Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Littelfuse Incorporated First Quarter 2019 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. At this time, I will turn the call over to the Head of Investor Relations, Trisha Tuntland. You may begin, ma'am.

Good morning, and welcome to the Littelfuse first quarter 2019 earnings conference call. With me today are Dave Heinzmann, President and CEO; and Meenal Sethna, Executive Vice President and CFO. This morning, we reported results for our first quarter, and a copy of our earnings release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website. A webcast of today's conference call will also be available on our website. Our discussions today will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may involve significant risks and uncertainties. Please review today's press release and our Form's 10-K and 10-Q for more detail about important risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. We assume no obligation to update any of this forward-looking information. Also, our remarks today refer to non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure is provided in our earnings release available in the Investor Relations section of our website. Before proceeding, I'd like to mention our participation at upcoming investor events. On May 7, we will be at Oppenheimer's Industrial Growth Conference in New York. On June 5, we will be attending Baird's Global Consumer, Technology & Services Conference in New York. And on June 10, we will be at Stifel's Cross Sector Insight Conference in Boston. We hope to see you at these events. I will now turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks, Trisha. Good morning and thanks for joining us today. We delivered a solid first quarter in line with our sales and adjusted EPS guidance. We achieved revenue of $406 million and our adjusted EPS of $1.96 was above the midpoint of our guidance range. During the first quarter, we continue to see good design win activity across the electronic, industrial and transportation end markets we serve, driven by the strong fundamentals of the business and the content opportunities driven by a safer, greener and more connected world. Later I will provide more commentary on the performance of the business. With ongoing softness in global auto production and access channel inventories in electronics, we anticipate soft demand to persist. We continue to expect improving conditions in the second half of the year. Despite slower growth in some areas of our end markets, we remain well positioned to continue the execution of our five year strategy of double digit sales and earnings growth. As we have a demonstrated in the past, we will deliver exceptional value for our shareholders by driving above the market sales growth, leveraging our operational excellence and managing our cost to align to business conditions. With that brief introduction, I'll now turn the call over to Meenal to provide additional color on our financial results.

Thanks, Dave, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with highlights from our first quarter of 2019. Sales of $406 million net guidance and as projected we're down 3% overall and 4% organically versus last year. Foreign exchange headwind of 2% was higher than we had projected, while acquisitions net of business exit added 3% sales growth. Sales across our electronics and industrial segments finished largely as we expected. Our automotive segments sales were slightly softer than our expectations. Global car build, excluding Japan where we have limited automotive sales was down 7%, a greater decline than we had expected. GAAP operating margins were 15%, while adjusted operating margins finished at 16.2%. Sequentially, adjusted operating margins improved 110 basis points on essentially flat sales more than offsetting foreign exchange headwinds. This improvement was a combination of our teams' ongoing efforts to contain costs while driving ongoing benefits from IXYS synergy initiatives. First quarter GAAP diluted EPS was $1.48, GAAP EPS included $12 million in after tax charges, mainly due to non-operating foreign exchange losses as well as acquisition, integration and restructuring charges. Adjusted diluted EPS of $1.96 for the quarter was above our guidance midpoint of $1.93. Foreign exchange headwinds along with negative mark to market comparisons reduced adjusted EPS by about $0.27 compared to last year. Lower volumes and associated leverage partially offset by lower expenses resulting from our IXYS synergies and cost containment efforts drove the remainder of our EPS decline over last year. Our GAAP effective tax rate was 20.3% for the quarter. Our adjusted effective tax rate was 19.7% essentially flat to last year. Now let me provide some additional performance highlights by product segment for the first quarter. Currency headwinds followed by lower year-over-year sales volumes and leverage had the largest impact to our company operating…

