Good afternoon, and welcome to Open Lending's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, today's conference call is being recorded. On the call today are Keith Jezek, CEO; and Chuck Jehl, CFO. Earlier today, the Company posted its fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings release and supplemental slides to its Investor Relations website. In the release, you will find reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures discussed on this call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you, that this call may contain estimated and other forward-looking statements that represent the Company's views as of today, February 27, 2024. Open Lending disclaims any obligation to update these statements to reflect future events or circumstances. Please refer to today's earnings release and our filings with the SEC for more information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied with such statements. And now, I'll pass the call over to Mr. Keith Jezek. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today for Open Lending's fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings conference call. I am pleased to report that excluding a negative change in estimate associated with our profit share, we exceeded the high end of our guidance range for certified loans and revenues in the fourth quarter. I am proud of our team and would like to thank each of our team members for delivering these results. For the full year 2023, we certified nearly 123,000 loans and delivered total revenue of $117.5 million, adjusted EBITDA of $50.2 million, and generated $75.5 million in cash before repurchasing $37.3 million in our common stock. As I reflect on 2023, the automotive lending environment, which directly impacts Open Lending, faced constrained inventory levels, the highest Fed funds rate in over 20 years, a high consumer affordability index, which represents the weeks of income needed to purchase a vehicle, and worsening credit availability and credit performance metrics. Additionally, credit unions experienced decades low share growth and the highest loan to share ratio since prior to the pandemic. Against this market backdrop, we continue to improve our product and technology, further refine our go-to-market strategy, and invest in key talent to position us well for growth as industry conditions improve. We remain focused on our mission to change lives by making transportation affordable. Notably, one of our most significant accomplishments in 2023 was launching an enhanced lenders protection proprietary scorecard in the fourth quarter. Our new scorecard includes three additional alternative data sources beyond LexisNexis. The additional data provides us with access to 350 million detailed transactions, over 170 million consumer checking accounts, and an expanded suite of credit report attributes developed and maintained by TransUnion. Our model leverages AI machine-learning…

Thanks, Keith. During the fourth quarter of 2023, we facilitated 26,263 certified loans compared to 34,550 certified loans in the fourth quarter of 2022. Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2023 was $14.9 million, which includes an ASC 606 negative change in estimate of $14.3 million associated with our profit share, compared to $26.8 million in revenue in the fourth quarter of 2022, which includes a negative change in estimate of $12.8 million. Excluding the negative change in estimate in fourth quarter of 2023, we exceeded the high end of our guidance range for both certified loans and revenues. To breakdown total revenues in the fourth quarter, program fee revenues were $13.5 million and claims administration fees and other revenue were $2.6 million, while profit share revenue was negative $1.1 million due to the impact of the previously mentioned negative change in estimate. As a reminder, profit share revenue is comprised of the expected earned premiums, less the expected claims to be paid over the life of the contracts, and less expenses attributable to the program. The net profit share to us is 72% and the monthly receipts from our insurance carrier partners reduce our contract asset. Profit share revenue in the fourth quarter of 2023 associated with new originations was $13.2 million or $501 per certified loan as compared to $18.9 million or $546 per certified loan in the fourth quarter of 2022. As a reminder, U.S. GAAP revenue recognition rules related to variable consideration require that we reevaluate the reported profit share revenue estimate for prior periods based on new available information each quarter. This process requires the evaluation of both internal and external information available during the period to quantify the change in estimate for the quarter. Profit share change in estimate is a measure of…

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from the line of Peter Heckmann with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Can you talk a little bit about the outlook for refinancing of auto loans that we -- rates seem to have reached a plateau here and may moderate? We didn't expect much in the fourth quarter, but I guess, what are you thinking in terms of the appetite for some of your lending customers to resume some refinancing programs?

Yes. Hi, Pete, it's Chuck. I'll start and Keith can jump in. But you're right, I mean, we've seen rates stabilize since August, I guess is the timeframe that we've not seen any further actions. We're unlikely to see a cut in March is what -- I think what we're all hearing now, but they have stabilized a bit. I think the key to us as we think about our refinance business and what really -- how it'll really come back for us is really our primary customer, credit unions and the lending capacity and just kind of being lent out. And even if there's an opportunity to refi, it's just having the ability to do that loan. So -- and we believe that we've seen signs, as Keith in the prepared comments said, that, that we've seen signs of improvement of that. But I don't know if you want to add anything else.

