Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Liberty Global’s Second Quarter 2023 Investor Call. This call and the associated webcast are the property of Liberty Global and any redistribution, retransmission or rebroadcast of this call or webcast in any form without the expressed written consent of Liberty Global is strictly prohibited. [Operator Instructions] Today’s formal presentation materials can be found under the Investor Relations section of Liberty Global’s website at libertyglobal.com. After today’s formal presentation, instructions will be given for a question-and-answer session. Page 2 of the slides details the company’s Safe Harbor statements regarding forward-looking statements. Today’s presentation may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including the company’s expectations with respect to its outlook and future growth prospects and other information and statements that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These risks include those detailed in Liberty Global’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including most recently filed forms 10-Q and 10-K as amended. Liberty Global disclaims any obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect any change in its expectations or in the conditions on which any such statement is based. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Mike Fries.

Okay. Thank you operator and welcome, everyone, to our second quarter investor call. Charlie and I are going to jump right into the presentation and our prepared remarks and time for questions, of course, will follow. And I’m beginning on Slide 3, with some key headlines from the quarter, all of which, as we’ll discuss, support our core value creation strategies. And by value creation, we mean only one thing, staying aligned with shareholders as we work to increase the value of our stock. That’s it. Now some have asked for a clear articulation of that narrative, which we’ve summarized right at the top of this slide. For us, it involves three main strategies. First of all, we’re focused on maximizing the inherent equity value of our core operating businesses and doing what we can to ensure that, that equity value is transparent or crystallized for the benefit of shareholders. Second, we’re making smart investments in strategic adjacencies that both benefit our platforms and generate significant returns. And third, we’re managing a dynamic capital structure that receives cash from operations and asset sales from time to time, which together with our sizable liquidity today, we are largely allocating to buying back our own stock. And we made good progress on all three strategies in the second quarter. I’ll start with our national FMC champions in the U.K., Switzerland, Belgium and Holland, which continued to deliver solid operational performance. Financial results for the entire group improved sequentially, particularly adjusted EBITDA. And as Charlie is going to discuss in a moment, we’re confirming all of our guidance for the year. Now just diving into that for a second. We’ve talked about the importance of pricing actions at the OpCo level to balance out inflationary pressures and support revenue growth through 2023. As…

The next slide sets out the quarterly revenue and EBITDA for each of our key operating companies. As Mike discussed, we largely expect an acceleration in growth in the second half of the year as the full impact of the various price increases across our companies becomes fully effective in Q3 and Q4. For the quarter, VMO2 on a reported basis delivered 6.2% of revenue growth. Excluding the impact of nextfiber construction revenues, VMO2 revenue growth was 1%, with our mobile price rise supporting strong mobile service revenues which offset fixed revenue pressures. We expect to see the impact of the fixed price rise build in the coming quarters, supporting improved sequential top line trends in the second half. VodafoneZiggo delivered stable revenues in Q2 as weakness in consumer fixed continues to be offset by strong B2B and mobile performance with the Dutch business marking its ninth consecutive quarter of mobile service revenue growth. We expect our fixed price adjustment to around 8.5% to support revenue trends in the second half. Belgium delivered revenue growth of 1% in Q2 as the mid-June price adjustment in 2022 continues to support top line fixed performance. And Switzerland saw a slight revenue decline in Q2, driven by continued pressures on consumer fixed ARPU as the continued impact of the UPC right pricing activity is partially offset by strong flanker brand performance. Sunrise has implemented a 4% price adjustment from July across all brands, which is expected to support revenue performance in the second half. Moving on to our Q2 adjusted EBITDA performance. VMO2 delivered 4.4% EBITDA growth despite $22 million of OpEx cost to capture in the quarter. Excluding the nextfibre construction contribution, EBITDA grew 2.8% in the quarter. We expect EBITDA trends in the second half to be driven by the timing…

Absolutely. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Robert J Grindle with Deutsche Bank. Robert, your line is now open.

And [indiscernible] to third parties. It certainly appears very logical as an opportunity. But why now and why all of a sudden, if indeed, it is all of a sudden, as well as a third-party opportunity, is this an arm of lengthening exercise between central and the OpCos? And is it triggered post the approval for the move to Bermuda? Thanks.