Thanks, Meenal. We'll start with our electronics product segment. In the first quarter reported sales of $265 million were up slightly with organic sales down 4%. We saw a softness across some of our electronics end markets, we had success and growth opportunities across appliances and automotive electronics despite a significant decline in global auto production. We continue to see channel inventory corrections in response to lower growth rates and access inventory at end customers. Our electronics book-to-bill exited the first quarter was nearing 1.0, an improvement over where we were – what we were seeing three months ago. We continue to closely monitor distributor point of sales data and inventory levels. Broad line distributor book-to-bill for our products was also around 1.0. During the quarter, we saw stable demand for our power semiconductor products, which have less automotive and distribution exposure. However, the protection side is a semiconductor business similar to our Passives business is more reliant on the distribution channels and was impacted by excess inventory. While our channel partners have reduced absolute inventory levels in our products, slower end market demand resulted in a static level of weeks of inventory in the channel. As we exited the first quarter channel inventory is across most of our electronics products remained at the upper end of our normal range, which is typically 11 to 14 weeks. As a result, we expect continued softness with ongoing distributor inventory destocking consistent with our comments in January. Our long-term relationships with our channel partners are significant factor contributing to our success across our electronics product segment, it's about 75% of sales in the segment are fulfilled through our distribution partners. These three relationships jointly drive demand creation in customer partnerships and ultimately collectively drive profitable growth. However, when the market growth pattern…

Thanks, Dave. Onto guidance now, as we discussed in January, we expected the first half of 2019 was going to be a challenge due to a variety of market factors, but we expected to see improving conditions largely in the second half of the year. As Dave noted, the market trend in content opportunities, we continue to see aligned to this view. With this backdrop, we anticipate sales to the second quarter of 2019 of $409 million to $421 million. The midpoint of the guidance reflects a 10% decline in reported sales and a 7% organic sales decline versus last year. We estimate currency to be about a 2% headwind to sales growth for the quarter. We expect second quarter adjusted diluted EPS to be in the range of $2 to $2.14. Our adjusted EPS guidance assumes an adjusted effective tax rates in the range of 18% to 19% for the quarter. Our adjusted EPS guidance includes an estimated $0.25 decline from last year, due to unfavorable foreign exchange impacts and mark-to-market comparisons as well as timing of stock compensation expense. Sequentially, sales growth is projected to be up 2%, with adjusted EPS growth projected to be 6% at the midpoint of our guidance, highlighting the cost improvement efforts that we're driving. We are estimating 25 million share – 25 million diluted shares for the second quarter, which incorporates the shares bought back to date. I'll also provide a few additional financial model updates for the full year. Consistent with recent trends, currency is continued to be a headwind. Based on current foreign exchange rates for the full year, we expect to see about a 1% sales decline from foreign exchange and about $0.50 in adjusted EPS decline versus last year due to currency. At current interest rates, we are estimating interest expense for the year in the range of $22 million to $23 million. We expect amortization expense of approximately $40 million for the year. We're maintaining our full year 2019 tax rate range in the 18% to 20% range, but expect the rate to vary across quarters due to the timing of certain discreet tax items. Our full year estimate for capital expenditures remains $90 million to $95 million. We expect to invest for long term organic growth opportunities as well as the IXYS footprint and integration work, which is in full swing this year. And with that, I'll turn it over to Dave for some final comments.

Thanks, Meenal. In conclusion, you can see by our actions that we remain focused on operational excellence and managing our cost to align to business condition. Over the years, we have been proven source of growth and value creation. Our business fundamentals remain strong and we are well positioned to benefit from the content opportunities driven by the global mega trends of safety, energy efficiency and increasing connectivity. We will continue to differentiate our company by the consistency, reliability, and performance we deliver with our circuit protection, power control and fencing products in the electronic, industrial and transportation end markets we serve. I will now turn the call back to the operator for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Shawn Harrison with Longbow Research. Please proceed.

Good morning, Shawn.

Good morning. The inventory correction that you're seeing in the electronics business based upon the POS you're seeing from distribution now through April, do you think you'll be free and clear of that inventory overhang as you move into the second half of the year and get more toward a typical organic growth rate?

Shawn, as we discussed in the prepared remarks, we did see absolute inventory dollars reduce in the channels with our distribution partners, but with sell through, the weeks of inventory really didn't move down very much. So there's certainly more work to be done and driving that out of the channel. Clearly, that's impacting and reflected in our guidance in the second quarter. Our general view is – there's a likelihood it bleeds into third quarter, but certainly begins to improve in the back half of the year.

