort of in a waiting game we have a lot of high value assets consigned in our pipeline, but the buying population has to make a decision on when it’s in our interest to take position of this equipment and at some point that worm turns and we’ve been through cycles before, this is probably the worst cycle in 10 plus years. And so our goal is to stay close to our client provide them financial advice, strategic advice and ultimately when that market turns we’ll be well position to benefit.

Okay. And then just one last question cash flow really strong, cash building on the balance sheet, no debt on the books where your stock price is, I think you said you had about $5.2 million left on your authorization, any thoughts on capital allocation here going forward beyond that $5 million of the authorization?

No announcement to make this time, but we do monitor share buyback to maintain discipline on dilution. So that’s an ongoing exercise.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Rohit Kulkarni with RBC. Please proceed.

Great, thanks. On updates on LiquidityOne transformation as in where are you with the process as far as the incremental spend promised or year marked for the process I know it’s been maybe six to nine months, so probably you’re half way through whatever you had planned since maybe September or December of last year? And what would be - from the outside what would be the earliest signs of things that you would want us to focus on in terms of progress in terms of forward movement be the specific segment or cost lowering it does seem that costs over the last three quarters, four quarters have been tapering down sequentially $50 million to $48 million, $49 million to $45 million, $46ish million is that an evidence of how you are progressing along this project?

So first before I get into the actual timeline of investment cycle, let me say that LOT has two components, it has revenue enhancement opportunities because we’re developing new capabilities and example of that is our ability to serve more OEMs in the returns management, return to vendor arena. And so the ability to drive new revenue growth and new service capabilities is one area that we’ll be able to highlight and see as we win mandates in those areas. I think you’ll also likely see self service capabilities reveal themselves as we move through fiscal ‘16 and like the self service capabilities our GovDeals platforms forum has always been self-service and we see application of that in the commercial arena for the mid-market. And so you’ll be experimenting with ideas on that. And you’ll see that in the public market place. The other side of the equation is obviously the expense side and by enveloping our entire business with one code, stack, one set of systems and using a much more modular modern cloud based infrastructure, we’ll ultimately be able to realize a cost efficiencies we’ve been moving things to the cloud over the course of fiscal ‘15 that’s an ongoing effort, but we want to understand that we’re driving business practice integration and business transformation and then the IT systems follow that. And so we’re positioned in fiscal ‘17 and beyond to have largely deployed common operational processes, which provides a more efficient business and equipped with unified IT systems. So those are important levers of the LOT program. And in terms of cost, cost is not a linear formula in these programs, there are some big modules that were attacking in parallel I mentioned our HR, human resources information system, that’s just starting to get up and running in terms of deployment we’ll have that deployed internally October 1 and a new payroll system deployed January 1, 2016. But you have financial ERP module that as anyone knows who has done ERP a significant undertaking. It’s the right time for us to do it because we are serving clients globally. We have cross border transactions happening every day in our business and with the addition of Jorge and the experienced team we are in a great position to define the best practices to handle, global sellers and buyers and make sure they have a terrific customer experience, clearing transactions on our back-end. But that process is more weighted to later stages of being completed. So lot of very large important initiatives underneath LOT some in the revenue arena, some that will drive cost efficiencies and there is not a linear spend.

And internally from the progress you are seeing so far, you seem things to be on track, any particular positive surprises that you would highlight?

I think we are on track.

Okay, great. Thank you, guys.

That concludes the question-and-answer portion of today's call. I would now like to turn the conference over to Julie Davis for closing remarks.

Thank you. That concludes our call for today. We thank you for your participation and we will now be available for any follow-up questions. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen that concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.