Hey Robert, first of all, there’s no correlation between that particular accounting change or intention in Bermuda at all. I think the right way to think about this is we are always looking for opportunities to manage our central spend and central costs. You would know that in the past, we’ve entered into arrangements with companies like Infosys, for example, that help us provide services to Vodafone or Deutsche Telekom companies. We’ve sold assets to and to do so in an efficient and cost-optimized way. So the way to think about this potential idea and it’s really an intention, not a sure thing is that in the context of perhaps expanding relationships like that, we might consider monetizing the investment we have and what we think are world-class platforms. I wouldn’t read too much into it be on that. It’s not related to really anything else. It’s just us doing exactly what we told you we would do, which is to be sure we’re never at the short end of the stick when it comes to matching revenues and costs in our central services platforms. And we’re always looking for ways to continue to optimize the spend at the center, which you can rest assured, will happen here over time. And this could be one potential outcome of that, quite frankly, I think it’s a bit premature to make the accounting change, but we’ve done it anyway, and I don’t think there’s much more to read into it than that.

Thanks Mike.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Carl Murdock-Smith with Berenberg. Your line is now open.

Hi, thanks very much. I just wanted to ask about the ARPU movements in the U.K. So you’ve talked about it a bit, but given the 14% price increase it’s quite surprising to see a 4% ARPU decline. So I was wondering if you could just help us with the various moving parts there. So kind of within that 18% swing, kind of how much is due to TV switch off? How much is due to telephony switch off? How much is due to spin down? And then how much is due to customers on special offers, not having the price increase to begin with? And kind of what percentage of the customer base was actually impacted by the 14% price increase. Thank you.

Yes. I’m going to let Lutz address that. But Carl, you’ve answered your own question in the last comment there where you mentioned that a relatively small percentage of that price increase is actually flown -- worked its way through the P&L as of June 30. But Lutz, why don’t you provide additional color? Lutz Schüler: Yes. Hi, Carl. So first of all, different to a year ago we set out the price right letters across April and May this year. So therefore it only became effective for a fraction of the customers in Q2. So that’s number one that is different to a year ago. We did it consciously to have more time to deal with every customer. That’s number one. Number two, we apply the price rise only to customers who have -- were out of their limited discounts. And number three is that therefore during the course of the year, you will see that the majority of the price rise will be materializing. And maybe the last topic in that context, right? So we have lost 15,000 broadband customers, different to our mobile contract situation where it’s part of the TSMCs, customers can react directly with us. So therefore, in our case, you see that the churn has already materialized into Q2. And so you won’t see that anymore happening during the course of the year, and you will see a higher materialization of the price rise in Q3, Q4.

Just one thing to add to that. Going into 2024, our contracts now say that we have a contractual right to raise prices by CDI [Ph] plus in the same way that BT and other operators in the market have. So this is the last year where for us, customers have a choice whereas in other contractual arrangements with other operators, they really don’t have a choice. So that will be a benefit in 2024 because the contracts have changed. Does that help, Carl?

That’s great. Thanks very much guys.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Ulrich Rathe with Societe General. You may proceed.

Yes, thanks very much. I was -- if I stay with the U.K., please. I was wondering about the sort of the broadband churn that you’re seeing. I think you mentioned during the prepared remarks that there is still growth in the new footprint, I assume that goes sort of sidewise also stable, which would mean the BAU footprint would have seen quite material churn. Now you said it’s about in line with expectations in the prepared remarks. I was just wondering what kind of incentivization did you have to give customers this quarter to sort of mitigate the effect given that it looks pretty steep at least from the outside. Anything unusual there? And could you comment on how this sort of leads to drop through the drop-through effects, drop-through? Thank you very much.

Lou, do you want to take. Lutz Schüler: Shall I do this, Mike?

Yes. Yes, go ahead. Lutz Schüler: So a couple of things. So you’re right with your assumption that obviously the churn is higher in our existing coverage because we are growing the new coverage. Is it that materially as you think I wouldn’t say so, but I think we are not disclosing the number. Actually, the churn number is significantly lower compared to what we have planned for internally, yes. So we think the impact is much less. And how do we manage churn this year. We do it on a much, much more advanced and sophisticated level. What do I mean with that? We have visibility of all customers across all different product sets. So broadband only, broadband voice and video, broadband and voice, brought all quad-play of all customers. And then in areas where we are overbuilt by Openreach, overbuilt by altnet. And then we have tenure, right? So how long are these customers with us? Are they in the promotional period? Are they end of offer step-up whatsoever. And during the recent months, we were in a position, therefore, to come up with very targeted offers for every subsegment and we manage this to target it very specifically. And therefore, we are also in the position to have now understood that the balance always between churn and retention benefits are managed in a very balanced way. And therefore, we have also a very good feeling for the revenue to come. So that’s a much, much more advanced and sophisticated level than previous year. I hope that helps. That’s helpful.