Okay, great. And then there is a follow-up. Is there a way to quantify, the actions of the non-IXYS action, you have taken to improve profitability, either be in the sensors business or other businesses and when you would expect to see the full run rate of those potential profit improvement actions?

Yes. So Shawn, as I mentioned also in the prepared remarks, we started in the fourth quarter into the first quarter with cost reduction. And then also, we just recently announced the plant closure, I mentioned. Those take a little bit of time to start to get into the run rate because closures typically take six to nine months to complete by the time you get everything out. So I would say, you're going to see progressive sequential improvement in the margin. That's what we're expecting some of the cost actions. I think, the pieces that are a little bit difficult to predict right now are things like foreign exchange as an example, which had a pretty significant headwind for us. But we would expect progressive sequential improvement from all the cost actions that we're doing.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Christopher Glynn with Oppenheimer. Please proceed.

Good morning, Chris.

Thanks. Hey, good morning. On the IXYS integration comments that process including some footprint stuffs in full swing, just wondering if we should be thinking about impacts on the profitability of IXYS even on an adjusted basis. I know, you exclude the restructuring costs that are permitted, but typically there is redundancies and such?

Well, certainly we expect the profitability of the IXYS business that we acquired to continue to gradually improve profitability. As we put these actions in place. As we've talked about, we've taken some steps on taking out some product lines that really didn't drive margin profiles that we felt. We're appropriate and didn't fit our strategy. And these cost reduction moves also longer term on footprint rationalization will take time to get in place. As we talked about, we literally announced recently we're starting construction of a new plant in the Philippines, but that's going to take us two to three years to get the plant completed, the transfers completed, customer approvals and things like that. But we certainly believe year-to-year, we will continue to see gains and profitability of the IXYS business.

Okay. Thanks for that. And then on the $0.50 of EPS impact from FX for the year, can you review the mechanics on transactional exposure there? Overall – and then where it's could, particularly, it sounds like auto?

Yes. So if I step back bigger picture from the business that we have and where we do business in general. We have a long position when it comes to the euro. So the weaker euro has hurt us and we have short position in largely in the countries where we've got larger manufacturing sites, so one in places like China where the stronger RMB does hurt us, the Philippines and Mexico. But I think with that backdrop, with the direction where currencies have moved, they're moving around a little bit. It's the combination of really, I'd say those four currencies that are really causing, and I'd say the bulk of that being from the euro and the RMB that are really causing that year-over-year decline. And specifically, on your question on auto, Chris, when we take a look at our broader, I call it the sales and the manufacturing footprint in our auto was probably the most dispersed in terms of sales around the world in multiple currencies and really manufacturing in locations around the world across the entire segment. So that's why it tends to get hurt the most from a currency perspective.

Thank you, Chris.

And our next question comes from David Leiker with Baird. Please proceed.

All right. Good morning.

Good morning.

I guess two things I'd like to take through. You kind of rely, I mean if you look at the timing of the stock comp, it's, headwind here in Q2. I mean by definition, I think that implies it was a tailwind at some point last year. Can you help clarify that? And as you look at product Q1 and Q2 are progressing and if you step back three or four months, can you give us some sense, I know you don't get full year guidance, but some sense of what that depth full year it looks like. Obviously, currency and production are headwinds, but what about the balance of that relative to what you were expecting at the start of the year?

Yes, so let me take the stock comp piece first. So really the stock comp is really a timing issue. And if I put it simply, for us the grants occur in the second quarter of the year. And we, like many companies have provisions around retirement and age of service and if individuals meet those provisions, you've got to – we accelerate investing. And so you take expense immediately in the quarter. So rather than ratably having that expense spread over multiple years, it gets – it hits all in one quarter. And so that's really – that ends up being the timing issue. I'd say twofold. One being second quarter for us tends to have the highest stock compensation expense because of that. And as we have some bigger invests that are going on it even frontloads expense versus the multiple years of investing that you have.

But that the timing of that is similar to what it would have been in past years. Is that right?