Yes, that's a great question. I mean we certainly believe that there'll be very large pent-up demand for refi as these rates have been put on the books, as you're probably noting in the last year at the highest rates in the last 25 years. And so we anticipate a large pent-up demand for refi volume in the future. And in fact, it tipped up ever so slightly, just below 1 percentage point in our certified loans in Q4, right.

Got it. Got it. And then just in terms of the average size of institution, I haven't run all the numbers yet, but I guess we're really not seeing the benefit of that just because of the appetite or the lack of appetite for underwriting a whole lot of loans below prime. Is that having certainly the number of, I think you ended the year with, what, 470 or so active financial institutions. I mean, certainly if we apply some of the metrics that we saw in prior periods to that, I mean there really is a significant potential for higher loan volumes as the market normalizes.

Well, you raise a good point. Again, it's Keith speaking. There is no doubt, as you're well aware; our strategy over the last 18 months has been to focus solely on the larger accounts. And as we begin to ramp up, these institutions will begin to add what we hope is significant volume as reflected in their larger asset size in general. And as you've heard me talk about, we just want to make sure that we have the successful integrations already with their losses, so we can install faster. And in fact, our time to first Cert volume, first Cert revenue has gone from roughly 180 days down below 100 days. So not only are we targeting the bigger accounts, but we're able to get to first revenue much, much faster.

Okay. All right. Thank you. I'll get back in the queue.

Thanks, Pete.

Thank you. Next question comes from the line of David Scharf with JMP Securities. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions today. Keith wanted to follow-up on some of the commentary on credit union growth. You noticed the slowest deposit growth, in, I guess, 25 plus years. Were you indicating I was writing down too quickly, did you start to see some first signs of a rebound in the fourth quarter? Just trying to get a sense for in different rate environments, what the competitive aspects are of credit unions versus kind of regionals and community banks, how they typically respond to a lower rate environment, what advantages, and just how your value prop is either more or less compelling to a credit union in various rate environments. Because increasingly it seems like in recent quarters, the discussions have been focusing more on the liquidity of this customer as opposed to what's now a familiar refrain about the consumer side of your marketplace bottomed out.

I'm sorry; can you repeat that last sentence?

I'm sorry. Really trying to get a sense of, I mean, are you getting increasing conviction that credit union lending capacity is finally bottomed out?

Well, yes, we saw signs, and that's what I tried to refer to in my opening remarks, that we've seen an increase in share growth, which gives us great sign for optimism. But let's just first just take a quick step back. Many lenders, including credit unions have taken a pause with the lag effect of the Fed's actions. And the Fed intended to tighten and slow down the economy. And lo and behold, they did. All of consumer finance is down, but what we're seeing is a continued or a start to share growth in our credit unions, and we think that the coming interest rate relief will lead to reversal of deposit outflows. And will lead to -- that will lead to the current tightening of consumer credit being only a temporary thing. Prior cycles have shown us it's only temporary and they will get back to their core mission of community-based lending.

Got it. Maybe as a follow-up, just kind of once again sort of taking a step back from all of the different external shocks and unique aspects of this cycle. One of the themes that the company has always communicated is that part of the value proposition to potential new lenders is CECL relief. And instinctively, I would think in a higher loss environment, where you're even -- where you're having to reserve for even greater lifetime losses upfront, that the value prop would potentially be even greater. It seems like in this environment that hasn't necessarily been the case. Can you just talk about the conversations with potential clients during the sales cycle, how CECL relief is sort of playing into those discussions? Or are you just finding that a lot of potential lenders are just so bogged down right now and uncertainty, that's not as much of a factor just yet?

Well, and again, this is Keith speaking. I love the nuance of your question, because what we are seeing is, in addition to being what we call in the industry lent out. So their loan to share ratios being at decades high and with share growth being at decades low, they had to in 2023, for the first time, take on these CECL reserves. So it was this, almost this triple whammy to slow down the potential growth in lending. Our value proposition, the discussions that we have around CECL are just as valid and just as valuable as ever before. And we're engaged weekly in conversation with current customers and prospective customers about the value of the program to get them this much needed relief.

Got it. Thank you very much. Very helpful.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Kyle Peterson with Needham & Company. Please go ahead.