Could you quantify that in any way at all. Lutz Schüler: I think we don’t do it today.

Yes, we’re not going to provide that information. I mean we haven’t in the past. We are not going to do it today.

Got it. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Yemi Falana with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking my questions. It appears the U.K. has been fairly well litigated. So could you maybe double-click on Dutch KPIs? So one area you flagged weakness was related to front book pricing from some of your competitors. Is it fair to then say as a result, you should expect some dual benefits from pricing and a return to more normalized approximately flat volumes from here? Or are there any other effects around that fixed base that we need to be aware of.

Well, I think the main point we tried to make, and I’ll let Ritchy whose is the CFO of VodafoneZiggo on the call address that in more detail. But the main point we try to make was we felt there was a double whammy this year with KPN who reduced their front book and took price increases later in the year, whereas we took our price increases quite early in the year. And so our view is despite what they said on their call, which was baffling to us a fair amount of promotional intensity largely driven by them. And so we respond and we manage through the best we can, but I think the circumstances of how they’ve approached pricing, lowering their front book and then not increasing prices until midyear versus what we’ve done, which is to raise prices early in the year. It had the effect that you would think it would have, which is to impact our broadband gross adds and churn. Ritchy, do you want to address that any further?

Yes. I think it’s well said, Mike. The one thing I would like to add is if you look at the expectation and from an IP perspective, needless to say that the price increase still need to kick in, in the third quarter. And there we do get the -- not only the kick [Ph] compared to the ARPU levels we have today but also compared to KPN’s pricing because they’ll have to suffer through the back book, front book pricing. Having said that, we maintain premium levels in the market, which I think is the right thing to do. And then going forward that also broadband development should let’s say, be more rational in terms of, let’s say, the net add performance.

Our price increase was 8.5, by the way, there was 6.4%. So that was maybe a third -- lower price increase. Yes.

Thanks for the color.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Polo Tang with UBS. Your line is now open.

Yes hi for taking the question. I have one main question on Switzerland and a follow-up on Telenet. Just on Switzerland. Can you maybe talk in a bit more detail about the reception of your 4% price rise? And should we expect the soft net adds that you saw in Q2 to continue in Q3. Also, can you maybe comment in terms of the reaction to Salt price move? And how should we think about the profile of Sunrise financials -- in the coming quarters? You got the price rise, I appreciate Q3. Should we actually get a big step up in terms of financials in Q4 given you’re lapping the drag from closing down the UPC brands? That’s the first question, Switzerland. Just a quick one on Telenet because in the call earlier in his closing remarks, John Porter [Ph] mentioned that Telenet may not be listed going forward. He hinted that Telenet could come back in a different form. So I was just wondering if you could maybe expand on this and give you a view of this and also maybe talk about the merits of revisiting a Telenet VodafoneZiggo merger? Thanks.

Sure. I’ll address the second one. And Andre, who’s on and Charlie, whoever wants to address the issue around Switzerland price increases and visibility to second half financials. On the Telenet question, obviously for those who may not be aware, we intend to delist the company hopefully in September after I think, 16 years, 17 years, something like that. And that’s moving forward. So nothing -- there should be no confusion about that, and I’m not suggesting that’s what he meant. In terms of any future moves, listen, consistent with what I’ve said at the outset of my remarks, we are going to look at every opportunity to maximize the equity value of our OpCo’s. And that may include pretty much anything. And so it’s certainly possible that you could contemplate several different opportunities in the Benelux region for us to look at combinations or relistings or things of that nature. So I don’t mean to suggest that it’s scattered. Our thinking is quite clear. I’m simply saying I can’t give you visibility to anything specific as we sit here today. I’m not sure what exactly he was referring to. But certainly, as we’ve discussed in the past, we’re going to look at all options to ensure that we can drive value to our shareholders from what we believe are extraordinarily good businesses, the best businesses in what we think are Europe’s best markets, which today are being valued at virtually nothing. So just you wait, we will certainly be focused on things like that perhaps I wouldn’t -- I can’t give you any more specifics nor could he. But we’ll keep our options open, which wouldn’t surprise you fuller. Andre, do you want to tackle the Swiss question? André Krause: Sure. So firstly, on the price rights, it’s pretty…

Yes, great. Thanks, André.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Matthew Harrigan with the Benchmark Company. You may proceed.