Timing is similar to past years, but we happened to have just some higher – happened to have just with the population that we have. We just happen to have more people that fall into that and with some higher dollar amounts year-over-year.

Okay. And then if we – currency and leave the build rates on the side, if you look at the rest of the business, how would you characterize that that's performing relative to where you expected at the beginning of the year?

Yes, I think – I'll take that David. I think, in general, the years kind of shaping up as we expected going directly into the year. We certainly knew that the first half of the year with excess inventories and a bit of a correction in the electronic side of the business was going to be a challenge. We're seeing that, maybe it'll take us a little longer than we'd hoped to kind of bleed through that. Maybe, again, as I mentioned earlier, a little bit in the third quarter. From the automotive standpoint, we are going into the year, I had a more pessimistic view on what car build was going to look like. In the full year of 2019 then maybe what the agencies we're putting out, probably pretty consistent though when I think what David, your embarrassed view is on what car build is. So yes, kind of shaping out as we expected, I do think the amount of excess inventory in the channels in automotive, which normally has not been or hasn't historically been so much of a headwind. In China, because of our structure being a little different and the number of small tier ones and small OEMs that we serve, a lot of that gets served through distribution channels. And so there was more excess inventory in the channel in automotive then we would typically have seen. And that's probably a bit of a negative surprise for us. But we'll work our way through that as car builds pick up in Asia.

Thank you, David.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Matt Sheerin with Stifel. Please proceed.

Good morning, Matt.

Stock comp and the year-over-year headwinds, that $0.25 year-over-year headwind on EPS, you talked about stock comp and mark-to-market and FX. Could you break that down for us and also kind of elaborate on what that mark-to-market impact was in, what was that?

Yes. So let me start with your second question. So we talked about in various calls that with the accounting rules changed around minority investments that you had and that changed in the beginning of 2018. So you're required to mark-to-market minority investments that you have in that mark-to-market runs through the P&L. So we have a few investments that we've had impacts every quarter, sometimes, they end up being material. Last year for us, we had some positive income that came through and we don't forecast that. So that ends up being the issue and that's about a $0.05 impact on a year-over-year basis. The stock comp incremental piece on a year-over-year basis is about $0.09 and then the rest is foreign exchange.

Okay, great. That's helpful. And then back onto the electronics business and the headwinds that you're seeing in the correction. One thing, I think you did talk about that last quarter, it was the fact that the pricing has been stable if not firm or up in some cases last year and the thought from the suppliers industry beaters, is that volumes come back, we're going to be – if you return to more normal pricing and some pricing pressure. Are you starting to see that as volumes come back and what's your take on the pricing environment as we go through the year?

Good question, Matt. And yes, as we talked about last year, we probably had more favorable pricing conditions than we would in a normal year with a strong kind of build up that was going on in the focus on making sure they have product. So we do see that, beginning to move back closer on its way towards normal. It's not back yet at a stage where we see pricing and kind of our average level, particularly in electronics. So it's still favorable compared to history, but it's becoming unfavorable compared to last year. So our expectation is that kind of worked its way back to normal levels over the course of the next maybe three or four quarters.

Thank you, Matt.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Steven Fox of Cross Research. Please proceed.

Good morning.

Good morning. First question was, the operating leverage you called out in your – for the current quarter, 6% increase in profits versus 2% in sales. What are the main drivers quarter-over-quarter in that leverage? And then I had a follow-up.

Sure. So the 2% and the 6% that I called that was really for the second quarter, the 2% growth…

Yes. That's what I was talking about.

Sure. So the leverage – so when I talked about earlier with some of the questions, the stock compensation piece is actually from a timing perspective and sequential perspective, that's actually a negative for us. And then offsetting that, there were some of the operational improvements we've been talking about. It's the continued progression we see in the IXYS synergies that are coming through. The additional volume that we have, the sales volume that helps from a margin and a leverage drop through as well. And then overall, we've been talking about the past couple of quarters, we're really containing costs in terms of – not just variable costs but other discretionary spend, et cetera. And you're seeing some of the benefits of that.

Great. That's helpful. And then I had a follow-up if I could?

Sure.

