Thank you, Brendan. It's a pleasure to speak with – to you today and I'm excited to discuss the results of our lead clinical trial, Lomecel-B. To start let me review the background and various initiatives of our Aging Frailty program for the benefit of the listeners. Several years ago, we launched two clinical trials evaluating Lomecel-B and older individuals diagnosed with mild to moderate Aging Frailty. One was to study the effects of Lomecel-B primarily on endurance exercised to tolerance and mobility. We referred to this trial as the Phase 2b trial. And the second trial designated to evaluate with Lomecel-B can improve immune response in at-risk frail subjects receiving the influenza vaccine. We referred to this as the HERA trial. Both of these trials were awarded grants along the way with substantial funding received from the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Aging for the Phase 2b and a Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund TEDCO award for the HERA trial. As announced earlier this year, we completed both of these trials and we now have the data for the Phase 2b. We anticipate announcing data from the HERA trial later in this third quarter. In addition to the U.S. frailty trials, our Japanese Phase 2 Aging Frailty clinical study is on track to initiate later this year being led by our partners at the National Center for Geriatrics & Gerontology in Japan. And finally, we sponsor a registry in the Bahamas under the approval and authority of the National Stem Cell Ethics Committee while like in the U.S. and Japan, Lomecel-B is considered investigational and not approved for commercial sale under the approval terms from the Ethics Committee, we are permitted to charge a fee to participants, which offsets the costs of sponsoring the Registry Trial. Our frailty program was predicated upon the results of the Phase 1/2 clinical trial at [indiscernible] of the University of Miami several years ago, where we administered allogeneic bone marrow derived MSCs into older frail subjects and evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 52 weeks in a placebo-controlled design. The results of this study, which are published in the Journals of Gerontology, provided the basis for Longeveron frailty program and the Phase 2b clinical trial. The objective of the Phase 2b trial is to evaluate whether an investigational product Lomecel-B could have a positive impact on the signs and symptoms of the condition. Aging Frailty is a clinically defined and extreme form of unsuccessful aging and it is readily recognized by a combination of the hallmark clinical symptoms, which can include involuntary muscle loss, something called sarcopenia, weakness, slowing down, fatigue, unintentional weight loss, and low activity levels, as well as being associated with a chronic inflammatory state. The diagnosis of Aging Frailty indicates that the individual is at an elevated risk for core clinical outcomes such as hospitalization, institutionalization and death. Despite the pressing need for interventions, there are no FDA approved therapies that can slowdown, reverse or prevent Aging Frailty. Frailty would be considered a new indication from a regulatory standpoint and that's where we're required discussions with the FDA and other health authorities as to potential clinical and regulatory pathways for future approval. So the Phase 2b trial, which was partially funded by a prestigious Small Business Innovation Research grant from the NIH evaluated the safety and efficacy of the single peripheral intravenous infusion of four different doses of Lomecel-B therapy compared to placebo. The study randomized and treated a total of 148 subjects as follows: 25 million cells, there were 37 recipients, 50 million cells n equals 31, 100 million cells n equals 34, 200 million cells n equals 16 and placebo n equals 30. The main inclusion criteria for entry into the trial was 70 to 85 years of age, a screening six-minute walk test of between 200 and 400 meters, a Canadian Health and Safety Assessments, abbreviated as CHSA, clinical frailty score of five or six, five is mildly frail, six is moderately frail and a minimum serum TNF-α of greater than 2.5 micrograms per ML. TNF-α is a marker of inflammation in the blood. We selected as our primary endpoint to six minute walk test distance. Safety and efficacy evaluations were conducted at 90, 180 and 270 days after infusion. The six-minute walk test is a validated field study. It's widely used to assess functional exercise capacity, treatment effectiveness and prognosis because it is accurate, reproducible, easy to administer and well tolerated. It has been used as the basis for FDA approval for many drugs and indications, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension, COPD, Hunter syndrome and Morquio A syndrome, which is a lysosomal storage disorder. The six minute walk test is particularly applicable to Aging Frailty because the test is an integrated global assessment of cardiac, respiratory, circulatory and muscular capacity. Age-related loss of skeletal muscle, sarcopenia, leading to diminished strength, lack of endurance and low tolerance of physical exertion, a common core clinical presentations of Aging Frailty. The six minute walk test, therefore, can be used as a meaningful reflection of a patient's ability to perform basic activities of daily living. Statistics indicate that 40% of community dwelling adults over 75 years of age has difficulty walking even a quarter mile, which is 400 meters, which is the U.S. Census Bureau Standard Measure to assess disability. The pre-specified statistical analysis plan for the primary efficacy endpoint, the change in six minute walk distance at 180 days post infusion involved a primary analysis and a secondary analysis. It's now my pleasure to give you the primary results of the study. The primary analysis of the primary efficacy endpoints, the primary analysis compared the change from baseline in six minute walk test distance for the four Lomecel-B cohorts to the placebo cohort of day 180, the average baseline six minute walk test was comparable for all groups and the entire population average was 311 meters, which clearly indicates an impaired mobility. There were statistically significant increases in the highest three doses of 50 million, the 100 million and the 200 million Lomecel-B cohorts and no significant changes in the placebo for the lowest dose of Lomecel-B. However, after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Hochberg method four Lomecel-B cohorts did not show a statistically significant placebo-adjusted difference compared to placebo. These changes were 0.2 in the 25 million, p 0.9902, 27.7 meters in the 15 million p 0.1279, change of 16.8 meters in the 100 million p equals 0.3472 and change compared to placebo in the 200 million of 41.3 meters p 0.0635. However, the 200 million dose group did get close and unfortunately had a smaller cohort size compared to the rest of the cohorts. Now, despite not achieving the statistical significance for the peer-wide comparison to placebo at day 180 significant differences from placebo were observed at day 270 with a 50 million and 200 million Lomecel-B cohorts, which was a pre-specified exploratory endpoint. I would now like to show the slides, please Brendan.