Thank you. Since you’re very focused analytically on EBITDA minus CapEx, I’m curious, what is kind of the steady state CapEx as a percentage of sales fall out now the all fiber initiative in the U.K. and then also the very positive development that you’re able to get 15 gigs on the hydro fiber [indiscernible] policy. It feels like a lot of the arrows are moving in the right direction in terms of maybe moving that down a little bit more than the people had assumed at one point in time? I know you’re a little reticent on that point. But if you could just kind of give us some directional feedback that would be helpful? Thank you.

Well, Matthew, there’s a few things working here. A lot of the “fiber” activity in the U.K. is off balance sheet. So we’ve obviously seen an improvement in the CapEx intensity in the U.K. because of that, although we are investing in 5G and mobile as you would expect us to. But I think the numbers that Charlie showed you on Slide 10, which gives the capital intensity for each asset are pretty steady state. Now whether that’s peaking this year or next year, you should assume we believe capital intensity is declining longer term as these investments trail off. At some point, you have upgraded fully your 5G network. We’ve done that in 2 of the 4 markets already. At some point, you have completed any network investments that would be necessary. And unlike maybe prior decades or prior years, there doesn’t appear to be a meaningful new technology or new structure or new investment required longer term. So we would see capital intensity declining longer term. I think that’s a safe statement. But we’re probably in the next 12 -- in this next 12 to 18 months peaking out kind of at levels where we are today, and you can get those levels, obviously, right off of the financials. Charlie, do you want to add anything to that?

No, that’s right. I mean the investment cycle we’re in is the 5G, as you say, the fiber upgrade and to some extent, the digital transformation. So these are elevated levels. I would guess mid-to high teens where see where it will settle out. But like a few years, don’t forget that Telenet, for example, has got a pretty big potential rebuild, et cetera, et cetera. But I think Mike sounded right.

Thanks Mike. Thanks, Charles.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of James Ratzer with New Street Research. You may proceed.

Yes, hello guys. Thanks for taking the question. I’d love to come back if we can, just to the topic of KPIs and the broadband net adds just given the swing we saw in this quarter and would love if we could isolate a bit more what you think is kind of just specific to the price rise and how much could rebound in the third quarter? And in particular, I’m looking at VMO2, we saw a swing of almost 40,000 in the rate and in VodafoneZiggo kind of change of 20,000, again, in the quarter. Given those markets went with early price rises, and I think you’re suggesting that the kind of churn impact from that is now finished. I mean are you already seeing evidence of that in July? And should we be expecting there for that in Q3. We can go back to a 20,000 plus run rate in the U.K. and something closer to flat in the Netherlands. Thank you.

James, you’re specifically speaking about broadband. I just want to make sure I understand your question and not…

Broadband, net adds, yes.

Yes. And listen, I mean, we tried to refrain and we do refrain from quarterly forecasting. And so we’re not going to take the base here. But in the place -- in the market like the U.K., I think it’s a safe assumption that as we look to the balance of the year, we intend Q3 and Q4 could be better than Q2. That’s our intention, obviously. And you can almost assume that, given the guidance we provided, and you can look through the guidance in each market and draw those conclusions. But I’m not going to give you any specific numbers in the month as the OpCo guys do it either. But I think we were clear that this particular quarter was impacted by certainly price rise announcements, which were sizable, mid-teens in one market, 8%. We’ve never taken 8% to 9% increases in Holland, 6%. These are big increases, historically large increases, which we think play out well for us financially over the long term, but had what we also thought would be the intended effect of driving some churn in the period. So I think we’ll just leave it at that.

Okay. Mike right let’s ask more qualitatively then. I mean, are you seeing other impacts that could, for example, like hold back net adds in the back half of the year? Is it the fact that your customers could still try to move operator out of contract. It could be a drag in the second half of the year? Or is there a cost of living issue or increased competitive issue? I’m just trying to think about whether -- once we’re through the price rise, is there anything more structural going on in the market from a competitive or contractual point of view?