In terms of closing the sensor plant, I guess, I was trying to understand the thought process involved there. How reactionary it was or strategic? And given sort of the uncertainty, hopefully improving markets and some of the product pruning, you seem to have on your operating calendar to do. Could you pull some of that in or push some of that out? Are you going to move that around depending on market conditions? Thanks.

Yes. So in general, what's driven us to make the decision to do a plant consolidation and shutdown a plant. We had a small – relatively small sensor manufacturing plant in Italy. We have a larger factory in Lithuania and we also do a lot of sensor manufacturing in Mexico. So we made the decision that simplifying the footprint for the long-term would give us a better on a lower fixed overhead cost structure. So we made that decision really for the long-term strategy of the business. Pulling that in and pushing that out, it's really not related to particular cycles or things like that, because as you know, in the automotive world, when you're making transfers and changes like that, you've got to work very closely with customers and get qualifications and go through that process. So that really dictates the timing of when you can complete those things. Other actions that we're looking at in the automotive sensor business. Clearly, in the automotive world, you don't move very rapidly with customers without creating problems for customers. So, we will continue to look at those things and make decisions and take actions as quickly as possible. But with respect to what our customers need and to make sure we're supporting our customers as we implement those changes. Thanks, Steve.

Thank you, Steven.

Thank you. And our next question comes from David Godfrey with CL King & Associates. Please proceed.

Hey, it's George. Good morning. I believe you said the organic growth on a sequential basis for Q2 about 2%. Is that right?

Yes, correct.

Okay. So if I just annualize that 8%, there's no reason to think of 5% to 7% target is off the table. Is that right?

I would say, we're pleased with the fact that we've been showing sequential growth the past couple of quarters. I would say, with a lot of the market dynamics that we've talked about on the electronic side with the excess inventory sitting in the channel, we're still working through that. And the other backdrop being automotive, the first half being so far down on car builds, I think it'd be a bit optimistic to assume an 8% growth for the year even on a sequential basis right now. I think we've got to see how things really play out the next couple of quarters.

No, I was thinking on the three year targets that you laid out before the 5% to 7% on – realize any given year it could be up or down, but those are still on the table, correct?

Yes. What I look back at is the 5% to 7% is still absolutely there. We stand by the 5% to 7% and don't really have any change to that. If I take a look at the past couple of years, we've been growing 7% and 8% organically, it averaged out to about 8% the past two years. It's not going to be that, when we look at a year-over-year growth this year. But we still feel very good about the long-term, the five year view on our 5% to 7% target that we'd set out to achieve.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Gary Prestopino with Barrington Research. Please proceed.

Good Morning, Gary.

Good morning. When you guys – when you reported Q4 numbers, you were talking about a decline in auto build of 2% to 4% for this year. Given what's happened in Q1 with the auto build, has that changed at all in your outlook?

Yes. I think our outlook of full year build remains pretty consistent. But we do expect it to be down low single digits for the year, it's kind of our view. There a lot of bots out there from other different companies as well as the agencies that produce those forecasts, the comps on car build get easier in the back end of the year. So it'll certainly show improvement year-over-year in the back end of the year compared to last year. But I think our view is still that that we'll ultimately end our car build down a couple of percentage points.

Okay. So then, based on what happened in Q1, it would imply that it's got to get better as we go through the year. So in terms of what you are seeing there, is it going to be basically more North American based for your business, European base, China-based or is it just a content growth all across the board?

Yes. First of all, we certainly continue to see content growth beyond car build globally. So that continues to be a good story for us. And so we're comfortable with that. And kind of continuing storyline from a car build and how things are going to improve going into the back end of the year, I would say, North America has been kind of relatively stable and we'll see it bounce around stable for most of the years. We don't see that changing dramatically. Europe, we see softening in second quarter compared to last year clearly. If you remember last year there was kind of build up to WLTP and then a decline in the back end of the year. The big swing will be whether China car build – particularly China car build picks up in Q3 or ultimately into Q4 where they're expecting strong performance there. So a lot of it was really dependent on – I would say, Asia being the big swinger.

Thank you, Gary.

