Damian deGoa
Analyst · Jefferies
Thank you, Jason, and good morning, everyone. I am joined today by Mike Kaseta, our Chief Financial Officer and several members of our management, who may help address questions later in the call. My comments today will be brief and consistent with the release issued earlier today. What I can confidently say is that in seven months since I assume this role CEO we have delivered on every objective we set forth. We immediately address and increase the financial stability of the company, focusing it on value creating activity. We increase the value of our Treprostinil Injection product by securing the FDA clearance and launch of the RG 3ml Medication Cartridge that enables to deliver Treprostinil Injection by subcutaneous route of administration and more than doubles the addressable market for that product. We promptly resubmitted the NDA for LIQ861 now with a PDUFA day action in November. And we continue to engage in multiple work streams to defend our legal rights to provide choice and options for patients to receive Treprostinil therapy in a convenient, easy-to-use dry powder inhaler. Despite some minor setbacks along the way last year, we have shown perseverance. We were not deterred when restrictions imposed by other companies limited access to the cartridges needed by patients using the CADD-MS 3 pump. Instead, working with our manufacturing partner and through our litigation against Smiths Medical and United Therapeutics, we launched the RG 3ml Medication Cartridge earlier this year. We went above and beyond and solved the device problem in order to allow greater patient access to the Treprostinil Injection medication. It’s important to remember that our Treprostinil Injection is AP-rated and therapeutically equivalent to Remodulin, with the same active and inactive ingredients, same dosage strength, same dosage forms, the same Smiths Medical pumps, with the same services and support for patients and healthcare providers at a lower cost. It’s also worth noting that we are partners with Sandoz, Novartis, one of the largest pharma companies in the world, and all the resources and expertise that they had to bear. Even though our product is a generic, we treat the commercialization efforts more like a brand. We have a national field sales force have experienced PAH sales reps, that are calling up prescribers. And we recently hired a VP of Market Access to work with payers to complement Sandoz efforts. We have confirmed that the available supply of pumps is more than adequate to serve the subcutaneous patient population. Though it’s a bit early to assess the full impact of our launch, we are highly encouraged and I look forward to updating you during our next earnings call on the response to this new choice. Concurrent with the launch of the subcutaneous cartridge, our in-house team promptly resubmitted the NDA for 861 ahead of schedule. The FDA has since confirmed that the resubmission was complete and considered a Class 2 response setting a PDUFA gold date of November 7, 2021. We feel confident that the data submitted clarifies and directly addresses the CMC related items identified by the agency last year. We also feel well prepared to support the FDA’s pre-approval inspections, with one currently ongoing at our North Carolina facility. Needless to say, it’s an exciting time in the company’s evolution and we look forward to a positive outcome with the agency with the goal of receiving tentative approval in the fall. As we work to support the FDA’s ability to grant tentative approval, our ultimate success will be tied to the resolution of Hatch-Waxman Litigation brought by United Therapeutics. Well, we cannot disclose the details of our legal strategies and arguments, we can remind you that the FDA’s 30 months regulatory state, which expires in October 2022, is directly tied to patents covering a process of making Treprostinil, a compound that has been manufactured at commercial scale for decades. We will provide updates in the future as they deemed -- as they are deemed material, but for the time period being, we remain confident in our arguments of non-infringement and invalidity that we have pursued in the Hatch-Waxman Litigation and the corresponding IPR proceedings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Lastly, with a long-term path in mind, we took the additional steps in the second quarter to ensure financial -- stable financial footing. We maintained a sense of discipline in each financial decision and we build a prioritized operating plan to provide the capital needed to achieve our near term goals of launching 861. We have taken these steps with the fervent belief that Liquidia’s products are the best interest of the patient community who are -- who we are committed to support. At this time, I’ll turn the call over to Mike to review our second quarter financial summaries.