Well, every market is different and every market has a different set of headwinds and/or tailwind. And we are operating in competitive environments. And so don’t walk away from this call thinking everything is simple and rosy. These are competitive markets with competitive products and services and competitive pricing. And we’re not going to give you guidance except to say that we think Q3 was extraordinary in its impact and that we are hopeful of better results for the second half of the year. But I don’t want to also lead you to believe because that’s not doing me or you any favors that this is a simple equation. We might say, I think one thing here on July 25 and then KPN decides that they’re going to drive units again in the fourth quarter and make irrational pricing decisions or something happens in another market of that type. So we just can’t predict those things. We can stick to our own business and manage them as best we can focused on price and value. I’m just going to leave it at that. I mean I think we’re certainly optimistic, but I don’t want to pretend that these aren’t competitive markets. And I think you all know that. Lutz Schüler: The only thing I can add for U.K., and I’m not giving any guidance is, right? And I said it before, right, customers have an extraordinary cancellation right, right? 30 days after they got the letter. So therefore, the feedback on it entirely materialized into Q2. And there was a cost of living crisis before the price rise and there’s one after. So therefore we actually have planned internally with a higher churn on the back of the price rise that is double the size from previous year. I don’t know what models you are working with but we think that the impact from churn was rather modest, yes, maybe that helps.

Okay, thanks guys.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Georgios Ierodiaconou with Citigroup. You may proceed.

Good afternoon and thank you for taking my question. I had one and then one clarification, please. My question is on -- regarding the U.K. market. And you mentioned in your opening remarks the appetite for consolidation in the alternate space in the medium term. And I’m just curious, there’s been obviously a lot of news flow around different companies in the U.K., some of them changed hands. Some others are looking at financing options. But so far, you haven’t really put the trigger on any of these transactions yourselves. So I’m curious whether it’s a matter of scale, whether it has to be beyond a certain level for you to show interest. Is it some of the technologies or the way in which some smaller loans [Ph] maybe structuring that networks? Is it a case of overlap and antitrust concerns. I just wanted to understand why there hasn’t been any progress, let’s say on that front? And my second question is just a clarification on the response to Paulo’s question earlier. I think, André, you mentioned the fact that the [indiscernible] cancellation right is now over. However, my understanding is there tends to be a delay in the KPIs in Switzerland. Is this still possible that the beginning of the third quarter, we may see a significant impact from that period? Or do you think the churn effect is already fully reflected in the second quarter? Thank you.

Listen, on the altnet question, we’re going to be very careful here. Certainly, what I mentioned remains true. We think the market requires consolidation, and we’ll see consolidation. And you raised all the reasons or let me say, all of the factors that we consider when we look at those things overlap technology, how much retrofit would -- is required scale, size, price expectations. So should those assets come to market and I’m not going to say whether they have or haven’t or whether we’ve looked at it or not, but you can probably assume we have. We’re going to be evaluating them very carefully in the context of those variables. The fact that nothing’s happened publicly to date, I wouldn’t take too much look into that or read much into that. I think there will likely be more coming. It seems to us, given where the interest rate environment financing market seems to be settling out. So we’ll just keep you posted. I mean I think my point was to say, we are monitoring that environment that we are obviously active ourselves in upgrade and new build. And so we should naturally be evaluating opportunities should they come forward, and you should expect we will do that. That’s all I’ll say there. André, do you want to address the Swiss question again? André Krause: Yes, sure. Thanks for the question. So yes, it’s true, there will be some churn impact also happening in the third quarter. Reason for that is that the customers did have an extraordinary termination right if they are in a contractual binding period. That is true for roughly 40% of the customers. 60% are not bound. So they could also be free to churn when their invoices are now coming out with the higher price points. Now first indication is that it’s not any higher than what we have seen in the extraordinary termination period. Hence, we are not expecting that to be a larger impact than what we have seen in Q2. And the positive impact in Q3 is twofold. One, we are no more aggressive again on our front book driving more sales. We have come down a bit in the period when we announced the price rise because we didn’t want to put more oil to the fire of our promotions, but we are doing that now after the summer period again when people are getting back to school, and we run the usual campaigns on the back of that. And the second thing is also the price rise of Salt gives us a stronger argument to retain our customers if they are not liking the price rise as the market has moved on, in particular, on the mobile side. So yes, there is further churn exposure also in the third quarter, but we think we have better tools now also to manage it, and we are not having any indication of that being any higher than what we have seen.