Hey, great. Good afternoon, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to start off on some of the profit share developments in the ASC 606 adjustments. Just wanted to kind of get a sense of how you guys are thinking about, at least in the 1Q guide, some of the different macro assumptions, just so we can kind of model in what the expected changes on the prior period developments are. Obviously, we've taken a couple negative revisions the last couple of quarters, but what are you guys assuming at least over the next couple of months here on that front?

Yes. Hey, Kyle, it's Chuck. I'll start; maybe we just step back and just kind of think about the industry a bit. The credit market has worsened throughout fiscal 2023 for all participants in consumer savings eroded, credit card debt increased, delinquency rates increased and then loan loss across lenders continued to grow throughout the year. Delinquency for auto 15-year plus highs and despite Open Lending, if you think about our strength of our decision and pricing engine, we're not immune to the overall performance of credit like a lender. But it's important to note we're not the lender and we're dependent on defaults and -- delinquencies and defaults lenders and their servicing. So we're not a servicer. So I think that backdrop kind of points to delinquencies, 60-plus day delinquencies in our book or 100 basis points better than the 60 plus in the non-prime in the industry. So we're 4.5%, 60 plus and the industry is 5.5%. I think as we think about the $14.3 million and what we booked in the quarter and you think about the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, the MUVVI, what we're seeing right now are the worst performing vintages. Call it late 2021, and into 2022, those vintages are put on the peak of the Manheim and the highs and that's the peak claims and defaults 18 months to 24 months out. So that's what we're seeing in working through as a company and everybody in the industry is. So if you think about the $14.3 million we booked, it was merely just frequency of default was the main driver in the quarter and then also severity of loss. The Manheim Vehicle -- the MUVVI came down more than the industry expected, more than Cox expected, and that impacted us as well. So those were two negative impacts and then there was prepay speeds were better than we projected and that was a positive impact. So you put all that together, that's what generated the back book adjustment of the $14.3 million in the book. So as we think about moving forward, your comment, we feel like 18 months to 24 months past those worst performing vintages, we feel like we're well into and feel like hopefully that's something that's going to be behind us soon. So -- but I hope that's helpful. I just wanted to give a little bit of perspective on the kind of the back, in the measures that we've taken, Keith mentioned in the prepared comments, we've implemented a new scorecard LT 2.0 card that's going to be a better predictor of default delinquencies than default and the appropriate price for the risk and take less risk on certain different scores and credits. So we believe we're taking the appropriate actions to continue to protect our book.

That's helpful. I appreciate the color. And just to follow-up a little bit, I know there's been a lot of conversation with some of the different bank volatility and concerns about concentration, specifically in some commercial real estate assets and such. But how have some of your conversations gone, I guess particularly with the bank clients, given some of the regulatory impetus to diversify the loan book, has there been more appetite from some banks that might have historically skewed a little more commercial to maybe partner with you guys to diversify the loan book, or you guys not seen any impacts from some of the recent volatility with your New York community banks and such as of late?

Yes. And this is Keith speaking. I think it's a good question. We were just at a large automotive finance conference last couple of weeks ago, and there's a heightened interest from banks to grow the book of business around auto and then specifically to kind of grow this book of business around this near non-prime sector. As you well know, they need to check all types of fair lending boxes and chief among those is the CRA, the Community Relief Act. So there's a great deal of interest in growing this book of business with the bank segment. That's one of the reasons why, as I noted in our 2024 priorities, that we're focusing more heavily on that cohort.

Very helpful. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question comes from the line of John Hecht with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Yes. Afternoon, guys. Thanks very much. First question is, how do we think about, I guess, seasonality of Certs this year? I mean, usually there is a seasonal element to the business, but at the same time, you're talking about maybe Trans bottoming out and maybe as you go through the year, you might get some organic growth, kind of same-store sales type of activity with the newer counterparties that you guys have signed up. So, I mean, do you think that Certs, which you kind of in the middle of the range, you kind of sit flat in the first quarter from Q4. Is there a chance or an expectation that the Cert activity would grow throughout the year or will it follow more seasonal trends as we think about forecasting?

