Greetings, welcome to Centrus Energy First Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Dan Leistikow, Vice President, Corporate Communications. Thank you. You may begin.

Good morning. Thank you all for joining us. Today, we'll cover the results for the first quarter of 2024 ended March 31. Today, we have Amir Vexler, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kevin Harrill, our Chief Financial Officer. Before turning the call over to Amir Vexler, I'd like to welcome all of our callers as well as those listening to our webcast. This conference call follows our earnings news release issued yesterday. We expect to file our report for the first quarter on Form 10-Q later today. All of our news releases and SEC filings, including our 10-K, 10-Qs and 8-Ks, are available on our website. A replay of this call will also be available later this morning on the Centrus website. I would like to remind everyone that certain information we may discuss on this call today may be considered forward-looking information that involves risk and uncertainty, including assumptions about the future performance of Centrus. Our actual results may differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in our forward-looking statements is contained in our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Finally, the forward-looking information provided today is time sensitive and accurate only as of today, May 8, 2024, unless otherwise noted. This call is the property of Centrus Energy. Any transcription, redistribution, retransmission or rebroadcast of the call in any form without the expressed written consent of Centrus is strictly prohibited. Thank you for your participation. And I'll now turn the call over to Amir Vexler.

Thank you, Dan, and thank you to everyone on the call today. In the first quarter, we achieved $43.7 million in total revenue, $4.3 million in gross profit and a net loss of $6.1 million. As we have said many times before, the best way to look at our business is on an annual basis rather than quarterly because of the way our contracts are structured. Our LEU customers generally have long-term multiyear contracts that commit them to pay for a given quantity of fuel each year. They decide which quarter to take delivery, which is when we book the revenue. Another factor is the market price of enrichment, which has varied significantly over the last several years, leading to contracts with different pricing depending on when they are signed. So when we have a first quarter with fewer deliveries and lower priced contracts, we tend to make it up in the rest of the year. Having said that, the fact is this was an incredibly productive quarter for Centrus, a period in which we booked new sales, achieved new milestones and production of high assay, low enriched uranium, applied for hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to advance those efforts and saw Congress approved a historic investment in uranium enrichment. Last year, at our facility in Piketon, Ohio, Centrus embarked on a first-of-a-kind production of high-assay low-enriched uranium or HALEU. The advanced nuclear fuel component needed for the next generation of reactor. In November, we announced the delivery of our first 20 kilograms of HALEU under Phase 1 of our competitively awarded contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. As we discussed on our last earnings call, the amount of HALEU we've been able to produce since that time has been limited as the department continues to experience…

Thank you, Amir. Good morning, everyone. Our first quarter of 2024 results are in line with our internal projections for this quarter based on customer orders and deliveries. This quarter's results are also consistent with the first quarter's reported over the past 3 years, which has included a smaller percentage of annual deliveries at lower margins. Additionally, the first quarter of 2023 included 1 higher margin delivery that did not repeat in the first quarter of 2024, although we expect a similar delivery later in the year. For the first quarter of 2024, our LEU business generated $23.6 million in revenue, a decrease of $35.2 million compared to the same quarter in 2023, reflecting decreases in both the volume of SWU sold as well as the average price of SWU sold. Our cost of sales in LEU decreased from $34.9 million in the first quarter of 2023 to $23.1 million in 2024, again, reflecting the decrease in sales volume, partially offset by an increase in the average unit cost of SWU sold. We ended the quarter with a modest LEU gross profit of $0.5 million compared to $23.9 million in the first quarter of 2023. The decrease in the LEU gross profit was partially offset by a $4.7 million improvement in the gross margin from our Technical Solutions segment, compared to the first quarter of 2023. We -- on a consolidated basis, our gross profit was $4.3 million, a decrease from $23 million in the same quarter last year. In Technical Solutions, we generated revenue for the first quarter of $20.1 million with cost of sales of $16.3 million. That compares to revenue of $8.1 million against cost of sales of $9.0 million in the same quarter last year. As Amir noted earlier, we have transitioned to Phase 2 of the HALEU operation contract and with that transition to a cost-plus incentive fee model, which improved has improved the profitability of that segment. We ended the quarter with a cash balance of $209.3 million and an additional $32.6 million in restricted cash for a total of $241.9 million of cash and restricted cash. Our strong cash position continued to enable us to manage our operational obligations and make strategic investments in our future. With that, let me turn things back over to Amir.