Very clear. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Nick Delfas with Redburn. You may proceed.

Hey thanks very much. Just really, just a follow-up on the George’s question, but for the Netherlands. I think, Mike, you said that you’re exploring strategic options to strengthen the Dutch business. Can you talk a little bit more about that? Are you talking about additional fiber assets or what was in your mind? Thanks very much.

Well, I was making more of a general comment about two things. Number one, we and our partners at Vodafone are, I would say, intensifying our attention to the market and to the asset, which is a good thing. I think that partly has to do with new management of Vodafone and probably has to do with circumstances in the market. So I would say, number one, that’s a positive, and that’s partially what I was signaling with that comment. And number two, I’m not going to be specific about what that might look like because there’s lots of options, except to say that we believe VodafoneZiggo today is a unique business with a massive customer reach, 7 million Dutch people have some product from VodafoneZiggo, it’s more or less is equal to KPN and some of the most important customer reach metrics. And so it’s a very valuable and profitable asset. And you should assume that we’re going to look at it strategically and try to make decisions about it, that it maximizes value for us and our partners. That was really the main point there. I’m not going to get into what those options might be, except to say that we’re squarely focused on it. So sorry I can’t be more transparent. I just wanted to make the point that there’s a renewed intensity to be sure we are looking at all options and doing all things in that market to preserve and drive value creation from VodafoneZiggo.

Okay, thanks very much.

Thank you. Final question comes from the line of David Wright with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. You may proceed.

Yes, thank you very much. A couple of questions please. Mike, I guess, I just want to understand and perhaps there’s an element of frustration here that you are having to sort of balance this price rise versus churn all the time. And just your view on why perhaps, consumers are not willing to accept the price increase when you are arguing for better speeds through the cable networks, etcetera, versus competition. Why is that not being valued and maybe retaining customers a little better. And then I guess, I guess my question -- second question is also quite top down, which is you obviously talked about the value in Liberty and I think your actions in terms of buying back stock clearly reflect your belief that there is a lot of locked value in this business. But I guess at the same time, value in the equity markets is always founded on very clear financial reporting and earnings visibility and there’s so much around the business now that. I’m maybe speaking on my own behalf, what is relatively opaque, having to deal with nextfibre adjustments at VMO2. We’ve got this new central accounting that is complicated. They’re invested joint ventures that are building off balance sheet, etcetera. Do you think the complexity of the group works against its equity share price? And is there any way to kind of resolve that? Or are these things that you just need to work through before you can consider your options longer term. A couple of, I guess, fairly high-level questions. Thank you.

Thanks, David. Those are good questions. On the customer point and why aren’t we retaining more in the wake of price increases, I would just remind you, we are still in a cost of living crisis. Inflation is still at extraordinary levels. And our competitors are good at what they do. So these are intense markets from a promotional point of view. We’re taking significant price increases in an environment where customers are challenged. So I think we’re -- what you should want to know is, are you achieving the results that you intended to achieve when you implemented the price increase. While we don’t provide you with that visibility, I think the answer you should take away from this call is largely, yes, that we are more or less on track in each market where we’ve taken large increases and that we feel like we’re -- the trajectory is essentially as we predicted. The other last point I’ll make on that is, unlike peers say in the U.K., we have historically given fixed customers an option to opt out. That will go away next year. And so this is the last year where customers will be given this extraordinary period of time, which BT [Ph] does not provide them to say, well you know what, I don’t like that price, rise? So I’m coming back to you for something different or I’m moving on. That’s not the case with other operators. So we’ve done that in almost every market now. We have contracts that are clear, and so that’s a historical fact that we think we’ve sorted through going forward. So three points. One, these are still challenged consumer times. Two, we have strong competitors. Three, we’re doing essentially as we expected we would do. So that’s a data…

So with that, we’ll let go. I appreciate you staying on as long as you have, and we’ll speak to you next quarter. Thanks, everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes Liberty Global’s Second Quarter 2023 Investor Call. As a reminder, a replay of the call will be available in the Investor Relations section of Liberty Global’s website. There, you can also find a copy of today’s presentation materials.