Hey, John, it's Chuck. Yes, as we think about, we're just putting out the quarterly guidance still as you saw, and there's just so much going on in the puts and takes of the guide, the affordability around the consumer, inventory levels, elevated prices, I could go on and on. We talked about lending capacity at the credit unions. Keith talked about the share growth or deposit growth. It's in the tightening focused on prime and super prime. It's a difficult time to really project that. So if you think about our flat from Q4 to Q1 in the guide, March is seasonally obviously a strong month for the company, and -- but it is the best. And Q1 is not always the best quarter. But March is a seasonally strong month due to tax season. But you probably read, as we did, that there's delay on tax refunds and even dollar amounts of the refunds are even smaller, so all of those things went into our inputs to the quarter. And as we think about full year, the timing of any Fed cut, we thought there might be a cut in March. Looks like that's not going to happen now, and hopefully, later in the year, we'll start to see that, but it's really hard to project.

Okay. And then thinking about program fees and profit share levels per Cert, I think is the current range, I mean, I think you've been around $520 of program fees per Cert for a little while. The profit share has kind of drifted lower. But as you re-price some of the premium, where do we think those go on a trajectory basis?

Yes. We'll start with program fees, and it's all based on mix, right? I mean, in volume unit, we have the volume discounts on our program fees, so -- but I think modeling in that $520 range on average for program fee is fine, and on profit share around that $500, I think is a good number to model. But we do have a new scorecard in place that we've talked about, and we're going to be better predicting this risk and the probability of default. But even at the $500 profit share, we've talked about this before to an ultimate loss ratio. We've stressed that new vintage, the Q4 vintage to about a 64% loss ratio. So -- and we're seeing the new vintage -- new vintages perform better than the older vintages that I talked about on my previous comment about the late 2021, 2022 vintages performing worse. So there could be some room there. But that's we put it on the books at $500 with that stress in the current environment, but they're hopeful it'll perform a little better.

Thank you guys very much.

Okay. Yes. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Next question comes from the line of John Davis with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Mr. Davis, please go ahead with your question. Mr. Davis, if you have muted the phone from your end, please unmute your phone and go ahead with your question.

Hey, can you guys hear me?

Hey, JD, yes, we're hear, JD first [ph] unmute.

Thanks for taking the question. This is Taylor on for JD. Just to follow-up on the refi question, it looks like refis were about 5% of total Certs during the quarter. So it's obviously been much higher previously, but still up quarter-over-quarter. So just curious how we should think about refi as a percent of total Certs in 2024, just with the mentioned large pent-up demand.

Well, quarter-over-quarter refi at 5% in the fourth quarter of 2023 is actually down from 14% in Q4 2022. So it's just been since the rate hikes and even starting in, I guess, early 2022, when the Fed started taking action, we went from a peak of 43% in Feb of 2022 down to just single-digits on the refi. We still believe it's a great opportunity for us, and as our lenders have capacity and free up the balance sheets, it'll come back, because obviously, affordability we talked about is huge to the near and non-prime consumer and there's a lot of opportunity there to refi. But to give you the exact percent of what that's going to be in 2024, it's hard to say right now, just based on the kind of the impacts to our core customer and the lending capacity challenges.

And I would just add, and this is Keith, that we just think of it as a potential nice upside to the business.

Absolutely.

We know it would all happen. And we know this; we call it a refi tsunami will hit. There are shores. We're just not sure exactly when that will happen.

Got you. That's helpful. And then just on adding any new OEMs, I think recently you've mentioned multiple OEMs in the pipeline, so just curious if there's any update there on how conversations are progressing.

Yes, great question. This is Keith. Progressing really nicely, as you've heard me say before, multiple large prospects in the pipeline, solid material progression through milestones throughout the sales process, these are long sales cycles and we're cautiously optimistic that we'll have success with a couple of them. In addition to that, we keep adding just kind of larger enterprise type accounts in and around the OEM captive space as well. So the pipeline is growing. The progress through the pipeline is growing objectively, and we're very optimistic about the future with additional captives. As you heard us say in the prepared remarks, the captives have now eclipsed all other lender types as the number one source of auto loan originations in the U.S.

Thanks for taking the question.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor over to Keith Jezek for closing comments.

Well, thank you, operator, and thank you, everyone, for your time today. I just wanted to say, as we look forward, it's important to remember that the near and non-prime then file and credit invisible borrowers are not going away. These borrowers will find access to credit. Open Lending offers a unique solution that combines over two decades of credit risk with default insurance that allows all lenders to offer fair rates to these borrowers while meeting their individual yield targets. Thank you again.

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.