Thank you. Before we get to your questions, I want to offer a bit of a context about the environment we are in. I've spent more than 25 years in the nuclear fuel industry. I've never seen the market change as dramatically as it is changing now as industry and policymakers come to term with a new technological and geopolitical realities and race to catch up. The Covid pandemic offered a stark warning about the importance of supply chains. The Ukraine invasion, sparked concerns over Russia's dominance in the nuclear fuel market causing market prices for enrichment to triple. Meanwhile, a whole new generation of reactors is coming to market. Many of them will require a HALEU and will use them for a lot more than just electricity. They have the potential to provide high temperature heat for industrial processes like making cement or steel or desalinating water. Google and Microsoft are exploring deploying these new reactors to provide 24/7 power to the vast new data centers that will be needed for AI systems. And next year, the U.S. military will test a prototype of a HALEU-fueled microreactor to meet the needs of our troops and military bases. Recognizing the surging need for clean energy, last year, the United States joined with 2 dozen countries on 4 continents in a pledge to triple nuclear energy generation by 2050, enjoyed a subsequent declaration with our closest allies and committing to support new enrichment capacity needed to meet this goal. As a company and as a country, we have a once in a generation opportunity to reclaim American leadership in uranium enrichment. It was a mistake for United States to see this market to others. It's time for us to get back in the game, but we can do it without you. So let me close by expressing my gratitude to our investors who are supporting us on this journey. We expect to accomplish great things together. With that, we're happy to take your questions. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Rob Brown with Lake Street Capital.

[Indiscernible] Rob, if you have a little more color on the $900 million of LEU kind of continued commitments and what that entails and sort of what that means for the market share?

Well, I'm actually glad you posed that as your first question. I think that's probably one of the most important things in our discussion today. This is a -- it's different from past orders, obviously. And the way it's different from it, this is actually meant for production in our facility in Piketon. So these are LEU, this is material that will be produced by us. Now obviously, as we said, it's contingent, contingent on several factors. And probably the biggest factor is as we have been prepping everybody in the past, we are seeking a public private partnership, and it's contingent upon an actual materialization of that and the build of the facility. So the way to read this correctly is that the market and the commercial utilities are really seeking fairly aggressively another competitor in the market, and they're looking to Centrus to be that competitor. And so, we do view it as a huge step forward, very positive news and a very good indicator from the market to accomplish really what we're set to do here, become a producer

Yes, exactly. That was perfect. And then second question is really on the HALEU incentive, the $2.7 billion, and I know there's some moving pieces here. But how do you see that playing out when that gets the Russian ban that then start to move forward through a separate RFP process? Or how do the steps kind of play out at this point?

Yes. So I think we kind of prepped the investment community for that earlier as well. We've -- it's been communicated that in order for the $2.7 billion federal investment to be unlocked, the ban on Russia has to be put in place, which it was. And so, that really unlocks a significant amount of funding which is going to flow through the DOE to the industry, and Centrus is very well positioned to be a major player in this. As you know, the intent for the $2.7 billion in funding is to stand up a supply chain for fuel, a reliable supply chain here for fuel supply chain that we've seeded to others, predominantly to Russia. And with our successful demonstration in October where we demonstrated our ability to enrich as I said, I think that positions us extremely well in this competition for the $2.7 billion. Now how it's going to be divided in what manner? Nobody really at this point knows it would be the DOE decision.

Our next question is from Alex Rygel with B. Riley Securities.

Exciting times here, locking on, for sure. First question here. As it relates to the enrichment nor the uranium and importation ban, any early insight into the waiver process and the time line there? Sort of who's applying for the waivers or you or your customers? And how urgent is that need for these waivers?