Thank you. And we have a follow-up from David Leiker with Baird. Please proceed.

Hi, David.

Hi. Thanks. Just I guess a couple of other things here. If we look at IXYS, you talked about winning a contract for an onboard charter is that, contract win a function of IXYS and being able to cross sell that product or something that has been developed – contract won organically with what was within Littelfuse before.

Yes. Actually that specific win we were talking about is actually in our circuit protection business. It wasn't with a power semiconductor business, but with that we are seeing good design wins and good activity, particularly in Asia with IXYS power semiconductors being designed into offboard charging systems. Not onboard yet. We've talked about this before. IXYS really has not had a lot of business and they on vehicles side of automotive and we're working through readiness on that and we see that long-term on the roadmap for us for sure. But in the near-term the opportunity on the power semi side on EVs is really in the infrastructure side.

Okay. And then just one other item back on the inventory channel side of the equation, particularly on the automotive side, I guess more than others. We've heard comments from some other suppliers, similar type of environment that you're in that had been talking about those inventories looking closer to a more normal inventory levels. They'll let you seem to be suggesting. Is there any – do you have any thoughts of what you might be saying that's different than what some others might be seeing?

Yes. I can't speak for the exact supply chain that others are seeing. In North America and in Europe for us, we have a relatively short supply chain between us and ultimately the OEM. We ship directly to the Tier 1's, the Tier 1's then carry kind of normal inventory levels into the OEM. But that operates a bit differently for us in China with several smaller Tier 1's in the electrical infrastructure side and the number of OEMs being served much of that for us, we're serving through a distribution channel. So there's one more step in the supply chain, if you will in China that we don't see in the rest of the world. And with that, it adds the typical inefficiency of another step in the supply chain and with a lot of strong growth in car build and China for so long, I think they were carrying pretty heavy inventory levels to make sure they could respond to fluctuations and demands from the OEMs. And as car builds came down, they ended up having – it came down very meaningfully, particularly with the Chinese national OEMs. The amount of inventory they were carrying in the channel is higher and they're bleeding that down. So I think, I can't speak for others. That's a unique thing for us in China specifically that drives the problem.

Thank you, David.

Thank you. And our next question is from Steven Fox with Cross Research. Please proceed.

Hi, Steven.

Hi. Sorry for the follow-up. I just wanted to make sure I was clear on one part of my question, Dave. When you look at product pruning going on, is that something that you can sort of manage relative to markets or is that sort of fix given where you are with different end of life commitments? Thanks.

Yes. So specific – I think, we're talking about automotive sensors on that. In the automotive world, when we make that decision that we want to work our way maybe out of a particular area, particular application, the reality is that does take time because we were not – with our ongoing relationships with the automotive customers, we're not interested in putting them in a difficult position. So we'll communicate with them and work it off over the course of a couple of years to kind of work through those sorts of things in the automotive world. Whereas in other spaces where we've done some product pruning in and around the IXYS business, most of those cases we're able to take faster action to kind of work our way through that in a year or less than a year.

Great. I appreciate that color. Thank you.

Thank you.

And our next question is from David Godfrey with CL King & Associates. Please proceed.

Hi, George.

Hi. Thank you for taking the follow-up. Dave, you were quite accurate and provide a little color on what you thought the automotive market would look like this year ahead of time. Do you have any – I'm just curious on your experience, any intuitions on what it might look like next year at this point? Or do you need to be closer to the end of the current year?

I think we would have to be able to closer to the end of the year because there's so much driven by kind of regional economies and things like that. But it's a little hard for me to predict that. What I will say, it's going to take us back to comments we've made before, which is when we build our strategy over the long-term, we believe global car build grows at about global GDP, which is about 2% on a year-over-year basis. And by the way, if you'll look back from 2016, which was about a 5% car build growth, in 2017 and a 2% and you kind of look over the period of time, it's going to end up being about 2%. So I don't have any particular insight on what 2020 looks like other than our long-term plan continues to build around that 2% or so.

Thank you.

Thanks, George. We appreciate your questions. Thank you for joining us on today's call and your interest in Littelfuse. We look forward to talking with you again soon. Have a great day.