Well, the Cenex supply contract is our largest source of supply of low enriched uranium that we delivered to the customers. We've been very clear in our filings that an immediate cutoff absent a waiver would have a material adverse effect on our business and financials. Not only to us, I mean, it would be extremely disruptive to the entire U.S. nuclear industry, and this is the reason why there is a provision for a waiver. For the past few months, we have been providing input and working with industry groups and providing input to the right stakeholders as to how the process should be and how it should work. We obviously have all the intentions to apply for a waiver at the first opportunity. And really, the bottom line here is that we believe that the case for waivers is very strong in international interest. So to answer your question, yes, we've been preparing. We're going to make use of this process, and it is extremely important, not only to Centrus, but to the industry here in the U.S.

And then as it relates to your current production here, HALEU, is the DOE supplying you with a consistent stream of cylinders, yet you have not kind of -- about what time of the year do you anticipate that the supply of cylinders will meet your production?

Right, right. So it's a situation that we monitor and we reported progress on on these calls as well. And so, Centrus anticipates that the delays in obtaining the 5B cylinders is temporary. We have a line of sight to when the cylinder should be more consistently available. And really, we expect the problem to be fully resolved this fall. So, again, it's a temporary issue. Now that the supply chain is picking up, we fully expect it to be resolved this fall.

Our next question is from Joseph Rager with ROTH MKM.

Thank you for taking the question. So kind of following on the question about the waivers. You guys have said that it would have an adverse effect. But from a standpoint of like investors kind of fully understand that, hypothetically, if there was any period of time during which you had to deliver without a waiver, would that mean that the contracts will be canceled? Or would it mean that you would have to buy in the open market? Or would it be a combination thereof?

Well, first, before I dive into answering the question, I just want to make something really clear just in case folks who are not following the news is that the ban has not been implemented before -- I mean it's in front of the President for signature. I mean we do expect that to happen just it's a technicality, but it's not really in place yet. So just -- that's one point. In terms of how our contracts are structured and what recourse we have, we really are working on and have been working on contingency plans even beyond the waiver. There's things that we've been working together with our customers, with our suppliers. I will not get into a lot of details that reflect our contractual decencies ,but we are working on contingencies beyond that. I mean this is really our job as a leadership team here

Okay. Fair. And then beyond that, would -- how have you guys seen any uptick in requests for deliveries from your customers because they don't want to deal with the complication, let's say, get signed soon in the 90-day starts. When that's over, they don't want to have like a window where it's complicated. So have you seen any uptick in the last few weeks and then saying, yes, we want to take our delivery before this becomes an issue?

No. We have not seen that in a time period that you quoted, no.

Okay. And then a completely different topic. I saw that the U.K. government is giving approximately GBP 200 million to Urenco build a HALEU facility in the U.K. One, do you think that has any impact on you guys, given it's an ally -- or is it also potentially a positive given that they're giving the money? And then you mentioned the size of your facility, if you guys went completely towards producing LEU, how much could you guys produce from that facility, if you built it out?

Okay. Multipart question. Let me answer the first one relating to the announcement this morning. So yes, here, we have -- our competitors are state-owned and further reinforcement of that is it's a sole source award by the U.K. government to one of our competitors. Now, what are the implications to -- what implications to Centrus. Well, number one, I'd like to point out that we're already enriching HALEU. We are far ahead of folks that are just stepping into this now. So we're talking about licensing, designing, installing building, we're much further along that path. Now to me, the way I read the cards here is that you have a government that's stepping in and putting hundreds of millions of dollars into the HALEU market. I think this is a positive sign that there is a strong belief even just beyond the commercial community up to the government of the U.K. that the advanced reactors are a reality. The advanced reactors will require HALEU, and this is not just the phantom need. So to me, this is a very positive signal. As I said, we are -- I believe we are ahead of the competition because we're already enriching HALEU. And beyond that, I'm not sure there's anything else that would comments.

And the second part about LEU capacity?

Yes. So -- thank you for reminding me the second part of the question. I was trying to remember. So if you're thinking about our building and how large it is, we really are estimating a $3.5 million so in the existing building and the existing license. So that's quite a bit.

And that's on an annual basis, $3.5 million?

Correct.

[Operator Instructions]. We will pause for a brief moment to see if there's any further questions. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Dan for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. This will conclude our investor call for the first quarter of 2024. As always, I want to extend a thank you to our listeners online and our investors who called in. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.

Thank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation.